| Literature DB >> 36133500 |
Jiya Mulayamkuzhiyil Saju1, Naishal Mandal1, Nang I Kham1, Rabia Shahid1, Shaili S Naik1, Shivana Ramphall1, Swarnima Rijal1, Vishakh Prakash1, Heba Ekladios2, Pousette Hamid3.
Abstract
Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a worldwide public health problem affecting millions, with developing nations accruing a significant disease burden. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has been proposed in many studies as a causative factor for unexplained iron deficiency anemia. In this systematic review, we searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect to come up with five cross-sectional studies and five Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), which evaluated the association between H. pylori and unexplained iron deficiency anemia and the response of IDA to anti-H. pylori therapy. H. pylori eradication therapy included triple therapy (proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin, amoxicillin) or quadruple therapy (proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, metronidazole, tetracycline) for 10-14 days. Quadruple therapy was used if there is a penicillin allergy or a local antibiotic resistance level of more than 15% to clarithromycin. The cross-sectional studies concluded that H. pylori infection was associated with low serum ferritin levels. The RCTs confirmed that H. pylori are associated with iron deficiency anemia by demonstrating improvement in markers of iron status (ferritin, hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), serum transferrin receptor levels) with H. pylori eradication therapy. In a nutshell, this systematic review concludes that H. pylori testing and treatment must be considered as a differential diagnosis of unexplained IDA in all age groups and serves as a benchmark for more randomized clinical trials to prove causation.Entities:
Keywords: anti h pylori therapy; h pylori; iron deficiency anemia; serum ferritin; unexplained anemia
Year: 2022 PMID: 36133500 PMCID: PMC9469910 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29112
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Figure 1PRISMA 2020 flow diagram
PRISMA = Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Study characteristics
ID: Iron deficiency (determined by serum ferritin levels in most studies); Anemia: Determined by hemoglobin levels in most studies; IDA: Iron deficiency anemia (determined by all or some of these parameters in most studies: Hemoglobin, transferrin saturation, MCV, ferritin); EIA: Enzyme Immunoassay; UBT: Urea breath test; RCT: Randomized controlled trial; MCV: Mean corpuscular volume; MCH: Mean corpuscular hemoglobin; ELISA: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IgG: Immunoglobin G; sTfR: Serum transferrin receptor; H. pylori: Helicobacter pylori; S. ferritin: Serum ferritin; Hb: Hemoglobin
| Study | Study design | Study Location | Number of participants | Age of participants | Prevalence of | Definition of markers of iron status |
|
| DiGirolamo et al. [ | Cross-sectional study | Alaska | 86 | 1-5 years | 41% IgG positive, 86% UBT positive, 80% Stool antigen test positive | ID - Ferritin<10 ng/mL; IDA = Hb <11 g/dL for <2 years, <11.1 g/dL for 2-5 years, <11.5 g/dL for 5 year | |
| Lee et al. [ | Retrospective cohort | Korea | 281 | 22-65 years | 66.50% | ID - Ferritin < 30 ng/mL; Anemia Hb <13 g/dL for men, <12 g/dL for women; IDA – Anemia + Ferritin <10 ng/mL, transferrin saturation <16% | CLO test (rapid urease test )conducted during endoscopy |
| Milman et al. [ | Cross-sectional study (Population-based survey) | Denmark | 2794 | 30-60 years | 25.60% | ID - Ferritin < 15 mg/L; Anemia Hb <13 g/dL for men, <12 g/dL for women; IDA - Ferritin <12 mg/L | |
| Parkinson et al. [ | Cross-sectional study (Population-based serosurvey) | Alaska | 2080 | <5 to 50+ age groups | 75% | <12 ng/mL for low serum ferritin |
|
| Queiroz et al. [ | International multicentered study - Cross-sectional study | Brazil, Chile, United Kingdom | 311 | 10.7+-3.2 mean age, 3-16 years | 27.70% | IDA – Hb <110 g/L (3-5 years), <115 g/L (6-11 years), <120 g/L (12-16 years), S. ferritin <12 mg/L (3-5 years), <15 mg/L (6-16 years) |
|
| Cardenas et al. [ | RCT - Double-blind | Texas | 110 | 3-10 years | All children selected were |
| |
| Fagan et al. [ | RCT - Open-label | Alaska | 219 | 7-11 years | All children were iron deficient and | ID <10 mg/L of ferritin; Anemia- Hb <115 g/L; IDA – iron <25mg/dL, TIBC >450 mg/dL, iron saturation<15% |
|
| Xia et al. [ | RCT - Double-blind | Suihua, China | 1037 | 12–18-year-old females | 31.2% both stool antigen test and IgG antibody test positive | ID- S.ferritin <12 mg/L; Anemia - Hb<120 g/L; IDA – Hb <120 g/L, S.ferritin <12 mg/L or Hb <120 g/L, S.ferritin >12 mg/L, sTfR >24.5 mmol/L | Current |
| Chen et al. [ | RCT | Wuhan, China | 86 | 18-76, median age 53 | All 86 were having IDA + | IDA - Hb <120 g/L in men & <110 g/L in women, S. ferritin < 12 mg/L, MCH < 27 pg, MCV < 80 fL | UBT > 3.33 Bq C14 content considered positive, gastritis diagnosed by endoscopy |
| Kurekci et al. [ | Uncontrolled clinical trial | Egypt | 140 | 6-16 years | All 140 were | ID - Ferritin <10 ng/mL; IDA - Ferritin <10 ng/mL, Hb & MCV below the lower limit of age matched values; Control - Normal Hb + S.ferritin>10 ng/mL |
|
Cochrane Collaboration's tool for risk of bias assessment of Randomized Controlled Trial
Risk of bias: L: Low, H: High, U: Unclear
| Random Sequence Generation - Selection bias | Allocation of concealment - Selection bias | Blinding of both participants and evaluators - Performance bias | Blinding of assessment during outcome collection - Detection bias | Incomplete outcome data - Attrition bias | Selective reporting - Reporting bias | Other bias / Comments | |
| Cardenas et al. (2011) [ | L | L | L | L | L | L | L |
| Fagan et al. (2009) [ | L | L | H | H | L | L | L |
| Xia et al. (2011) [ | L | L | L | L | L | L | L |
| Kurekci et al. (2005) [ | H | U | U | U | U | L | L |
| Chen et al. (2007) [ | L | U | U | U | U | U | L |
Adapted Newcastle Ottawa Scale for risk of bias assessment of Cross-sectional study
| Selection (maximum 4) | Comparability (maximum 2) | Outcome (maximum 2) | Total Score | |||||
| Representativeness of the sample | Sample size | Non-respondents | Ascertainment of the exposure (absence or exclusion) | The subjects in different outcome groups are comparable, based on the study design or analysis. Confounding factors are controlled | Assessment of the outcome | Statistical test | ||
| DiGirolamo et al. [ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Milman et al. [ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Parkinson et al. [ | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Queiroz et al. [ | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Lee et al. [ | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |