Literature DB >> 36134912

Diversity of Endophytic Yeasts from Agricultural Fruits Positive for Phytohormone IAA Production.

Aleksey Kachalkin1,2, Anna Glushakova1,3, Rostislav Streletskii1.   

Abstract

This study reports the diversity of cultivable endophytic yeasts from agricultural fruits that respond positively to the plant-promoting property of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production. The IAA synthesis by the strains was quantified with an Agilent 1100 series liquid chromatography system. IAA was present in the culture liquid of 72% of all 97 strains examined after three days of cultivation. The most active endophytic yeast strains in this study belonged to the species Aureobasidium pullulans, Candida zeylanoides, Hanseniaspora uvarum, Metschnikowia pulcherrima, Meyerozyma caribbica, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, and Yarrowia galli. The highest IAA production was observed in the endophytic strain of A. pullulans (9109.19 ± 146.02 μg/g). No significant differences were found between IAA production in strains from agricultural products of different countries. However, the level of IAA production was strictly strain-specific. Our results suggest that the internal tissues of fruits may be a promising source for the isolation of plant-beneficial yeasts that can be used to promote plant growth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IAA; endophytic yeasts; fruits; plant beneficial trait

Year:  2022        PMID: 36134912      PMCID: PMC9497158          DOI: 10.3390/biotech11030038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BioTech (Basel)        ISSN: 2673-6284


1. Introduction

Endophytic yeasts are one of the most promising areas in the study of microbe–plant associations. Plants and yeasts, developing within their internal tissues, together form a single symbiotic system that serves as an excellent model for studying fundamental questions of ecology and evolution, as well as for addressing a number of modern practical questions in agriculture. One of these current practical questions is the search for plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs) in the diverse range of endophytic yeasts in agriculturally important plants, for example, those that produce phytohormones such as auxins, cytokinins, etc. [1,2,3,4,5]. The effects of strains producing important phytohormones are often responsible for the microbial stimulation of germination, growth and development of higher plants [6,7]. Although many indole compounds in the auxin series have biological activity, IAA is the most potent, widely used and studied in nature. For example, the ascomycete yeasts Cyberlindnera saturnus (ex. Williopsis saturnus) isolated from the roots of maize could also produce IAA and stimulate growth processes in the plant [8]. Basidiomycete yeasts, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, isolated from poplar and willow were able to produce IAA, which can also promote the growth of some important crops such as corn, tomato, pepper, squash, sunflower, and grasses under nitrogen stress [9]. Thai researchers have extensively studied the phytohormonal activity of epiphytic and endophytic yeasts associated with sugarcane, rice, and other tropical crops. Screening studies indicate a widespread ability of endophytic yeasts to synthesize IAA. The strain dependence of the intensity of the manifestation of this trait is highlighted [6,10,11]. The strain dependence of this trait for the ascomycete yeast Aureobasidium pullulans isolated from the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of Drosera spatulata is also supported by the results of the study conducted by Taiwanese researchers [12]. The authors also tested the effect of IAA-active strains on the growth of tobacco seedlings (Nicotiana benthamiana). It was found that the most active IAA producers stimulated the growth of lateral roots, root hairs, increase in the amount of chlorophyll, elongation of the stem and increase in the number of leaves. No significant effect was found on root length. Studies on endophytic yeasts and their phytohormonal activity have been actively conducted for some time and show extremely interesting results [13,14,15,16]. However, they are usually limited to a small sample of strains or a narrow range of plants. In a study of 24 yeast strains from corn roots, 10 strains were able to produce IAA after one week of cultivation [8]. Of the seven yeast strains from mandarins, only four could be reliably confirmed to produce IAA [17]. In another study with endophytic yeasts from mandarins, the activity was detected in all eight strains [18]. In a study with yeasts from grapevine, 67 of the 69 strains were shown to be able to synthesize IAA both without the addition of tryptophan and with this precursor [19]. This prompted us to conduct a large-scale study on the IAA-producing capabilities of endophytic yeast strains isolated from the inner tissues of fruits derived from different countries and to evaluate the potential contribution of endophytic yeasts to stimulate plant growth.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Location and Sampling

A study on the synthesis of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) was carried out for a sample of 97 endophytic yeast strains isolated from fruits of different production purchased from trade networks in the Moscow region (Argentina, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Brazil, China, Chile, Dominican Republic, Egypt, Georgia, Iran, Israel, Kenya, Moldova, Peru, Russia, Serbia, Spain, Turkey, Uzbekistan and Vietnam).

2.2. Microbiological Analyses and Species Identification

To study endophytic yeast communities in 2019–2020, fruits were treated according to the following scheme: 70% ethanol, 30 min; 2% sodium hypochlorite, 30 min; 70% ethanol, 30 s; and washing in sterile distilled water for 10 min [20,21]. After the exocarp was removed with a sterile scalpel, the inner tissue was excised, homogenized, and poured with sterile water to obtain a 1:10 dilution. The suspensions were vortexed on a Multi Reax Vortexer (Heidolph Instruments, Germany) for 15 min at 2000 rpm. Three suspensions were prepared for each fruit. The prepared suspensions were plated in three replicates each on glucose-peptone-yeast extract (GPY) agar (20 g/L glucose, 10 g/L peptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L agar) supplemented with chloramphenicol (500 mg/L) to prevent bacterial growth. A total of 3318 plates were incubated at 22 °C for 5–7 days. The grown yeast colonies were classified into morphological types using a dissecting microscope and the number of colonies of each type was counted. From 5 to 7 colonies of each morphotype were isolated in a pure culture. Purified yeast strains were cryopreserved in 10% (v/v) glycerol in water solution at −80 °C in the yeast collection of the Soil Biology Department at Lomonosov Moscow State University (WDCM 1173). Identification of yeast species was based on the ITS rDNA nucleotide sequence. DNA isolation and PCR were performed according to the procedure described previously [22]. DNA sequencing was performed using the Big Dye Terminator V3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) with subsequent analysis of the reaction products on an Applied Biosystems 3130xl Genetic Analyzer at the facilities of Evrogen (Moscow, Russia). For sequencing, the ITS5 primer (5’-GGA AGT AAA AGT CGT AAC AAG G) was used [22]. For species identification, nucleotide sequences were compared with those in public databases, using the BLAST NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed on 7 July 2022)) and the MycoID (www.mycobank.org (accessed on 7 July 2022)) tools. The resulting sequences have been deposited in NCBI (GenBank OP216812-OP216908). The ITS regions of the strains studied were 99.5–100% similar to the type strains. Endophytic strains of 17 yeast species commonly occurring in fruits were examined: Aureobasidium pullulans (8 strains); Candida parapsilosis (4 strains); Candida zeylanoides (7 strains); Debaryomyces fabryi (8 strains), Debaryomyces hansenii (8 strains), Filobasidium magnum (3 strains), Filobasidium wieringae (4 strains), Hanseniaspora uvarum (7 strains), Metschnikowia pulcherrima (9 strains), Meyerozyma caribbica (7 strains), Meyerozyma guilliermondii (5 strains), Rhodotorula babjevae (6 strains), Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (8 strains), Yarrowia deformans (4 strains), Yarrowia divulgata (3 strains), Yarrowia galli (3 strains), Yarrowia lipolytica (3 strains). Information on the strains examined is presented in Table 1. A full list of the yeasts isolated in the work has been published previously [23].
Table 1

IAA production (with standard deviations) of studied strains and information about it.

Strain KBPSpeciesPhylumCountry of OriginSubstrateIAA, mg/LIAA, μg/g
YE-0002 Candida zeylanoides ASC *Turkeynectarine--
YE-0007 Debaryomyces hansenii ASCTurkeynectarine--
YE-0013 Metschnikowia pulcherrima ASCTurkeycherry0.1 ± 0.0115.85 ± 2.16
YE-0017 Debaryomyces hansenii ASCIranpepper0.01 ± 0.001.09 ± 0.24
YE-0024 Hanseniaspora uvarum ASCRussiagooseberry--
YE-0031 Metschnikowia pulcherrima ASCRussiaapple0.07 ± 0.0117.15 ± 2.51
YE-0034 Filobasidium wieringae BASTurkeycherry--
YE-0043 Hanseniaspora uvarum ASCIrangrapes0.05 ± 0.017.53 ± 1.25
YE-0045 Meyerozyma caribbica ASCBrazilmango0.29 ± 0.2440.24 ± 33.14
YE-0053 Filobasidium wieringae BASMoldovacherry0.03 ± 0.0021.32 ± 1.15
YE-0058 Yarrowia galli ASCRussiaapple0.11 ± 0.0017.85 ± 0.03
YE-0061 Yarrowia galli ASCArgentinaapple--
YE-0065 Rhodotorula babjevae BASRussiaapple0.08 ± 0.0016.08 ± 0.00
YE-0066 Rhodotorula babjevae BASArgentinaapple0.05 ± 0.008.78 ± 0.89
YE-0067 Yarrowia lipolytica ASCRussiaapple--
YE-0068 Yarrowia galli ASCTurkeyapple0.63 ± 0.02100.60 ± 4.75
YE-0069 Filobasidium wieringae BASRussiaapple0.06 ± 0.017.86 ± 1.30
YE-0070 Hanseniaspora uvarum ASCRussiaapple0.11 ± 0.0325.34 ± 3.90
YE-0071 Yarrowia divulgata ASCRussiaapple--
YE-0072 Candida zeylanoides ASCChileapple0.08 ± 0.0137.57 ± 1.66
YE-0073 Candida zeylanoides ASCRussiaapple--
YE-0074 Rhodotorula mucilaginosa BASRussiaapple0.54 ± 0.0991.74 ± 13.51
YE-0079 Candida zeylanoides ASCRussiaapple--
YE-0080 Yarrowia lipolytica ASCRussiaapple0.08 ± 0.0112.35 ± 1.08
YE-0081 Yarrowia divulgata ASCRussiagooseberry0.08 ± 0.0114.85 ± 3.00
YE-0086 Yarrowia lipolytica ASCRussiaapple0.26 ± 0.0544.61 ± 7.70
YE-0093 Yarrowia deformans ASCRussiaapple0.31 ± 0.0658.33 ± 11.56
YE-0106 Hanseniaspora uvarum ASCRussiaapple0.04 ± 0.0012.94 ± 0.03
YE-0114 Yarrowia divulgata ASCRussiagooseberry0.03 ± 0.004.15 ± 0.14
YE-0118 Candida parapsilosis ASCRussiabeet0.03 ± 0.017.63 ± 3.10
YE-0119 Yarrowia deformans ASCRussiaapple--
YE-0120 Rhodotorula babjevae BASRussiabeet--
YE-0122 Candida parapsilosis ASCRussiaapple0.01 ± 0.005.97 ± 0.38
YE-0125 Yarrowia deformans ASCBelaruspepper0.02 ± 0.003.31 ± 0.06
YE-0128 Yarrowia deformans ASCEgypttangerine0.02 ± 0.003.85 ± 0.05
YE-0130 Meyerozyma guilliermondii ASCEgypttangerine0.02 ± 0.003.41 ± 0.19
YE-0131 Candida zeylanoides ASCRussiaapple0.06 ± 0.007.67 ± 0.13
YE-0133 Filobasidium magnum BASRussiaapple0.18 ± 0.0241.04 ± 4.55
YE-0139 Metschnikowia pulcherrima ASCRussiaapple--
YE-0151 Debaryomyces hansenii ASCSpaintangerine0.15 ± 0.0138.44 ± 2.23
YE-0159 Metschnikowia pulcherrima ASCRussiaquince0.22 ± 0.03366.21 ± 24.36
YE-0164 Rhodotorula mucilaginosa BASSerbiaplum0.04 ± 0.005.86 ± 0.78
YE-0166 Rhodotorula mucilaginosa BASRussiaapple0.04 ± 0.007.9 ± 0.41
YE-0177 Rhodotorula mucilaginosa BASRussiapea0.03 ± 0.006.1 ± 0.05
YE-0179 Meyerozyma caribbica ASCDominican Republiccoconut0.51 ± 0.0671.42 ± 7.22
YE-0180 Debaryomyces hansenii ASCRussiatomato0.13 ± 0.0123.76 ± 0.2
YE-0204 Meyerozyma caribbica ASCIrankiwi0.02 ± 0.003.13 ± 0.08
YE-0205 Rhodotorula mucilaginosa BASIrankiwi0.05 ± 0.0111.35 ± 1.79
YE-0214 Debaryomyces hansenii ASCRussiapepper--
YE-0216 Hanseniaspora uvarum ASCRussiaapple--
YE-0217 Candida zeylanoides ASCRussiaapple--
YE-0220 Rhodotorula babjevae BASRussiacarrot--
YE-0221 Filobasidium wieringae BASRussiatomato0.04 ± 0.019.09 ± 0.86
YE-0230 Filobasidium magnum BASIsraelpersimmon0.12 ± 0.0233.42 ± 5.34
YE-0242 Aureobasidium pullulans ASCPerumango0.75 ± 0.05736.80 ± 37.48
YE-0250 Metschnikowia pulcherrima ASCRussiastrawberry0.05 ± 0.0160.11 ± 9.85
YE-0256 Aureobasidium pullulans ASCSerbiacherry0.11 ± 0.0319.35 ± 4.5
YE-0260 Aureobasidium pullulans ASCTurkeyapricot0.43 ± 0.02319.26 ± 7.01
YE-0269 Aureobasidium pullulans ASCPerumango0.06 ± 0.0610.33 ± 10.33
YE-0270 Aureobasidium pullulans ASCTurkeyapricot0.04 ± 0.005.84 ± 0.61
YE-0282 Filobasidium magnum BASTurkeygrapes0.02 ± 0.004.48 ± 1.00
YE-0289 Aureobasidium pullulans ASCRussiacurrants0.08 ± 0.0113.74 ± 1.30
YE-0299 Rhodotorula babjevae BASRussiaapple0.09 ± 0.0027.32 ± 0.84
YE-0302 Hanseniaspora uvarum ASCRussiaapple--
YE-0303 Metschnikowia pulcherrima ASCRussiaapple0.57 ± 0,01163.87 ± 38.82
YE-0310 Hanseniaspora uvarum ASCAzerbaijanpersimmon0.06 ± 0.0196.13 ± 4.20
YE-0316 Metschnikowia pulcherrima ASCIsraelpersimmon0.07 ± 0.0113.97 ± 1.54
YE-0337 Candida zeylanoides ASCAzerbaijanpersimmon1.32 ± 0.21176.43 ± 30.64
YE-0347 Debaryomyces hansenii ASCGeorgiapistachios--
YE-0367 Candida parapsilosis ASCVietnambanana--
YE-0503 Meyerozyma caribbica ASCVietnamjackfruit0.1 ± 0.0114.55 ± 1.55
YE-0623 Candida parapsilosis ASCVietnampassion fruit--
YE-0625 Meyerozyma caribbica ASCVietnampassion fruit0.05 ± 0.017.82 ± 1.46
YE-0652 Metschnikowia pulcherrima ASCVietnamtangerine0.03 ± 0.004.49 ± 0.08
YE-0672 Debaryomyces fabryi ASCRussiawalnut--
YE-0676 Debaryomyces fabryi ASCEgypttangerine0.03 ± 0.005.14 ± 0.37
YE-0678 Debaryomyces fabryi ASCChileapple--
YE-0680 Debaryomyces fabryi ASCChilekiwi0.07 ± 0.0115.56 ± 1.96
YE-0681 Debaryomyces fabryi ASCTurkeygrapes0.03 ± 0.004.45 ± 0.15
YE-0684 Debaryomyces fabryi ASCGeorgiapeanuts0.04 ± 0.018.95 ± 2.24
YE-0688 Debaryomyces fabryi ASCTurkeytomato0.04 ± 0.017.83 ± 1.91
YE-0700 Meyerozyma guilliermondii ASCEgyptorange0.07 ± 0.029.2 ± 2.02
YE-0712 Meyerozyma guilliermondii ASCEgyptorange0.15 ± 0.0228.57 ± 5.10
YE-0713 Debaryomyces fabryi ASCSpaintangerine--
YE-0718 Debaryomyces hansenii ASCSpaintangerine--
YE-0719 Debaryomyces hansenii ASCTurkeyapple0.11 ± 0.0021.71 ± 0.53
YE-0721 Rhodotorula babjevae BASTurkeyapple0.47 ± 0.0645.29 ± 3.94
YE-0722 Meyerozyma guilliermondii ASCVietnamlongan0.06 ± 0.0111.56 ± 0.95
YE-0725 Metschnikowia pulcherrima ASCVietnampassion fruit--
YE-0728 Meyerozyma guilliermondii ASCVietnamlongan0.07 ± 0.0018.87 ± 0.00
YE-0735 Meyerozyma caribbica ASCVietnamguava--
YE-0878 Meyerozyma caribbica ASCIranwatermelon--
YE-0882 Rhodotorula mucilaginosa BASIranmelon0.05 ± 0.009.87 ± 0.51
YE-0959 Rhodotorula mucilaginosa BASIsraelwatermelon0.03 ± 0.005.5 ± 0.18
YE-0967 Rhodotorula mucilaginosa BASIsraelwatermelon0.61 ± 0.0894.98 ± 19.35
YE-0979 Aureobasidium pullulans ASCIsraelcress14.96 ± 1.739109.19 ± 146.02
YE-1002 Aureobasidium pullulans ASCUzbekistanparsley0.05 ± 0.0511.98 ± 11.98

* ASC—Ascomycota; BAS—Basidiomycota.

2.3. Synthesis of IAA

For IAA synthesis, yeasts were cultured in a liquid medium for 72 h at 22 °C using a Heidolph shaker. An aliquot of 100 µL of the yeast suspension (OD595) was added to 20 mL of liquid medium. The medium for culturing the yeasts contained 6.7 g of nitrogenous base (Fluka) and 10 g of glucose per 1 L of water with the addition of tryptophan (1 g/L). Sample preparation for the determination of IAA: 20 mL of the culture liquid was acidified to pH = 3 with hydrochloric acid and placed in a 100 mL separatory funnel, to which 20 mL of ethyl acetate [24] was added and shaken vigorously for 1 min. The aqueous phase was then drained and subjected to this procedure again, and the organic phase was placed in a 100 mL evaporation flask. The re-extracted aqueous phase was drained and a new portion of the organic phase was poured into the same flask. The funnel was then washed with 10 mL of ethyl acetate, which was also poured into the flask. The extract was concentrated on a rotary evaporator (50 rpm) to a final volume of ≤0.5 mL [25]. The resulting concentrate was transferred to a 1.5 mL chromatography vial, and 0.5 mL of acetonitrile was added to the evaporation flask and placed in an ultrasonic bath for 1 min to separate the IAA from the flask walls. The acetonitrile from the flask was also transferred to the vial. Then, 0.5 mL of acetonitrile was again added to the flask and the treatment was repeated. If necessary, the contents of the vial were made up to 1.5 mL of acetonitrile. Quantification of IAA was performed using an Agilent 1100 series high performance liquid chromatograph with UV detector. A Security Guard Catridges C18 4 ×3.0 mm precolumn and a Diasfer 110-C18 5 µm 4.0 × 250 mm analytical HPLC column were used. The detection wavelength was 222 nm. Flow rate of the eluent—1.0 mL/min. Mobile phase—water, acetonitrile, 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid (45:54:1% v/v). The volume of the injected sample was 10 µL. The temperature of the column thermostat was 25 °C. The analysis was performed for 18 min. Solutions of the standard substance indole-3-acetic acid (DiaM) in acetonitrile were used to calibrate the instrument. IAA produced by yeasts was expressed as per liter and per gram of dry biomass. Calibration was performed in six steps (Figure 1). The correlation coefficient r > 0.995. The biomass was used to calculate the specific auxin concentration [26,27]. For each strain, the study was repeated twice.
Figure 1

Calibration curve for standard solutions of IAA.

2.4. Data Analyses

Statistical data processing and graphical presentation of the obtained results were carried out using Excel 2010 (Microsoft, Albuquerque, NM, USA) and Statistica 8.0 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA) programs. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out for groups comparison. Statistical significance was judged at the level of p < 0.05.

3. Results

Indole-3-acetic acid was present in the culture liquid of 69 (72% of all strains examined) of the 97 endophytic yeast strains studied after three days of cultivation (Table 1). This value of active strains differs from the data we previously obtained for non-endophytic yeast strains from different natural substrates. At that time, the percentage of active strains was 92% [27,28]. The observed differences can be explained by the different approaches used in the analysis: in the current study, the determination of indole-3-acetic acid in the culture liquid was performed without the step of pre-concentration and the minimum values of IAA synthesis were not considered. In addition, we were interested in the rapid response of the yeasts and the ability to produce IAA in significant amounts. However, it is known that for some strains the maximum concentration of IAA in the culture liquid is reached only on day 5–7 [17]. The results we obtained for strains of the most abundant yeast species in agricultural products show that all yeast species studied are capable of synthesizing IAAs, but the extent of production is strictly strain-specific (Table 2 and Figure 2).
Table 2

Proportion of active strains of the studied endophytic yeast species and average IAA production (with standard deviations) in the culture liquid and per unit biomass.

Yeast SpeciesProportion (%) of Strains Starting to Synthesize IAA after 72 hIAA, mg/LIAA, μg/g Dry Biomass
Aureobasidium pullulans 1002.06 ± 1.271278.31 ± 766.88
Candida parapsilosis 500.01 ± 0.013.40 ± 1.43
Candida zeylanoides 42.90.22 ± 0.1434.10 ± 18.25
Debaryomyces fabryi 62.50.03 ± 0.015.24 ± 1.36
Debaryomyces hansenii 500.05 ± 0.0210.62 ± 3.67
Filobasidium magnum 1000.11 ± 0.0326.31 ± 7.28
Filobasidium wieringae 750.03 ± 0.019.56 ± 2.91
Hanseniaspora uvarum 57.10.04 ± 0.0120.28 ± 8.93
Metschnikowia pulcherrima 77.80.12 ± 0.0471.29 ± 28.21
Meyerozyma caribbica 71.40.14 ± 0.0619.59 ± 7.75
Meyerozyma guilliermondii 1000.07 ± 0.0213.82 ± 3.32
Rhodotorula babjevae 66.70.14 ± 0.0619.87 ± 5.88
Rhodotorula mucilaginosa 1000.18 ± 0.0629.16 ± 9.83
Yarrowia deformans 750.09 ± 0.0516.37 ± 9.43
Yarrowia divulgata 66.70.04 ± 0.027.60 ± 3.20
Yarrowia galli 66.70.25 ± 0.1239.49 ± 19.64
Yarrowia lipolytica 66.70.12 ± 0.0518.99 ± 8.65
Figure 2

IAA production by the strains of the studied yeast species (logarithmic scale).

Maximum IAA production (9109.2 μg/g) was found in strain A. pullulans (YE-0979) Strains of this species are regularly cited as the most active producers of IAA in various studies [12,29]. In our previous study on the phytohormonal activity of non-endophytic yeasts, we found the maximum IAA production (7990.4 µg/g) in strain Metschnikowia pulcherrima Y-5623 [27]. In this study, the endophytic strains of this ascomycetous yeast species also showed high IAA activity. A comparison of the yeast groupings studied, such as Phylum and Origin, showed no statistically significant results. It is most likely that the ability of endophytic yeast to synthesize IAA is determined by the nature of the strains.

4. Discussion

It is widely recognized that endophytic yeasts have an excellent ability to promote plant growth, which can be a boon to agricultural practices. This ability of endophytic yeasts is based on their ability to secrete bioactive compounds such as auxins, gibberellins, siderophores [30,31]. The production of plant hormones provides a direct method of promoting plant growth by endophytes. Auxins and gibberellins have many growth-promoting properties in plants, including promotion of root growth and stem elongation and, more broadly, cell proliferation and elongation. IAA has also been shown to play a role in controlling fungal diseases [31,32]. In particular, the production of IAA by endophytic yeasts has been reported and discussed in detail by several groups [5,8,30]. Our screening of strains from the internal tissues of fruits from different countries shows that more than 70% of endophytic yeast strains produce a significant amount of IAA relatively quickly, i.e., within the first 72 h after cultivation. No significant differences were found between the production of IAA by strains from agricultural products from different countries (Table 1). However, our previous studies have shown that tropical strains of ascomycete yeasts have significantly higher phytohormonal activity compared to strains from other regions [27,28]. Our results suggest that endophytic yeast complexes from the internal tissues of fruits may be a promising source of plant-beneficial yeast strains that can be used to promote plant growth. The isolation of an opportunistic yeast species, Candida parapsilosis, deserves separate consideration. The studied endophytic strains of this species showed the lowest IAA synthesis property. Previously, we detected C. parapsilosis yeasts in high abundance in the internal tissues of ripe fruits of apples and pears growing in conditions of high anthropogenic stress [22,23]. Most likely, opportunistic yeasts belong to the species contaminating agricultural products. This is indirectly indicated by their weak ability to synthesize the phytohormone IAA. IAA biosynthesis by endophytic yeasts from different fruits is highly strain-specific. Further detailed studies are planned to investigate the multiple factors affecting gene expression of IAA biosynthesis to varying degrees at both species and strain levels.
  21 in total

1.  [Yeasts Candida railenensis from acorns of Quercus robur L].

Authors:  O V Isaeva; A M Glushakova; A M Iurkov; I Iu Chernov
Journal:  Mikrobiologiia       Date:  2009 May-Jun

2.  Plant Growth Substances Produced by Azospirillum brasilense and Their Effect on the Growth of Pearl Millet (Pennisetum americanum L.).

Authors:  T M Tien; M H Gaskins; D H Hubbell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Endophytic yeasts and filamentous fungi associated with southern Brazilian apple (Malus domestica) orchards subjected to conventional, integrated or organic cultivation.

Authors:  Valdirene Camatti-Sartori; Rute Terezinha da Silva-Ribeiro; Rosa Maria Valdebenito-Sanhueza; Fernando Carlos Pagnocca; Sérgio Echeverrigaray; João Lúcio Azevedo
Journal:  J Basic Microbiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.281

4.  Plant growth-promoting traits of yeasts isolated from Spanish vineyards: benefits for seedling development.

Authors:  A Fernandez-San Millan; I Farran; L Larraya; M Ancin; L M Arregui; J Veramendi
Journal:  Microbiol Res       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 5.415

5.  Plant growth-promoting traits of epiphytic and endophytic yeasts isolated from rice and sugar cane leaves in Thailand.

Authors:  Pumin Nutaratat; Nantana Srisuk; Panarat Arunrattiyakorn; Savitree Limtong
Journal:  Fungal Biol       Date:  2014-05-10

6.  Identification of Novel Endophytic Yeast Strains from Tangerine Peel.

Authors:  Lijun Ling; Zibin Li; Zhenglong Jiao; Xi Zhang; Wenxia Ma; Juanjuan Feng; Ji Zhang; Lu Lu
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 7.  A potentially important resource: endophytic yeasts.

Authors:  Lijun Ling; Yixin Tu; Wenxia Ma; Shenglai Feng; Caiyun Yang; Yunhua Zhao; Nan Wang; Zibin Li; Lu Lu; Ji Zhang
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Endophytic Yeasts in Malus domestica and Pyrus communis Fruits under Anthropogenic Impact.

Authors:  A M Glushakova; A V Kachalkin
Journal:  Mikrobiologiia       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

9.  Yeasts producing zeatin.

Authors:  Rostislav A Streletskii; Aleksey V Kachalkin; Anna M Glushakova; Andrey M Yurkov; Vladimir V Demin
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Auxin as a player in the biocontrol of Fusarium head blight disease of barley and its potential as a disease control agent.

Authors:  Carloalberto Petti; Kathrin Reiber; Shahin S Ali; Margaret Berney; Fiona M Doohan
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 4.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.