| Literature DB >> 36132675 |
Rama Dubey1, Dhiraj Dutta1, Arpan Sarkar1, Pronobesh Chattopadhyay1.
Abstract
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are considered as one of the ideal materials due to their high surface area, high aspect ratio, and impressive material properties, such as mechanical strength, and thermal and electrical conductivity, for the manufacture of next generation composite materials. In spite of the mentioned attractive features, they tend to agglomerate due to their inherent chemical structure which limits their application. Surface modification is required to overcome the agglomeration and increase their dispersability leading to enhanced interactions of the functionalized CNTs with matrix materials/polymer matrices. Recent developments concerning reliable methods for the functionalization of carbon nanotubes offer an additional thrust towards extending their application areas. By chemical functionalization, organic functional groups are generated/attached to the surfaces as well as the tip of CNTs which opens up the possibilities for tailoring the properties of nanotubes and extending their application areas. Different research efforts have been devoted towards both covalent and non-covalent functionalization for different applications. Functionalized CNTs have been used successfully for the development of high quality nanocomposites, finding wide application as chemical and biological sensors, in optoelectronics and catalysis. Non covalently functionalized carbon nanotubes have been used as a substrate for the immobilization of a large variety of biomolecules to impart specific recognition properties for the development of miniaturized biosensors as well as designing of novel bioactive nanomaterials. Functionalized CNTs have also been demonstrated as one of the promising nanomaterials for the decontamination of water due to their high adsorption capacity and specificity for various contaminants. Specifically modified CNTs have been utilized for bone tissue engineering and as a novel and versatile drug delivery vehicle. This review article discusses in short the synthesis, properties and applications of CNTs. This includes the need for functionalization of CNTs, methods and types of functionalization, and properties of functionalized CNTs and their applications especially with respect to material and biomedical sciences, water purification, and drug delivery systems. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 36132675 PMCID: PMC9419119 DOI: 10.1039/d1na00293g
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Adv ISSN: 2516-0230
Salient features of SWCNTs and MWCNTs
| S. no. | SWCNTs | MWCNTs |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Single layer of graphene having a diameter of 0.4 to 3.0 nm | Multiple layer (2–50) of graphene having a diameter 1.4 to 100 nm (15–55 nm preferred) |
| 2 | Catalyst is required for synthesis | Can be produced without a catalyst |
| 3 | Bulk synthesis difficult due to requirement of proper control over growth and atmospheric conditions | Bulk synthesis is easy |
| 4 | Purity is poor | Purity is high |
| 5 | Functionalization sometimes results in defect generation | Chances of defect generation during functionalization are comparatively less |
| 6 | Characterization and evaluation is easy | It is a very complex structure |
| 7 | Easily twistable and pliable | Can't be easily twisted |
Comparison of main synthesis methods of carbon nanotubes
| Method/requirements | CVD | Laser ablation | Arc discharge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw materials & availability | Fossil based & botanical hydrocarbon, abundantly available | Graphite, difficult to get | Pure graphite, difficult to get |
| Nature of process & description | Continuous, substrate placed in an oven, and heated to high temperature followed by slow addition of carbon bearing gas such as methane. Gas decomposes to liberate carbon atoms which combine to form nanotubes | Batch intense laser pulse used to blast graphite to generate carbon gas to form CNTs, and different conditions were tried to get optimum which produces a sufficient amount of SWCNTs | Batch two graphite rods placed a few millimeters apart and connected to a power supply. At 100 amps carbon vaporizes and forms hot plasma |
| Process condition | High temperatures within 500 to 1000 °C at atmospheric pressure | Argon or nitrogen gas at 500 Torr | Low-pressure inert gas (helium) |
| Production cost | Low | High | High |
| Post treatment | Not required | Required | Required |
| Yield | High 20–100% | Moderate 70% max | Good 30–90% max |
| SWCNT | Long tubes with diameters ranging from 0.6 to 4 nm | Long bundles of tubes with length 5–20 microns, and individual diameter from 1–2 nm | Short tubes having diameters in range 0.6–1.4 nm |
| MWCNT | Long tubes with the diameter in the range of 10 to 240 nm | MWNT synthesis is possible but it is too expensive | Short tubes with inner diameter 1–3 nm and the outer diameter approximately 10 nm |
| Purity | High | High | High |
| Production rate | High | Low | Low |
| Energy requirement | Moderate | High | High |
| Reactor design | Easy | Difficult | Difficult |
| Advantages | Easy to scale up, simple process, long length SWCNTs with a controllable diameter and good purity | Good quality SWNTs with high yield and narrow distribution compared to arc discharge | Less expensive with open air synthesis. Can easily produce SWNT & MWNTs. SWNT with few structural defects & MWNTs even without a catalyst |
| Disadvantages | Synthesized CNTs are usually with defects | Costly technique since it requires expensive lasers and high-power, limited to labscale | Extensive purification required since nanotubes are short, tangled with random sizes and directions |
| References |
|
|
|
Effect of CNTs functionalization on properties
| Functionalization method | Property enhancement | References |
|---|---|---|
| Fluorination | Enhanced solubility in organic solvents |
|
| 1,3-Dipolar cycloaddition | Enhanced solubility in aqueous & organic solvents |
|
| Aryl diazonium salt reduction | Enhanced solubility in organic solvents |
|
| Reactive species functionalization | Further derivative functionalization |
|
| Electrophilic addition | Further derivative functionalization |
|
| Metal-containing molecular complex formation | Enhanced solubility & stability in organic solvents |
|
| Carboxylation | Further derivatization, use as molecular linker to interconnect nanotubes |
|
| Nanoparticles deposition | Soluble in water & able to trap water soluble metal ions |
|
| Surfactant functionalization | Enhanced dispersion |
|
| Polymer wrapping | Reversibly solubilized in water stable dispersion in water and organic solvents |
|
| Polymer absorption | Enhanced anchoring ability for proteins and small biomolecules, enhanced dispersion in organic solvents |
|
| Polymer encapsulation | Enhance dispersion of CNTs in a wide variety of polar and non polar solvents and polymer matrices |
|
| Metal deposition | Metal nanotube supported metal nanowire structures |
|
Scheme 1Functionalization approaches for CNTs.
Advantages and disadvantages of various methods of CNT functionalization
| Methods for CNT functionalization | Advantages | Disadvantages | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exohedral | • Does not disrupt the main structure of CNTs | • Properties are specific to the nature of functional groups attached | |
| • Properties of both CNTs and functional group achieved | |||
| Covalent | • Covalent bonds act as substitution sites for functionalization | • Change of hybridization from sp2 to sp3 and loss of the p-conjugation system on the graphene layer |
|
| • Secondary substitution reactions possible | • This results in quenching of the tube emission | ||
| • Functionalization leads to enhanced solubility in water and organic solvents | • Sometimes CNTs get oxidatively consumed in the process | ||
| • Hydrophilic groups introduced onto the CNT surface render them more biocompatible and biodegradable | |||
| Non covalent | • Possibility of adsorbing various groups on CNT surface without disturbing the π system of the graphene sheets | • Stability of dispersions also depends on the nature and concentration of surfactants |
|
| • Hydrophobic part of the adsorbed molecules attaches with nanotube sidewalls through van der Waals, π–π, CH–π and other interactions, whereas aqueous solubility is provided by the hydrophilic part of the molecules | • Polymer wrapping over CNT surface is solvent dependent | ||
| • Aggregation prevented by coulombic repulsion forces between modified CNTs | |||
| • Polymer encapsulated CNTs could be well dispersed in polymer matrices and solvents | |||
| • NTs serve as an electrodeposition template and subsequently as a wire to electrically connect the deposited Au, Pt and Pd nanoparticles resulting in metal nanotube supported metal nanowire structures | |||
| • Non covalent strategy to attach carboxylic functional groups through p–p stacking interactions, thereby creating stable aqueous dispersions and limiting cytotoxicity | |||
| Endohedral | • Buckytubes constitute smart carrier systems which may be filled with tailored materials to address specific demands | • This strategy requires CNTs to be opened, usually under aggressive conditions, which may lead to damaging of the outer wall or surface functionalization |
|
| • CNTs can be filled with anticancer antimalarial drugs | |||
| • Sensitive biological compounds with a low melting point or high decomposition rate can be easily dissolved and introduced into the CNTs, which would otherwise be impossible through a physical route | • Filling yield tends to be rather low (scarcely above 20%) and dramatically reduced with a decrease in CNT diameter, which makes the task rather difficult in the case of SWNTs and DWNTs | ||
| • MWNTs allow for prolonged release of the encapsulated drug, thereby increasing its anticancer efficacy |
Fig. 1Cycloaddition reactions of CNTs, where R1/R2 = alkyl or aryl group.
Fig. 2Arylation of CNTs via reduction of diazonium salts, where R = Cl, NO2, COOH, CO2CH3etc.
Fig. 3Functionalization of CNTs with nitrenes, where R = alkyl group.
Fig. 4Functionalization of CNTs with radicals.
Fig. 5Electrophilic addition reaction of CNTs, where R = alkyl/aryl group.
Fig. 6Linking of CNTs via surface and tip functionalized groups.
Fig. 7Amidation of COOH functionalized CNTs.
Fig. 8Ionic functionalization of COOH functionalized CNTs.
Fig. 9Surfactant functionalization of CNTs (a) and a surfactant micelle (b).
Fig. 10Functionalization of CNTs via polymer wrapping.
Fig. 11Functionalization of CNTs by substituted pyrenes.
Fig. 12Fullerene encapsulation inside CNTs.
Application of functionalized CNTs
| f-CNT compound (chemical structure) | Application area | Advantages offered | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polyethylene/polystyrene/PMMA-covalently functionalized SWCNTs | Advanced polymeric nanocomposites | Enhanced dispersion of CNTs in polymer matrices |
|
| Increased interfacial bonding | |||
| Polymer encapsulated CNTs–Nylon 6 nanocomposite | Advanced polymeric nanocomposites | Improved interfacial adhesion between polymer encapsulated CNTs and Nylon 6 |
|
| Metal NP supported CNTs | Catalysis | Improved catalytic activity and selectivity |
|
| CNTs functionalized with Vaskas compound | Catalysis and molecular electronics | Enhanced solubility with solution durability |
|
| CdSe QDs loaded multiamino f-CNTs & magnetic Fe3O4 NPs for nano sensors, optoelectronics | Nano sensors, optoelectronics, catalysis | Optical property of QDs and magnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles were maintained |
|
| Metal coated and metal filled CNTs | Stealth technology | Enhanced EM absorbing properties |
|
| SWCNTs/PmPV | Photovoltaic devices | Enhanced optoelectronic properties |
|
| Immobilization of DNA, proteins, oligonucleotides | Miniaturized novel biosensors | Coupling of NTs electronic properties with recognition properties of immobilized biosystems |
|
| Chemically functionalized CNTs | Substrate for neuronal growth | Controlled neuronal processes by charge manipulation of f-CNTs |
|
| Glucose oxidase attached CNTs | Single-molecule biosensors | Controlled enzymatic activity |
|
| Covalently linked nanotube peptide conjugates | New bioactive nanomaterials | Enhanced |
|
| Peptide wrapped SWCNTs | Designing & identification of peptide sequences | Identification using phage display |
|
| f-SWCNTs-ethylene oxide surfactants, 4-hydroxynonenal-MWCNTs | Biomolecular recognition | Detection of antibodies binding |
|
| Adsorption of specific antibody | |||
| CNTs and telomeric DNA fragment containing noncanonical G-quadruplex and i-motif forms | Molecular dynamics simulation studies | Encoding of CNTs with tubular nucleic acids for information storage |
|
| Functionalized and cross linked CNTs | Water purification | Highly efficient and targeted removal of chemical and biological contaminants |
|
| Metal oxide coated CNTs | Electrocatalytic water treatment | Treatment by electrocatalytic process |
|
| Magnetic CNTs, f-CNTs | Separation of hydrocarbon and oil from water | Enhanced separation capacity |
|
| Rim functionalized CNTs, zwitterion functionalized CNTs/polyamide nanocomposite membranes, electrochemically modified CNTs | Water desalination | Enhanced performance |
|
| Amine functionalized multi walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)-polyimide membranes | Organic solvent nanofiltration | Enhanced flux |
|
| PEG-CNTs | Battery wastewater | Specific removal of chromium and zinc |
|
| Functionalized CNTs | Drug delivery | Biocompatibility and targeted drug delivery |
|
| Polymeric nanohybrids and f-CNTs | Drug delivery | Targeted drug delivery for cancer therapy |
|
| COOH functionalized SWCNTs | Drug delivery | Targeted delivery of cladribine and flutamide anticancer drug for in a gas phase and water solution |
|
| PEG-SWCNTs | Drug delivery | Targeted drug delivery for cancer |
|