Literature DB >> 36138208

Eccentrically widened bone tunnels after all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a computed tomography and three-dimensional model-based analysis.

Di Liu1, Zi-Jun Cai1, Wen-Hao Lu1, Lin-Yuan Pan1, Yun-Tao Yang1, Yu-Sheng Li2,3, Wen-Feng Xiao4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the extent of tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using the all-inside technique and to establish its correlation with patient-reported clinical outcomes and femoral graft bending angle (GBA).
METHODS: Tunnel widening was evaluated using computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional (3D) models, and the femoral GBA was directly measured on CT images using the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) software. Clinical follow-up was routine procedure, and patient-reported clinical outcomes mainly included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) scores, and subjective knee stability assessment.
RESULTS: Fifty-two patients received standard all-inside ACLR, with a median follow-up of 6 months. Reconstructed anterior cruciate ligaments (ACLs) were scanned during the first 3 days and 6 months after surgery. On both the femoral and tibial sides, bone tunnels were most significantly enlarged at the articular aperture segment; the femoral tunnel was 9.2 ± 1.3 mm postoperatively and was significantly enlarged by 32% to a mean tunnel diameter of 12.1 ± 2.0 mm at 6 months after surgery. Moreover, the extent of tunnel enlargement gradually decreased as the measured levels approached those of the bone cortex. The femoral tunnel center was shifted into the anterior and distal direction, and the tibial tunnel center was shifted into the posterior and lateral direction. Additionally, the mean femoral GBA was 105.9° ± 8.1° at the 6-month follow-up. Tunnel enlargement and GBA were not significantly correlated with patient-reported outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Femoral and tibial tunnels were significantly greater and eccentrically shifted at the 6-month follow-up after all-side ACLR. However, the extent of tunnel widening does not markedly affect the short-term clinical outcomes. Meanwhile, the femoral GBA was not significantly correlated with femoral tunnel widening or patient-reported outcomes. Although the tunnel widening following all-inside ACLR was not associated with clinical outcomes, it potentially caused difficulties in revision ACLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  All-inside; Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Computed tomography; Tunnel position; Tunnel widening

Year:  2022        PMID: 36138208     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07164-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.114


  53 in total

1.  Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method.

Authors:  M Bernard; P Hertel; H Hornung; T Cierpinski
Journal:  Am J Knee Surg       Date:  1997

2.  Comparison of Tunnel Enlargement and Clinical Outcome Between Bioabsorbable Interference Screws and Cortical Button-Post Fixation in Arthroscopic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Randomized Study With a Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years.

Authors:  En-Rung Chiang; Kun-Hui Chen; Aaron Chih-Chang Lin; Shih-Tien Wang; Hung-Ta Wu; Hsiao-Li Ma; Ming-Chau Chang; Chien-Lin Liu; Tain-Hsiung Chen
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  All-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrew J Blackman; Michael J Stuart
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Significant anterior enlargement of femoral tunnel aperture after hamstring ACL reconstruction, compared to bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Authors:  Hiroshi Amano; Yoshinari Tanaka; Keisuke Kita; Ryohei Uchida; Yuta Tachibana; Yasukazu Yonetani; Tatsuo Mae; Yoshiki Shiozaki; Shuji Horibe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction-A Systematic Review of Techniques, Outcomes, and Complications.

Authors:  Darren de Sa; Ajaykumar Shanmugaraj; Melissa Weidman; Devin C Peterson; Nicole Simunovic; Volker Musahl; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Incidence in Adolescent Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joshua T Bram; Lacey C Magee; Nishank N Mehta; Neeraj M Patel; Theodore J Ganley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Comparison of Postoperative Tunnel Widening After Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions Between Anatomic and Nonanatomic Femoral Tunnels.

Authors:  Nam-Hong Choi; Seung-Joo Lee; Seong-Cheol Park; Brian N Victoroff
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  The mid- to long-term results of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons using Transfix technique.

Authors:  Mehmet Asik; Cengiz Sen; Ibrahim Tuncay; Mehmet Erdil; Cem Avci; Omer F Taser
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 4.114

9.  Measurements of bone tunnel size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 2D versus 3D computed tomography model.

Authors:  Bernardo Crespo; Cathrine Aga; Katharine J Wilson; Shannon M Pomeroy; Robert F LaPrade; Lars Engebretsen; Coen A Wijdicks
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2014-06-26

Review 10.  Transportal versus all-inside techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rohan Bhimani; Reza Shahriarirad; Keivan Ranjbar; Amirhossein Erfani; Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.