| Literature DB >> 36133643 |
Riccardo Guanà1, Andrea Carpino2, Giuseppe Garbagni3, Cecilia Morchio1, Salvatore Garofalo4, Alessandro Pane4, Federico Scottoni5,6, Elisa Zambaiti7, Giulia Perucca8, Elena Madonia1, Fabrizio Gennari1.
Abstract
Acquired vaginal strictures are rare entities in children. As a result, they are generally difficult to manage and tend to recur despite appropriate initial therapy. This case study reports the staged management of vaginal stenosis following the insertion of a button battery. In this case, an 11-year-old girl experienced at 4 years old a battery insertion in the vaginal canal by her neighbor's son, who was 6-year-old at the time. Two weeks from insertion, the parents noted the foreign body discharge spontaneously. The girl had not complained of any symptoms at the time and had been asymptomatic for many years. In November 2020, she came to the emergency department reporting cramping abdominal pain accompanied by mucopurulent discharge. An abdominal ultrasound showed the presence of hematometrocolpos, and a vaginal stenosis dilation under general anesthesia was performed the following day. After 3 weeks, the stenosis was still present, preventing the passage of Hegar number 4. The girl was subjected to a vaginoscopic stenosis resection utilizing a monopolar hook passed through an operative channel. A Bakri catheter filled with 120 mL of water was left in place. After 10 days, the girl was discharged home with the Bakri inserted. Two weeks after discharge, she was reevaluated in the outpatient setting, where the Bakri was removed with no signs of residual stenosis. Acquired vaginal stenosis could be demanding to treat, particularly with the sole conservative approach. A first-line option can be the Hegar dilation. The endoscopic approach can be a second-line, minimally invasive treatment, but long-term outcomes are difficult to predict. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).Entities:
Keywords: children; endoscopic treatment; hematometrocolpos; vaginal stenosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 36133643 PMCID: PMC9484869 DOI: 10.1055/a-1920-5849
Source DB: PubMed Journal: European J Pediatr Surg Rep ISSN: 2194-7619
Fig. 1( A and B ) Vaginoscopic appearance of the stenosis: preincision appearance and ( C and D ) postincisional aspect.
Fig. 2Drawings of the hysteroscopic resection: the red circle indicates the endoscopic incision line.
Fig. 3Bakri catheter before and after being filled with water.
Different techniques used for acquired vaginal stenosis
| Author | Surgical technique | Number of pts | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vassallo and Karram | • Z-plasty | 20 cases | 17-mo FU: 75% uneventful; 25% needed a second procedure |
| Layman and McDonough | Olbert balloon catheter | 6 cases | Uneventful FU |
| Cheng et al | Vaginoscopic management using a “no-touch” technique with a diagnostic 4.5-mm-outer sheath hysteroscope | 14 cases | 1-y uneventful FU |
| Kamal et al | Surgical resection and postoperative vaginal dilation | 1 case | 2-y uneventful FU |