| Literature DB >> 36135278 |
Carlos Arrieta-Durango1, Luis Henao-Rivas1, Ricardo Andrade-Pizarro1.
Abstract
In this work, the rheological behavior of passion fruit peel extract was determined at different temperatures (5-40 °C) and peel content in the extract (40-55% w/w). The extract was obtained after blanching the passion fruit peels at 95 °C for 5 min, then they were crushed to reduce their size, water was added, and finally, they were subjected to liquefaction and subsequent filtration. Rheological measurements were made using a rheometer with a plate and plate geometry. Extract samples were adequately described by the power-law model exhibiting pseudoplastic behavior, without the presence of thixotropy. The temperature did not influence the flow behavior index, but the consistency coefficient did. The dynamic study (the temperature sweep test) showed that passion fruit peel extract exhibits a more elastic than viscous behavior, typical of a gel.Entities:
Keywords: apparent viscosity; elastic behavior; pseudoplastic; rheology
Year: 2022 PMID: 36135278 PMCID: PMC9498797 DOI: 10.3390/gels8090566
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gels ISSN: 2310-2861
Figure 1Rheograms of the passion fruit peel extracts at different temperatures. (a) 5 °C, (b) 10 °C, (c) 25 °C, and (d) 40 °C.
Oswald–De Waele model rheological parameters (k and n) of passion fruit peel extracts.
| Peel Content in the Extract, | T, °C | k, Pa sn | n | Thixotropy, % | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 | 5 | 23.90 ± 2.45 | 0.261 ± 0.006 | 2.45 ± 0.05 | 0.995 |
| 10 | 24.35 ± 2.62 | 0.252 ± 0.007 | 1.03 ± 0.01 | 0.996 | |
| 25 | 19.14 ± 0.61 | 0.237 ± 0.009 | 1.74 ± 0.02 | 0.996 | |
| 40 | 17.10 ± 2.39 | 0.230 ± 0.011 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.997 | |
| 45 | 5 | 24.10 ± 2.07 | 0.250 ± 0.031 | 2.36 ± 0.01 | 0.996 |
| 10 | 25.72 ± 2.85 | 0.277 ± 0.008 | 1.65 ± 0.02 | 0.996 | |
| 25 | 20.94 ± 2.86 | 0.222 ± 0.015 | 0.84 ± 0.01 | 0.996 | |
| 40 | 17.51 ± 1.90 | 0.261 ± 0.003 | 1.51 ± 0.01 | 0.996 | |
| 50 | 5 | 29.85 ± 2.49 | 0.245 ± 0.011 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.996 |
| 10 | 29.47 ± 1.49 | 0.236 ± 0.016 | 1.22 ± 0.01 | 0.996 | |
| 25 | 23.36 ± 1.17 | 0.287 ± 0.004 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.995 | |
| 40 | 22.97 ± 2.93 | 0.235 ± 0.007 | 1.72 ± 0.02 | 0.996 | |
| 55 | 5 | 39.10 ± 3.16 | 0.228 ± 0.016 | 2.55 ± 0.03 | 0.996 |
| 10 | 38.47 ± 1.53 | 0.023 ± 0.017 | 0.65 ± 0.02 | 0.996 | |
| 25 | 35.60 ± 3.23 | 0.263 ± 0.017 | 1.05 ± 0.01 | 0.998 | |
| 40 | 31.33 ± 2.12 | 0.240 ± 0.006 | 0.51 ± 0.01 | 0.995 |
Arrhenius model for consistency coefficient of passion fruit peel extracts.
| Peel Content in the Extract, | k0, Pa sn | Ea, J mol−1 K−1 | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 0.87 ± 0.15 | 7714.8 ± 0.8 | 0.944 |
| 10 | 1.03 ± 2.62 | 7423.1 ± 0.7 | 0.878 |
| 25 | 2.08 ± 0.61 | 6163.7 ± 0.9 | 0.901 |
| 40 | 5.55 ± 2.39 | 4545.0 ± 0.01 | 0.966 |
Figure 2Temperature dependences of storage modulus (G′) and loss modulus (G″) for the passion fruit peel extract.