| Literature DB >> 36133981 |
Aditya Dileep Kurdekar1, Chelli Sai Manohar2, L A Avinash Chunduri3, Mohan Kumar Haleyurgirisetty4, Indira K Hewlett4, Venkataramaniah Kamisetti1.
Abstract
Nanoparticle based sensors are good alternatives for non-enzymatic sensing applications due to their high stability, superior photoluminescence, biocompatibility and ease of fabrication, with the only disadvantage being the cost of the synthesis process (owing to the expensive precursors and infrastructure). For the first time, we report the design of an immunosensor employing streptavidin conjugated copper nanocluster, developed at a much lower cost compared to other nanomaterials like noble metal nanoparticles and quantum dots. Using in silico tools, we have tried to establish the dynamics of conjugation of nanocluster to the streptavidin protein, based on EDC-NHS coupling. The computational simulations have successfully explained the crucial role played by the components of the immunosensor leading to an efficient design capable of high sensitivity. In order to demonstrate the functioning of the Copper Nanocluster ImmunoSensor (CuNIS), HIV-1 p24 biomarker test was chosen as the model assay. The immunosensor was able to achieve an analytical limit of detection of 23.8 pg mL-1 for HIV-1 p24 with a linear dynamic range of 27-1000 pg mL-1. When tested with clinical plasma samples, CuNIS based p24 assay showed 100% specificity towards HIV-1 p24. With the capability of multiplexed detection and a cost of fabrication 100 times lower than that of the conventional metal nanoclusters, CuNIS has the potential to be an essential low-cost diagnostic tool in resource-limited settings. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 36133981 PMCID: PMC9419792 DOI: 10.1039/c9na00503j
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Adv ISSN: 2516-0230
Scheme 1Schematic illustration of the reaction pathway involved in EDC-NHS activation of glutathione functionalized copper nanoclusters.
Comparison of free energies of formation of various species involved in the EDC-NHS activation of copper nanoclusters
| Process steps | Δ | Δ | Δ | Δ | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | 44.47 | 42.367 | 43.204 | 954.901 | 835.448 |
| Cu | 26.93 | 15.762 | 16.69 | 901.957 | 896.757 |
| Cu | 46.307 | 23.112 | 23.92 | 863.514 | 825.632 |
| Energy gain (step 2) | 19.377 | 7.35 | 7.23 | −38.443 | −71.125 |
| Net energy gain (step 1 + step 2) | −25.09 | −35.02 | −35.974 | −993.34 | −906.57 |
Fig. 1Comparison of the best docked poses for the different sized Cu-gluta-NHS clusters with the streptavidin protein for varying cluster sizes of (a) Cu1 (b) Cu6 (c) Cu13 (d) Cu20 (e) Cu57 as determined by HEX.
Binding affinity of the various copper clusters towards streptavidin as obtained from the molecular docking studies using HEX
| Ligand | Cu1 | Cu6 | Cu13 | Cu20 | Cu57 |
| Hex docking score | −276.49 | −275.59 | −301.06 | −344.62 | −388.80 |
Effect of the number of glutathione molecules attached to the nanocluster surface on the binding affinity of CuNC towards streptavidin
| No of glutathione tails | HEX docking score |
|---|---|
| Cu13-glutathione-NHS | −317.76 |
| Cu13-2 glutathione-NHS | −388.24 |
| Cu13-4 glutathione-NHS | −301.06 |
| Cu13-6 glutathione-NHS | −344.62 |
Binding affinity of copper nanoclusters towards streptavidin in the presence and absence of glutathione
| Nanocluster | Binding affinity in absence of glutathione-NHS tail (kcal mol−1) | Binding affinity in presence of glutathione-NHS (kcal mol−1) |
|---|---|---|
| Cu1 | −37.70 | −276.49 |
| Cu6 | −114.95 | −275.59 |
| Cu13 | −137.85 | −301.06 |
| Cu20 | −185.36 | −344.62 |
| Cu57 | −294.07 | −388.80 |
The binding score of the interactions of the biotin and its corresponding active site residues for the best-docked poses of various Cu-streptavidin protein
| Nanocluster | BA_biotin (kcal mol−1) | Interacting active site residues |
|---|---|---|
| Cu0 | −224.65 | Gly 16, Glu 98 |
| Cu1 | −264.78 | Gly 16, Gly 68, Gly 98, Thr 71 |
| Cu6 | −265.58 | Gly 16, Gly 68, Gly 98, Thr 71 |
| Cu13 | −254.13 | Gly 16, Gly 98, Thr 71 |
| Cu20 | −273.37 | Gly 16, Ile 17, Gly 68, Gly 98, Thr 71 |
| Cu57 | −234.20 | Gly 16, Glu 98 |
Fig. 2The best docked pose for the interactions of the biotin with the streptavidin-Cu20 simulated through Pymol.
Comparison of fluorescence polarization value of the unconjugated CuNCs with the conjugated CuNCs
| Sample |
|
| FP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unconjugated CuNCs | 94 | 78 | 0.093 |
| Conjugated CuNCs (CuNIS) | 132 | 99 | 0.143 |
Scheme 2Schematic illustration of CuNIS application for detection of HIV-1 p24 antigen.
Fig. 3(a) Calibration curve of CuNIS based HIV-1 p24 assay (b) the calibration curve of CuNIS based HIV-1 p24 assay with resolved axis showing the lower end of the linear dynamic range.
Comparison of sensitivities of various other copper nanocluster based sensors
| Analyte | Limit of detection | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrogen sulphides | 650 nM |
|
| Fe3+ metal ions | 23.4 nM |
|
| Nitrate ions | 3.4 μM |
|
| Dopamine | 0.5 nM |
|
| Cyanide ions | 0.37 μM |
|
| RNA of hepatitis B | 12 × 109 molecules |
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 4(a) Results for CuNIS based p24 assay for (a) 10 HIV +ve samples (b) 10 HIV −ve samples (c) HIV −ve, HBV +ve/HIV −ve, and HCV +ve/HIV −ve.
A cost comparison of different metal nanocluster immunosensors
| S. No | Nanocluster | Precursor | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Platinum | Chloroplatinic acid hexahydrate | 1.33 |
| 2 | Gold | Tetrachloroauric(III) acid | 1.07 |
| 3 | Silver | Silver nitrate | 0.175 |
| 4 | Copper | Copper( | 0.012 |
All the costs have been based on the commercial prices for the chemicals from Sigma-Aldrich.
The equivalent masses were calculated taking into account the amount of precursor used for each reaction.