Literature DB >> 36131183

Temporary or Permanent? A Clinical Challenge in the Evaluation of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with Unconsciousness and Normal Initial Head CT.

Cheng-Yu Li1, Chi-Cheng Chuang1, Ching-Chang Chen1, Po-Hsun Tu1, Ting-An Hsu2, Yu-Chi Kuo2, Chien-Hung Liao2, Chi-Hsun Hsieh2, Chih-Yuan Fu3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with unconsciousness and normal initial head computed tomography (CT) present a clinical dilemma for physicians and neurosurgeons in the emergency department (ED). We recorded how long it took for patients to regain consciousness and evaluated the patients' characteristics.
METHODS: From 2018 to 2020, TBI patients with unconsciousness and normal initial head CT [Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score < 13, negative CT scan and normal laboratory test results] were evaluated. Patients who regained consciousness were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression (MLR) analyses were used to evaluate independent factors for regaining consciousness.
RESULTS: A total of 77 patients were included in this study. Fifty-eight (75.3%) patients regained consciousness, most within one day (43.1%). Nineteen (24.7%) patients never regained consciousness. MLR analysis showed that initial GCS score (odds 1.85, p = 0.017), early airway protection in ED (odds 25.02, p = 0.018) and 72-h GCS score improvement by two points (odds 0.02, p = 0.001) were independent factors for regaining consciousness. Overall, 94.1% of patients who received early airway protection and improved 2 points in 72-h GCS score regained consciousness. The association between days to M5 status and days to M6 status (consciousness) was highly significant. Fewer days to M5 status were highly associated with needing fewer days to regain consciousness.
CONCLUSIONS: For TBI patients with unconsciousness and normal initial head CT, a higher probability of regaining consciousness was observed in those who underwent early airway protection and who improved 2 points in 72-h GCS score. Regaining consciousness within a short period could be expected in patients with M5 status.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Société Internationale de Chirurgie.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36131183     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06747-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.282


  2 in total

1.  Usefulness of the abbreviated injury score and the injury severity score in comparison to the Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Brandon P Foreman; R Ruth Caesar; Jennifer Parks; Christopher Madden; Larry M Gentilello; Shahid Shafi; Mary C Carlile; Caryn R Harper; Ramon R Diaz-Arrastia
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2007-04

Review 2.  Airway management in trauma.

Authors:  O Langeron; A Birenbaum; J Amour
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.051

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.