| Literature DB >> 36135746 |
Lei Wang1, Jun-Geon Je2, Hyun-Soo Kim3, Kaiqiang Wang1, Xiaoting Fu1, Jiachao Xu1, Xin Gao1, You-Jin Jeon2,4.
Abstract
Seaweeds are potential ingredients in the cosmeceutical industry. Our previous study demonstrates that the phlorotannin-enriched extract of Ecklonia maxima (EME-EA) containing dieckol and eckmaxol possesses strong anti-inflammatory activity and suggests the cosmeceutical potential of EME-EA. In order to evaluate the cosmeceutical potential of EME-EA, the anti-melanogenesis and photoprotective effects of EME-EA were investigated in this study. EME-EA remarkably inhibited mushroom tyrosinase and melanogenesis in alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone-stimulated B16F10 cells. In addition, EME-EA significantly suppressed UVB-induced HaCaT cell death that was consistent with inhibition of apoptosis and reduction in scavenging intracellular reactive oxygen species. Furthermore, EME-EA significantly inhibited collagen degradation and matrix metalloproteinases expression in UVB-irradiated HDF cells in a concentration-dependent manner. These results indicate that EME-EA possesses strong anti-melanogenesis and photoprotective activities and suggest EME-EA is an ideal ingredient in the pharmaceutical and cosmeceutical industries.Entities:
Keywords: Ecklonia maxima; UVB irradiation; melanogenesis; photodamage
Year: 2022 PMID: 36135746 PMCID: PMC9506176 DOI: 10.3390/md20090557
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 6.085
Figure 1Anti-melanogenesis effect of EME-EA. (A) Tyrosinase inhibitory activity of EME-EA; (B) cytotoxicity of EME-EA on B16F10 cells; (C) melanin synthesis levels of B16F10 cells stimulated by α-MSH or co-treated with EME-EA; and (D) relative intracellular tyrosinase activities of B16F10 cells stimulated by α-MSH or co-treated with EME-EA. The data were expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 3). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 as compared to α-MSH-treated group and ## p < 0.01 as compared to control group.
Figure 2Protective effect of EME-EA against UVB-induced HaCaT cell damage. (A) The intracellular ROS levels of UVB-irradiated HaCaT cells; (B) the viability of UVB-irradiated HaCaT cells. The data were expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 3). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 as compared to UVB-irradiated group and ## p < 0.01 as compared to control group.
Figure 3Protective effect of EME-EA against UVB-induced apoptosis in HaCaT cells. The relative levels of apoptosis were measured using Image J software. The data were expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 3). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 as compared to UVB-irradiated group and ## p < 0.01 as compared to control group.
Figure 4Protective effect of EME-EA against UVB-induced HDF cell damage. (A) Collagenase inhibitory effect of EME-EA; (B) the intracellular ROS levels of UVB-irradiated HDF cells; (C) the viability of UVB-irradiated HDF cells; and (D) collagen levels of UVB-irradiated HDF cells. The data were expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 3). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 as compared to UVB-irradiated group and ## p < 0.01 as compared to control group.
Figure 5Inhibitory effect of EME-EA on MMPs expression in UVB-irradiated HDF cells. (A) MMP-1 expression level in UVB-irradiated HDF cells; (B) MMP-2 expression level in UVB-irradiated HDF cells; (C) MMP-8 expression level in UVB-irradiated HDF cells; (D) MMP-9 expression level in UVB-irradiated HDF cells; and (E) MMP-13 expression level in UVB-irradiated HDF cells. The data were expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 3). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 as compared to UVB-irradiated group and ## p < 0.01 as compared to control group.