| Literature DB >> 36133917 |
Shiwan Tao1, Yamin Zhang2,3, Qiang Wang1, Chunxia Qiao1, Wei Deng2,3, Sugai Liang2,3, Jinxue Wei1, Wei Wei2,3, Hua Yu2,3, Xiaojing Li2,3, Mingli Li1, Wanjun Guo2,3, Xiaohong Ma1, Liansheng Zhao1, Tao Li2,3,4.
Abstract
Emerging evidence has demonstrated overlapping biological abnormalities underlying schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BP), and major depressive disorder (MDD); these overlapping abnormalities help explain the high heterogeneity and the similarity of patients within and among diagnostic categories. This study aimed to identify transdiagnostic subtypes of these psychiatric disorders based on lipidomics abnormalities. We performed discriminant analysis to identify lipids that classified patients (N = 349, 112 with SCZ, 132 with BP, and 105 with MDD) and healthy controls (N = 198). Ten lipids that mainly regulate energy metabolism, inflammation, oxidative stress, and fatty acylation of proteins were identified. We found two subtypes (named Cluster 1 and Cluster 2 subtypes) across patients with SCZ, BP, and MDD by consensus clustering analysis based on the above 10 lipids. The distribution of clinical diagnosis, functional impairment measured by Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scales, and brain white matter abnormalities measured by fractional anisotropy (FA) and radial diffusivity (RD) differed in the two subtypes. Patients within the Cluster 2 subtype were mainly SCZ and BP patients and featured significantly elevated RD along the genu of corpus callosum (GCC) region and lower GAF scores than patients within the Cluster 1 subtype. The SCZ and BP patients within the Cluster 2 subtype shared similar biological patterns; that is, these patients had comparable brain white matter abnormalities and functional impairment, which is consistent with previous studies. Our findings indicate that peripheral lipid abnormalities might help identify homogeneous transdiagnostic subtypes across psychiatric disorders.Entities:
Keywords: bipolar disorder; brain whiter matter; lipidomics profile; major depressive disorder; schizophrenia
Year: 2022 PMID: 36133917 PMCID: PMC9483200 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.969575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
Comparison of demographic characteristics between the psychiatric patient and healthy control groups.
| Variables | Patients | HC |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | |||
| Sex | 141/205 | 66/128 | 2.11 | 0.15 |
| Age | 24.86 ± 8.32 | 25.22 ± 8.22 | 0.48 | 0.63 |
| Educational Attainment | 13.29 ± 2.79 | 15.20 ± 2.44 | 8.27 | <0.001*** |
| BMI | 21.04 ± 3.01 | 20.93 ± 2.60 | −0.42 | 0.68 |
The p value was obtained by the chi-square test.
The p value was obtained by the two-sample t test.
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Age, sex and BMI data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. BMI was calculated as weight divided by height squared (kg/m2).
HC, healthy control; BMI, body mass index.
FIGURE 1The sPLS-DA model for differentiating psychiatric patients and healthy controls using lipidomic data. (A) Balanced error rates (BERs) decreased when more components were added to the tuning sPLS-DA model. Here, the first 2 components (light blue line) were sufficient to achieve good performance (error rate = 0.046 ± 0.005, 1,000×7-fold cross-validation), and the optimal features of each component are indicated as a diamond plot. (B) The sPLS-DA sample plot with ellipse circles indicating the 95% confidence interval. The first two components of the sPLS-DA model differentiating the psychiatric patient group (orange triangle) from the HC group (blue circle). (C) Classification performance per component (overall and BER) for three prediction distances using repeated cross-validation (1,000×7-fold). All the classification error rates were lower than 0.06. (D) The ROC curve of the sPLS-DA model, and the AUC = 0.986. sPLS-DA, sparse partial least squares discriminant analysis; ROC, receiver operating curve; AUC, area under the receiver operating curve; HC, healthy control group; Psychosis, psychiatric patient group.
Identified differential lipids for classifying psychiatric patients and healthy controls.
| Lipids | Classification | Formula | Molecular weight | VIP | Freq | Trend | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comp 1 | Comp 2 | ||||||
| 9,12-Octadecadienal | Fatty acyls/Fatty aldehydes | C18H32O | 264.2455 | 33.38 | 31.50 | 1.00 | ↑*** |
| 20-oxo-22,23,24,25,26,27-hexanorvitamin D3 | Sterol lipids/Vitamin D3 like derivatives | C21H30O2 | 314.2248 | 6.92 | 6.53 | 1.00 | ↓*** |
| 10-nitro-9Z,12Z-octadecadienoic acid | Fatty acyls/Nitro fatty acids | C18H31NO4 | 325.2255 | 0.00 | 9.52 | 1.00 | ↓*** |
| DGTS 16:0/18:1 | Other | C44H83NO7 | 737.6169 | 0.00 | 2.71 | 1.00 | ↑*** |
| 4-amino-3-methylbutanoic acid | γ-Aminobutyric acid analogue | C5H11NO2 | 117.0791 | 0.00 | 2.07 | 0.93 | ↓*** |
| Cyclopentaneoctanoic acid | Fatty acyls/Unsaturated fatty acids | C17H26O5 | 310.1781 | 0.00 | 1.70 | 0.94 | ↑*** |
| OxPC 16:0-18:1+2O | Other | C42H82NO10P | 791.5690 | 0.00 | 1.59 | 0.95 | ↑*** |
| Caprylic acid | Fatty acyls/Straight chain fatty acids | C8H16O2 | 144.1152 | 0.00 | 1.37 | 0.97 | ↑*** |
| Hexadecandioic acid | Fatty acyls/Dicarboxylic acids | C16H30O4 | 286.2145 | 0.00 | 1.30 | 0.93 | ↑*** |
| 12-Tridecynoic acid | Fatty acyls/Unsaturated fatty acids | C13H22O2 | 210.1621 | 0.00 | 1.12 | 0.89 | ↑*** |
Up arrow (↑) indicates an upregulated trend in psychiatric patients compared with healthy controls; down arrow (↓) indicates a downregulated trend in psychiatric patients compared with healthy controls.
***p value < 0.001, adjusted by false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment.
VIP, variable importance in projection; Comp1, first component of the classification model; Comp2, second component of the classification model; Freq, lipid occurrence frequency when performing 1,000 times cross-validation; DGTS, diacylglyceryl- N,N,N- trimethylhomoserine; OxPC, [2-[(Z)-12,13-dihydroxyoctadec-9-enoyl]oxy-3-hexadecanoyloxypropyl] 2-(trimethylazaniumyl)ethyl phosphate.
FIGURE 2The consensus clustering analysis identified two subgroups within psychiatric patients. (A) The consensus matrix heatmap plot visualized the stability of the two subtypes. The “p1” and “p2” labels refer to the probability of the sample being classified into “class 1” and “class 2,” respectively, after clustering was repeated 50 times. “Prob” refers to the calculated probability of the sample being classified into the corresponding subgroup. The “consensus” legend refers to how consistent two samples were in the same subgroup. (B) The PCA plot confirmed that there were two subgroups of psychiatric patients. The confident samples (silhouette score >0.5) are classified into two subgroups obviously separated from each other, and the ambiguous samples (silhouette score <0.5) are indicated by crosses on the plot.
Comparison of demographic characteristics and functional impairment assessment between the lipid-based subgroups.
| Variables | Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | |||
| Demographic characteristic | ||||
| Sex | 64/115 | 62/78 | 2.05 | 0.15 |
| Age | 25.11 ± 8.45 | 24.21 ± 7.73 | 0.98 | 0.33 |
| Educational Attainment | 13.15 ± 2.92 | 13.40 ± 2.60 | −0.82 | 0.41 |
| BMI | 20.82 ± 2.84 | 21.24 ± 3.28 | −1.22 | 0.22 |
| Clinical diagnosis distribution | ||||
| SCZ | 33 | 65 | 65.81 | <0.001*** |
| BP | 59 | 64 | ||
| MDD | 87 | 11 | ||
| Clinical assessment | ( | ( | ||
| GAF scale scores | 54.96 ± 13.08 | 50.17 ± 13.83 | 2.94 | 0.0036** |
The p value was obtained by the chi-square test.
The p value was obtained by the independent two-sample t test.
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Age, sex, BMI and GAF scale scores are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. BMI was calculated as weight divided by height squared (kg/m2). HC, healthy control; BMI, body mass index; GAF, Global Assessment of Functioning Scale.
FIGURE 3Distribution of clinical diagnoses in the two subgroups. (A) Cluster 1 included 179 psychiatric patients, consisting of 33 (18%) patients with SCZ, 59 (33%) patients with BP and 87 (49%) patients with MDD, and Cluster 2 included 140 psychiatric patients. (B) A higher proportion of MDD patients was present in Cluster 1 (89%) than in Cluster 2 (11%). There were more patients with SCZ in Cluster 2 (66%) than in Cluster 1 (34%). Patients with BP were uniformly distributed in Cluster 1 (52%) and Cluster 2 (48%). SCZ, schizophrenia; BP, bipolar disorder; MDD, depressive disorder. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Comparison of clinical features of SCZ, BP and MDD patients between the lipid-based subgroups.
| Variables | SCZ | BP | MDD |
|---|---|---|---|
| PANSS scale | − | ||
| YMRS scale | − | ||
| HAMA scale | − | + | |
| HAMD scale | − | − | |
| Maternal gestation | − | ||
| Full-term/preterm pregnant period | − | ||
| Full-term normal/caesarean delivery | − | ||
| Bipolar I/II subtype | + | ||
| Psychotic feature | − | ||
| Onset age | − | − | − |
| TDP (month) | − | − | − |
| CDP (month) | − | − | |
| DUP (month) | − | − | |
| Current episode state | − | ||
| Depressive episodes | − |
+ indicates a significant difference in SCZ, BP, and MDD patients between the lipid-based subgroups in the corresponding item; − indicates there are no significant differences.
PANSS, positive and negative syndrome scale; YMRS, young mania rating scale; HAMA, hamilton anxiety scale; HAMD, hamilton depression scale; TDP, total duration of illness period; CDP, current duration of illness period; DUP, duration of untreated period.
FIGURE 4Radial diffusivity (RD) differences between the two subgroups for 48 white matter brain regions that represent the major fasciculi. The colour bar (red–yellow) indicates the mean effect size of the group (Cohen’s d). The genu of the corpus callosum (green arrow) showed significantly increased RD in patients in the Cluster 2 subgroup (Cohen’s d = 0.405; p.adj = 0.018).