| Literature DB >> 36138032 |
Zhiqiang Ku1,2, Xuping Xie3, Jianqing Lin4, Peng Gao1, Bin Wu4, Abbas El Sahili4, Hang Su1, Yang Liu3, Xiaohua Ye1,2, Eddie Yongjun Tan4, Xin Li1, Xuejun Fan1, Boon Chong Goh4,5, Wei Xiong1, Hannah Boyd1, Antonio E Muruato3, Hui Deng1, Hongjie Xia3, Jing Zou3, Birte K Kalveram3, Vineet D Menachery6, Ningyan Zhang1, Julien Lescar7, Pei-Yong Shi8, Zhiqiang An9.
Abstract
One major limitation of neutralizing antibody-based COVID-19 therapy is the requirement of costly cocktails to reduce emergence of antibody resistance. Here we engineer two bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) using distinct designs and compared them with parental antibodies and their cocktail. Single molecules of both bsAbs block the two epitopes targeted by parental antibodies on the receptor-binding domain (RBD). However, bsAb with the IgG-(scFv)2 design (14-H-06) but not the CrossMAb design (14-crs-06) shows increased antigen-binding and virus-neutralizing activities against multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants as well as increased breadth of neutralizing activity compared to the cocktail. X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM reveal distinct binding models for individual cocktail antibodies, and computational simulations suggest higher inter-spike crosslinking potentials by 14-H-06 than 14-crs-06. In mouse models of infections by SARS-CoV-2 and multiple variants, 14-H-06 exhibits higher or equivalent therapeutic efficacy than the cocktail. Rationally engineered bsAbs represent a cost-effective alternative to antibody cocktails and a promising strategy to improve potency and breadth.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36138032 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33284-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 17.694