Poria cocos Extract from Mushrooms Stimulates Aquaporin-3 via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathway.

Background: Poria cocos (PC), a fungus, has been used for more than 2000 years as a food and medicine in China. PC and its components have various pharmacological effects on the skin, including immunomodulatory activities, barrier function improvement, and anti-tumor effects. However, the effect of PC in aquaporin-3 (AQP3) expression, which is essential for epidermal water permeability barrier maintenance, was not reported.
Methods: This study examined the mechanism through which the ethanol extract of the sclerotium of PC (EPC) promoted the expression of AQP3 in cultured human keratinocytes. Western blotting was used to investigate the expression of AQPs and the activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt-related signaling molecules in HaCaT cells. Cells were treated with inhibitors of PI3K/Akt and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) prior to EPC treatment.
Results: EPC promoted the expression of AQP3 in HaCaT cells without affecting AQP1 and AQP2 expression. Phosphorylated Akt levels were increased by EPC treatment, and the inhibition of PI3K by LY2940002 resulted in a reduction in EPC-induced AQP3 expression. Furthermore, EPC stimulated the phosphorylation of p70S6K and AktSer473, which are downstream targets of mTORC1 and mTORC2, respectively. The mTOR complex inhibitors, rapamycin and Torin 1, partially reduced EPC-induced AQP3 expression.
Conclusion: These results suggest that EPC increased expression of AQP3, which is important for skin moisturization, by activating the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in human keratinocytes.

Introduction

The skin is the body’s first line of defense against the external environment.1 For this reason, the skin is responsible for providing a physical and water-impermeable barrier for the body as it responds to a variety of stresses such as microorganisms, sunlight or physical trauma.2 In particular, keratinocytes, which form the skin barrier, are the predominant cell type found in the epidermis and constituting approximately 90% of the epidermal cells.3 Keratinocytes could handle the inflammatory response as well as skin hydration to maintain the homeostasis of the skin barrier.4 Thus, to find out whether the drugs/or cosmetics could regulate skin hydration, the determination of water proteins in keratinocytes is essential.

Aquaporins (AQPs), also called water channels, are a family of transmembrane proteins that mainly transport water across biological membranes and are involved in many physiological functions, including renal water balance, epithelial fluid secretion, cell migration, brain oedema and metabolism in adipocytes.5,6 Among them, several of the mammalian aquaporins such as AQP1, and AQP2 appear to be highly selective for the passage of water, whereas others (recently termed aquaglyceroporins such as AQP3, AQP7 and AQP9) also transport glycerol.7 Especially, AQP3, an aquaglyceroporin, is most abundantly expressed in keratinocytes of the basal layer of the human epidermis and is associated with keratinocyte migration, and proliferation.8–10

Poria cocos, a medicinal mushroom belonging to the Polyporaceae family, is widely used in nephrosis, insomnia, and diarrhea.11–13 Previous studies have reported that several compounds derived from P. cocos such as polysaccharides and triterpenoids have been reported to exhibit antitumor, anti-inflammatory, and anti-allergic activities, as well as immunomodulatory activities.11,14,15 In addition, it has been shown that the sclerotium of P. cocos has a skin-whitening effect.16

However, the moisturizing activity of P. cocos has not been reported. Therefore, in this study, we investigated whether the ethanol extract of the sclerotium of P. cocos (EPC) regulates AQP3 expression in cultured keratinocytes. In addition, we also demonstrated regulatory mechanisms of EPC by evaluating the activation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of P. cocos Extracts

P. cocos Wolf was purchased from Omniherb (Youngcheon, Kyungbook, South Korea). The fungus (500 g) was soaked in 3 L of 100% ethanol for 3 days at room temperature with sonication for 60 min once a day. The solution was filtered using a standard sieve (No. 270, 53 µm), evaporated to dryness at 40 °C under vacuum (Eyela N-11, Japan), and freeze-dried (PVTFD10RS, IlShin BioBase, Korea). The amount of ethanol extract obtained was 24.9 g (yield: 6.98%), which was stored. The extract was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and DMSO was used at a final concentration range of less than 0.01%.

Cell Culture and Drug Treatment

HaCaT cell lines originating from human keratinocytes were purchased from the Korea cell line bank (Seoul, South Korea). HaCaT cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Welgene, Korea) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco Inc., USA), 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. The cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2, and the medium was changed every 48 h. All experiments were performed in plastic tissue culture flasks obtained from SPL Life Science (Pocheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea). The cells were serum-starved for 24 h before incubation with EPC. LY294002, Torin 1 (Cell Signaling Technology, Dallas, TX, USA) and rapamycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St.Louis, MO, USA) were added 2 h prior to EPC treatment.

Cell Viability Analysis

Cell viability was determined using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 1×104 cells/well. After incubation with various concentrations (6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 and 200 µg/mL) of EPC, MTT (0.5 mg/mL, Sigma) was added to each culture well and further incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. The medium was removed, 200 µL of DMSO was added, and the mixture was shaken for 10 min to dissolve the formazan crystals. The absorbance of the solubilized formazan was measured at 570 nm using a spectrofluorometer (F-2500, Hitachi, Japan).

Immunocytochemistry

HaCaT cells were plated in a chamber slide and incubated with EPC (50 μg/mL) for 24 h at 37°C. Then, the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at RT and washed 3 times with PBS. The cells were treated with 0.1% TritonX-100 for 15 min at RT. After washing, non-specific binding sites were blocked with serum (3% BSA) for 1 h at RT and incubated with AQP3 antibody (1:200) at 4°C overnight. The cells were then washed and incubated with AlexaFluor®488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:1,000; cat. no. A-11011) for 2 h at RT in a darkened room. For nuclear staining, the cells were incubated with DAPI (cat. no. H-1200; Vector Laboratories, Newark, CA, USA) at 1:1000 for 5 min at RT. The slide was finally washed with PBS and mounted for microscopic examination. Images were visualized using a confocal laser microscope (Olympus, Japan).

Immunoblot Analysis

After treatment with EPC, cells were lysed with cold RIPA lysis buffer (EzRIPA lysis kit, ATTA, Japan) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. The HaCaT cell lysate was then centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. The resultant protein samples were separated using SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA). The membrane was stained with ponceau solution to confirm uniform transfer of all proteins and then incubated in a blocking solution (TBS with 0.05% Tween 20) containing 5% non-fat dry milk or 5% bovine serum albumin at room temperature for 2 h. The membranes were then probed with antibodies against AQP-1 (1:1000), AQP-2 (1:1000), AQP-3 (1:1000), p-Akt (1:1000), Akt (1:1000), p-p70S6K (1:1000), p70S6K (1:1000), and β-actin (1:5000). Antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA) and Cell Signaling Technology (Dallas, TX, USA). The primary antibodies were diluted in TBST solution containing 5% (w/v) skim milk or 5% (w/v) BSA. The membranes were then incubated with a specific horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Invitrogen Biotechnology, USA). Immunoreactive proteins were detected using the ECL Kit (Millipore, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA). The bands were analyzed using a Chemidoc image analyzer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The signal intensity was quantified by ImageJ.

Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analysis (LC/MS)

The standard of pachymic acid (PA) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The EPC and PA were dissolved in methanol. Thereafter, ultra-performance liquid chromatography was performed on the ACQUITY UPLC system (Waters, MA, USA) with an ACQUITY binary solvent manager pump (ACQ-BSM), a ACQUITY PDA detector (ACQ-PDA) and Waters micromass ZQ spectrometer (Waters) coupled with an electrospray ionization (ESI) interface and an ion trap mass analyzer. The EPC and pachymic acid were analyzed under the following conditions: column, ACQUITY UPLC BEH Shield RP18 (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 μm; USA); mobile phase, distilled water (solvent system A), and acetonitrile (CH3CN, solvent system B) in a gradient mode (B from 10% to 100% in 15 min); sample injection volume, 5 µL; flow rate, 0.3 mL/min; column temperature, 40°C, UV wavelength, 200 nm. The conditions of MS analysis in the negative ion mode were as follows: capillary voltages, –3.00 kV; cone voltage, –100 V; extractor voltage, –2 V; RF lens voltage, –0.2 V; source temperature 120°C, desolvation temperature 400°C, gas flow desolvation 600 L/hr, gas flow cone 30 L/hr.

Statistical Analysis

All analyses were performed in triplicate, and numerical data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Multiple comparisons were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

EPC Promotes the Expression of AQP3 in Keratinocytes Without Affecting AQP1 and AQP2

We first evaluated the cytotoxicity of EPC on HaCaT cells using an MTT assay as shown in Figure 1A. This figure shows HaCaT cells were treated with various concentrations of EPC (6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 and 200 µg/mL) for 24 h. Because EPC did not show any cytotoxic effects at concentrations up to 50 µg/mL, we used EPC in the subsequent experiments at the concentration of 0–50 µg/mL. The effect of EPC on AQP1, AQP2 and AQP3 expression in cultured human keratinocytes is shown in Figure 1B. This figure shows HaCaT cells were treated with various concentrations of EPC (12.5, 25 and 50 µg/mL) for 24 h, and AQP expression was analyzed using Western blotting. As expected, AQP3 protein levels were significantly higher than other AQPs; AQP1 protein level was markedly lower than that of AQP3, and AQP2 was not detected in the cells. EPC induced AQP3 upregulation in a concentration-dependent manner without affecting the levels of AQP1 and AQP2. In addition, Figure 1C shows the immunocytochemistry analysis confirmed that intracellular AQP3 expression was visibly increased by ECT treatment. These results indicate that EPC promoted the expression of AQP3 in HaCaT cells without affecting AQP1 and AQP2 expression.

Figure 1

Effects of EPC on AQPs expression in HaCaT cells. (A) Cytotoxic effects of EPC in HaCaT cells. The cell viability was measured by MTT assay. HaCaT cells were incubated with or without ethanol extract of the sclerotium of Poria cocos (EPC) as indicated doses (6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 or 200 μg/mL) for 24 h. * p < 0.05 vs control group. (B) HaCaT cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 1% FBS for 24 h and then treated with various concentrations of EPC (12.5, 25, and 50 µg/mL) for 24 h. Expression levels of AQP1, AQP2, and AQP3 were analyzed using Western blotting. (C) Confocal immunofluorescence images of AQP3 protein. HaCaT cells were treated with EPC (50 µg/mL) for 24 h. The signals of AQP3 protein (green) were detected using anti-AQP3 antibody, and nuclei were counterstained with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (blue). Scale bar, 50 µm.

PI3K/Akt Pathway is Involved in EPC-Induced AQP3 Upregulation

To examine whether EPC regulated AQP3 expression through activation of PI3K/Akt in HaCaT cells, we analyzed the effect of EPC on Akt phosphorylation. Figure 2A shows the phosphorylated Akt levels were increased following treatment with 50 µg/mL EPC for 0.5, 1, 2, 24 h. However, Figure 2B and C shows that the increase in AKT was suppressed by the PI3K inhibitor LY294002. Next, we evaluated whether the inhibition of endogenous PI3K signaling in HaCaT cells affects EPC-induced AQP3 regulation. Figure 3A and B shows the expression levels of AQP3 in HaCaT cells after treatment with EPC at 25 and 50 μg/mL in the presence or absence of LY294002. The inhibition of PI3K caused a noticeable decrease in EPC-induced AQP3 expression. These results support the involvement of the PI3K/Akt pathway in the upregulation of AQP3 by EPC in HaCaT cells.

Figure 2

EPC promotes Akt activation in HaCaT cells. (A) Cells were treated with 50 µg/mL of EPC for different time periods (0.5, 1, 2, and 24 h) and Akt activation was examined using immunoblotting. (B) Cells were treated with 25 or 50 µg/mL of EPC in the presence or absence of the PI3K inhibitor LY294002. LY294002 was pretreated with 20 µM for 2 h. (C) The quantification of (B) by ImageJ. Relative expression levels of p-Akt. *p < 0.05 vs control group, †p < 0.01 vs EPC-treated group. The values are means ± SD of three independent experiments.

Figure 3

PI3K inhibition blocks EPC-induced upregulation of AQP3. (A) Cells were pretreated with PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (20 µM) for 2 h followed by treatment with 25 or 50 µg/mL of EPC. After 24 h, AQP3 level was analyzed using immunoblotting. Actin was used as a loading control. (B) Quantification of (A) by ImageJ. Relative expression levels of AQP3. *p < 0.05 vs control group, †p < 0.01 vs EPC-treated group. The values are means ± SD of three independent experiments.

EPC Activates mTOR Signaling in Keratinocytes

mTOR is one of the downstream components of the PI3K/Akt pathway and exists in two functionally and structurally distinct protein complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2.9,10 To determine whether mTORC1 or mTORC2 activation is involved in AQP3 upregulation by EPC in HaCaT cells, phosphorylation of the downstream targets mTORC1 and mTORC2 was examined. p70S6K and AktSer473 are the respective mTORC1 and mTORC2 markers. Figure 4 shows the EPC increased the phosphorylation of p70S6K and AktSer473. Figure 4 shows the rapamycin, a mTORC1 inhibitor, completely blocked the EPC-induced increase in p70S6K phosphorylation. However, it did not affect the phosphorylation of the mTORC2 target AktSer473. This result suggests that EPC activates mTORC1 and mTORC2 signaling complexes.

Figure 4

mTORC1 and mTORC2 activation are induced via EPC treatment. Cells were pretreated with mTORC1 inhibitor rapamycin (50 nM) with/without 25 or 50 µg/mL of EPC. The protein levels of mTORC1 marker p70 S6K and mTORC2 marker AktSer473 were detected by Western blot analysis after 4 h. Actin was used as a loading control.

Inactivation of mTOR Signaling Partially Blocks EPC-Induced AQP3 Upregulation

Based on the above results, we assessed the potential involvement of mTOR in the ability of EPC to stimulate AQP3 expression in HaCaT cells using mTOR inhibitors. Figure 5A shows the inhibition of mTORC1 signaling with rapamycin partially down-regulated the EPC-induced AQP3 expression, but had no effect on AktSer473 phosphorylation. Moreover, Figure 5B shows the Torin 1 blocking two mTOR complexes, an inhibitor of mTOR downstream targets, significantly reduced AQP3 expression increased by EPC. As expected, in Figure 5B, activation of p70S6K and AktSer473 was completely blocked by Torin 1. These results indicate that upregulation of AQP3 by EPC in HaCaT cells can be regulated by activation of mTOR complexes.

Figure 5

mTOR inhibitors partially blocks EPC-induced AQP3 upregulation. Cells were pretreated with mTORC1 inhibitor rapamycin (A) or mTOR complex inhibitor Totin 1 (B) with/without 25 or 50 µg/mL of EPC. The protein levels of mTORC1 marker p70 S6K and mTORC2 marker AktSer473 were detected by Western blot after 4 h. AQP3 levels were detected by Western blot after 24 h. Actin was used as a loading control.

Analysis of Active Candidate Components from EPC

To determine the active ingredient from EPC, we performed an optimized HPLC using PA based on the reports reported so far.17–22 As shown in Figure 6, analysis by UPLC of EPC provided major peaks at 4.8 min, and this peak was identified as PA based on the comparison of the retention time in chromatograms of compounds.

Figure 6

UPLC analysis of EPC. (A) EPC and (B) pachymic acid was dissolved in methanol. A sample volume of 5 μL was injected and analyzed at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min using an ultraviolet detector at 200 nm.

PA Promotes the Expression of AQP3 in Keratinocytes

We first evaluated the cytotoxicity of PA on HaCaT cells using an MTT assay is shown in Figure 7A. This figure shows the HaCaT cells were treated with various concentrations of PA (1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 µM) for 24 h. Because PA did not show any cytotoxic effects at concentrations up to 2 µM, we used PA in the subsequent experiments at the concentration of 0–2 µM. The effect of PA on AQP3 expression in cultured human keratinocytes is shown in Figure 7B. This figure shows the HaCaT cells were treated with various concentrations of PA (1 and 2 µM) for 24 h, and AQP3 expression was analyzed using Western blotting. As expected, PA induced upregulation of AQP3 in a concentration-dependent manner. These results indicate that PA upregulates the expression of AQP3 in HaCaT cells.

Figure 7

Effects of PA on AQP3 expression in HaCaT cells. (A) Cytotoxic effects of PA in HaCaT cells. The cell viability was measured by MTT assay. HaCaT cells were incubated with or without of the pachymic acid (PA) as indicated doses (1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20 or 30 μM) for 24 h. * p < 0.05 vs control group. (B) HaCaT cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 1% FBS for 24 h and then treated with indicated concentrations of PA (1 and 2 µM) for 24 h. Expression levels of AQP3 were analyzed using Western blotting.

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the moisturizing effects and regulatory mechanisms of EPC in cultured human keratinocytes. We confirmed that AQP3 expression was significantly higher than that of AQP1 and AQP2 in cells and that the expression of AQP3 was significantly increased via EPC treatment. Moreover, the present study showed that EPC induced AQP3 expression through activation of the P3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. These findings support the potential that EPC could lead to an increase in AQP3, which is important for maintaining the epidermal water permeability barrier, through PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway.

In this study, we could only detect the AQP3 not AQP1 and AQP2 (Figure 1). Among AQPs, AQP1 is mainly found on endothelial cells and fibroblasts of the human dermis, acts as a selective water channels, and up-regulated in fibroblasts during hypertonic stress.23,24 In similar, AQP2 is mainly expressed on kidney and fibroblasts,25 and rarely detected in keratinocytes.5,26,27 Because AQP1 and AQP2 is rarely detected in keratinocytes, we think that the AQP1 was not detected well in our study. However, EPC significantly up-regulated the AQP3 in keratinocytes, which suggests that it may facilitate the transport and metabolism of water and glycerol in the skin epidermis, and the function of the epidermal water permeability barrier.

In this study, we examined the role of the PI3K/Akt pathway in AQP3 expression in EPC-stimulated cells, because there are so many previous reports regarding PI3K/Akt pathway to induce AQP3.28–31 Previous reports suggested that the overexpression of Akt could contribute to the increase of AQP3, and consequently lead to autophagic responses,28 which means PI3K/AKT could mainly control the AQP3. In accordance with previous reports,28–31 we also found that the EPC treatment could increase the p-Akt, and EPC-induced AQP3 expression was noticeably decreased via treatment with the PI3K inhibitor, which support the involvement of the PI3K/Akt pathway in EPC-induced upregulation of AQP3. However, the increase rate of p-Akt is irrational to be a main regulator of AQP3. As shown in Figures 2 and 3, AQP-3 was increased about 12-fold increase, whereas p-AKT was increased about 20%. This might be a discrepancy that the increase of AQP-3 stem from p-ATK because AKT increase is relatively less than AQP-3. We think that AKT pathway might contribute the increase of AQP-3 at least partly, not the mainly. There are possibilities that Ras, ERK, AMPK could be mediated to induce AQP-3.28,32,33 Although we cannot perform the experiments of other pathway right now, we will examine the various mechanisms in next further experiments of active ingredients of PC.

mTOR signaling is one of the known downstream targets of the PI3K/Akt pathway and exists as two structurally distinct multiprotein complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2; they regulate different cellular processes.34,35 mTORC1 mediates cell growth, cell proliferation, protein synthesis, and autophagy. mTORC2 functions as a regulator of actin cytoskeleton. Especially, mTORC1 regulates keratinocyte proliferation in the basal layer, whereas mTORC2 controls epidermal stratification and terminal differentiation.36,37 In addition, it has been shown that mTORC1 contributes to keratinocyte proliferation following UVB radiation, whereas mTORC2 maintains the survival of DNA-damaged keratinocytes. The mTOR activator MHY1485 attenuated skin cell damage by UV radiation, mTOR inhibitors almost abolished MHY1485-induced cytoprotective effects.38,39 Thus, we investigated the roles of the mTORC1 and mTORC2 pathways in EPC-induced AQP3. Here, EPC promoted the phosphorylation of p70S6K and AktSer473, the downstream targets of mTORC1 and mTORC2, respectively. We confirmed that mTORC1 inhibitor rapamycin treatment partially down-regulated EPC-induced AQP3 expression as well as suppressing p70S6K activation. Torin 1, as a selective ATP-competitive mTOR inhibitor, inhibits mTORC1 and mTORC2. The effect of EPC on AQP3 expression was decreased by blocking both mTOR complex with Torin 1. These data suggest that the mTOR pathway is activated by EPC, leading to the upregulation of AQP3 expression.

Several previous studies have reported that dehydrotrametenolic acid, the lanostane-type triterpene acid isolated from P. cocos, improves skin barrier function and has anti-diabetic and anti-tumor effects. Thus, many studies have focused on the dehydrotrametenolic acid, the lanostane-type triterpene acid as active compounds of P. cocos. However, in this study, we firstly reported that PA is a main ingredient of EPC, and a main active compound to induced AQP3 (Figures 6 and 7). Indeed, there are reports that PA could be derived from EPC,17 and exhibit the anti-inflammatory activity. In addition, PA has been reported to possess anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer properties, and anti-emetic,18–22 and could protect the skin tumor formation in mouse following initiation with 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA).20 Although we did not determine the detailed mechanisms of PA in AQP3, the novel findings of active ingredients of EPC could be helpful for further development of skin goods.

Conclusion

The summary is shown in Figure 8. EPC, and PA, a major physiologically active component of P. cocos, could promote the expression of AQP3. Figure 8 shows the EPC stimulated AQP3 expression through activation of PI3K/Akt in human keratinocytes. mTORC1 and mTORC2 pathways are activated by EPC, and the effect of EPC on AQP3 expression was decreased by blocking PI3K/Akt and both mTOR complex. These results suggest that EPC contributes to an increase in AQP3 levels, which is important for migration and proliferation of keratinocytes and the function of the epidermal water permeability barrier, by activating the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway.

Figure 8

A signaling pathway by which EPC promotes AQP3 in HaCaT cells. EPC induced the PI3K/Akt activation. mTORC1 downstream target p70S6K and mTORC2 downstream target Akt Ser473 were activated by EPC, respectively. Finally, the level of intracellular AQP3 was increased by EPC via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway.