| Literature DB >> 36135677 |
Yayong Yang1,2, Xinyu Xu1,2, Zhuohan Jing1,2, Jun Ye1,2, Hui Li3, Xiaoyu Li1,2, Lei Shi1,2, Mengyu Chen1,2, Tengyun Wang1,2, Baogui Xie2, Yongxin Tao1,2.
Abstract
In real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), internal control genes (ICGs) are crucial for normalization. This study screened 6 novel ICGs: Pre-mRNA-splicing factor cwc15 (Cwf15); ER associated DnaJ chaperone (DnaJ); E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4 (HUL4); ATP-binding cassette, subfamily B (MDR/TAP), member 1 (VAMP); Exosome complex exonuclease DIS3/RRP44 (RNB); V-type H+-transporting ATPase sub-unit A (V-ATP) from the 22-transcriptome data of 8 filamentous fungi. The six novel ICGs are all involved in the basic biological process of cells and share the different transcription levels from high to low. In order to further verify the stability of ICGs candidates, the six novel ICGs as well as three traditional housekeeping genes: β-actin (ACTB); β-tubulin (β-TUB); glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (GAPDH) and the previously screened reference genes: SPRY-domain-containing protein (SPRYp); Ras-2 protein (Ras); Vacuolar protein sorting protein 26 (Vps26) were evaluated by geNorm and NormFinder statistical algorithms. RT-qPCR of 12 ICGs were performed at different developmental stages in Flammulina filiformis and under different treatment conditions in Neurospora crassa. The consistent results of the two algorithms suggested that the novel genes, RNB, V-ATP, and VAMP, showed the highest stability in F. filiformis and N. crassa. RNB, V-ATP, and VAMP have high expression stability and universal applicability and therefore have great potential as ICGs for standardized calculation in filamentous fungi. The results also provide a novel guidance for the screening stable reference genes in RT-qPCR and a wide application in gene expression analysis of filamentous fungi.Entities:
Keywords: RT-qPCR; filamentous fungi; gene expression; internal control genes
Year: 2022 PMID: 36135677 PMCID: PMC9504127 DOI: 10.3390/jof8090952
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
The maximum fold change (MFC) and the average expression levels (RPKM) of the traditional housekeeping genes and reference genes identified from Volvariella volvacea #.
| Sample Type | Species | GSE No. | Traditional Housekeeping Genes | Reference Genes from Vv # | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| MFC | RPKM | MFC | RPKM | MFC | RPKM | MFC | RPKM | MFC | RPKM | MFC | RPKM | |||
| Different nutritional resources |
| GSE60004 | 1.1 | 528.7 | 1.9 | 244.1 | 6.0 | 1367.8 | 2.1 | 57.2 | 1.5 | 53.8 | 1.2 | 33.9 |
| GSE35227 | 3.7 | 3537.8 | 3.6 | 4393.9 | 5.1 | 35,633.7 | 5.9 | 358.8 | 3.7 | 469.0 | 1.9 | 459.6 | ||
| GSE44673 | 1.3 | 907.7 | 1.6 | 603.9 | 2.4 | 3931.2 | 2.7 | 68.4 | 1.3 | 62.4 | 1.4 | 64.3 | ||
| GSE52316 | 1.1 | 1040.2 | 2.1 | 498.9 | 2.2 | 2725.7 | 1.4 | 85.5 | 1.8 | 39.1 | 1.2 | 43.8 | ||
| GSE60986 | 2.7 | 1082.7 | 3.7 | 614.5 | 3.4 | 2309.1 | 3.4 | 23.4 | 2.2 | 39.3 | 1.4 | 34.8 | ||
| GSE68517 | 2.0 | 972.5 | 2.2 | 474.4 | 4.1 | 4434.0 | 4.1 | 62.4 | 3.5 | 50.5 | 3.0 | 42.3 | ||
| GSE36719 | 2.3 | 9441.1 | 3.0 | 4126.0 | 1.7 | 47,828.7 | 3.2 | 485.6 | 1.2 | 239.6 | 2.0 | 285.9 | ||
| GSE42692 | 2.1 | 2886.0 | 2.6 | 4401.9 | 3.9 | 29,295.9 | 2.1 | 328.9 | 1.1 | 332.2 | 1.2 | 395.7 | ||
| GSE51091 | 1.7 | 1068.4 | 1.6 | 675.1 | 3.5 | 3795.7 | 1.2 | 36.6 | 1.1 | 72.5 | 1.2 | 40.0 | ||
|
| GSE53629 | 1.1 | 19,940.5 | 1.5 | 3357.9 | 2.8 | 43,090.2 | 2.0 | 3869.0 | 1.2 | 1293.1 | 1.3 | 1464.1 | |
|
| GSE44100 | 1.1 | 663.7 | 1.5 | 287.6 | 1.4 | 881.7 | 1.1 | 81.2 | 1.7 | 92.3 | 1.1 | 41.3 | |
| Different development stages |
| Wang et al., 2015 | 2.8 | 1803.0 | 2.6 | 2067.8 | 19.7 | 1616.2 | 2.0 | 98.4 | 3.3 | 228.7 | 2.0 | 39.9 |
|
| GSE39569 | 2.5 | 3298.3 | 4.5 | 821.0 | 5.5 | 81,562.8 | 10.9 | 72.5 | 3.7 | 55,015.0 | 2.2 | 12,820.5 | |
|
| GSE41484 | 2.4 | 1434.4 | 1.6 | 681.5 | 5.3 | 4659.3 | 3.2 | 115.6 | 1.8 | 284.8 | 2.5 | 92.8 | |
|
| GSE61865 | 2.7 | 849.2 | 5.3 | 230.2 | 4.3 | 2048.4 | 3.6 | 72.0 | 4.3 | 56.5 | 1.7 | 66.3 | |
| Different stresses |
| GSE53013 | 1.6 | 1354.9 | 1.6 | 781.9 | 2.0 | 4027.3 | 2.7 | 18.1 | 2.5 | 47.2 | 1.9 | 41.4 |
| GSE52153 | 1.3 | 1493.3 | 1.6 | 792.9 | 1.5 | 4637.7 | 3.3 | 26.8 | 1.8 | 58.4 | 2.2 | 57.8 | ||
| GSE53534 | 1.8 | 591.9 | 2.5 | 357.0 | 2.4 | 16,553.0 | 2.0 | 22.0 | 2.8 | 15.5 | 1.7 | 16.1 | ||
|
| GSE57146 | 1.5 | 659.2 | 1.4 | 253.6 | 1.5 | 7283.7 | 1.2 | 41.4 | 1.8 | 61.5 | 1.4 | 28.4 | |
| Different strains |
| Wang et al., 2016 | 1.6 | 2234.2 | 1.8 | 1594.7 | 2.5 | 7846.6 | 1.6 | 107.8 | 3.1 | 164.7 | 1.4 | 24.9 |
|
| GSE43019 | 1.9 | 1840.7 | 1.7 | 9.7 | 1.7 | 5063.7 | 1.0 | 66.3 | 1.5 | 8.0 | 1.4 | 77.1 | |
|
| GSE63672 | 1.4 | 1343.5 | 2.3 | 764.4 | 7.9 | 4399.4 | 1.5 | 149.4 | 1.5 | 159.3 | 1.5 | 71.5 | |
|
| 500–3550 | 200–4500 | 800–50,000 | 18–150 | 8–500 | 16–100 | ||||||||
MFC: the ratio of the maximum and minimum values observed within the dataset [32]. The yellow background cells represent the maximum fold change > 3. #: The three reference genes identified from V. volvacea [15]. *: The reference range of RPKM value and average RPKM of genes was determined after the extreme values were removed according to 99% confidence interval of the Grubbs criterion [33].
The maximum fold change (MFC) and the average expression levels (RPKM) of the novel internal control genes.
| Sample Type | Species | GSE No. | Novel Internal Control Genes | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| MFC | RPKM | MFC | RPKM | MFC | RPKM | MFC | RPKM | MFC | RPKM | MFC | RPKM | |||
| Different nutritional resources |
| GSE60004 | 1.4 | 31.8 | 2.0 | 37.8 | 1.2 | 75.9 | 2.1 | 76.3 | 1.4 | 166.8 | 1.6 | 138.9 |
| GSE35227 | 2.0 | 250.2 | 2.0 | 216.4 | 1.8 | 592.0 | 2.2 | 581.9 | 1.7 | 1226.0 | 1.9 | 1861.9 | ||
| GSE44673 | 1.4 | 46.4 | 1.2 | 35.8 | 1.1 | 140.1 | 1.3 | 98.1 | 1.5 | 308.2 | 1.3 | 294.2 | ||
| GSE52316 | 1.2 | 36.1 | 1.3 | 33.1 | 1.4 | 95.0 | 1.4 | 86.7 | 1.4 | 275.2 | 1.3 | 292.7 | ||
| GSE60986 | 1.5 | 27.6 | 2.1 | 19.8 | 1.8 | 55.4 | 1.4 | 76.1 | 1.8 | 118.0 | 2.1 | 125.8 | ||
| GSE68517 | 1.5 | 32.0 | 1.5 | 28.1 | 1.7 | 79.6 | 2.3 | 85.1 | 3.0 | 157.6 | 1.7 | 245.8 | ||
| GSE36719 | 1.3 | 226.8 | 1.2 | 185.1 | 1.7 | 571.6 | 1.2 | 593.8 | 1.3 | 1184.6 | 1.4 | 1521.0 | ||
| GSE42692 | 1.1 | 220.7 | 1.2 | 206.4 | 1.5 | 545.7 | 1.1 | 522.1 | 1.6 | 1312.8 | 1.6 | 1685.7 | ||
| GSE51091 | 1.2 | 38.4 | 1.2 | 30.0 | 1.3 | 70.3 | 1.1 | 98.8 | 1.1 | 138.7 | 1.3 | 111.5 | ||
|
| GSE53629 | 1.2 | 1935.6 | 1.2 | 288.4 | 1.3 | 4480.3 | 1.2 | 2305.2 | 1.4 | 14,098.2 | 1.3 | 5809.2 | |
|
| GSE44100 | 1.6 | 66.9 | 1.5 | 50.5 | 1.1 | 98.0 | 1.5 | 135.7 | 1.1 | 211.7 | 1.1 | 88.1 | |
| Different development stages |
| Wang et al., 2015 | 1.7 | 24.5 | 1.8 | 49.8 | 2.0 | 54.2 | 1.8 | 274.8 | 1.5 | 182.5 | 1.5 | 198.0 |
|
| GSE39569 | 1.4 | 4334.8 | 3.0 | 11,422.0 | 1.1 | 6239.8 | 2.4 | 2175.3 | 1.7 | 5820.0 | 1.4 | 10,573.8 | |
|
| GSE41484 | 1.3 | 59.9 | 1.3 | 40.5 | 1.3 | 91.1 | 1.7 | 265.1 | 1.6 | 213.3 | 1.7 | 263.8 | |
|
| GSE61865 | 1.5 | 87.6 | 2.4 | 73.2 | 2.3 | 168.6 | 1.8 | 160.6 | 2.9 | 69.5 | 1.5 | 103.4 | |
| Different stresses |
| GSE53013 | 1.6 | 25.2 | 1.6 | 30.8 | 2.2 | 49.5 | 1.5 | 81.1 | 1.9 | 87.1 | 2.1 | 101.9 |
| GSE52153 | 1.6 | 32.1 | 1.9 | 33.4 | 1.5 | 64.6 | 1.5 | 93.7 | 2.2 | 129.7 | 1.6 | 144.8 | ||
| GSE53534 | 1.4 | 22.2 | 1.5 | 30.2 | 1.7 | 30.9 | 1.5 | 46.2 | 1.7 | 53.6 | 1.6 | 79.5 | ||
|
| GSE57146 | 1.1 | 30.9 | 2.2 | 28.2 | 1.8 | 56.3 | 1.2 | 119.5 | 1.2 | 56.5 | 2.8 | 104.5 | |
| Different strains |
| Wang et al., 2016 | 1.9 | 24.1 | 1.6 | 44.6 | 1.5 | 70.3 | 1.2 | 217.1 | 1.8 | 163.2 | 1.3 | 151.4 |
|
| GSE43019 | 2.0 | 48.2 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 8.6 | 2.5 | 54.9 | |
|
| GSE63672 | 1.3 | 109.2 | 1.3 | 67.1 | 1.9 | 293.5 | 1.5 | 165.8 | 2.0 | 467.9 | 1.4 | 79.8 | |
|
| 20–260 | 15–300 | 30–600 | 45–600 | 50–1350 | 50–1900 | ||||||||
MFC: the ratio of the maximum and minimum values observed within the dataset [32]. *: The reference range of RPKM value and average RPKM of genes was determined after the extreme values were removed according to 99% confidence interval of the Grubbs criterion [33].
The predicted function of the 12 reference ICGs.
| Gene Symbol | Gene Name | Pfam Annotation | Function |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Actin | Polymerize into microfilament and constitute major component of the cytoskeleton | |
|
| Tubulin/FtsZ family, GTPase domain | Be involved in cell division and constitutes the main component of microtubules | |
|
| Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase | Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase | Be involved in glycolysis and gluconeogenesis |
|
| SPRY-domain-containing protein | SPRY domain | Be involved in RNA processing and histone H3 methylation regulatory signaling pathways and regulates nutrient transport |
|
| Ras-2 protein | Ras family | Regulate cytoskeletal integrity, proliferation, apoptosis and cell migration |
|
| Vacuolar protein sorting protein 26 | Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 26 | Be involved in protein trafficking and regulate vesicular protein sorting |
|
| Pre-mRNA-splicing factor cwc15 | Cwf15/Cwc15 cell cycle control protein | Be involved in pre-mRNA splicing |
|
| ER associated DnaJ chaperone | DnaJ domain | Be involved in folding of nascent proteins and regulate the responses to stress |
|
| E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4 | HECT-domain (ubiquitin-transferase) | Constitute ubiquitin-protein ligases and participate in protein ubiquitination hydrolysis |
|
| ATP-binding cassette, subfamily B (MDR/TAP), member 1 | MSP (Major sperm protein) domain | Constitute cell cytoskeleton, with related vesicle-associated membrane protein and participate in vesicle fusion |
|
| Exosome complex exonuclease DIS3/RRP44 | RNB domain | Constitute ribonuclease II and involved in the mRNA degradation pathway |
|
| V-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit A | ATP synthase alpha/beta family, nucleo-tide-binding domain | Driven proton pump and involved in protein transport, active transport of metabolites and homeostasis |
Figure 1Variation in RT-qPCR value of 12 ICGs in samples of F. filiformis and N. crassa. (A) Average Ct value of each ICGs in 10 samples of F. filiformis (10 developmental stages samples of in the F. filiformis dikaryotic strain FL19: mycelia, aerial hyphal knot, primordia, bud, pileus in the young fruiting body, stipe the in the young fruiting body, pileus in elongation stage, stipe in elongation stage, pileus in maturation stage and stipe in maturation stage) were shown on the y-axis. The 12 ICGs candidates were shown on the x-axis. Error bars represent the maximum Ct value and the minimum Ct value, respectively. (B) Average Ct value of each ICGs in eight samples of N. crassa (WT; ∆Spds; BT; BS; CS; HS; JA; H2O2) were shown on the y-axis. The 12 ICGs candidates were shown on the x-axis. Error bars represent the maximum Ct value and the minimum Ct value, respectively.
Figure 2RT-qPCR Ct value of 12 ICGs in different samples of F. filiformis and N. crassa. (A) Average Ct value of three biological replicates and three technical replicates were shown on the Y-axis. The 10 samples of different developmental stages in F. filiformis were shown on the X-axis: mycelia, aerial hyphal knot; primordia, bud, pileus in the young fruiting body, stipe in the young fruiting body, pileus in elongation stage, stipe in elongation stage, pileus in maturation stage and stipe in maturation stage. (B) Average Ct value of three biological replicates and three technical replicates were shown on the Y-axis. The eight samples of different treatment conditions in N. crassa were shown on the X-axis: WT, ∆Spds, BT, BS, CS, HS, JA, and H2O2.
Figure 3The expression stability ranking of 12 ICGs candidates using geNorm in F. filiformis and N. crassa. The stability measure M values, calculated by geNorm, were shown on the y-axis. The lowest M values represent the most stable expression. (A) The expression stability ranking of 12 ICGs candidates in F. filiformis. (B) The expression stability ranking of 12 ICGs candidates in N. crassa.
The stability analysis of 12 ICGs candidates using NormFinder in F. filiformis and N. crassa.
| Sample Sets | Comprehensive Analysis A and B | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Gene Name | Stability Value | Gene Name | Stability Value | Gene Name | Stability Value |
| 1 |
| 0.110 |
| 0.387 |
| 0.175 |
| 2 |
| 0.114 |
| 0.398 |
| 0.261 |
| 3 |
| 0.353 |
| 0.454 |
| 0.266 |
| 4 |
| 0.427 |
| 0.501 |
| 0.348 |
| 5 |
| 0.440 |
| 0.512 |
| 0.546 |
| 6 |
| 0.536 |
| 0.542 |
| 0.681 |
| 7 |
| 0.745 |
| 0.563 |
| 0.699 |
| 8 |
| 0.909 |
| 0.639 |
| 1.098 |
| 9 |
| 1.104 |
| 0.828 |
| 1.350 |
| 10 |
| 1.185 |
| 0.835 |
| 1.426 |
| 11 |
| 1.251 |
| 0.948 |
| 1.501 |
| 12 |
| 1.610 |
| 1.365 |
| 1.507 |