Chaima Abidi1, Kais Rtibi1, Salima Boutahiri2, Haifa Tounsi3, Afifa Abdellaoui3, Soumaya Wahabi1, Bernard Gressier4, Bruno Eto5, Hichem Sebai1. 1. Laboratory of Functional Physiology and Valorization of Bio-Ressources-Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Beja, University of Jendouba, Beja, Tunisia. 2. Research Team of Chemistry of Bioactive Molecules and the Environment, Laboratory of Innovative Materials and Biotechnology of Natural Resources, Faculty of Sciences, Moulay Ismaïl University, Meknes, Morocco. 3. Laboratory of Human and Experimental Pathological Anatomy, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Beja, Tunisia. 4. Laboratory of Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lille, Lille, France. 5. Laboratories TBC, Laboratory of Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lille, Lille, France.
Abstract
Ginger (Zingiber officinale) rhizomes are commonly used in foods and employed for many ailments including gastrointestinal disorders. Our main objective was to evaluate the effect of Zingiber officinale aqueous extract (ZOAE) on gastrointestinal (GI) physiological motility and colonic dysmotility. Thereby, Wistar rats were given loperamide (LP, 3 mg/kg, b.w.) and ZOAE (75, 150, and 300 mg/kg, b.w.) or yohimbine (YOH, 2 mg/kg, b.w.). ZOAE-action on intestinal secretion was assessed using Ussing chamber technique and intestinal motility with isometric transducer. GI-transit (GIT) and gastric emptying (GE) were evaluated with the charcoal meal test and the red phenol methods. ZOAE-bioactive components were analyzed by liquid chromatography-high resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC-HRESIMS). Constipation was induced with LP and the different indicators such as stool composition, GIT, oxidative stress biological parameters, and colonic mucosa histological alteration were performed. Anti-constipation effect of ZOAE was confirmed on stool composition, GIT (53.42% to 85.57%), GE (55.47% to 98.88%), and re-established oxidative balance. ZOAE induces an amplitude increase of spontaneous intestinal contraction with EC50 of 10.52 μg/mL. No effect of ZOAE was observed on electrogenic transport of intestinal fluid. These findings suggest that ZOAE-bioactive candidates might exert an anti-constipation action and spontaneous intestinal contraction modulation.
Ginger (Zingiber officinale) rhizomes are commonly used in foods and employed for many ailments including gastrointestinal disorders. Our main objective was to evaluate the effect of Zingiber officinale aqueous extract (ZOAE) on gastrointestinal (GI) physiological motility and colonic dysmotility. Thereby, Wistar rats were given loperamide (LP, 3 mg/kg, b.w.) and ZOAE (75, 150, and 300 mg/kg, b.w.) or yohimbine (YOH, 2 mg/kg, b.w.). ZOAE-action on intestinal secretion was assessed using Ussing chamber technique and intestinal motility with isometric transducer. GI-transit (GIT) and gastric emptying (GE) were evaluated with the charcoal meal test and the red phenol methods. ZOAE-bioactive components were analyzed by liquid chromatography-high resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC-HRESIMS). Constipation was induced with LP and the different indicators such as stool composition, GIT, oxidative stress biological parameters, and colonic mucosa histological alteration were performed. Anti-constipation effect of ZOAE was confirmed on stool composition, GIT (53.42% to 85.57%), GE (55.47% to 98.88%), and re-established oxidative balance. ZOAE induces an amplitude increase of spontaneous intestinal contraction with EC50 of 10.52 μg/mL. No effect of ZOAE was observed on electrogenic transport of intestinal fluid. These findings suggest that ZOAE-bioactive candidates might exert an anti-constipation action and spontaneous intestinal contraction modulation.
Constipation signs include slow bowel movement, extremely dehydrated feces,
difficulty of fecal elimination, abundant demanded bowel motilities, visceral
bloating due to gas accumulation, and abdominal displeasure. In both children and
adults, the functional constipation pathophysiology is designed to be
multifactorial. It might arise from various factors, including nutritional status,
synthetic components such as the use of opioids, and emotional strain and pressure.
Recent researches have showed that functional constipation was related with
other diverse factors, such as the change of gastrointestinal nerve cells,
neuro-muscular diseases, neurotransmitter, and dysbiosis.The imbalance between free radicals and antioxidants or the oxidative damage was
shown in many studies to play a crucial role in the development of various
functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGDs) such as constipation. Indeed, continual
constipation child produces oxidative injury and potential free radical destruction.
These impairments were associated with enzymatic/non-enzymatic antioxidants
depletion as well as the overproduction of the major toxic by-products of lipid
peroxidation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation like hydrogen peroxide
(H2O2).Laxative chemical drugs with serious side effects are recommended to trigger
intestinal movements and help patients pass feces. For this, the perfect manner for
the management of this bowel slow pathogenesis is producing some habitual changes to
assimilate more natural laxatives as fiber foods to relieve constipation, drinking
enough liquids, especially water, and adding regularly exercising.Added to that, recently, several natural products exerting laxative actions have
honored highest consideration as new therapeutic approaches for constipation
management and its combined disruptions, despite various researches required to
investigate the potential mechanisms of pharmacological targets.
In this context, many studies have revealed the ability of bioactive
compounds of natural products especially with great antioxidant power may relieve
chronic constipation and its related symptoms. These bio-compounds are gaining a
potent concern in the biopharmaceutical sector and encouraging the seeking for new
important roots of bioactive components. In fact, several medicinal plants
containing alkaloids, tannins, coumarins such as Aloe ferox,
Malva sylvestris,
Urginea indica Kunth,
Ficus carica,
and others certainly declined affections related to LP-caused slow colonic
motility as the three stool parameters, gastric-emptying time, and small intestinal
transit time as well as oxidative stress parameters management in animal models.Zingiber officinale is a plant species native to India belonging to
the Zingiberaceae family.
The rhizomes of which are used worldwide not only as a spice but also in
traditional medicine.[10,11] Rhizomes have been used frequently for a very long time in
traditional medicine to relieve muscle pain, diabetes, nervous diseases, stroke,
hypertension, dementia, migraine, and asthma and obviously used to treat several
gastrointestinal disorders such as constipation, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting,
dyspepsia, gastric ulcerations, bloating, belching, gastritis, epigastric
discomfort, and indigestion.[10,12,13] Its phytochemical bioactive
compounds were identified to possess strong anti-oxidant[14,15] and anti-inflammatory
activities.[14,16]Currently, the requirement and use of ginger and its various by-products such as
gingerbread, ginger cake, ginger coffee, ginger drink, ginger oil, ginger spice, and
ginger syrup as well as pharmaceutical, food, and other associated industrial
productions have strongly raised.However, it is not clear whether the Zingiber officinale aqueous
extract (ZOAE) can alleviate constipation. Therefore, we used LP-induced
constipation in rats to evaluate its effectively relieving effect as well as the
possible associated mechanism of actions through the study of its in vivo and in
vitro antioxidant activities as well as its effect on ex vivo spontaneous intestinal
contraction.
Materials and Methods
Drugs and Chemicals
Gum arabic, charcoal meal, red phenol, methyl cellulose, sodium hydroxide (NaOH),
NaCl, hydrochloric acid (HCl), 2,2-diphényl 1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH),
butylhydroxyanisol (BHA), 2-thiobarbituric (TBA), 5,5′-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic
acid) (DTNB), trichloroacetic acid (TCA), methanol, ether, epinephrine, bovine
catalase, Folin Ciocalteu, GSH, tris, hydrogen peroxide
(H2O2), and yohimbine were obtained from sigma
chemicals Co (Sigma-AldrichGmbH, Steinheim, Germany). Loperamide hydrochloride
was purchased from local pharmacy and the other chemicals were used of
analytical grade.
Fresh Plant Material and Extract Preparation
The rhizomes of fresh plant (Zingiber officinale) of Chinese
origin were purchased from the regional market in Tunisia. After washing, they
were cut into rings and desiccated at 40°C with air circulation for 72 hours.
The dried rings were ground using a laboratory blender until a fine powder was
obtained. 1 g of this material was shaken for 24 hours in 20 mL of distilled
water. The obtained aqueous extract was filtered using Whatman No 1 (70 mm)
filter paper
(extraction yield = 27%) and stored at −80°C until use.
Zingiber officinale Aqueous Extract-Phenolic Compounds
Identification by Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Electrospray Ionization
Mass Spectrometry (LC-HRESIMS) Analysis
100 mL of 10% methanol was used to dissolve 100 mg of ZOAE. Then the mixture was
filtered and 1 mL was transferred into LC-MS vials for analysis. An opposite
phase column (Pursuit XRs ULTRA 2.8, C18, 100*2 mm, Agilent Technologies, United
Kingdom) was used to conduct HPLC surveys. 20 mL of prepared sample were
injected at a column temperature set at 30°C. The mobile phases consisted of .1%
formic acid in water (A) and .1% formic acid in methanol (B). A gradient program
was used for isolation at a flow rate of 1 mL.min−1. The mobile
phases consisted of an initial composition at 100% solvent A, with a gradient of
100% solvent B for 20 minutes, maintained at 100% solvent B for 5 minutes and at
100% solvent A for 25 minutes.The drying gas flow rate was 1 mL.min−1 at 320°C. MS was used in
positive ion mode in a mass range from 100 to 2000 m/z. High resolution mass
spectral data was obtained on a Thermo Instruments ESI-MS system (LTQ XL/LTQ
Orbitrap Discovery, UK) connected to a Thermo Instruments HPLC system (Accela
PDA detector, Accela PDA autosampler and pump Accela).
Phytochemical Compounds Contents and ZOAE-Antioxidant Activity
Total Phenol Quantity Analysis
The determination of total polyphenols was carried out according to the
method of Dewanto et al.
Briefly, a volume of .5 mL of the diluted extract was mixed with
.5 mL of Folin Ciocalteu reagent (1/10) and then neutralized with 1 mL of
20% sodium carbonate (w/v). After 1 hour incubation at room temperature, the
absorbance was measured at 765 nm against a blank using ultraviolet–visible
spectrophotometer. The concentration of total polyphenols contained in the
extract is calculated by referring to a calibration curve obtained using
gallic acid as standard. The results obtained are expressed in milligram of
gallic acid equivalent per gram of dry matter (mg GAE/g of DM).
Total Flavonoid Amount Exploration
The estimation of total flavonoids was carried out using the aluminum
trichloride method. The protocol used is described by Zhishen et al
and Kim et al
with a few small modifications. An aliquot of 400 μl of the
appropriately diluted extract was added to 120 μL of NaNO2 (5%).
After 5 minutes, 120 μL of AlCl3 (10%) have been added, and the
medium is mixed thoroughly. After 6 minutes, 800 μL of NaOH (1M) was added
to the medium. The absorbance is read immediately at 510 nm against a blank
using ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometer. The concentration of total
flavonoids contained in the extract is calculated by referring to a
calibration curve obtained using quercetin as standard. The content of
flavonoids is expressed in milligram of quercetin equivalent per gram of dry
matter (mg QE/g of DM).
Condensed Tannins Level Determination
The content of condensed tannins was determined according to the vanillin
methods described by Julkunen-Titto.
A volume of 50 μL of the appropriately diluted extract was added to
1500 μL of the vanillin/methanol solution (4%) and then thoroughly mixed.
Then 750 μL of concentrated hydrochloric acid (36%) was added.The mixture obtained was incubated at room temperature for 20 minutes. The
absorbance is measured at 550 nm against a blank. The concentration of
condensed tannins in the extract is calculated by referring to a calibration
curve obtained using catechin as standard. The results obtained are
expressed in milligram of catechin equivalent per gram of dry matter (mg
CE/g of DM).
Antioxidant Activity of ZOAE
The antioxidant activity of ZOAE was achieved through 2 mechanisms: the
ability to scavenge a free radical (DPPH) and chelating power on ferrous
ions:
2,2-diphényl 1-picrylhydrazyl Free Radical Scavenging Ability of
ZOAE
The anti-radical capacity evaluation of the extract was carried out using
the method of Bersuder et al.
Diverse concentrations of 500 μL of ZOAE were brought into
contact with 375 μL of 100% ethanol and 125 μL of .02 mM DPPH in 100%
ethanol. Following vigorous shaking, the mixture is incubated for
60 minutes in darkness and at ambient temperature then the reduction of
DPPH• radical was checked at 517 nm. The control sample
was performed in like manner, using distilled water instead of the
ZOAE.The free radical of DPPH is estimated as a percentage of inhibition
according to the following expression: I (%) = [(Ab + Ac − As)/Ac)] ×
100.Ab and Ac represent the blank absorbance and the control reaction tubes,
respectively, and As is the absorbance of the sample. The extract
concentration providing 50% inhibition (IC50) was calculated
by plotting inhibition percentages compared with concentrations of the
extract.
Ferrous Ion-Chelating Ability Assay
The Fe2+ chelation capacity of ZOAE was determined using the method of
Decker and Welch
with a slight modification. Briefly, 50 μL of
FeCl2-4H2O solution (2 mM) was added to 100 μL of ZOAE
(.5-5 mg/mL) diluted in 450 μL of distilled water. The reaction was started by
the inclusion of 5 mM ferrozine (.2 mL) and the combined solution was shaken
eagerly and then incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature. The absorbance
was examined at 562 nm and the Fe2+ chelation capacity was then
estimated corresponding to the control sampled. The percentage of
Fe2+ chelation capacity (%) using the following
formula:Ac represents the absorbance of the control reaction. Ab is the absorbance of the
blank and As is the absorbance of the sample, respectively.
Used Animals for Experiments
Adult male rats of the Wistar strain (Ten weeks old, weighting 180–220 g) and
male mice (weighting 20-30 g) were purchased from the Society of Pharmaceutical
Industries of Tunisia (SIPHAT, Ben-Arous, Tunisia). The animals were housed six
per cage with ad libitum access to water and a standard food
(Badr-Utique-TN). They are maintained under standard conditions of temperature
22 ± 2°C, relative humidity of 50%, and 12 light/dark cycles in the animal house
of the Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Beja and used for toxicity and
constipation studies.Male mice of the C57BL/6JRj strain (7 weeks old, weighing 20-25 g) from Janviers
SASA (Route des chênes, Le Genest-st-Isle, St Berthevin, France) were grouped in
polycarbonate cages and acclimatized for 1 week under the following conditions
(22–26°C, ventilation, and 12/12 light/dark cycle) with free access to water and
food in the animal house of the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lille,
France, and used for intestinal contraction studies. Circadian rhythm can
influence important functions in the body, for this, all experiments were
performed at the same time (9 h) every day. Moreover, all animal treatments were
approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of National
Institute of Health and performed according with the NIH Guidelines for Care and
Use of Laboratory Animals.
Acute Toxicity Study
The acute toxicity was evaluated, by administering orally, increasing doses of
the ZOAE ranging from 10 to 3200 mg/kg, b.w. to mice divided into 8 groups of 10
animals each. A control group was treated with 10 mL/kg of NaCl 0.9%. The
animals were examined every 30 minutes for the first 6 hours on the first day,
then once per day for 48 hours. These observations were based on mortality,
mobility, respiratory changes, and poor appetite.
GI-Transit Measurement
GI-motility was evaluated using the charcoal meal method.
The rats were fasted for 16 hours and divided into 6 groups of 6 animals
each: Group 1 served as a negative control and received 1 mL of physiological
solution (NaCl, .9%), Groups 2 and 3 received YOH (2 mg/kg, b.w.) and LP
(3 mg/kg, b.w.), respectively, and Groups 4, 5, and 6 were treated with
different doses of the ZOAE (75, 150, and 300 mg/kg, b.w.). A standard charcoal
meal (10% charcoal in 5% gum arabic) was administered orally using an
intra-gastric tube 2 hours after treatment. 30 minutes later, the animals were
sacrificed and the distance traveled by the charcoal meal from the pylorus was
measured. GIT was expressed as a percentage and calculated according to the
following rule:
GE Assessment
To measure the ZOAE-action on GE, the method of the red phenol was used.
Animals were randomized into six lots of six animals each and treated
1 hour before test-meal [50 mg phenol red in 100 mL aqueous methyl cellulose
(1.5%)] as follows: Group 1 served as a negative control and received 1 mL of
physiological solution (NaCl, .9%), Groups 2 and 3 received the standard-drug,
YOH (2 mg/kg, b.w.), and LP (5 mg/kg, b.w.) and Groups 4, 5, and 6 were treated
with various doses of the ZOAE (75, 150, and 300 mg/kg, b.w.). Sixty minutes of
receiving of the phenol red, animals were killed. The gastric contents were
combined with 100 mL of NaOH (0.1 N). The suspension was allowed to settle for
1 hour at room temperature, and to 2.5 mL of the supernatant .25 mL of
trichloroacetic acid 20% (w/v) was added and centrifuged at 1800 g for
20 minutes. The supernatant was finally mixed with 4 mL of NaOH (0.5 N) and the
absorbance of the samples was read at 560 nm. The collected phenol red from
animal stomachs after the test meal intra-gastric administration was considered
as the standard (0% of GE).The GE rate of percent was determined according to the following
formula:
Obtaining Constipated Rats
The gastric gavage of LP (3 mg/kg, b.w., in .9% sterilized physiological saline)
for 1 week was used to induce the slow colonic transit. A total of 36 rats were
used for the experiment and they were divided into the following groups:Group 1: Negative control group (n = 6), in which rats were treated
with a physiological solution (10 mL/kg of body weight).Group 2: Constipated group (n = 6), in which rats were treated with
LP (3 mg/kg of body weight).Group 3: LP + ZOAE 75 (n = 6), in which rats were treated first with
LP and 1 hour later treated with 75 mg/kg of body weight of
ZOAE.Group 4: LP + ZOAE 150 (n = 6), in which rats first were treated with
LP and 1 hour later treated with 150 mg/kg of body weight of
ZOAE.Group 5: LP + ZOAE 300 (n = 6), in which rats first were treated with
LP and 1 hour later treated with 300 mg/kg of body weight of
ZOAE.Group 6: YOH group (n = 6), in which rats were treated first with LP
and 1 hour later treated with a standard drug YOH (2 mg/kg of body
weight).The water/food intake was measured during the experimental duration.The wet/dry weight of the rat fecal pellets was collected on day 5 during
24 hours, and we calculated modifications in these indicators.The fecal water level was done by putting the fecal samples at 70°C for 24 hours
and calculated by the difference between the weight before and after drying.At the last of the practice, the animals were decapitated and the collected blood
was centrifuged at 3000 g/20min/4°C to obtain plasma. The colons of constipated
rats were removed and recovered under glace and the mucosae were then
homogenized in the Tris-buffered saline (TBS) solution and then centrifuged at
3000 g/15 min/4°C.The supernatant and the plasma thus obtained were stored at −80°C to be used for
biochemical assays.
Ex Vivo Antioxidant Activities of ZOAE
Catalase (CAT) activity was measured according to the Aebi method
by following the decrease in the absorbance of the reaction medium
(phosphate buffer + plasma or colon mucosa) after addition of
H2O2 at 240 nm. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) was
determined according to the method of Misra and Fridorich.
Moreover, the activity of glutathione peroxidase (GPx) was examined based
on Flohé and Günzler procedure.The last components of polyunsaturated fatty acids peroxidation in the cells or
the malondialdehyde (MDA) produced following an accumulation of the free
radicals during oxidative stress installation. It is measured by the method of
Draper et al.
Sulfhydryl groups (-SH) level was realized using Ellman’s method.
Reduced glutathione (GSH) level was accomplished in agreement with the
Sedlak and Lindsay method.
Colon Histology
Colonic tissue segments were removed and fixed directly in formaldehyde (10%)
after sacrifice for histopathological observations. The samples were
subsequently embedded in paraffin and then sectioned into 5 μm thick slices.
These sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) solution to
study the change in thickness and inflammatory infiltrate of the colonic mucosa,
while the secretion of mucus was observed with the staining of the Alcian
blue.
Study of Intestinal Contraction and Relaxation
Overnight fasted male mice are subjects to vertebral dislocation. A segment of
5 cm of the jejunum was excised and washed in saline solution under the ice. The
forceps were used to strip off precisely the jejunum mesenteric border. The
jejunum sections (2 cm) were detached using flushing with a solution of Tyrode
whose composition is as follows: NaCl (136.9 mM), KCl (2.7 mM), CaCl2
(1.8 mM), NaHCO3 (11.09 mM), MgCl2 (1.05 mM),
NaH2PO4 (.42 mM), and glucose (5.5 mM) at pH 7.4. Each
tissue was put in a 3 mL organ bath enclosing Tyrode’s solution maintained at
37°C ± .5 and providing 95% O2 and 5% CO2. A first tension
of .5 g was used, and the spontaneous muscular contractility was registered
isometrically at the same time utilizing JFD-2 Transducer (Laboratoires TBC,
France). Drugs and ZOAE were joined immediately to the organ chamber in volumes
not more than 1% of the total bath volume. At the last of the 45-minutes
equilibration duration, the actions of various doses of the ZOAE and/or the
drugs were evaluated cumulatively with a contact period of 2 minutes for each
concentration. The effect on contraction and relaxation of the extract at a
concentration of 500 μg/mL against 10−6 M carbamylcholine (CarbCh),
25 mM KCl and 10 mM CaCl2 was assessed.
Study of Intestinal ZOAE Secretion in Ussing Chambers
Jejunum tissues have been put in Ussing chambers (exposed area,
.30 cm2) containing on each side 3 mL of a Ringer solution
composed of NaCl (115 mM), NaHCO3 (25 mM), MgCl2 (1.2 mM),
CaCl2 (1.2 mM), K2HPO4 (2.4 mM), and
KH2PO4 (.4 mM).Each chamber must be maintained at a constant temperature of 37°C and
consecutively gassed by bubbling carbogen (95% O2–5% CO2).
During mounting, the sample must be well spread out and completely cover
the orifice of the Ussing half-chambers. Subsequently, 100 μL of the ZOAE at a
concentration of 500 μg/mL was added after forskolin (10 μM) was placed in the
serous side. Forskolin causes an increase in the chloride secretion of the cell
capacity. It is also used to check the viability and sensitivity of the
epithelial tissue. Using electrical parameters, short circuit current (Isc), and
conductance (G), it is possible to study the action of ZOAE on secretion through
the mouse jejunum.
Statistical Analysis
Pharmacological responses for isolated experiments using n tissues are presented
as means ± SEM (standard error of the mean). Graphs of the
concentration–response curves were resolved using nonlinear regression and were
fitted to the Hill equation by an iterative least-squares method (GraphPad Prism
version 8.0 for Windows, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). One-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA) was realized for the comparison of the diverse
actions with the control (Dunnett) and for the multiple-group comparisons
(Bonferroni–Dunn). Linear regression was used for food intake and water
consumption computed using the trapezoid rule. Statistical significance was set
as P < .05.
Results
Identification and Quantification of Zingiber Officinale
Aqueous Extract Phenolic Compounds With LC-HRESIMS Assay
The characterization of bioactive components in ZOAE was accomplished by
LC-HRESIMS and 23 phenolic compounds were experimentally established based on
their retention times. The main ones are quinic acid, trans-cinnamic acid,
rosmarinic acid, cirsiliol, protocatechuic acid, and p-coumaric acid (Figure 1 and Table 1).
Figure 1.
ZOAE-phenolic major compounds.
Table 1.
Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Electrospray Ionization Mass
Spectrometry (LC-HRESIMS) Analysis of ZOAE.
Molecular Formula
PubChem
(M) H m/z
Retention Time
Concentration, ppm
1. Quinic acid
C7H12O6
6508
191
2.112
147.609
2. Trans-cinnamic acid
C9H8O2
444539
147
32.168
75.046
3. Rosmarinic acid
C18H16O8
5281792
359
26.487
47.426
4. Cirsiliol
C17H14O7
160237
329
35.830
10.630
5. Protocatechuic acid
C7H6O4
72
153
6.907
8.868
6. P-coumaric acid
C9H8O3
637542
163
21.061
7.317
7. Syringic acid
C9H10O5
10742
197
16.259
3.365
8. Trans-ferulic acid
C10H10O4
445858
193
23.302
3.186
9. Naringin
C27H32O14
42428
579
26.258
2.519
10. Caffeic acid
C9H8O4
689043
179
14.607
2.442
11. Luteolin-7-o-glucoside
C21H20O11
5280637
447
24.859
1.835
12. Apigenin-7-o-glucoside
C21H20O10
45933926
431
27.171
.978
13. 4-O-caffeoylquinic acid
C16H18O9
5281780
353
11.634
.798
14. Chlorogenic acid
C16H18O9
1794427
353
11.634
.773
15. Kaempferol
C15H10O6
5280863
285
32.213
.721
16.4,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid
C25H24O12
6474309
515
27.060
.597
17. Acacetin
C16H12O5
5280442
283
40.654
.409
18. Quercetin
(quercetin-3-o-rhamnoside)
C21H20O11
15939939
447
27.024
.394
19. Hyperoside
(quercetin-3-o-galactoside)
C21H20O12
15939939
463
24.813
.305
20. Apigenin
C15H10O5
5280443
269
34.762
.277
21. Quercetin
C15H10O7
5280343
301
32.235
.190
22. Luteolin
C15H10O6
5280445
285
35.201
.044
23. Cirsilineol
C18H16O7
162464
343
39.057
.032
ZOAE-phenolic major compounds.Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Electrospray Ionization Mass
Spectrometry (LC-HRESIMS) Analysis of ZOAE.
Phenolic Compound Quantities
The result of colorimetric analysis of chemical constituents of ZOAE indicates
that the mean polyphenols, flavonoids, and condensed tannins contents were
equivalent to 4.14 ± .06 mg GAE/g DM, 2.34 ± .19 mg QE/g DM, and .33 ± .02 mg
CE/g DM, respectively (Figure
2).
Figure 2.
Phytochemical composition of ZOAE.
Phytochemical composition of ZOAE.
2,2-diphényl 1-picrylhydrazyl Scavenging and Metal Ion Chelating Activity of
ZOAE
The antiradical power of ZOAE to trap DPPH free radical was evaluated based on
the concentration required for 50% inhibition of this radical (IC50).
The kinetics of degradation of the DPPH radical as a function of the increasing
concentrations of ZOAE and BHA made it possible to specify an IC50 of
the order of .35 ± .01 mg/mL and .22 ± .01 mg/mL (Table 2).
Table 2.
IC50 (mg/mL) Values of ZOAE for DPPH and Metal Chelating
Tests.
IC50
DPPH Radical
Metal Chelating
EAZO
.35 ± .01
1.99 ± .15
BHA
.22 ± .01
.66 ± .08
DPPH, 2,2-diphényl 1-picrylhydrazyl; BHA, butylhydroxyanisol;
ZOAE, Zingiber officinale aqueous extract;
IC50, the median inhibitory concentration. Data
are represented as means ± SD (n = 3).
IC50 (mg/mL) Values of ZOAE for DPPH and Metal Chelating
Tests.DPPH, 2,2-diphényl 1-picrylhydrazyl; BHA, butylhydroxyanisol;
ZOAE, Zingiber officinale aqueous extract;
IC50, the median inhibitory concentration. Data
are represented as means ± SD (n = 3).The chelating capacity extract is measured by monitoring the inhibition of Fe
(II)-ferrozine complex formation after incubation of ZOAE, at different
concentrations, with divalent iron. The results obtained showed that the
inhibition concentration (IC50) to chelate 50% of Fe2+ is
equal to 1.99 ± .15 mg/mL and .66 ± .08 mg/mL, respectively, for ZOAE and BHA
(Table 2).
Effect of ZOAE on Acute-Toxicity Studies
The acute-toxicity test of ZOAE at the oral limit doses of 10, 50, 100, 200, 400,
800, 1600, and 3200 mg/kg caused no abnormal behavior or mortality in the mice.
No signs of toxicity were observed pending the monitoring period.
LD50 value considered higher than 3200 mg/kg.
Effect of LP and ZOAE on Food Intake and Water Intake
Figure 3 has shown that
LP causes a remarkable diminution in these parameters in constipated rats
compared to normal rats. However, the treatment with ZOAE considerably increases
access to water in a dose-dependent response in comparison to the constipated
animals and improves food consumption only at the highest dose (300 mg/kg)
compared to the same group. No significant difference (P >
.05) was detected in the food and water intake between the negative control and
the rats treated with ZOAE.
Figure 3.
Linear correlation between water consumption and food intake. Animals
were treated with NaCl solution (CT, NaCl 0.9%), LP (3 mg/kg, b.w.),
YOH (positive control group, 2 mg/kg, b.w.), and different
concentrations of ZOAE (75, 150, and 300 mg/kg, b.w.).
Linear correlation between water consumption and food intake. Animals
were treated with NaCl solution (CT, NaCl 0.9%), LP (3 mg/kg, b.w.),
YOH (positive control group, 2 mg/kg, b.w.), and different
concentrations of ZOAE (75, 150, and 300 mg/kg, b.w.).
Control of Constipation Induced by LP
The effect of LP in inducing constipation is demonstrated in Figure 4. Significant decrease in
gastrointestinal movement was observed in LP-group rats compared to the negative
control with a reduction of 22.70% (Figure 4A). It also delayed gastric
emptying time in constipated rats (%GE= 55.47 ± 1.40%) compared to the negative
control (%GE= 70.77 ± 1.23%) (Figure 4A). Oral administration of LP induces a significant
reduction in the total number of stools collected on day 5 in constipated rats
(n = 38.23 ± 4.88) compared to the negative control group (n = 109.00 ± 5.56)
(Figure 4B). A
reduction of 27.60% in fecal water content was also detected in constipated rats
compared to the negative control (Figure 4C). This reduction is proved by
a drop in weight of wet and dry stools compared to the control group (Figure 4D).
Figure 4.
Effect of LP on GIT and GE (Figure 4A), as well as its
action on total number of fecal markers [pellet (B),
water content of stools (C), and wet/dry fecal weight
(D)] discharged over 24 h. Data are expressed as
means ± SEM (n = 6). *: P < .05 in comparison
with the no treated animals (ANOVA test).
Effect of LP on GIT and GE (Figure 4A), as well as its
action on total number of fecal markers [pellet (B),
water content of stools (C), and wet/dry fecal weight
(D)] discharged over 24 h. Data are expressed as
means ± SEM (n = 6). *: P < .05 in comparison
with the no treated animals (ANOVA test).As shown in Figure 5A,
the highest rate of lipid peroxidation was marked in constipated rats at the
plasma and colonic level following intoxication by LP. On the other hand, for
non-enzymatic antioxidants, LP produced in the colon and plasma a reduction in
reduced glutathione (GSH, Figure 5B) and sulfhydryl group (-SH, Figure 5C) activity in LP-treated
animals compared to the control group.
Figure 5.
Effect of LP on colon and plasma MDA concentration (A),
reduced glutathione (B), sulfhydryl groups
(C), catalase (D), glutathione
peroxidase (E), and superoxide dismutase
(F) activity after LP-induced constipation in a rat
model. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). *:
P < .05 compared with the no treated rats
(ANOVA test).
Effect of LP on colon and plasma MDA concentration (A),
reduced glutathione (B), sulfhydryl groups
(C), catalase (D), glutathione
peroxidase (E), and superoxide dismutase
(F) activity after LP-induced constipation in a rat
model. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). *:
P < .05 compared with the no treated rats
(ANOVA test).For the enzymatic antioxidant, the results presented in Figure 6 showed that loperamide
significantly reduced colonic and plasma catalase (Figure 6D), GPx (Figure 6E), and SOD activities (Figure 6F) compared to
the control group.
Figure 6.
Effect of ZOAE on GIT and GE (A), as well as its action
on total number, water content of fecal pellet (B), and
wet/dry fecal weight (C) after LP-induced constipation
in a rat model. Animals were treated with different doses of ZOAE
(75, 150, and 300 mg/kg, b.w.) 1 hour after LP-administration. Data
are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). *: P < .05
in comparison with the no treated group (ANOVA test).
Effect of ZOAE on GIT and GE (A), as well as its action
on total number, water content of fecal pellet (B), and
wet/dry fecal weight (C) after LP-induced constipation
in a rat model. Animals were treated with different doses of ZOAE
(75, 150, and 300 mg/kg, b.w.) 1 hour after LP-administration. Data
are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). *: P < .05
in comparison with the no treated group (ANOVA test).
Anti-Constipation Effect of Zingiber officinale Aqueous
Extract
The treatment with ZOAE accelerated the intestinal transit compared to the
constipated rats at all the doses tested (Figure 6A). Likewise for gastric
emptying, ZOAE accelerated this process in a dose-dependent manner compared to
constipated rats (Figure
6A). The protective effect of ZOAE was demonstrated by increasing the
total number of stools while protecting them from dehydration. The latter was
reflected by an increase in fecal water content. The highest content was marked
at 300 mg/kg, b.w. (Figure
6B). This is confirmed by an increase in the weight of wet stools
(Figure 6C).The increase in MDA caused by LP was significantly attenuated in ZOAE-treated
rats with a reduction of 35.82% and 41.91%, respectively, for colon and plasma
at the highest used dose (Figure 7A). As shown in Figure 7B, the decrease in plasma and
colonic reduced glutathione activity previously observed in constipated rats was
significantly improved by ZOAE treatment for all doses and only at the last 2
doses for sulfhydryl group activity in colonic mucosa (Figure 7C).
Figure 7.
Reverse action of ZOAE on oxidative stress indicators [MDA
(A), reduced glutathione (B),
sulfhydryl groups (C), catalase (D),
glutathione peroxidase (E), and superoxide dismutase
(F)] after LP-caused constipated rat model. Animals
were treated with different doses of ZOAE (75, 150, and 300 mg/kg,
b.w.) 1 hour after LP-administration. Data are expressed as means ±
SEM (n = 6). *: P < .05 in comparison with the
no treated group (ANOVA test).
Reverse action of ZOAE on oxidative stress indicators [MDA
(A), reduced glutathione (B),
sulfhydryl groups (C), catalase (D),
glutathione peroxidase (E), and superoxide dismutase
(F)] after LP-caused constipated rat model. Animals
were treated with different doses of ZOAE (75, 150, and 300 mg/kg,
b.w.) 1 hour after LP-administration. Data are expressed as means ±
SEM (n = 6). *: P < .05 in comparison with the
no treated group (ANOVA test).Catalase activity was improved significantly by treatment with ZOAE in the
colonic mucosa at different doses. For plasma, the increase in activity is
slight but significant at the highest dose (Figure 7D). The decrease in plasma and
colonic GPx activity observed in the loperamide group compared to the negative
control was significantly improved by treatment with ZOAE in the last 2 doses
(Figure 7E). The
ameliorative effect of ZOAE for SOD activity was observed at the highest dose
with an increase of 23.60% and 26.85%, respectively, for the colon and the
plasma compared to the loperamide group (Figure 7F).
Effect of ZOAE on the Histology of the Colonic Mucosa
Colonic tissues were histologically studied to verify whether LP could alter the
morphology of the mucous layer H&E staining showed that the structure of the
colonic mucosa is conserved in the negative control group (Figure 8A). On the other hand, the
treatment with LP presents a shorter layer of the mucosa compared to normal rats
and induces an infiltration of inflammatory cells in the mucous layer (Figure 8A and B). The
administration of ZOAE could protect the colon by maintaining the thickness of
the mucosa and reducing the inflammatory infiltrate compared to the constipated
group and the YOH group where the infiltration of inflammatory cells into the
mucous layer is observed more abundant (Figure 8A and E). This protective effect
is more marked at the 2 highest concentrations (Figure 8A, C, and D).
Figure 8.
Effect of ZOAE on colon mucosa structure and production of the mucus
during LP-induced constipation. Animals were administrated with
different concentrations of ZO (75, 150, and 300 mg/kg, b.w.), YOH
(2 mg/kg, b.w.), and NaCl solution .9% 1 h after LP administration.
Constipated rats (LP) were treated only with LP molecule (3 mg/kg,
b.w.). (A) Negative control, (B)
constipated group, (C) LP + ZOAE 150 mg/kg, b.w.,
(D) LP + ZOAE 300 mg/kg, b.w., and (E)
LP + YOH. The histopathological modifications in the slide portions
of colon tissue were analyzed by staining with H&E followed by
monitoring at 40x.
Effect of ZOAE on colon mucosa structure and production of the mucus
during LP-induced constipation. Animals were administrated with
different concentrations of ZO (75, 150, and 300 mg/kg, b.w.), YOH
(2 mg/kg, b.w.), and NaCl solution .9% 1 h after LP administration.
Constipated rats (LP) were treated only with LP molecule (3 mg/kg,
b.w.). (A) Negative control, (B)
constipated group, (C) LP + ZOAE 150 mg/kg, b.w.,
(D) LP + ZOAE 300 mg/kg, b.w., and (E)
LP + YOH. The histopathological modifications in the slide portions
of colon tissue were analyzed by staining with H&E followed by
monitoring at 40x.Sections stained with Alcian blue were examined for mucus detection. LP-induced a
decrease in mucus secretion (Figure 8B) compared to the negative control group where the
secretion is observed normal (Figure 8A and B). Treatment with ZOAE increased the amount of mucus
associated with an improvement of producing cells compared to other groups
(Figure 8B, C, and
D).
Effect of Zingiber officinale Aqueous Extract on Spontaneous
Contraction of the Intestine
The results obtained in Figure
9 showed that the ZOAE does not induce intestinal relaxation or
contraction. However, ZOAE induces an increase of the amplitude of spontaneous
contraction of the intestine as a function of various doses (1, 10, 50, 100,
500, and 1000 μg/mL) with EC50 of 10.52 μg/mL.
Figure 9.
Typical recording of the effect of ZOAE on spontaneous contraction of
mouse jejunum (A). The concentration–response effect of
ZOAE at concentrations of 1–1000 μg/mL (B). This figure
shows that the concentration of ZOAE which induces 50% of the
maximum concentration (EC50) is 10.520 μg/mL. The
concentration–response curve was obtained using nonlinear regression
using Hill’s equation by an iterative least-squares method.
Typical recording of the effect of ZOAE on spontaneous contraction of
mouse jejunum (A). The concentration–response effect of
ZOAE at concentrations of 1–1000 μg/mL (B). This figure
shows that the concentration of ZOAE which induces 50% of the
maximum concentration (EC50) is 10.520 μg/mL. The
concentration–response curve was obtained using nonlinear regression
using Hill’s equation by an iterative least-squares method.
Effect of Zingiber officinale Aqueous Extract on the Nervous
System
Figure 10A shows that
the ZOAE does not inhibit the contraction induced by CarbCh which activates
acetylcholine receptors as a cholinergic agonist. In addition, Figure 10B and C show
that ZOAE when used before CarbCh rather reduces the frequency and causes an
increase in the contraction induced by CarbCh. ZOAE is a neurotrope and it acts
weakly on the nervous system.
Figure 10.
Effect of ZOAE (500 μg/mL) on the contraction induced by CarbCh
(10−6 M) before (A) and after
(B) its stimulation.
Effect of ZOAE (500 μg/mL) on the contraction induced by CarbCh
(10−6 M) before (A) and after
(B) its stimulation.
Effect of Zingiber officinale Aqueous Extract on Smooth
Muscles
The results in Figure
11 showed that the ZOAE at a concentration of .5 mg/mL does not
reduce the intestinal contraction induced neither with 25 mM of KCl nor that
induced by 10 mM of CaCl2, so it did not have direct effect on smooth
muscles, which makes it possible to deduce that the ZOAE is not a
musculotrope.
Figure 11.
Effect of ZOAE on intestinal contraction induced by 25 mM KCl
(A) and 10 mM CaCl2
(B).
Effect of ZOAE on intestinal contraction induced by 25 mM KCl
(A) and 10 mM CaCl2
(B).
Effect of Zingiber officinale Aqueous Extract on Fluid
Secretion (Ussing Chamber)
Figure 12 showed that
the ZOAE has no effect on the short circuit current (Isc).
Likewise, this extract has no effect on the increase in short circuit enhanced
by an adenylate cyclase activator or forskolin (FSK, 10 mM, serosal addition).
ZOAE does not influence the intestinal secretion of water and electrolytes
caused by FSK which excludes its effects as a secretagogue and an
anti-secretagogue.
Figure 12.
Typical short circuit current recording after addition of FSK
10−5 M and ZOAE (500 μg/mL).
Typical short circuit current recording after addition of FSK
10−5 M and ZOAE (500 μg/mL).
Discussion
In the recent research, the laxative/purgative actions of ZOAE were assessed based on
various modifications in numerous parameters such as fecal signs (numbers, weight,
and water content), GI-motility, spontaneous intestinal contraction, intestinal
water and electrolyte absorption/secretion processes, and the thickness of the
colonic mucous in vivo after LP-produced a slowing of frequent colonic transit, a
rat constipation model. These ZOAE-actions were compared with those obtained with
the YOH, an alpha-2 adrenergic antagonist, as a reference drug.Firstly, the data demonstrated that phytochemical analysis of ZOAE using LC-HRESIMS
technique reported the existence of 11 phenol carboxylic acids and 12 flavonoids.
Similar results showed the presence of some phenolic compounds obtained in this study.
The medicinal use of these compounds may be related to their antioxidant
abilities. In this context, many studies have shown that phenolic acids such as
quinic acid, caffeic acid, rosmarinic acid, trans-ferulic acid, and
p-coumaric acid have a strong antioxidant power.[38-40] Equally for flavonoids such
as kaempferol, luteolin and quercetin can decrease the oxidative damage induced by
reactive oxygen species.[40-42]It is well-intentioned that the antioxidant capacity of these constituents in natural
products is due to their ability to provide electrons or hydrogen atom transfer to
scavenge free radicals.
The anti-radical DPPH test to confirm the potentiality of the bioactive
components of ZOAE to act as donors of hydrogen atoms. The results obtained showed
that ZOAE has a high antioxidant power with IC50 = .35 ± .01 mg/mL
compared to different ginger extracts obtained using four solvents (ethanol,
methanol, acetone, and ethyl acetate) randomly collected from local markets of
Ayikel and Mandura town, Ethiopia.
The inhibitory effect of ZOAE on this free radical can be caused by the
polysaccharides of ginger. In this context, many studies have shown that the
polysaccharides of Zingiber officinale have a high antioxidant
potential in vitro by reducing the DPPH radical, hydroxyl radical, and superoxide radical.
But this antioxidant power can vary according to the method and the solvent
of extraction.[45,46]The antioxidant activities of the natural product extracts may be resulted from their
chelating activity ability against transition metal ions, in particular ferrous and
copper ions. This effect seems to be specifically influential for pathogenesis in
which immense amounts of metal ions may provoke an oxidation of biological
macromolecules especially proteins and lipids.For this purpose, the chelating capacity of ginger was studied. Indeed, the aqueous
extract of ginger showed a weak chelating effect towards Fe2+ ions, which
can be explained by the existence of small quantities of water-soluble molecules
with the capacity to bind or bond with iron ions. In contrast, some studies found a
significant chelating activity of the ginger aqueous/ethanolic extracts with a
chelating power of 27.3 and 36.2%, respectively, at a dose of 10 μg/mL concentration.
And others have shown the same effect for the organic extract of ginger
and for the chloroform extract of a species of the
Zingiberaceae family.
These authors reported that structures containing 2 or more of the following
functional groups OH, SH, COOH, PO3H2, CO, and NR2
in a favorable functional structure configuration are responsible for the chelating
activity.The acute toxicity assessment showed that ZOAE showed no indicators of toxicity or
mortality pending the checking duration with an LD50 higher than the limit dose
studied (LD50> 3200 mg/kg).In addition, to study the gastrointestinal empty stomach, we evaluated the movement
of phenol red which is attributable to peristaltic propulsion by monitoring the rate
of gastric emptying. The ZOAE accelerates GE-time in a dose-dependent manner
compared to the LP-group. These actions are principally due to the existence of the
main components in ginger citing gingerols and shogaol and to their activity on
muscarinic acetylcholine receptors and 5-HT serotonergic receptors. Pertz et al
demonstrated that ginger could act on the 5-HT receptor ion channel complex
by blinding the serotonin binding site and Sharma et al
reported that ginger inhibits cisplatin-induced delayed gastric emptying.
Similar results have shown that Zingiber officinale stimulated this
digestive phenomenon and antral contractions in patients with functional dyspepsia.Consumption of ZOAE effectively improved bowel movement, increased the amplitude of
spontaneous contraction of the intestine, and elevated stool output. In fact, ZOAE
protects against LP-induced constipation by accelerating colonic transit. This
protection has also been proven by the increased number of stools and fecal water
content compared to constipated rats. Indeed, LP binds to the opiate receptors of
intestinal wall cell, inhibits intestinal secretion, slows peristalsis by increasing
the time of intestinal transit, and stimulates the electron neutral absorption of
water and electrolytes in the enterocyte.[52-54] The laxative effect of ginger
can be explained by its high content of carbohydrates and dietary fiber. Ginger
contains around 60–70% carbohydrates and 3–8% of total fiber.
Via mechanical stimulation the insoluble fibers may induce the intestinal
mucosa to mucus water secretion and soluble fibers retain a massive water retention
capability to maintain the gut hydration.
They must be resistant to fermentation to remain intact and increase the
fecal water content. Fibers therefore make the stools denser, more voluminous, and
make them retain more water which promotes natural peristalsis and therefore their
progression. For these reasons, fibers accelerate colonic motility.The laxative effect of ZOAE can also be confirmed by its low content of condensed
tannins (.33 mg/g DM). It is known that tannins with proteins may form
protein–tannate complex and therefore cause their denaturation, which makes the
intestinal mucosa higher resistant and decreases water/electrolyte secretion, thus
promoting the inhibition of GIT.GI-hormones modulation such as cholecystokinin (CCK), gastrin (GAS), somatostatin
(SS), and motilin (MTL) may also be another influent mechanism for boosting the
LOP-induced constipation symptoms in animal models after ZOAE consumption. A recent
study revealed that naringenin, a natural flavonoid, regulated the production levels
of GI-metabolic components, such as MTL, GAS, endothelin (ET), substance P (SP),
acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in serum.Added to that, it has been shown in many studies that the involvement of the cell
types found in the intestinal circular muscle (interstitial cells of Cajal, ICCs) to
regular GI-function by production of electrical slow waves and mediating
neuromuscular signaling. Injuries to ICCs have been elucidated in several GI
motility disorders including constipation. Therefore, we think that ZOAE may excite
the membrane potentials by its depolarization. This stimulation can be led to smooth
muscle cells through the gap junction. ICCs might act in response to this membrane
depolarization with stimulating effect of the voltage-dependent channels of the
calcium ions. Thus, this action of pacemaker potentiality depolarization could
produce a GI-motility increase, as with diverse medicinal plants like
Liriope platyphylla and Citrus unshiu.Decreased mucus generation in the mucosa of the colon is related with colonic slow
transit and noted to reduce the colonic mucosal layer thickness, and the number of
mucus-generating cells has been investigated by histopathological diagnosis in the
constipated animals. In this context, in the treatment of animals with LP for a
week, an alteration in the colon microscopical structure was detected in the present
study. It not only caused a decrease in the thickness of the mucous layer and the
number of mucus-producing cells but also caused inflammation of the colon. This side
effect has been proven by several studies. A reduction in mucosal
thickness,[59-62] an infiltration of
inflammatory cells into the damaged mucosa,[60-63] and a decrease in mucus
production were detected in treated rats with LP.[62,63] Mucus is a viscous glandular
secretion produced by the mucous membrane and which lubricates the surface of the
epithelia, playing a role of protection against microorganisms and harmful substances.
Damage to mucus may be caused by reduction in the area of the mucous
membrane, and inflammation may be caused by loss of epithelial integrity and
decrease in mucus-producing cells.[64,65]Treatment with ZOAE protects the colon from inflammation that YOH cannot reduce. In
this context, many authors have confirmed the effect of this extract against inflammation
and others have shown the efficacy of its specific phytochemicals such as
gingerol against acute ulcerative colitis.
In a dose-dependent manner, ZOAE improves the epithelial integrity by
maintaining the thickness of the mucosa and protecting it by the excessive secretion
of mucus. This protective effect against structural damage to the colon may be due
to the antioxidant properties of certain phenolic compounds in ginger such as
quercetin glucoside and caffeoylquinic acid.
Similar results have shown that ZOAE increases the content of gastric mucin
depending on the dose.Oxidative stress is a state of lack of balance between the overproduction of free
radicals and cellular antioxidant capacities.
It is involved in various GI-disorders characterized by disturbance of
peristalsis and irregularity in the secretion/absorption process.
In this context, Zhou et al
reported that chronic constipation, a GI disease, can cause potential
oxidative stress in children. Long-term oxidative stress can damage major cellular
constituents through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) which may be
the subjects of potential injury to DNA, proteins, and lipids.[70,73]In this study, the inhibition of GI-motility and intestinal secretion induced by LP
is accompanied by the increase in plasma and colonic lipoperoxidation and the
attenuation of enzymatic (CAT, SOD, and GPx) and non-enzymatic (sulfhydryl group and
GSH) antioxidant activities. Our results are close to that of Jabri et al
and Sebai et al
who proved that LP increases the level of MDA and decreases antioxidant
activity.Treatment with ZOAE restored any oxidative disturbance obtained. It significantly
reduced lipid peroxidation thanks to the abundance polyphenolic components as
flavonoids like quercetin, kaempferol, apigenin, and luteolin. The latter is capable
of reducing free radical chains through electron and proton transfer and chelating
transition metal ions capable of catalyzing lipid peroxidation.
Our results corroborate with the work of Oboh et al
who revealed that the aqueous extract of 2 varieties of ginger (red and
white) produced significant reduction in brain MDA in a dose dependent manner and
this is due to the fact that phytochemicals compounds in ginger protect against
lipid peroxidation by their potential to chelate Fe+2 ions and trap
hydroxyl radical. Other studies have found that ginger lowers MDA levels and
increases plasma antioxidant capacity in diabetic rats.In addition, the administration of ZOAE at different doses significantly normalizes
the activity of non-enzymatic antioxidants, but for the improvement of the activity
of enzymatic antioxidants, it is not significant. The bioactive molecules present in
ginger can exert their antioxidant activity by increasing the concentration of
biologically important endogenous antioxidants.
In this context, the antioxidant potential of caffeic acid and ferulic acid
has been expressed through their strong iron-reducing activities.
They strengthen oxidative defense by increasing levels of endogenous
antioxidant enzymes.[78,79] Li et al
have also shown that treatment with cinnamic acid increases CAT, SOD, GPx,
and GSH activity. As well, rosmarinic acid and p-coumaric acid
regulate oxidative damage by increasing the activity of these
antioxidants.[81,82] The obtained results are in accordance with those found by
Abd-Allah et al
which provide that ginger elevates the level of reduced glutathione and
antioxidant enzymes and declines the MDA level in the intestinal mucosa.
Conclusion
ZOAE promotes GI and colonic motilities by enhancing a laxative action and
alleviating oxidative damage, which proved that ZOAE has a strong ability to reduce
and prevent slow colonic movements. These data may provide important information for
the future researches to elaborate the appropriate underlying mechanisms, the
mediated molecular pathways, and the principal bioactive compounds of ZOAE. Thus,
the obtained findings suggest the potential of ginger extract as an additive in the
food and pharmaceutical industries.
Authors: Ji Eun Kim; Young Ju Lee; Moon Hwa Kwak; Jun Ko; Jin Tae Hong; Dae Youn Hwang Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 3.659