| Literature DB >> 36135481 |
Yannan Xue1, Chang Liu1, Dongmei Liu1, Wenjuan Ding1, Zhaoge Li1, Junli Cao2, Xiaoming Xia1.
Abstract
Laodelphax striatellus Fallén is one of the main pests that can severely harm rice, corn, and wheat. Insecticides acting on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) are the main type of pesticides used for the control of L. striatellus in Shandong Province, a major grain-producing region in China. In this study, the rice seedling dipping method was used to determine the sensitivities of six field L. striatellus populations in Shandong to seven insecticides acting on nAChR. The results showed that all the field populations were sensitive to clothianidin, nitenpyram, and triflumezopyrim, and the Jiaxiang population exhibited the lowest resistance ratio (RR) to imidacloprid, dinotefuran, sulfoxaflor, and thiamethoxam. The Donggang population showed a medium-level resistance to imidacloprid, with the highest RR of 17.48-fold. The Yutai population showed low-level resistance to imidacloprid and thiamethoxam, with RRs of 7.23- and 7.02-fold, respectively. The contents of cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (P450s), carboxylesterase (CarE), and glutathione S-transferase (GST) were the highest in the Donggang population and the lowest in the Jiaxiang population. The P450 gene CYP314A1 and the CarE gene LsCarE12 were highly up-regulated in all populations. No mutations of V62I, R81T, and K265E in the nAChR β1 subunit were found in any of the populations. These results provide valuable information for the strategies of resistance management of L. striatellus in the field.Entities:
Keywords: Laodelphax striatellus Fallén; biochemical characteristics; nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; sensitivity
Year: 2022 PMID: 36135481 PMCID: PMC9506532 DOI: 10.3390/insects13090780
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 3.139
Primers used for RT-qPCR and the nAChR β1 subunit amplification.
| Gene | Accession Number | Forward Primer (5′-3′) | Reverse Primer (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| MG566048.1 | GAAGACATTCGTGAGGAGG | CCCAAAAGTAGTAAGAGCCAG |
|
| MG566046.1 | GCTCTTTCACCTTTCACCCAC | TTCATCACGTTCCAACTCCTC |
|
| JX876492.1 | GAACAATCGCATCCAACAA | GGCATCCAAGTACTCCAGA |
|
| JX462960.1 | ACTTCCAGTTTCAGACGCC | GACCGCTTCCCATCAGATC |
|
| KC579461.1 | CAAGGAGCGTCACAGAGTA | TCCATCACCAGAAGGAATAG |
|
| JX566821.1 | CCTATTCCTTCTGGTAATG | CGGCTTCTCTTCTATTATC |
|
| JX876513.1 | CCTACCAGAAAATATAAGCAAACGG | CACATTCCACATCAAACCTTCTG |
|
| HM600727.1 | CTTGTGGCAGGATTCGTAGAG | TCATGATTATCACCGAGAAGCC |
|
| JQ990753.1 | CAAAATGAGCAGGGAATCGC | TTGGATTCAGAGGTGTGGC |
|
| JQ990755.1 | CCGCTTCCTGTCATTTTCT | TGTTCTCAACGTAGGCCCA |
|
| JQ990757.1 | TCTGAGGACTGTCTCTATCTGG | CCACGTCAGCCTCTTTACTATC |
|
| MK238305.1 | GGTGCGGAATTCGTTGAAAAC | GGTGACTCGTTAATTGGTTTGC |
|
| JQ990761.1 | AAGCAAGCTGAGCAGATCG | CTTCAACAAGTCGTAGGGA |
|
| JQ990771.1 | GCCTGACAAAATGCTCTCAAG | GGCAATGTTCTGTTTCACCC |
|
| JX566828.1 | CTCTATGGGTTATGTCTTCGCG | CTCAACTCTACAATCGGAGGC |
|
| JN628446.1 | TTCCCAGTTGTAAGGCTTGG | CAAGAGTCGATATAGATGCGGC |
|
| JN628441.1 | GCCGGTGATCAGATGACTATC | TGGCCGAATCGTAATCCTTC |
|
| JN628448.1 | TCCCAAGTGCTTTATACTCATAGG | CTAAAGGTGGGTCTGTGGAG |
|
| JN628440.1 | TTCAATGCTAGAGGAAGAGCG | TGCCATCCACTTCTAAAACAGG |
|
| JN628443.1 | GCATCAAAATTCAGCTCAGTCG | TCCAGATAAGACAGCAACCATC |
|
| JN628444.1 | GCAATCAGTCGCCATTTCTAG | GCTTCATCGCTTTCATAGAACC |
|
| JN628445.1 | CCACCCAATCAAGAAACAGTTAAT | ATCATAACCGGCCATTCTGG |
|
| JN628442.1 | GGCTAAGGTGAGGGAGATTTG | CCGACACAATATTTGCCAGC |
| GAPDH | HQ385974.1 | GTGTTGACTACATGGTCTACT | GCTCACTGAATACCTGGATT |
| nAChR β1 | MF612140.1 | GTTCTGCTAGTCTTCGGAGTC | TTCCCGAATCTGTATGTACTG |
LC50 values of the susceptibility baseline of L. striatellus.
| Insecticide | LC50 (95% CI) (mg/L) | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Imidacloprid | 9.3060 (7.1210–11.5550) | [ |
| Nitenpyram | 1.2310 (0.9350–1.5310) | [ |
| Thiamethoxam | 1.7920 (1.3390–2.2770) | [ |
| Dinotefuran | 0.5280 (0.3690–0.6980) | [ |
| Sulfoxaflor | 0.3980 (0.2880–0.5030) | [ |
| Clothianidin | 2.5000 (1.6918–3.6945) | Present study |
| Triflumezopyrim | 0.4867 (0.3525–0.6672) | Present study |
Sensitivity to imidacloprid in six L. striatellus populations in Shandong Province.
| Population | LC50 (mg/L) | 95% CI (mg/L) | Slope ± SE | R2 | RR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donggang | 162.67 | 87.40–264.68 | 1.28 ± 0.32 | 2.26 (3) | 0.89 | 17.48 |
| Tancheng | 29.49 | 21.03–46.97 | 1.57 ± 0.30 | 4.00 (3) | 0.88 | 3.17 |
| Yutai | 67.26 | 46.95–115.03 | 1.41 ± 0.27 | 3.03 (3) | 0.92 | 7.23 |
| Jiaxiang | 23.63 | 16.26–36.61 | 1.48 ± 0.30 | 1.77 (3) | 0.94 | 2.54 |
| Daiyue | 42.14 | 24.19–71.27 | 1.14 ± 0.35 | 2.36 (3) | 0.82 | 4.53 |
| Jiyang | 31.99 | 23.42–46.77 | 1.72 ± 0.31 | 1.98 (3) | 0.94 | 3.44 |
Sensitivity to dinotefuran in six L. striatellus populations in Shandong Province.
| Population | LC50 (mg/L) | 95% CI (mg/L) | Slope ± SE | R2 | RR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donggang | 3.08 | 2.14–4.77 | 1.45 ± 0.29 | 4.34 (3) | 0.86 | 5.84 |
| Tancheng | 2.24 | 1.44–3.35 | 1.39 ± 0.29 | 3.28 (3) | 0.89 | 4.25 |
| Yutai | 4.12 | 3.18–6.21 | 2.66 ± 0.49 | 4.50 (3) | 0.89 | 7.81 |
| Jiaxiang | 1.93 | 1.35–2.58 | 1.84 ± 0.31 | 7.95 (3) | 0.84 | 3.65 |
| Daiyue | 2.57 | 1.67–4.00 | 1.68 ± 0.37 | 2.40 (3) | 0.89 | 4.86 |
| Jiyang | 2.66 | 2.10–3.42 | 2.55 ± 0.38 | 7.30 (3) | 0.90 | 5.04 |
Sensitivity to sulfoxaflor in six L. striatellus populations in Shandong Province.
| Population | LC50 (mg/L) | 95% CI (mg/L) | Slope ± SE | R2 | RR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donggang | 1.55 | 1.13–2.39 | 1.63 ± 0.28 | 1.29 (3) | 0.96 | 3.90 |
| Tancheng | 2.07 | 1.42–2.85 | 1.57 ± 0.28 | 3.30 (3) | 0.92 | 5.20 |
| Yutai | 1.62 | 1.12–2.13 | 1.95 ± 0.31 | 8.43 (3) | 0.84 | 4.07 |
| Jiaxiang | 1.41 | 1.04–1.99 | 1.87 ± 0.33 | 6.84 (3) | 0.85 | 3.54 |
| Daiyue | 1.79 | 1.18–2.48 | 1.54 ± 0.28 | 3.07 (3) | 0.92 | 4.50 |
| Jiyang | 2.13 | 1.41–3.04 | 1.41 ± 0.27 | 0.81 (3) | 0.98 | 5.35 |
Sensitivity to thiamethoxam in six L. striatellus populations in Shandong Province.
| Population | LC50 (mg/L) | 95% CI (mg/L) | Slope ± SE | R2 | RR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donggang | 6.87 | 5.15–9.92 | 1.92 ± 0.33 | 5.84 (3) | 0.87 | 3.83 |
| Tancheng | 6.37 | 4.32–8.44 | 2.10 ± 0.35 | 3.99 (3) | 0.80 | 3.55 |
| Yutai | 12.58 | 8.75–19.73 | 1.52 ± 0.31 | 1.21 (3) | 0.97 | 7.02 |
| Jiaxiang | 5.12 | 3.68–7.16 | 1.90 ± 0.35 | 7.52 (3) | 0.81 | 2.86 |
| Daiyue | 7.77 | 5.63–12.24 | 1.70 ± 0.31 | 6.14 (3) | 0.87 | 4.34 |
| Jiyang | 6.57 | 4.80–9.77 | 1.81 ± 0.34 | 3.56 (3) | 0.90 | 3.66 |
Sensitivity to nitenpyram in six L. striatellus populations in Shandong Province.
| Population | LC50 (mg/L) | 95% CI (mg/L) | Slope ± SE | R2 | RR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donggang | 1.33 | 0.98–1.93 | 1.67 ± 0.28 | 1.55 (3) | 0.96 | 1.08 |
| Tancheng | 0.68 | 0.51–0.98 | 1.76 ± 0.29 | 1.52 (3) | 0.97 | 0.55 |
| Yutai | 2.01 | 1.37–3.80 | 1.39 ± 0.28 | 5.09 (3) | 0.86 | 1.63 |
| Jiaxiang | 0.78 | 0.51–1.49 | 1.15 ± 0.26 | 4.96 (3) | 0.80 | 0.63 |
| Daiyue | 1.08 | 0.81–1.48 | 1.78 ± 0.29 | 0.47 (3) | 0.99 | 0.88 |
| Jiyang | 0.95 | 0.66–1.70 | 1.43 ± 0.28 | 5.32 (3) | 0.85 | 0.77 |
Sensitivity to clothianidin in six L. striatellus populations in Shandong Province.
| Population | LC50 (mg/L) | 95% CI (mg/L) | Slope ± SE | R2 | RR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donggang | 3.97 | 2.67–5.54 | 1.51 ± 0.27 | 3.75 (3) | 0.86 | 1.59 |
| Tancheng | 3.52 | 2.59–5.27 | 1.76 ± 0.31 | 2.76 (3) | 0.89 | 1.41 |
| Yutai | 3.76 | 2.66–5.00 | 1.81 ± 0.29 | 1.42 (3) | 0.89 | 1.51 |
| Jiaxiang | 3.50 | 2.46–5.62 | 1.48 ± 0.29 | 3.44 (3) | 0.84 | 1.40 |
| Daiyue | 5.61 | 3.96–8.26 | 1.87 ± 0.36 | 2.09 (3) | 0.89 | 2.24 |
| Jiyang | 3.56 | 2.16–5.17 | 1.32 ± 0.27 | 1.74 (3) | 0.90 | 1.42 |
Sensitivity to triflumezopyrim in six L. striatellus populations in Shandong Province.
| Population | LC50 (mg/L) | 95% CI (mg/L) | Slope ± SE | R2 | RR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donggang | 0.99 | 0.69–1.42 | 1.47 ± 0.27 | 5.99 (3) | 0.85 | 2.03 |
| Tancheng | 0.69 | 0.47–0.93 | 1.8193 ± 0.31 | 6.97 (3) | 0.87 | 1.42 |
| Yutai | 0.89 | 0.63–1.20 | 1.90 ± 0.33 | 6.69 (3) | 0.86 | 1.82 |
| Jiaxiang | 0.61 | 0.45–0.88 | 1.63 ± 0.28 | 2.44 (3) | 0.94 | 1.26 |
| Daiyue | 0.76 | 0.50–1.08 | 1.52 ± 0.29 | 1.94 (3) | 0.94 | 1.57 |
| Jiyang | 0.67 | 0.47–0.89 | 1.97 ± 0.32 | 3.17 (3) | 0.94 | 1.38 |
Figure 1P450s (A), CarE (B), and GST (C) contents of six L. striatellus populations in Shandong Province. The data are the mean ± SE (n = 3), and different letters on the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 2The relative expression levels of seven P450 genes in six L. striatellus populations from Shandong Province compared with SS (red dotted line means 2-fold overexpression level). The data are the mean ± SE (n = 3), and different letters on the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3The relative expression levels of eight CarE genes in six L. striatellus populations from Shandong Province compared with SS (red dotted line means 2-fold overexpression level). The data are the mean ± SE (n = 3), and different letters on the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4The relative expression levels of eight GST genes in six L. striatellus populations from Shandong Province compared with SS (red dotted line means 2-fold overexpression level). The data are the mean ± SE (n = 3), and different letters on the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
The nAChR β1 subunit gene mutation sites and frequency in six L. striatellus populations from Shandong Province.
| Population | Insects | Frequency of Mutation Site | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| V62I | R81T | K265E | ||
| Donggang | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tancheng | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yutai | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jiaxiang | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daiyue | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jiyang | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SS | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |