| Literature DB >> 36132134 |
Juil Park1, Yun Soo Jeong2, Yun Seok Suh2,3, Hyo-Cheol Kim2,3, Jin Wook Chung2,3, Jin Woo Choi2,3.
Abstract
Background: A diverse clinical course after the spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) renders nonstandardized treatment protocols. Purpose: To evaluate clinical course and role of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in patients with rupture of HCC. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 127 patients who were treated for ruptured HCC at single institution between 2005 and 2014. After multidisciplinary discussion, patients underwent medical management, TAE, emergency surgery or staged surgery. Patients were retrospectively divided into two groups based on the intent of treatment: curative and palliative. The rebleeding rate and 1-month and overall survival (OS) were compared between two groups. The incidence and survival of patients with intraperitoneal drop metastasis (IPDM) were also analyzed.Entities:
Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma; intraperitoneal drop metastasis; spontaneous rupture; transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; transcatheter arterial embolization
Year: 2022 PMID: 36132134 PMCID: PMC9483098 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.999557
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Figure 1Flow chart of the study population. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; TAE, transcatheter arterial embolization; TACEm transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.
Characteristics of the study sample between curative and palliative treatment groups.
| Curative treatment group (n = 97) | Palliative treatment group (n = 30) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 58 ± 13 | 59 ± 11 | 0.989 |
|
| 88 (90.7)/9 (9.3) | 26 (86.7)/4 (13.3) | 0.504 |
|
| 60 (61.9) | 26 (86.7) |
|
|
| |||
|
| 223 ± 103 | 210 ± 98 | 0.531 |
|
| 3.6 ± 0.6 | 3.0 ± 0.7 |
|
|
| 1.3 ± 0.8 | 2.2 ± 1.8 |
|
|
| 1.15 ± 0.18 | 1.33 ± 0.49 | 0.060 |
|
| 1.12 ± 0.73 | 1.13 ± 0.53 | 0.956 |
|
| 112 ± 191 | 211 ± 232 |
|
|
| 70 ± 77 | 90 ± 89 | 0.231 |
|
| 133 ± 112 | 185 ± 123 |
|
|
| 201 ± 282 | 303 ± 177 | 0.174 |
|
| 39016 ± 127314 | 97368 ± 339723 | 0.182 |
|
| 21634 ± 41490 | 39103 ± 34867 | 0.245 |
|
| 13 (13.4) /84 (86.6) | 16 (53.3)/14 (46.7) |
|
|
| 32 (33.0) /65 (67.0) | 22 (73.3)/8 (26.7) |
|
|
| 77 (79.4) | 9 (30.0) |
|
|
| 9.4 ± 4.1 | 12.0 ± 5.5 |
|
|
| 47 (48.5) | 6 (20.0) |
|
|
| 66 (68.0)/31 (32.0) | 7 (23.3)/23 (76.7) |
|
HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; PT, prothrombin time; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GGT, gamma glutamyl peptidase; AFP, alpha fetoprotein; PIVKA, prothrombin-induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist; AU, arbitrary unit.
The bold values are the parameters of statistically significant differences between the two groups.
Characteristics of the study sample undergoing transcatheter arterial embolization or surgery in the curative treatment group.
| TAE/TACE (n = 73) | Emergency and Staged Surgery (n = 24) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 59 ± 13 | 56 ± 13 | 0.317 |
|
| 66 (90.4)/7 (9.6) | 22 (91.7)/2 (8.3) | 1.000 |
|
| 47 (64.4) | 13 (54.2) | 0.239 |
|
| |||
|
| 221 ± 109 | 228 ± 86 | 0.597 |
|
| 3.5 ± 0.6 | 3.9 ± 0.5 |
|
|
| 1.3 ± 0.7 | 1.2 ± 0.9 | 0.363 |
|
| 1.16 ± 0.20 | 1.10 ± 0.09 | 0.130 |
|
| 1.17 ± 0.82 | 0.98 ± 0.25 | 0.297 |
|
| 126 ± 216 | 72 ± 57 |
|
|
| 73 ± 82 | 59 ± 57 | 0.431 |
|
| 143 ± 121 | 102 ± 67 |
|
|
| 236 ± 318 | 103 ± 93 | 0.118 |
|
| 37574 ± 117588 | 43537 ± 157050 | 0.850 |
|
| 16744 ± 24966 | 32848 ± 65751 | 0.407 |
|
| 60 (85.2)/13 (17.8) | 24 (100.0)/0 (0.0) |
|
|
| 42 (57.5)/31 (42.5) | 23 (95.8)/1(4.2) |
|
|
| 52 (71.2) | 23 (95.8) |
|
|
| 9.7 ± 4.3 | 8.4 ± 3.4 | 0.144 |
|
| 29 (39.8) | 16 (66.7) |
|
|
| 44 (60.2)/29 (39.8) | 20 (83.3)/4 (16.7) |
|
TAE, transarterial embolization; TACE, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; PT, prothrombin time; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GGT, gamma glutamyl peptidase; AFP, alpha fetoprotein; PIVKA, prothrombin-induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist; AU, arbitrary unit.
The bold values are the parameters of statistically significant differences between the two groups.
Figure 2Overall survival in the study population.
Figure 3Overall survival in the study population based on (A) initial treatment modality (conservative treatment vs. transcatheter arterial (chemo-) embolization vs. emergency operation vs. staged operation) and (B) treatment intent (palliative vs. curative).
Figure 4(A) Probability of intraperitoneal drop metastasis (IPDM) and (B) overall survival in the study population based on IPDM.
Figure 5Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) performed for ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma in a 41-year-old male patient. The portal phase of the initial computed tomography (CT) demonstrates (A) contrast media extravasation (arrow) from the tumor to the peritoneum and (B) washout lesion (asterisk) in segment 6 of the liver protruding to the peritoneum with focal discontinuity (arrow) of the liver surface, suggesting ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma. (C) Celiac angiography showing hypervascular tumor staining (arrows) corresponding to the CT findings. (D) Spot image of fluoroscopy demonstrating administration of iodized oil-doxorubicin mixture at the branch of S6 with partial uptake within the tumor. (E) Portal phase of the 1-month follow-up CT shows lipiodol-doxorubicin uptake (arrow) in the lateral aspect of the index tumor with a residual lesion (asterisk) in the medial portion. (F) Portal phase of the 11-month follow-up CT after tumorectomy performed at 6-month demonstrates a huge hypoattenuating mass (arrows) in the peritoneum, suggesting intraperitoneal drop metastasis.