Literature DB >> 36130559

Ectopic craniopharyngioma of the orbit: illustrative case.

Albin A John1, Harrison Marsh1, Stephen S Rossettie1, Coby N Ray2, Kenn A Freedman2, Benedicto C Baronia3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Craniopharyngiomas are uncommon malformations of the sellar or parasellar region that are partly cystic and calcified and have low histological grade. The typical age of presentation is bimodal, with peak incidence rates in children at age 5 to 14 years and in adults at age 50 to 74 years. The usual clinical manifestations are related to endocrine deficiencies due to mass effect along with visual impairment and increased intracranial pressure. If a tumor is favorably localized, the treatment of choice is complete resection. OBSERVATIONS: The authors presented a unique case of a 61-year-old man with a suspicious cystic lesion in the right orbital roof that was causing right-sided headaches with pressure and pain in the right eye. Both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were used for further evaluation and showed a suspicious lytic bone lesion that had an epicenter within the orbital rim, which was highly suggestive of a tumor of interosseous origin. After removal, the tumor was identified by pathology as a craniopharyngioma. LESSONS: The importance of this case report is in documenting a unique case of an ectopic craniopharyngioma in the orbit, adding to current hypotheses of the pathogenesis of ectopic craniopharyngiomas, and presenting an extensive review of literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  de novo craniopharyngioma; ectopic craniopharyngioma; orbit

Year:  2022        PMID: 36130559      PMCID: PMC9379760          DOI: 10.3171/CASE21544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Case Lessons        ISSN: 2694-1902


Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) are low-incidence, cystic, benign brain tumors stemming from the remnants of the Rathke’s pouch, an invagination at the roof of the developing mouth that gives rise to the adenohypophysis, or metaplasia of adenohypophysis pars tuberalis cells to squamous cell nests.[1-4] These tumors can occur anywhere on the path of embryonic cell migration between the midline sphenoid bone and the floor of the sella turcica.[1,2,5,6] CPs comprise 3% of all intracranial tumors and show a bimodal age, with the first peak occurring during childhood and a second peak occurring in the sixth decade of life.[4] Presenting symptoms of CP in children include headache, visual disturbances, central diabetes insipidus symptoms, and growth stunting. Adults may present with a headache as well; however, presentation can also include decreased sexual function and hypothalamic dysfunction, especially in thermoregulation.[1-4,7] The pituitary gland is made up of the adenohypophysis, neurohypophysis, and infundibular stalk. The adenohypophysis is an outpouching of oral ectodermal epithelium (Rathke’s pouch) whereas the neurohypophysis and infundibular stalks are extensions of the diencephalon. By the fifth week of gestation, Rathke’s pouch elongates and extends upwards and makes a pharyngo-hypophyseal stalk that separates from the oral epithelium between weeks 6 and 8 after meeting with the neurohypophysis. Rathke’s cleft then involutes. However, the pharyngo-hypophyseal duct can persist in ∼33% of patients, leading to a persistent connection between the sellar floor and the vomer.[8-10] Approximately 50% of these tumors originate at the level of the third ventricle within the infundibulum and may expand into the third ventricular cavity.[1] It is uncommon for CPs to occur outside of this locality; however, cases have been documented of CPs at the cerebellopontine angle and other disparate locations.[1,11] Differential diagnosis for CP includes germ cell tumors, pituitary tumors, and cysts of Rathke’s pouch.[1] There are two subtypes of CP: adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP) and papillary craniopharyngioma (PCP). These subtypes differ by their age distribution and pathogenesis. ACPs are the more common type overall whereas PCPs occur almost exclusively in adults.[1] ACPs, which arise from an increased activation of the WNT pathway because of increased stability of β-catenin, are predominantly cystic and calcified and take up contrast in their walls.[1,4] ACPs have densely packed cells interspersed with squamous cells, known as stellate reticulum. There are nodules of eosinophilic keratinous masses with cystic cavities that are lined by flattened epithelium. ACPs may also have Rosenthal fibers but should not be mistaken for pilocytic astrocytoma.[2,4] PCPs, on the other hand, arise from BRAF V600E mutations and appear on imaging as monomorphous, palisading, noncalcified, and solid masses.[1,2,4] This case report and review of literature investigate a unique case of a primary craniopharyngioma originating within the right superolateral orbital roof. To investigate the prevalence of ectopic locations of craniopharyngiomas, an extensive literature review was conducted using the research databases PubMed, Cochrane Database, and Google Scholar from 1900 to 2021. The search query used was adapted from that used by Gabel and colleagues.[12] Search terms included “craniopharyngioma” and “ectopic” or “unusual” or “uncommon” and excluded “recurrent.” The resulting search query yielded 69 results, of which 26 articles were included. Studies of craniopharyngiomas were included if the CP did not occur primarily within the third ventricle or sellar, parasellar, infrasellar, or suprasellar space. Radiological studies, malignant craniopharyngiomas, giant cell tumors, dermoid cysts, and ectopic recurrences of primary craniopharyngiomas were excluded.

Illustrative Case

The patient was a 61-year-old obese (body mass index: 35.2 kg/m2) man with a past medical history of anemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, prostate biopsy in 2019 that was concerning for cancer, and surgical removal of lipomas in his left shoulder and right atrium of the heart. The patient was initially referred by an ophthalmologist for an oculoplastics consultation regarding concern for a supraorbital lesion that presented with periodic pain around the right eye that was seen on a previous computed tomography (CT) scan. A subsequent CT scan showed a lytic bone lesion of the right orbit, which, in conjunction with patient’s concerning prostate cancer, was suspicious for a malignant neoplasm. He also reported tinnitus and pressure in his right eye. He denied any changes in mental status or any visual disturbances.

Ophthalmological Examination

A comprehensive dilated eye examination was performed. The patient had 20/20 vision in both eyes with his current glasses (pseudophakia in the right eye) and had an intraocular pressure of 8 mm Hg in the right eye and 7 mm Hg in the left eye. He had full confrontational fields in both eyes with no obvious proptosis and full ocular motility. On further examination, tenderness to palpation at his superior orbit was appreciated. Slit lamp examination and dilated fundus examinations were noncontributory. The patient also had decreased forehead sensation on the right side.

Imaging

CT imaging, as seen in Fig. 1, showed an expansile lytic lesion (21 × 19 × 13 mm [transverse × anteroposterior × craniocaudal]) in the roof of the right orbit. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as seen in Fig. 2, demonstrated a mildly T1 hyperintense and T2 hypointense nonenhancing lesion in this region.
FIG. 1.

Preoperative CT imaging. A–C: A lytic lesion involving the roof of the right orbit along with erosive changes along the inferior margin. There is minimal soft tissue component extending into the orbit and abutting the superior aspect of the right globe.

FIG. 2.

Preoperative MRI demonstrates a mildly T2 hyperintense (A) and T1 hyperintense (B and C) nonenhancing lesion within the roof of the right orbit. There is subtle abnormal restricted diffusion within this lesion (D).

Preoperative CT imaging. A–C: A lytic lesion involving the roof of the right orbit along with erosive changes along the inferior margin. There is minimal soft tissue component extending into the orbit and abutting the superior aspect of the right globe. Preoperative MRI demonstrates a mildly T2 hyperintense (A) and T1 hyperintense (B and C) nonenhancing lesion within the roof of the right orbit. There is subtle abnormal restricted diffusion within this lesion (D). The tentative plan to address the lesion involved a combined case with neurosurgery and oculoplastics that included orbital biopsy and total resection via a transcranial right supraorbital skull base approach.

Surgical Procedure

The patient received a stereotactic craniotomy using a right supraorbital skull base approach with gross removal of the orbital tumor, repair and reconstruction of the skull base, cranioplasty, and duroplasty. Using a neuronavigational system (Medtronic StealthStation), a supraorbital bone flap was created with simultaneous dural opening because of its tight adherence to the bone. The tumor was identified at the superior portion of the orbital rim. Coring of the tumor was performed, and a specimen was sent for pathologic determination. The remaining tumor was removed piecemeal. Both the skull base and the orbital roof were reconstructed using a MEDPOR implant (Stryker). A DuraMatrix (Stryker) duroplasty was performed at the skull base with overlying Gelfoam (Ethicon) to fill the cavity of the tumor. Titanium plates and screws were used to secure the bone, and bone cement was used to seal the reconstruction. After proper surgical closure, the patient was neurologically intact and was transferred to the neurosurgical intensive care unit. Blood loss during the procedure was 50 mL. Postsurgical CT, as seen in Fig. 3, demonstrated minimal pneumocephalus, no signs of intracranial hemorrhage, and an intact reconstruction of the orbital rim. Pathology of the orbital tumor specimen noted cholesterol crystals, giant cells, reactive fibrosis, focal hemorrhage, hemosiderin-laden macrophages, and calcifications most consistent with a diagnosis of craniopharyngioma, as seen in Fig. 4. Pan-cytokeratin staining showed focal positivity of epithelial components of the lesion. The level of Ki-67, a proliferation marker, was low. The patient had a benign postoperative course and was discharged on postoperative day 4 without any plans for radiation treatment. The patient will follow up with the neurosurgery department for a custom implant to address the orbital defect and assessment for possible recurrence.
FIG. 3.

Postoperative CT imaging demonstrates gross total resection of the lytic lesion involving the roof of the right orbit along with postsurgical changes of metallic plate reconstruction

FIG. 4.

A: Original magnification ×10. Hematoxylin and eosin staining demonstrates cholesterol crystals, calcifications, and inflammation. B–E: Original magnification ×20. Hematoxylin and eosin staining demonstrates cholesterol crystals (B and C), inflammation (C), hemosiderin-laden macrophages (D), and histiocytic giant cells (B). No evidence of high N:C ratio cells indicative of metastatic tumors. Procedural hemorrhage noted (C and D).

Postoperative CT imaging demonstrates gross total resection of the lytic lesion involving the roof of the right orbit along with postsurgical changes of metallic plate reconstruction A: Original magnification ×10. Hematoxylin and eosin staining demonstrates cholesterol crystals, calcifications, and inflammation. B–E: Original magnification ×20. Hematoxylin and eosin staining demonstrates cholesterol crystals (B and C), inflammation (C), hemosiderin-laden macrophages (D), and histiocytic giant cells (B). No evidence of high N:C ratio cells indicative of metastatic tumors. Procedural hemorrhage noted (C and D).

Postsurgical Outcome

On follow-up examination with the ophthalmology department, our patient reported minimal discomfort and no changes to his vision. He denied eye or orbital pain and had no other reports. On examination, he had full ocular motility in both eyes; no ecchymosis or enophthalmos in the right eye; and equal, round, normally reactive pupils.

Discussion

Observations

Development of the Orbit

The orbit starts developing during the third intrauterine week via migration of neural crest cells (NCCs) from the maxilla and the frontonasal anlage. These migratory NCCs, influenced by the developing eye, brain, and face, meet at the optic stalk to form the orbit.[13,14] The NCCs undergo an epithelial-mesenchymal transition and differentiate into cranial bone, nerves, and connective tissues. Osteogenesis occurs during week 6, and ossification starts at week 8 and ends around week 14. In contrast to the mesodermal origin of the parietal and occipital bones, the orbit is made from migrated NCCs that undergo both intramembranous and endochondral ossification (sphenoid and ethmoid bones only).[14]

Craniopharyngioma of the Orbit

Extensive literature review noted only one other ectopic craniopharyngioma at the orbit. A case report by Vitulli and colleagues noted an ectopic craniopharyngioma at the superior posterolateral compartment of the orbit with thinning of the lateral wall but no evidence of intracranial extension.[13] Using an endoscopic transorbital approach, the CP was removed. The CP presented in this study is different from that reported by Vitulli and colleagues because it originated in the roof of the right orbit. Origin of a CP in the frontal bone is highly unusual; however, its interosseus origin is best evidenced by review of this patient’s surgical reports, tumor histology, and radiology. During resection of the tumor, the neurosurgeon noted that the tumor was soft, vascular, and easily suctioned, consistent with a CP. Furthermore, histology, as seen in Fig. 4, noted many features most consistent with a diagnosis of CP. Further deeper levels and β-catenin staining noted definite cytoplasmic focal positivity in the clusters of cells and minute foci of nuclear staining. Although chronic xanthogranulomatous inflammation and hematic cysts of the orbit may present similarly, supporting factors for the diagnosis of CP include presence of epithelial components in the lesion, lack of increase in serological inflammatory markers, and cystic lytic (bone) lesions on imaging. Other differentials, such as ameloblastoma and odontogenic cysts, are unlikely because our sample lacks the characteristic epithelial changes. Histologically, the constellation of findings in our sample is most consistent with a craniopharyngioma. Upon review of the radiologic findings, as seen in Fig. 2, the epicenter of the CP is located within the right frontal bone, with scalloping of the frontal bone and erosive changes involving the roof of the orbit. MRI demonstrates an expansile appearance of the roof of the orbit along. Furthermore, the CP presented in this case is subtly hyperintense in T1-weighted imaging, a common characteristic in CP imaging, with no significant suppression on fat-suppressed imaging.

Craniopharyngioma Development

Many prevailing theories for ectopic craniopharyngiomas exist, including the embryonic/de novo theory, migratory theory, and metaplasia theory. The embryonic theory, one of the earliest and most established theories, proposes that CPs develop from remnants of the Rathke’s pouch. The de novo theory, on the other hand, attributes CP development to totipotent or multipotent cells rather than embryonic remnants of the Rathke’s pouch. However, both theories focus on development of CP from cells found along the line that extends from the vomer to the floor of the sella turcica through the sphenoid bone.[6,15-22] The migratory theory focuses on diffuse spreading of cells throughout the suprasellar and sellar regions as a result of differing rates of cell multiplication during the rotation of the adenohypophsyis.[10,23] This theory developed from accounts of remnants of the Rathke’s pouch found on the posterior wall of the pharynx and sphenoid bone.[6,17-20,22,24-27] Alternatively, the metaplastic theory aims to address CP development in adults whereby squamous epithelium of the Schneiderian membrane, derived from the oral ectoderm, undergoes metaplasia.[5,10,19-22,28] Other researchers have found associations between congenital proliferative syndromes, such as Gardner syndrome, and CP formation because there is an increased β-catenin and persistent activation of WNT signaling pathways as a result of defective APC.[13,29-31] Our review of the literature involving ectopic CPs, as described in Table 1, indicates that they are rare, with the cerebellopontine angle and nasopharynx as the first and second most common ectopic loci, respectively.[12,32-36] When considering nasopharyngeal ectopic CPs, researchers currently hypothesize their development resulting from incomplete resorption of the Rathke’s canal itself. Aberrant anterior or posterior growth of the pars tuberalis is thought to contribute to this incomplete resorption, allowing embryonic remnants to persist at the posterior wall of the pharynx or other ectopic loci.[24,32,37]
TABLE 1.

Ectopic CP location, embryology, and surgical approach

Authors & YearEctopic LocationEmbryological OriginSurgical Removal Technique
Shah et al., 2007;[5] Algahtani et al., 2018[19]
Fourth ventricle
CSF cavity of rhombencephalon
Posterior fossa craniotomy
Banczerowski et al., 2006[6]
Rt temporobasal region
Forebrain ectoderm
Rt temporal craniotomy
Kim et al., 2014;[29] Yan et al., 2009;[20] Khalatbari et al., 2012;[28] Gabel et al., 2017;[12] Zhou et al., 2010[33]
Cerebellopontine angle
CSF cavity between metencephalon folds
Suboccipital craniotomy
Ortega-Porcayo et al., 2015[24]
Frontotemporal
Forebrain ectoderm
Endoscopy; frontal lateral approach
Bashir et al., 2009;[18] Álvarez Salgado et al., 2017[30]
Posterior fossa
Mesoderm
Posterior fossa craniotomy
Pourkhalili et al., 2016[25]
Extradural
N/A*
Frontotemporal craniotomy
Lee et al., 2011[15]
Prepontine cistern
CSF cavity anterior to metencephalon
N/A
Sangiovanni et al., 1997[26]
Corpus callosum
Diencephalon neuroectoderm
Interhemispheric approach
Lewin et al., 1984;[34] Benitez et al., 1988;[9] Wang et al., 2001[35]
Nasopharynx
Cavity
Ethmoidectomy; transpalatal approach
Kawamata et al., 2002;[17] Langdon et al., 2018;[36] Horiuchi et al., 2019[39]
Clivus
Occipital sclerotome, endochondral
Endoscopy; transphenoidal
Smith et al., 2020[22]
Anterior ethmoid sinus
Neural crest
Endoscopy
Vitulli et al., 2021[13]W/in orbitNeural crestTransorbital/transcranial

N/A, surgical resection method was not discussed.

Ectopic CP location, embryology, and surgical approach N/A, surgical resection method was not discussed.

Resection

In our case, a transcranial approach that involved a craniotomy and unroofing of the orbit was performed so that the tumor could be removed without going through periorbita. Table 1 describes how previous cases of ectopic CP were surgically managed.

Lessons

Proposed Theory

A common factor among the disparate ectopic locations of CP is some modality of translocation, the foundation of our proposed theory. This theory differs from previously accepted migration theories because it emphasizes an external modality for translocation (e.g., cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] or NCC) rather than migration of the Rathke’s pouch remnants themselves. Having reviewed multiple cases in literature of recurrent CPs as a result of CSF seeding,[38-42] evidence indicates that ectopic craniopharyngiomas may occur as hamartomatous growths in various locations as a result of either CSF spreading or NCC migration that translocates squamous epithelia remnants from involution of Rathke’s cleft or another idiopathic process. These seeds rest at favorable locations and later undergo metaplasia to form a CP.[10,20,40] CPs like the one described in this study can also develop, as Vitulli postulates, as a result of sequestration and translocation of squamous epithelia by NCCs during their migration.[13] Using mice models, the proposed translocation theory can be further investigated. Additional investigation into CSF cytology and a better understanding of NCC migration paths may also provide future direction in uncovering the pathogenesis of ectopic CPs. Presented in this illustrative case report and extended review of literature is a unique case of a craniopharyngioma presenting at the orbital rim rather than the sellar or parasellar region. The tumor was managed via a joint neurosurgery and oculoplastic procedure that accomplished total resection via a craniotomy with unroofed orbital approach. Our case report and review add CPs to the list of orbital tumors, propose a unifying theory for ectopic CP pathogenesis, and report an unusual case of a CP that grew within the orbital bone itself.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Dr. Meenu Sharma from University Medical Center Department of Pathology and Dr. Roy Jacob from University Medical Center Department of Radiology for their assistance with pathology and imaging assistance, respectively, in this report.

Disclosures

The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Author Contributions

Conception and design: John, Marsh, Rossettie, Baronia. Acquisition of data: John, Freedman, Baronia. Analysis and interpretation of data: John, Freedman, Baronia. Drafting the article: all authors. Critically revising the article: all authors. Reviewed submitted version of manuscript: all authors. Approved the final version of the manuscript on behalf of all authors: John. Administrative/technical/material support: Baronia. Study supervision: Ray, Baronia.
  39 in total

Review 1.  The pathogenesis of craniopharyngiomas.

Authors:  Vikram C Prabhu; Henry G Brown
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Cystic craniopharyngioma of lateral ventricle with small stalk in suprasellar cistern: a rare case.

Authors:  Sudhansu Sekhar Mishra; Sanjay K Behera; Satya Bhusan Senapati; Souvagya Panigrahi
Journal:  Neurol India       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 3.  Craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  Hermann L Müller; Thomas E Merchant; Monika Warmuth-Metz; Juan-Pedro Martinez-Barbera; Stephanie Puget
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 52.329

4.  Posterior fast craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  E M Bashir; P D Lewis; M R Edwards
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.596

5.  Isolated cerebellopontine angle craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  Yi Yan; Wen-Yuan Tang; Gang Yang; Dong Zhong
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 6.  Craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  Hermann L Müller
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 19.871

7.  Craniopharyngioma presenting as a nasopharyngeal mass: CT and MR findings.

Authors:  W I Benitez; K J Sartor; E J Angtuaco
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Craniopharyngioma arising in the pharyngeal hypophysis.

Authors:  R Lewin; E Ruffolo; C Saraceno
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 0.954

9.  Ectopic craniopharyngioma of the fourth ventricle: case report.

Authors:  Gopal B Shah; Anita S Bhaduri; Basant K Misra
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2007-07

10.  Temporal extradural ectopic craniopharyngioma. Case report.

Authors:  Péter Banczerowski; Katalin Bálint; László Sipos
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.115

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.