| Literature DB >> 36132179 |
Nur Anis Raihana Mhd Rodzi1, Lai Kuan Lee1.
Abstract
Sacha Inchi (Plukenetia Volubilis L.), SI, is the oleaginous plant of the Euphorbiaceous family originally cultivated in the Amazonian forest. It is traditionally appreciated and consumed as the healthful food. In vivo, in vitro and clinical studies have suggested the beneficial effects of SI for a variety of neuroprotection, dermatology, antidyslipidaemic, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory, antiproliferative and antitumor modulation activities. Many of these potential impacts are related to its bioactive compounds, particularly essential fatty acids, proteins and phytochemicals. However, there are some scientific evidences underlying the risk of toxicity associated with the high doses of SI seed oils. With the aforementioned, this review outlines a narrative review of SI, including its ethnobotanical components, phytochemistry profile, organoleptic and sensory evaluations. The essential development of its latest applications in the field of medicine, pharmacology, safety and toxicological issues, are laconically demonstrated. Moreover, the underlying challenges and upcoming prospective for the integration of SI use are detailed.Entities:
Keywords: Complementary medicine; Ethnopharmacology; Functional food; Nutrition; Precision; Sacha Inchi
Year: 2022 PMID: 36132179 PMCID: PMC9483583 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10572
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Crop features of SI.
| Factor | Features |
|---|---|
| Altitude | Reaches a height of 200 m above sea level in the low jungle and 1500 m in the high jungle. |
| Temperature | Adjusts well in a wide range of temperatures (from 10 to 36 °C). |
| High temperatures are undesirable, which resulting in the wilting of flowers and fruits, especially those that are still fresh. | |
| Water | Requires constant access to water in order to thrive, and it will grow more effectively if the rainy season is consistent throughout the year (850–1000mm). |
| During the dry season, continuous irrigation is vital. | |
| Drought or cold temperatures for extended periods induce slow and difficult growth. | |
| Light | When exposed to low light intensity, the crop needs additional days to complete its vegetative cycle. |
| Flowering is reduced in instances where the shade is particularly severe. | |
| Soil | Able to grow in a variety of soil conditions, including acidic soils and areas with high aluminium concentrations. |
| Location selection is vital to allow proper growth and productivity. | |
| It thrives in clay soil, sandy loam, and acidic soils. | |
| Drainage | In order to rid surplus water both superficially and deeply, this crop requires proper drainage system. |
| The texture of the soil is addressed for proper drainage. |
Adapted from (Gillespie, 2007).
Figure 1Plukenetia volubilis L.; Photo A – Habitus of plant with fresh capsules; B – Whole fruit; driedmcapsules; C – Raw seeds, with testa (shells); D – Dried testa; E – Seeds, without testa; and F –Consumer products; oil and roasted, salted seeds.
Proximate composition of SI seed (kernel) oil and powdered SI.
| Component | SI seed | Powdered SI |
|---|---|---|
| Moisture (g/100g) | 3.30–8.32 | 4.08 ± 0.03 |
| Fat (g/100g) | 33.4–54.70 | 5–11.2 |
| Protein (g/100 g) | 24.20–33.30 | 57.60–61 |
| Total fibre (g/100 g) | 6.59–13.86 | 5.72–12 |
| Carbohydrates (g/100g) | 6.00–30.90 | 15.62–22 |
| Ash (g/100g) | 2.70–6.46 | NR |
| Minerals (mg/100g) | ||
| Calcium | 126.30 ± 0.69 | NR |
| Phosphorus | 519.70 ± 2.77 | NR |
| Sodium | 0.30 ± 0.00 | NR |
| Potassium | 489.30 ± 10.7 | NR |
| Magnesium | 344.20 ± 2.1 | NR |
| Copper | 0.80 ± 0.0 | NR |
| Iron | 4.20 ± 0.0 | NR |
| Manganese | 1.00 ± 0.0 | NR |
| Zinc | 4.10 ± 0.4 | NR |
Source: (Bueno-Borges et al., 2018; Kim and Joo, 2019; Takeyama and Fukushima, 2013; Wang, 2018).
Source: (Organic Crops E.I.R.L, 2017; Quinteros et al., 2016).
Fatty acids content (% of total fatty acids) and bioactive compounds in SI seed and SIO.
| Component | SI seed | SI oil |
|---|---|---|
| Palmitic (C16:0) | 1.6–2.1 | 4.7 ± 0.2 |
| Stearic (C18:0) | 1.1–1.3 | 3.3 ± 0.1 |
| Oleic (C18:1, ω-9) | 3.5–4.7 | 8.9 ± 0.1 |
| Linoleic (C18:2, ω-6) | 12.4–34.98 | 34.1 ± 0.1 |
| ⍺-linolenic acid (C18:3, ω-3) | 12.8–47.04 | 48.2 ± 0.4 |
| Total SFAs | 2.6–3.2 | NR |
| Total UFAs | 30.6–34.3 | NR |
| ⍺-tocopherol (mg/100g) | 1.13–1.27 | 0.4 |
| β-tocopherol (mg/100g) | 0.75–0.95 | NR |
| γ-tocopherol (mg/100g) | 57.4–68.2 | 125.7 |
| δ-tocopherol (mg/100g) | 29.2–47.6 | 86.9 |
| Total flavonoids (mg rutin eq./g oil extract) | NR | 0.34 |
| Total carotenoids (mg/kg) | 0.7–0.9 | NR |
| Total phenols (mg GAE/100g) | 64.6–80.0 | 6.20 |
| Campesterol | 4.5–8.8 | 15.0–15.3 |
| Stigmasterol | 21.2–32.3 | 36.11–58.70 |
| β-Sitosterol | 46.6–63.1 | 43.46–127.40 |
| Total antioxidant activity (μmol TE/g) | 6.5–9.8 | 18.2–95.0 |
Data are presented as % total fatty acids.
Source: (Carillo et al., 2018; Chirinos et al., 2013).
Source: (Chasquibol et al., 2019; Chirinos et al., 2016; Cisneros et al., 2014; Fanali et al., 2011; Follegatti-Romero et al., 2009; Gutiérrez, 2011; Nascimento et al., 2013).
Pharmacological activities of SI.
| Pharmacological Activity | Part | Methods and Outcomes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antioxidant | Seed | SI seeds from 16 cultivars were analysed for different phytochemical, and the content of the evaluated compounds exhibit high variations. | ( |
| The total phenolic and total carotenoid contents were linked to the hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidant capabilities, respectively. | |||
| PUFAs, tocopherols, phytosterols, and phenolic compounds in the seed showed potent antioxidant properties. | |||
| Seed (oil) | ABTS and DPPH assays were used to determine the antioxidant activity of the oil's lipophilic and hydrophilic extracts | ( | |
| Lipophilic extract demonstrated higher antioxidant activity than the hydrophilic extract. | |||
| Seed and seed kernels (raw and honey-coated) | The changes of total phenolic content using several processing methods (open boiling, pressure boiling, low and high temperature roasting, and honey roasting) were tested on SI kernels. The DPPH value was strongly affected by the process temperature and the water activity of the seeds. | ( | |
| Leaf (leaf extract and leaf extract-based silver nanoparticles) | AgNPs (silver nanoparticles) showed a stronger antioxidant activity against DPPH radicals than leaf extracts | ( | |
| Antidyslipidaemic | Seed (roasted) | In 28 volunteers, the effect of consuming 30 g/d SI seeds for 6 weeks were evaluated. 30g confit wheat ( | ( |
| Seed (oil) | SIO consumption resulted in decreases in mean total cholesterol and non-esterified fatty acid readings, as well as an increase in HDL-C. | ( | |
| Antitumour and antiproliferative | Leaf (leaf extracts) | Several leaf extracts were used to address HeLa (cervix) and A549 (lung) tumour cell lines. Methanol and hexane extraction methods inhibited HeLa cell proliferation by 54.3 and 48.5%, respectively. | ( |
| Seed (oil) | In Walker 256 tumour-bearing rats, SIO was found to exhibit anticancer action. | ( |
ABTS = 2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate); DPPH assay = 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate.
Figure 2Simplified mechanisms of SI bioactivity.
Figure 3Mechanism of ROS that can damage RNA and DNA.
Figure 4Chemical structure of tocopherol isomers.
Techno-functional properties of SI proteins.
| Outcomes | Reference |
|---|---|
| Low solubility and water adsorption capacity (7.96% and 2.16 g/g, respectively) | ( |
| Water absorption index (3.2–4.4 g/g), water solubility index (12.4–26.2%), and solubility (10.7–38.0 mg/g) | ( |
| Albumin fraction extracted with saline solution displayed notable protein solubility (63%), water-holding capacity (1.6 g/g), oil retention capacity (1.7 g/g), foaming (350%) and emulsifying (13.0 mL/g) abilities | |
| Increased protein solubility up to 63% as pH increased from 3.0 to 7.0 and significantly dropped (up to approximately 18%) at pH 10.0 | ( |
| 2% salt addition reduces solubility of protein fraction | ( |
| Oil absorption capacity (1.4 g/g), foaming capacity (55% at 1% concentration and pH 8.0), foam stability (33.7% at 1% of concentration, pH 8.0 at 120 min), and emulsifying capacity (59.1%), generally higher than soy protein isolates | |
| Lower water holding (1.8 g/g) and gelling capacities (15%) compared to soy protein isolates | |
| Protein isolates extracted by alkaline water (pH 12.0) presented 84.4% solubility, foam stability of 30% at pH 8.0, and emulsifying, water retention, oil absorption, gelling, and foaming (pH 8.0) capacities of 53.5%, 4.7 g/g, 267.1%, 13%, and 49%, respectively | ( |
Adapted from (Sánchez et al., 2021).