Literature DB >> 36133092

Theoretical study of the influence of doped niobium on the electronic properties of CsPbBr3.

Xingyou Liang1, Xuefeng Ren2, Shuzhang Yang3, Lizhao Liu4, Wei Xiong5, Li Cheng4, Tingli Ma3,6, Anmin Liu1.   

Abstract

In the family of inorganic perovskite solar cells (PSCs), CsPbBr3 has attracted widespread attention due to its excellent stability under high humidity and high temperature conditions. However, power conversion efficiency (PCE) improvement of CsPbBr3-based PSCs is markedly limited by the large optical absorption loss coming from the wide band gap and serious charge recombination at interfaces and/or within the perovskite film. In this work, using density functional theory calculations, we systemically studied the electronic properties of niobium (Nb)-doped CsPbBr3 with different concentration ratios. As a result, it is found that doped CsPbBr3 compounds are metallic at high Nb doping concentration but semiconducting at low Nb doping concentration. The calculated electronic density of states shows that the conduction band is predominantly constructed of doped Nb. These characteristics make them very suitable for solar cell and energy storage applications. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 36133092      PMCID: PMC9419738          DOI: 10.1039/d0na01000f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanoscale Adv        ISSN: 2516-0230


Introduction

Organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have favourable properties including appropriate band gap, high absorption coefficient, low cost and easy fabrication process, and show great potential for photovoltaic devices.[1-6] Their power conversion efficiency (PCE) has been increased dramatically from 3.8% to a certified 25.5% by various strategies such as composition engineering, interface engineering, construction engineering, and preparation techniques.[7-14] Although the rapid increase of PCE has been realized, the intrinsic stability of hybrid perovskites under high humidity and high temperature is still a key issue for meeting the commercial requirements.[15,16] To reduce the instability issues, the use of all-inorganic cesium lead halides (CsPbX3), which contain inorganic cesium (Cs) rather than organic cations as in organic–inorganic perovskites, has been demonstrated to be an effective strategy for improving the stability of PSCs.[17-19] Thus, currently, CsPbX3 has attracted much attention. It is divided into different components by tuning the halide anions, mainly focusing on CsPbI3,[20,21] CsPbI2Br,[22,23] CsPbIBr2,[24,25] and CsPbBr3.[26,27] From the family of all-inorganic PSCs, CsPbBr3 exhibits superior stability under high humidity and high temperature conditions, which is significant to the practical application of PSC devices. However, the PCE is limited by large optical absorption loss and serious charge recombination. At present, the best PCE of CsPbBr3-based PSCs is just around 11%.[28] Therefore, it is urgent to know how to improve the PCE and reduce the cost of CsPbBr3 PSCs. To date, several strategies have been applied to enhance the PCE and simultaneously prolong the thermal stability of inorganic PSCs. For example, Chu and co-workers fabricated an amorphous Nb2O5 film as the ETL of inorganic planar CsPbBr3 by the magnetron sputtering method, and 5.74% PCE was obtained due to the suitable surface work function and high transmittance of amorphous Nb2O5 and low charge recombination at the amorphous Nb2O5/CsPbBr3 interface.[29] Yu et al. demonstrated an interesting method by face-down liquid-space restriction to prepare high-quality CsPbBr3 perovskite films on compact TiO2 layers. This novel method can obtain uniform, smooth and high-quality perovskite films, which greatly increased the PCE and Voc in planar all-inorganic CsPbBr3 PSCs.[30] Zhong et al. developed a one-step solution-processing method to fabricate CsPbBr3 films using precursor engineering and applied it for a CsPbBr3-based device. A PCE of 7.37% has been achieved with high stability over 1500 h under an ambient atmosphere with 30–35% relative humidity.[31] Liao et al. developed a modified multistep spin-coating strategy for CsPbBr3 film preparation, and the optimized PCE was improved to 8.12%. This might be mainly attributed to the high crystallinity and reduced density of trap states of the CsPbBr3 film.[32] They also selected a novel antisolvent-washing strategy for highly efficient carbon-based CsPbBr3 PSCs, increasing the PCE to 8.55%.[33] Tang et al. reported a Lewis-base polymer, polyvinyl acetate (PVAc), to modify the CsPbBr3 film. A maximum PCE of up to 9.53% with an excellent Voc of 1.553 V was achieved for the CsPbBr3-based PSC.[34] Yang et al. applied a vapor-assisted solution technique to prepare a uniform and pure CsPbBr3 film. The optimized CsPbBr3 PSC showed a PCE of 10.45% and outstanding stability for over 90 days under harsh conditions (80% RH, 85 °C).[35] Qi et al. proposed a phase transition-induced method to produce high-quality CsPbBr3 thin films. A PCE of 10.91% was obtained for n–i–p structured PSCs with metal electrodes, and the carbon electrode-based devices exhibited excellent long-term stability and retained 80% of the initial efficiency in ambient air for more than 2000 h without any encapsulation.[28] Although there are many ways to improve the efficiency of the device, few studies were reported to fundamentally improve the absorption capacity of this kind of material, and the current efficiency is far from its ultimate efficiency. Theoretical calculations are an effective method to design materials and study the mechanism.[36-40] In this study, we systematically study the electronic properties of niobium (Nb)-doped CsPbBr3 with different concentration ratios using first-principles calculations. This work will provide a good theoretical basis for understanding the structure and electronic properties of these compounds. Through the analysis of these results, we propose that Nb-doped CsPbBr3 may be a promising solar cell absorber with good band gap and light absorption properties, which provides a feasible method for improving the efficiency of the device.

DFT calculation details

The Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) based on the plane-wave pseudopotential technique was employed, using the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) functional for the exchange-correlation interaction and the projector augmented wave (PAW) pseudopotential for the ion–electron interaction.[41-44] A kinetic energy cutoff of 350 eV was chosen to ensure good convergence of the total energy and stress. The well-tested Monkhorst–Pack k grid of a uniform spacing of 0.02 Å−1 was adopted to sample the first Brillouin zone. All the structures were fully relaxed using the conjugate gradient algorithm until the force on each atom was less than 0.001 eV Å−1 and the energy was converged to 10−4 eV. We calculate the doping energy (Edoping) of five kinds of supercell structures doped with CsPbBr3 at different Nb concentrations, and the formula of Edoping is given bywhere Edop is the total energy of the system after CsPbBr3 is doped with Nb atoms, Epure is the total energy of the pure undoped CsPbBr3 system, and EPb and ENb are the energy of single atoms of Pb and Nb, respectively. Visualization of k-point paths in the 1st Brillouin zone is shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Visualization of k-point paths in the 1st Brillouin zone; g, g, and g are vectors for the reciprocal lattice.

Results and discussion

In order to explore the effect of Nb doping of CsPbBr3 on its absorption capacity, we doped Nb into CsPbBr3 by expanding cells, that is, doping one Nb atom in each supercell, as shown in Fig. 2. We constructed Nb-doped CsPbBr3 with 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25%, and 3.125% concentration ratios, and the corresponding supercells and chemical formulae are shown in Table 1. The original CsPbBr3 structure of five different supercells and the crystal structure after doping with different Nb concentrations are shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 2

Schematic diagram of the crystal structure of Nb-doped CsPbBr3.

Supercells and chemical formulae of different concentration ratios of Nb doped in CsPbBr3

SupercellChemical formulaDoping concentration
2 × 1 × 1Br6NbCs2Pb50%
2 × 2 × 1Br12NbCs4Pb325%
2 × 2 × 2Br24NbCs8Pb712.5%
2 × 2 × 4Br48NbCs16Pb156.25%
2 × 4 × 4Br96NbCs32Pb313.125%
Fig. 3

Schematic diagrams of the pristine and Nb-doped CsPbBr3 crystal structures with different concentration ratios.

The raw data used to calculate the doping energy are shown in Table 2. According to formula (1), we calculated the doping energies of Nb atoms doped in five supercell structures. The detailed calculation results are shown in Table 3. The results show that as the doping concentration increases, the doping energy gradually increases. When the doping concentration of Nb reaches 12.5%, the doping energy reaches the maximum value of −2.77 eV. However, when the doping concentration of Nb atoms is increased, the doping energy will gradually decrease.

The raw data for calculating the doping energy

StructuresPristine (eV)Doped (eV)
2 × 1 × 1 supercell−31.7945−35.2799
2 × 2 × 1 supercell−63.5882−66.9168
2 × 2 × 2 supercell−127.177−130.491
2 × 2 × 4 supercell−254.354−257.757
2 × 4 × 4 supercell−508.72−512.19
Pb atom−0.095720351
Nb atom−0.64194424

Band gaps and doping energy of different concentration ratios of Nb doped in CsPbBr3

SupercellChemical formulaDoping concentration k-pointsGap (eV)Doping energy (eV)
2 × 1 × 1Cs2Pb2Br604 × 8 × 82.51
2 × 1 × 1Cs2PbNbBr650%4 × 8 × 80 (metallic)−2.94
2 × 2 × 1Cs4Pb3NbBr1225%4 × 4 × 80 (metallic)−2.78
2 × 2 × 2Cs8Pb7NbBr2412.5%4 × 4 × 21.94−2.77
2 × 2 × 4Cs16Pb15NbBr486.25%4 × 4 × 21.89−2.87
2 × 4 × 4Cs32Pb31NbBr963.125%4 × 2 × 21.84−2.92
The optimization results of lattice parameters for these pristine and differently Nb doped CsPbBr3 are shown in Table 4. Since Nb is significantly smaller than the atomic radius of Pb, when Nb is doped to replace the Pb atom in CsPbBr3, the lattice constant will be significantly reduced.

Comparison of calculated lattice parameters of pristine and Nb-doped CsPbBr3

Lattice parametersSupercells
2 × 1 × 12 × 2 × 12 × 2 × 22 × 2 × 42 × 4 × 4
Pristine50% Nb dopedPristine25% Nb dopedPristine12.5% Nb dopedPristine6.25% Nb dopedPristine3.125% Nb doped
a (Å)12.00111.42611.98611.75811.98611.88111.98211.93611.98011.956
b (Å)6.0055.71311.98611.75811.98611.88111.98211.93623.96023.908
c (Å)6.0055.7135.9935.879611.98611.88123.96423.87323.96023.908
Based on the relaxed structures, we studied the electronic properties of these compounds, including the band structures and density of states, which will be discussed below. Fig. 4 shows the band structures of the undoped system calculated by the PBE method and the Nb-doped system with different concentrations. Through comparison, it is found that the Fermi level of CsPbBr3 after doping with Nb is closer to the conduction band. As shown in Fig. 4a, the energy band of CsPbBr3 undoped with Nb shows a direct band gap. The highest point of the valence band (VBM) and the lowest point of the conduction band (CBM) are located at point R in the first Brillouin zone, respectively. Moreover, all undoped structures have the same band gap. When the doping concentration of Nb is 50% or 25%, both structures show the properties of metals, as shown in Fig. 4b and c. Furthermore, when the doping concentration of Nb is 12.5%, 6.25% or 3.125%, the Fermi level is closer to the conduction band, which indicates an n-type semiconductor. There is a direct band gap at the Γ point, and the forbidden band widths are 1.94 eV, 1.89 eV, and 1.84 eV, which correspond to Fig. 4d, e and f, respectively.
Fig. 4

(a) Band structures of the CsPbBr3 supercell of 2 × 1 × 1. Band structures of different Nb doping concentration ratios of (b) 50%, (c) 25%, (d) 12.5%, (e) 6.25%, and (f) 3.125% corresponding to different pristine CsPbBr3 supercells. The red bands are those of Nb.

The properties of the electronic band gap energy of different concentration ratios of Nb doping in CsPbBr3 are further explained by the density of states. The density of states (DOS) explains the properties of these materials, as shown in Fig. 5. It can be clearly seen that the materials in Fig. 5a and b have crossed the Fermi level, which proves that when the doping concentration of Nb in CsPbBr3 is 50% or 25%, the material becomes a metallic conductor. In Fig. 5c–e, none of them cross the Fermi level, which proves that these materials are semiconductors.
Fig. 5

Density of states (DOS) of Nb-doped CsPbBr3 with different concentration ratios. (a) 50%, (b) 25%, (c) 12.5%, (d) 6.25%, and (e) 3.125%.

Conclusion

In summary, CsPbBr3 is an excellent material for improving the stability of PSCs. Doping Nb into the material is considered to be an effective method to improve the PCE. Through DFT calculations, we systematically studied the electronic properties of CsPbBr3 doped with different Nb concentration ratios, including the band structure and density of states. The results show that when the doping concentration of Nb is 3.125%, 6.25% or 12.5%, all three compounds have semiconductor properties, the band gaps are direct, and the basic band gaps occur at Γ symmetry points. As the doping concentration increases, the band gap width gradually increases. When the doping concentration of Nb is too high (25%, 50%), the compounds are all metallic conductors, which do not have the properties of semiconductors. From this work, we can expect that the performance of PCE and long-term stability of doped CsPbBr3 at a certain Nb concentration will be greatly improved.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.
  16 in total

1.  Projector augmented-wave method.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev B Condens Matter       Date:  1994-12-15

2.  Solar cells. High-efficiency solution-processed perovskite solar cells with millimeter-scale grains.

Authors:  Wanyi Nie; Hsinhan Tsai; Reza Asadpour; Jean-Christophe Blancon; Amanda J Neukirch; Gautam Gupta; Jared J Crochet; Manish Chhowalla; Sergei Tretiak; Muhammad A Alam; Hsing-Lin Wang; Aditya D Mohite
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Formation of thin films of organic-inorganic perovskites for high-efficiency solar cells.

Authors:  Samuel D Stranks; Pabitra K Nayak; Wei Zhang; Thomas Stergiopoulos; Henry J Snaith
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 4.  All-Inorganic CsPbX3 Perovskite Solar Cells: Progress and Prospects.

Authors:  Jingru Zhang; Gary Hodes; Zhiwen Jin; Shengzhong Frank Liu
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  High-Purity Inorganic Perovskite Films for Solar Cells with 9.72 % Efficiency.

Authors:  Jialong Duan; Yuanyuan Zhao; Benlin He; Qunwei Tang
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Interface Engineering for All-Inorganic CsPbI2 Br Perovskite Solar Cells with Efficiency over 14.

Authors:  Lei Yan; Qifan Xue; Meiyue Liu; Zonglong Zhu; Jingjing Tian; Zhenchao Li; Zhen Chen; Ziming Chen; He Yan; Hin-Lap Yip; Yong Cao
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 30.849

7.  Solvent engineering for high-performance inorganic-organic hybrid perovskite solar cells.

Authors:  Nam Joong Jeon; Jun Hong Noh; Young Chan Kim; Woon Seok Yang; Seungchan Ryu; Sang Il Seok
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 43.841

8.  Elegant Face-Down Liquid-Space-Restricted Deposition of CsPbBr3 Films for Efficient Carbon-Based All-Inorganic Planar Perovskite Solar Cells.

Authors:  Pengpeng Teng; Xiaopeng Han; Jiawei Li; Ya Xu; Lei Kang; Yangrunqian Wang; Ying Yang; Tao Yu
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 9.229

9.  Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells.

Authors:  Akihiro Kojima; Kenjiro Teshima; Yasuo Shirai; Tsutomu Miyasaka
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Solvent-controlled growth of inorganic perovskite films in dry environment for efficient and stable solar cells.

Authors:  Pengyang Wang; Xingwang Zhang; Yuqin Zhou; Qi Jiang; Qiufeng Ye; Zema Chu; Xingxing Li; Xiaolei Yang; Zhigang Yin; Jingbi You
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.