Literature DB >> 36138084

A pipeline for automated deep learning liver segmentation (PADLLS) from contrast enhanced CT exams.

Jayasuriya Senthilvelan1, Neema Jamshidi2.   

Abstract

Multiple studies have created state-of-the-art liver segmentation models using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs) such as the V-net and H-DenseUnet. Oversegmentation however continues to be a problem. We set forth to address these limitations by developing a an automated workflow that leverages the strengths of different DCNN architectures, resulting in a pipeline that enables fully automated liver segmentation. A Pipeline for Automated Deep Learning Liver Segmentation (PADLLS) was developed and implemented that cascades multiple DCNNs that were trained on more than 200 CT scans. First, a V-net is used to create a rough liver, spleen, and stomach mask. After stomach and spleen pixels are removed using their respective masks and ascites is removed using a morphological algorithm, the scan is passed to a H-DenseUnet to yield the final segmentation. The segmentation accuracy of the pipleline was compared to the H-DenseUnet and the V-net using the SLIVER07 and 3DIRCADb datasets as benchmarks. The PADLLS Dice score for the SLIVER07 dataset was calculated to be 0.957 ± 0.033 and was significantly better than the H-DenseUnet's score of 0.927 ± 0.044 (p = 0.0219) and the V-net's score of 0.872 ± 0.121 (p = 0.0067). The PADLLS Dice score for the 3DIRCADb dataset was 0.965 ± 0.016 and was significantly better than the H-DenseUnet's score of 0.930 ± 0.041 (p = 0.0014) the V-net's score of 0.874 ± 0.060 (p < 0.001). In conclusion, our pipeline (PADLLS) outperforms existing liver segmentation models, serves as a valuable tool for image-based analysis, and is freely available for download and use.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36138084     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20108-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  14 in total

1.  Automatic 3D liver segmentation based on deep learning and globally optimized surface evolution.

Authors:  Peijun Hu; Fa Wu; Jialin Peng; Ping Liang; Dexing Kong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Use of Liver Imaging and Biopsy in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Elliot B Tapper; Anna S-F Lok
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Morphological Study of Human Liver and Its Surgical Importance.

Authors:  Heena J Chaudhari; Minal K Ravat; Vasant H Vaniya; Amul N Bhedi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-06-01

4.  MRI: stability of three supervised segmentation techniques.

Authors:  L P Clarke; R P Velthuizen; S Phuphanich; J D Schellenberg; J A Arrington; M Silbiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Modified U-Net (mU-Net) With Incorporation of Object-Dependent High Level Features for Improved Liver and Liver-Tumor Segmentation in CT Images.

Authors:  Hyunseok Seo; Charles Huang; Maxime Bassenne; Ruoxiu Xiao; Lei Xing
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Comparison and evaluation of methods for liver segmentation from CT datasets.

Authors:  Tobias Heimann; Bram van Ginneken; Martin A Styner; Yulia Arzhaeva; Volker Aurich; Christian Bauer; Andreas Beck; Christoph Becker; Reinhard Beichel; György Bekes; Fernando Bello; Gerd Binnig; Horst Bischof; Alexander Bornik; Peter M M Cashman; Ying Chi; Andrés Cordova; Benoit M Dawant; Márta Fidrich; Jacob D Furst; Daisuke Furukawa; Lars Grenacher; Joachim Hornegger; Dagmar Kainmüller; Richard I Kitney; Hidefumi Kobatake; Hans Lamecker; Thomas Lange; Jeongjin Lee; Brian Lennon; Rui Li; Senhu Li; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Gábor Nemeth; Daniela S Raicu; Anne-Mareike Rau; Eva M van Rikxoort; Mikaël Rousson; László Rusko; Kinda A Saddi; Günter Schmidt; Dieter Seghers; Akinobu Shimizu; Pieter Slagmolen; Erich Sorantin; Grzegorz Soza; Ruchaneewan Susomboon; Jonathan M Waite; Andreas Wimmer; Ivo Wolf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 7.  Liver segmentation: indications, techniques and future directions.

Authors:  Akshat Gotra; Lojan Sivakumaran; Gabriel Chartrand; Kim-Nhien Vu; Franck Vandenbroucke-Menu; Claude Kauffmann; Samuel Kadoury; Benoît Gallix; Jacques A de Guise; An Tang
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2017-06-14

Review 8.  LI-RADS: a conceptual and historical review from its beginning to its recent integration into AASLD clinical practice guidance.

Authors:  Khaled M Elsayes; Ania Z Kielar; Victoria Chernyak; Ali Morshid; Alessandro Furlan; William R Masch; Robert M Marks; Aya Kamaya; Richard K G Do; Yuko Kono; Kathryn J Fowler; An Tang; Mustafa R Bashir; Elizabeth M Hecht; Kedar Jambhekar; Andrej Lyshchik; Shuchi K Rodgers; Jay P Heiken; Marc Kohli; David T Fetzer; Stephanie R Wilson; Zahra Kassam; Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Amit G Singal; Christopher S Lim; Irene Cruite; James Lee; Ryan Ash; Donald G Mitchell; Matthew D F McInnes; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2019-02-05

9.  Automatic Multi-Organ Segmentation on Abdominal CT With Dense V-Networks.

Authors:  Eli Gibson; Francesco Giganti; Yipeng Hu; Ester Bonmati; Steve Bandula; Kurinchi Gurusamy; Brian Davidson; Stephen P Pereira; Matthew J Clarkson; Dean C Barratt
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data.

Authors:  Robert J Gillies; Paul E Kinahan; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.