| Literature DB >> 36131899 |
Piyush Shukla1, Oluwatobi Akanbi2, Asakipaam Simon Atuah3, Amer Aljaedi4, Mohamed Bouye5, Shakti Sharma6.
Abstract
There is no question about the value that digital signal processing brings to the area of biomedical research. DSP processors are used to sample and process the analog inputs that are received from a human organ. These inputs come from the organ itself. DSP processors, because of their multidimensional data processing nature, are the electrical components that take up the greatest space and use the most power. In this age of digital technology and electronic gizmos, portable biomedical devices represent an essential step forward in technological advancement. Electrocardiogram (ECG) units are among the most common types of biomedical equipment, and their functions are absolutely necessary to the process of saving human life. In the latter part of the 1990s, portable electrocardiogram (ECG) devices began to appear on the market, and research into their signal processing and electronics design capabilities continues today. System-on-chip (SoC) design refers to the process through which the separate computing components of a DSP unit are combined onto a single chip in order to achieve greater power and space efficiency. In the design of biomedical DSP devices, this body of research presents a number of different solutions for reducing power consumption and space requirements. Using serial or parallel data buses, which are often the region that consumes the most power, it is possible to send data between the system-on-chip (SoC) and other components. To cut down on the number of needless switching operations that take place during data transmission, a hybrid solution that makes use of the shift invert bus encoding scheme has been developed. Using a phase-encoded shift invert bus encoding approach, which embeds the two-bit indication lines into a single-bit encoded line, is one way to solve the issue of having two distinct indicator bits. This method reduces the problem. The PESHINV approach is compared to the SHINV method that already exists, and the comparison reveals that the suggested PESHINV method reduces the total power consumption of the encoding circuit by around 30 percent. The computing unit of the DSP processor is the target of further optimization efforts. Virtually, all signal processing methods need memory and multiplier circuits to function properly.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36131899 PMCID: PMC9484937 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7307552
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Proposed model architecture.
Figure 2Architecture for video segmentation framework.
Algorithm 1: For Adaptive Kalman Filter.
Information retrieved from initial observation.
| Total number of participants | Total running time of the video (seconds) | Total frames extracted | Total time consumed (seconds) | Frame rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 22500 | 828 | 5.83 E + 01 | 1.42 E + 01 |
Figure 3Generation of RGB signal.
Figure 4Process of signal detrending.
Figure 5Separation of green signals.
Figure 6Before Kalman filter.
Figure 7After the implementation of the Kalman filter.
Figure 8Comparison of Kalman filter.
Figure 9HARR results obtained from EHVD.
HARR results for EHVD.
|
| Frame rate | EHVD respiration rate | EHVD heartbeat rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 828 | 1.42e + 01 | 4.92e + 00 | 9.45e + 00 |
Figure 10HARR results obtained from IVMD.
HARR results for IVMD.
| Total frames extracted | Frame rate | IVMD respiration rate | IVMD heartbeat rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 828 | 1.42e + 01 | 3.44e + 00 | 8.27e + 00 |
Figure 11HARR results obtained from MAFD.
HARR results obtained from MAFD.
| Total frames extracted | Frame rate | MAFD | MAFD |
|---|---|---|---|
| 828 | 1.42e + 01 | 2.17e + 00 | 5.60e + 00 |
Comparison of HARR value for various methods.
| Methods | Total frames extracted | Frame rate | Respiration rate | Heartbeat rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAFD | 828 | 1.42e + 01 | 2.17e + 00 | 5.60e + 00 |
| IVMD | 828 | 1.42e + 01 | 3.44e + 00 | 8.27e + 00 |
| EHVD | 828 | 1.42e + 01 | 4.92e + 00 | 9.45e + 00 |
From Table 5, it is clear that the respiration rate of the MAFD process is 2.17e + 00, for IVMD it is 3.44e + 00, and for EHVD it is 1.42e + 00. Then, the heartbeat rate is predicted to be 5.60e + 00 for MAFD, 8.27e + 00 for IVMD, and 9.45e + 00 for EHVD. From the obtained values, the EHVD possesses better performance in the estimation of heartbeat rate and respiration rate.