| Literature DB >> 36134911 |
Natália Santana Carvalho1, Luiggi Cavalcanti Pessôa1,2, Kricelle Mosquera Deamici3, Jania Betânia Alves da Silva1,4, Fernanda Aleluia de Souza Parga5, Carolina Oliveira de Souza6, Pedro Paulo Lordelo Guimarães Tavares6, Denilson de Jesus Assis1,7.
Abstract
Microalgae lipids offer numerous advantages over those of plants and animals, enabling the sustainable commercialization of high value-added products in different markets. Although these markets are in a vertiginous annual expansion, technological life cycle modeling is a tool that has been rarely used for microalgae. Life cycle modeling is capable of assisting with decision-making based on data and is considered as a versatile model, usable in multiple software analyzing and diagnostic tasks. Modeling technological trends makes it possible to categorize the development level of the market and predict phase changes, reducing uncertainties and increasing investments. This study aims to fill this gap by performing a global analysis and modeling of microalgal lipid innovations. The Espacenet and Orbit platforms were used by crossing the keywords "microalgae", "lipid*", and the IPC code C12 (biochemistry and microbiology). Different sigmoid growth models were used in the present study. A successive repetition of the Chlorella genus category was found in the keyword clusters regarding extraction and separation of lipids. The life cycle S curve indicates a market starting at the maturity phase, where the BiDoseResp model stands out. The main countries and institutions at the technological forefront are shown, as well as potential technological domains for opening new markets.Entities:
Keywords: mathematical models; patents; technological prospecting
Year: 2022 PMID: 36134911 PMCID: PMC9496988 DOI: 10.3390/biotech11030037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BioTech (Basel) ISSN: 2673-6284
Figure 1Illustrative scheme of the methodological steps performed. Image created with BioRender. * Truncation symbol representing the sequence of characters of any length.
Search strategy based on patent documents.
| Keywords | Codes | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microalgae | Lipid * | C12 1 | C12R 2 | |
| X | X | 4027 | ||
| X | X | 1472 | ||
| X | X | 347 | ||
| X | X | X | 110 | |
| X | X | X | 274 | |
1 Biochemistry, microbiology, enzymology, mutation and genetic engineering. 2 Processes involving microorganisms. * Truncation symbol representing the sequence of characters of any length. X: Symbol to indicate the codes and keywords used in the combinations.
Figure 2Distribution of patent documents by classification codes.
Figure 3Technological domains involved in the prospected codes. The numbers show the quantity of documents in each technological domain.
Figure 4Number of documents by applications. “N.O” refers to unspecified.
Figure 5Number of documents by years.
Adjustment of the accumulated number of documents to sigmoid growth models.
| Model | F-Value | R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BoltzIV | 11,042.05 | <0.01 | 0.9990 |
| DoseResp | 14,390.94 | <0.01 | 0.9992 |
| BiDoseResp | 15,665.72 | <0.01 | 0.9996 |
| Logistic | 14,490.49 | <0.01 | 0.9992 |
| Gompertz | 7888.21 | <0.01 | 0.9981 |
| Richards | 42.11 | <0.01 | 0.7767 |
Figure 6The technological trend of microalgae lipids.
BiDoseResp model parameters for technological trend of microalgae lipids.
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value | 2.873 | 287.162 | 2005.952 | 2013.171 | 0.389 | 0.193 | −0.062 |
| Standard error | 0.617 | 3.201 | 0.187 | 0.138 | 0.205 | 0.01 | 0.035 |
| R2 | 0.9996 | ||||||
Figure 7Typical S-curve of the life cycle of technologies. Source: Adapted from Taylor and Taylor [39].
Figure 8Distribution of patent filings by country. EP: European Patent Office; WO: World Intellectual Property Organization. Created with flourish.studio [43].
Figure 9Top ten applicants for documents in relation to microalgae lipids.
Figure 10Number of documents by institutions.
Figure 11Interaction networks between the main depositors and their respective institutions. The numbers represent the quantity of interactions of the main depositors.
Figure 12Clusters of the most repeated keywords in the document portfolio.