| Literature DB >> 36136715 |
Efterpi V Bouroutzika1, Ekaterini K Theodosiadou1, Mariana S Barbagianni1, Serafeim Papadopoulos2, Dimitrios Kalogiannis3, Stella Chadio3, Zoi Skaperda4, Demetrios Kouretas4, Eleni G Katsogiannou1, Irene Valasi1.
Abstract
The preovulatory follicles and preimplantation stage embryos are found to be rather sensitive to heat stress due to their low potential for scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS). The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of melatonin administration on redox status and hematological variables during the preovulatory period and early stages of embryogenesis in heat-stressed ewes in vivo. Forty Karagouniko-breed ewes were divided in two groups, the melatonin (M, n = 20) group and control (C, n = 20) one. All animals were subjected to heat stress throughout the study, which lasted forty days (D0 to D40). In M group, melatonin implants were administered on D0. Then, oestrous synchronization was applied (D19-D33). On D34, six rams were introduced into the ewe flock for mating. Ultrasonographic examination was conducted on D73 for pregnancy diagnosis. The temperature humidity index (THI), the rectal temperature (RT), and the number of breaths per minute (BR) were evaluated twice daily. Redox biomarkers, namely total antioxidant capacity (TAC), reduced glutathione (GSH), and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), were assayed in blood samples collected on D0, D33, and D40. In addition, packed cell volume (PCV), white blood cells (WBCs), leukocyte differential count, and cortisol assessment were conducted in blood samples on D33 and D40. The results indicated improved fertility rate and mean number of lambs born per ewe due to improved redox status (p < 0.05) in ewes that received melatonin implants 34 days approximately before the onset of oestrus. The PCV decreased in both groups between the two time-points (p < 0.05). However, the NEU/LYMPH ratio decreased (p < 0.05) only in group M. The low cortisol levels and the decreased NEU/LYMPH ratio in both groups support the hypothesis that ewes of the indigenous Karagouniko breed may exhibit adaptation to environmental thermal stress. The administration of melatonin as an antioxidant regime may improve the reproductive competence of heat stressed ewes and may also enhance their ability to adapt at high ambient temperatures.Entities:
Keywords: cortisol; ewes; fertility rate; glutathione; heat stress; hematological variables; lipid peroxidation; melatonin; total antioxidant capacity
Year: 2022 PMID: 36136715 PMCID: PMC9505195 DOI: 10.3390/vetsci9090499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Sci ISSN: 2306-7381
Figure 1Experimental overview of the study.
Figure 2Temperature- Humidity Index (THI) throughout the study, estimated twice daily (12.00 and 18.00 h).
Rectal temperature and breathing rate (mean ± SEM) in group M (melatonin) and group C (control) during the week following the introduction of rams into the ewe flock (D34-D40).
| Group | Time of Day | Days of Experimental Period | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D34 | D35 | D36 | D37 | D38 | D39 | D40 | ||
| Rectal temperature (°C) | ||||||||
| M | 12.00 | 39.11 ± 0.05 a,A | 39.22 ± 0.05 a,A | 39.35 ± 0.04 a,A | 39.29 ± 0.04 a,A | 39.20 ± 0.05 a,A | 39.25 ± 0.05 a,A | 39.19 ± 0.05 a,A |
| 18.00 | 39.72 ± 0.09 a,B | 39.95 ± 0.13 a | 39.91 ± 0.07 a | 40.06 ± 0.07 a,B | 40.09 ± 0.06 a | 40.01 ± 0.09 a | 40.17 ± 0.08 a | |
| C | 12.00 | 39.27 ± 0.05 b,A | 39.24 ± 0.07 b,A | 39.20 ± 0.06 b,A | 39.27 ± 0.04 b,A | 39.35 ± 0.06 b,A | 39.37 ± 0.05 b,A | 39.36 ± 0.05 b,A |
| 18.00 | 40.0 ± 0.03 b,B | 40.16 ± 0.02 b | 40.13 ± 0.02 b | 40.24 ± 0.02 b,B | 40.25 ± 0.03 b | 39.89 ± 0.03 b | 39.25 ± 0.02 b | |
| Breathing rate (breaths min−1, bpm) | ||||||||
| M | 12.00 | 54.75 ± 2.8 c,C | 55.4 ± 2.3 c,C | 55.8 ± 2.2 c | 55.7 ± 1.7 c,C | 55.85 ± 1.5 c,C | 60.8 ± 1.6 c,C | 60.5 ± 2.1 c,C |
| 18.00 | 89.05 ± 2.9 c,D | 82.75 ± 2.9 c,D | 92.1 ± 2.5 c,D | 87.35 ± 1.8 c,D | 89 ± 1.7 c,D | 95.4 ± 1.4 c,D | 95.5 ± 1.9 c,D | |
| C | 12.00 | 65.6 ± 0.9 d,C | 65.9 ± 1.2 d,C | 65.7 ± 1.1 d | 66.4 ± 0.8 d,C | 68.7 ± 0.9 d,C | 67.1 ± 0.7 d,C | 68.1 ± 0.9 d,C |
| 18.00 | 99.6 ± 1.2 d,D | 104.8 ± 1.7 d,D | 103.6 ± 2.1 d,D | 100.6 ± 0.9 d,D | 118.1 ± 4.2 d,D | 112.5 ± 1.9 d,D | 109.3 ± 2.2 d,D | |
The same superscript a–d within the same column denotes significant difference (p ≤ 0.05). The same superscript A–D within the same column denotes significant difference (p ≤ 0.05).
Hematological variables and cortisol concentration in blood plasma (mean ± SEM) in group M (melatonin) and group C (control) on D33 and D40.
| Group Time | Hematological Variables | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCV | WBCs | NEU | LYMPH | MONO | EOS | PLT | NEU/LYMPH Ratio | Cortisol | ||
| (%) | (cells/μL) | (cells/μL) | (cells/μL) | (cells/μL) | (cells/μL) | (cells ×103/μL) | (μg/L) | |||
|
|
| 33.50 ± 0.80 a | 7956 ± 1140 | 3355 ± 467 c | 4814 ± 819 | 242 ± 53 | 345 ± 176 | 362 ± 27 | 0.73 ± 0.06 d | 1.23 ± 0.41 |
|
| 30.83 ± 0.96 a | 5467 ± 631 | 1584 ± 149 c | 3285 ± 341 | 152 ± 66 | 200 ± 94 | 356 ± 28 | 0.51 ± 0.06 d | 1.51 ± 0.36 | |
|
|
| 32.14 ± 0.84 b | 6529 ± 1665 | 1761 ± 197 | 2459 ± 952 | 102 ± 30 | 145 ± 77 | 382 ± 29 | 0.93 ± 0.28 | 0.71 ± 0.41 |
|
| 31.66 ± 0.98 b | 5643 ± 1287 | 1213 ± 179 | 2293 ± 687 | 123 ± 20 | 171 ± 25 | 370 ± 29 | 0.64 ± 0.23 | 0.59 ± 0.17 | |
The same superscript a–d within the same group M or C denotes significant difference (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) in blood plasma of group M (melatonin) and group C (control) at three time points of the study. No difference was found between the two groups or between the three time points in group M or group C; p > 0.05.
Figure 4Glutathione (GSH) levels in blood plasma of group M (melatonin) and group C (control) at three time points of the study. a: Difference between the two groups, b: Difference between the three time points in group M or group C; p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 5Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) levels in blood plasma of group M (melatonin) and group C (control) at three time points of the study. a: Difference between the two groups, b: Difference between the three time points in group M or group C; p ≤ 0.05.