Literature DB >> 36136875

On the Simulation of Ultra-Sparse-View and Ultra-Low-Dose Computed Tomography with Maximum a Posteriori Reconstruction Using a Progressive Flow-Based Deep Generative Model.

Hisaichi Shibata1, Shouhei Hanaoka1, Yukihiro Nomura2,3, Takahiro Nakao2, Tomomi Takenaga1, Naoto Hayashi2, Osamu Abe1.   

Abstract

Ultra-sparse-view computed tomography (CT) algorithms can reduce radiation exposure for patients, but these algorithms lack an explicit cycle consistency loss minimization and an explicit log-likelihood maximization in testing. Here, we propose X2CT-FLOW for the maximum a posteriori (MAP) reconstruction of a three-dimensional (3D) chest CT image from a single or a few two-dimensional (2D) projection images using a progressive flow-based deep generative model, especially for ultra-low-dose protocols. The MAP reconstruction can simultaneously optimize the cycle consistency loss and the log-likelihood. We applied X2CT-FLOW for the reconstruction of 3D chest CT images from biplanar projection images without noise contamination (assuming a standard-dose protocol) and with strong noise contamination (assuming an ultra-low-dose protocol). We simulated an ultra-low-dose protocol. With the standard-dose protocol, our images reconstructed from 2D projected images and 3D ground-truth CT images showed good agreement in terms of structural similarity (SSIM, 0.7675 on average), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR, 25.89 dB on average), mean absolute error (MAE, 0.02364 on average), and normalized root mean square error (NRMSE, 0.05731 on average). Moreover, with the ultra-low-dose protocol, our images reconstructed from 2D projected images and the 3D ground-truth CT images also showed good agreement in terms of SSIM (0.7008 on average), PSNR (23.58 dB on average), MAE (0.02991 on average), and NRMSE (0.07349 on average).

Entities:  

Keywords:  X-rays; computed tomography; deep learning; image reconstruction; maximum a posteriori; unsupervised learning

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36136875      PMCID: PMC9498355          DOI: 10.3390/tomography8050179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tomography        ISSN: 2379-1381


  8 in total

1.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.

Authors:  Zhou Wang; Alan Conrad Bovik; Hamid Rahim Sheikh; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.856

2.  A maximum a posteriori probability expectation maximization algorithm for image reconstruction in emission tomography.

Authors:  E Levitan; G T Herman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Image quality of ultralow-dose chest CT using deep learning techniques: potential superiority of vendor-agnostic post-processing over vendor-specific techniques.

Authors:  Ju Gang Nam; Chulkyun Ahn; Hyewon Choi; Wonju Hong; Jongsoo Park; Jong Hyo Kim; Jin Mo Goo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Normalizing Flows: An Introduction and Review of Current Methods.

Authors:  Ivan Kobyzev; Simon Prince; Marcus Brubaker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 6.226

5.  A geometry-informed deep learning framework for ultra-sparse 3D tomographic image reconstruction.

Authors:  Liyue Shen; Wei Zhao; Dante Capaldi; John Pauly; Lei Xing
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 6.698

6.  A Simple Low-dose X-ray CT Simulation from High-dose Scan.

Authors:  Dong Zeng; Jing Huang; Zhaoying Bian; Shanzhou Niu; Hua Zhang; Qianjin Feng; Zhengrong Liang; Jianhua Ma
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 1.679

7.  Patient-specific reconstruction of volumetric computed tomography images from a single projection view via deep learning.

Authors:  Liyue Shen; Wei Zhao; Lei Xing
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 25.671

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.