Moritz L Weber1, Gaurav Lole2,3, Attila Kormanyos4, Alexander Schwiers1, Lisa Heymann1, Florian D Speck4,5, Tobias Meyer2, Regina Dittmann1, Serhiy Cherevko4, Christian Jooss2,3, Christoph Baeumer1,6, Felix Gunkel1. 1. Peter Grünberg Institute (PGI-7) and Jülich-Aachen Research Alliance (JARA-FIT), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich 52425, Germany. 2. Institute of Materials Physics, University of Göttingen, Göttingen 37077, Germany. 3. International Center for Advanced Studies of Energy Conversion (ICASEC), University of Göttingen, Göttingen 37077, Germany. 4. Helmholtz-Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Erlangen 91058, Germany. 5. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen 91058, Germany. 6. Faculty of Science and Technology, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, Enschede 7500 AE, The Netherlands.
Abstract
The stability of perovskite oxide catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) plays a critical role in their applicability in water splitting concepts. Decomposition of perovskite oxides under applied potential is typically linked to cation leaching and amorphization of the material. However, structural changes and phase transformations at the catalyst surface were also shown to govern the activity of several perovskite electrocatalysts under applied potential. Hence, it is crucial for the rational design of durable perovskite catalysts to understand the interplay between the formation of active surface phases and stability limitations under OER conditions. In the present study, we reveal a surface-dominated activation and deactivation mechanism of the prominent electrocatalyst La0.6Sr0.4CoO3-δ under steady-state OER conditions. Using a multiscale microscopy and spectroscopy approach, we identify the evolving Co-oxyhydroxide as catalytically active surface species and La-hydroxide as inactive species involved in the transient degradation behavior of the catalyst. While the leaching of Sr results in the formation of mixed surface phases, which can be considered as a part of the active surface, the gradual depletion of Co from a self-assembled active CoO(OH) phase and the relative enrichment of passivating La(OH)3 at the electrode surface result in the failure of the perovskite catalyst under applied potential.
The stability of perovskite oxide catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) plays a critical role in their applicability in water splitting concepts. Decomposition of perovskite oxides under applied potential is typically linked to cation leaching and amorphization of the material. However, structural changes and phase transformations at the catalyst surface were also shown to govern the activity of several perovskite electrocatalysts under applied potential. Hence, it is crucial for the rational design of durable perovskite catalysts to understand the interplay between the formation of active surface phases and stability limitations under OER conditions. In the present study, we reveal a surface-dominated activation and deactivation mechanism of the prominent electrocatalyst La0.6Sr0.4CoO3-δ under steady-state OER conditions. Using a multiscale microscopy and spectroscopy approach, we identify the evolving Co-oxyhydroxide as catalytically active surface species and La-hydroxide as inactive species involved in the transient degradation behavior of the catalyst. While the leaching of Sr results in the formation of mixed surface phases, which can be considered as a part of the active surface, the gradual depletion of Co from a self-assembled active CoO(OH) phase and the relative enrichment of passivating La(OH)3 at the electrode surface result in the failure of the perovskite catalyst under applied potential.
Active and durable energy materials are
key to establish a sustainable
energy management based on efficient devices for the production, conversion,
and storage of chemical fuels based on renewable energy, much needed
to abandon climate-damaging fossil fuels.[1−3] Essentially,
the sluggish oxygen evolution reaction (OER) thwarts the implementation
of water splitting concepts for the production of hydrogen. To overcome
this limitation, the exceptional catalytic activity of perovskite
oxides for the OER has stimulated the discussion about the intrinsic
properties responsible for the high catalytic performance of this
material class for many years.[4−7] Here, the attention increasingly lies on the processes
at the topmost surface and in the near-surface region of the oxide
catalysts, which influence the catalytic activity of perovskite materials.[8−12] In addition to activity, the stability of perovskite electrocatalysts
in alkaline media and under applied potential is highly debated since
high robustness is crucial for their applicability in energy devices.[4,10,11,13,14] Numerous studies have indicated that electrocatalysts
undergo surface reconstructions and chemical transformations under
OER conditions that may be related to the transformation of the perovskite
surface toward an active, dynamic state and also to detrimental processes
leading to irreversible degradation. Here, leaching of cations[11,15−20] as well as structural modifications such as amorphization[11,15,17,18,21−25] and even complete decomposition of oxide catalysts[26,27] were observed and linked to changes in the catalysts’ activity.
At the same time, recent studies have shown that near-surface phase
transitions may play a key role in the catalytic process.[8,12,28]Hence, it is apparent that
surface phase transformations can trigger
catalytic activity and are also involved in the aging of catalysts.
The link between these processes however remains unresolved to date.
Therefore, a holistic view on both activity and stability of perovskite
OER catalysts, with respect to dynamic surface processes involved
in the oxygen evolution reaction, is needed to develop strategies
to overcome the stability limitations of active perovskite electrocatalysts.
Epitaxial model catalysts offer a high level of control in material
properties and thus attracted much attention for the study of catalytic
processes at well-defined perovskite surfaces.[11,12,14,26,29−32] In the present study, we identify active species
at the surface of LSCO at the atomic scale and provide a detailed
understanding of the potential-driven, dynamic processes at the solid–liquid
interface under OER conditions that result in the formation of Co-oxyhydroxide
as active surface species and La-hydroxide as inactive passivation
layer. Our findings link the transformation of the crystalline perovskite
catalyst toward mixed chemical phases in the near-surface region to
the degradation behavior of LSCO during operation in alkaline media.
Results
Catalyst
Efficacy and Lifetime at Increased OER Reaction Rates
The
electrochemical performance of 20-nm-thick epitaxial LSCO electrocatalysts
was characterized in 0.1 M KOH using a rotating disk setup. Details
on the sample preparation can be found in the Experimental
Section and ref (26). Figure a shows
representative cyclic voltammetry data, where an iR-corrected potential of E = 1.66 ± 0.01 V vs
RHE was determined at a current density of j = 1.0
mA·cm–2 based on the average value obtained
from three different samples. A representative Nyquist plot, obtained
by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) at open-circuit potential
is shown as an inset image. Furthermore, Tafel analysis was performed
by consecutive steady-state galvanostatic holds at different current
densities as displayed in Figure b. The Tafel plot derived from averaged values obtained
from three samples is given in Figure c with a Tafel slope of ∂V/∂log(j) ∼88 mV/dec, which is in good agreement with the
literature.[33,34] All LSCO layers hence show high
OER activity comparable to the best-in-class perovskite catalyst.
Figure 1
Electrochemical
performance of 20 nm epitaxial (001) LSCO thin
films catalyzing the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). (a) Averaged
forward and reverse scans of the second cycle of cyclic voltammetry
measurements; the inset image shows the Nyquist plot obtained by electrochemical
impedance spectroscopy. (b) Steady-state measurement of four consecutive
galvanostatic holds. (c) Tafel plot obtained from steady-state galvanostatic
measurements; error bars represent the standard deviation of average
values obtained by the measurement of three different samples. (d)
Chronopotentiometric measurements for the characterization of the
LSCO stability on the basis of the catalyst lifetimes at different
applied current densities. Abrupt increase of potential denotes the
end of lifetime. (e) Plot of the lifetimes (left) and the respective
transferred charge (right) depending on the applied current density
determined based on the data shown in panel (d), visualizing a strong
nonlinearity, i.e., potential dependence of the catalyst deactivation.
Electrochemical
performance of 20 nm epitaxial (001) LSCO thin
films catalyzing the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). (a) Averaged
forward and reverse scans of the second cycle of cyclic voltammetry
measurements; the inset image shows the Nyquist plot obtained by electrochemical
impedance spectroscopy. (b) Steady-state measurement of four consecutive
galvanostatic holds. (c) Tafel plot obtained from steady-state galvanostatic
measurements; error bars represent the standard deviation of average
values obtained by the measurement of three different samples. (d)
Chronopotentiometric measurements for the characterization of the
LSCO stability on the basis of the catalyst lifetimes at different
applied current densities. Abrupt increase of potential denotes the
end of lifetime. (e) Plot of the lifetimes (left) and the respective
transferred charge (right) depending on the applied current density
determined based on the data shown in panel (d), visualizing a strong
nonlinearity, i.e., potential dependence of the catalyst deactivation.To evaluate the stability, i.e., the lifetime,
of the LSCO electrocatalysts
during OER operation, chronopotentiometry was performed at different
current densities. Here, the oxygen evolution reaction is driven under
steady-state conditions (constant reaction rate) until the deactivation
of the LSCO thin-film electrodes is evident from a rapid increase
in overpotential. All samples used for lifetime testing experienced
equal electrochemical treatment before the respective galvanostatic
measurements. A detailed description of the measurement protocol is
given in the Experimental Section. The end
of lifetime represents a sudden loss of the OER activity. Increasing
lifetimes are observed for decreasing current densities, ranging between
0.6 and 19.5 h in the current density range between j = 1.0 and 10.0 mA·cm–2 (Figure d). Notably, the lifetime measurement
of epitaxial LSCO at j = 0.1 mA·cm–2 remained stable for >200 h and did not reach the end of its lifetime
during the measurement time (denoted by asterisk). The investigation
of the potential-dependent catalyst lifetime reveals substantial,
though considerably varying stability of the epitaxial thin-film electrodes
of only 20 nm thickness. As can be seen, the lifetime shows a pronounced
nonlinear trend for LSCO catalysts operated at different current densities
(Figure e, left).
Similarly, the total charge Δq, indicative
of the total amount of oxygen generated during the catalyst life,
strongly depends on the applied potential (Figure e, right). This results in pronounced differences
in the efficiency of the catalysts depending on the operation conditions,
where low reaction rates at the catalyst surface lead to higher stability,
while high current densities and high potentials result in rapid catalyst
deactivation. Consequently, dynamic processes need to be considered
to gain fundamental understanding of the degradation behavior of LSCO
electrocatalysts.
Surface-Dominated Catalyst Deactivation under
Steady-State OER
Operation
After steady-state operation of the epitaxial LSCO
model electrodes until the end of lifetime, the formation of island-like
structures is visible at the initially smooth surface by atomic force
microscopy (AFM), which exhibits a distinct step terrace structure
in the pristine state (Figure a). In spite of the severe morphologic changes, X-ray diffraction
analysis (XRD) in 2θ–ω measurement geometry reveals
only minor changes in the bulk properties of the thin-film catalysts,
reflected by a slight broadening of the thin-film diffraction peak
and a slight shift of the peak position toward lower diffraction angles
(Figure b). Reciprocal
space mapping confirms a slight expansion of the c-lattice parameter, while the strain state is preserved as evident
from the constant a-lattice parameter (Figure c).
Figure 2
(a) Representative atomic
force microscopy (AFM) images of an LSCO
thin film comparing the morphology in the as-prepared state and after
the end of lifetime (operated at j = 10.0 mA·cm–2). (b) X-ray diffraction 2θ–ω analysis
reveals a high crystallinity and similar thickness of the catalyst
layers in the as-prepared and post-catalysis state. (c) X-ray diffraction
in reciprocal space mapping geometry around the asymmetric (013) reflections
confirms minor expansion in the thin-film c-lattice
parameter, while epitaxial strain is found to be preserved after electrochemical
operation (constant a-lattice parameter).
(a) Representative atomic
force microscopy (AFM) images of an LSCO
thin film comparing the morphology in the as-prepared state and after
the end of lifetime (operated at j = 10.0 mA·cm–2). (b) X-ray diffraction 2θ–ω analysis
reveals a high crystallinity and similar thickness of the catalyst
layers in the as-prepared and post-catalysis state. (c) X-ray diffraction
in reciprocal space mapping geometry around the asymmetric (013) reflections
confirms minor expansion in the thin-film c-lattice
parameter, while epitaxial strain is found to be preserved after electrochemical
operation (constant a-lattice parameter).These rather marginal changes in the bulk properties,
however,
are unlikely to explain the complete deactivation of the catalysts.
In fact, they demonstrate the high dissolution stability of the epitaxial
thin-film catalysts in steady-state operation mode. Nevertheless,
a slight decrease in thickness of the crystalline LSCO layer can be
observed from the XRD analysis that indicates a loss of the structural
order of the perovskite material in the near-surface region. The degradation
zone can be estimated to be about ∼1 nm in depth for thin-film
electrodes operated at high current densities of j = 10.0 mA·cm–2 based on the periodicity of
the thickness oscillations. After operation at lower current densities,
the degradation depth was found to be slightly increased to several
nanometers, which is consistent with an increased amount of transferred
charge in the low potential regime (cf. Figure e). The lifetime of LSCO electrocatalysts
under steady-state operation at increased current densities, therefore,
might be rather determined by a surface-dominated deactivation mechanism
than a bulk process.In contrast, bulk degradation and amorphization
of the entire catalytic
thin films were reported under repeated dynamic cycling.[26] The decreased amorphization rate under steady-state
operation conditions in comparison to dynamic operation conditions
during commonly applied potential cycling like cyclic voltammetry
is consistent with the observations of May et al.[15] However, the limitation of structural changes to the topmost
surface during steady-state operation at relatively increased current
densities associated with the accelerated failure of the electrocatalysts
is surprising.
Surface Mobility of Cobalt Moieties Promotes
Activity and Surface
Disorder
To elucidate the atomistic details of the catalytic
OER process, we investigated the LSCO samples under near-OER conditions
using environmental transmission electron microscopy (ETEM), which
allows to study the catalyst surface in direct contact to adsorbed
water. The experimental details and the lamella preparation procedure
followed the routines established in references[35,36] and are described in the Experimental Section. After a recrystallization
procedure of the FIB lamella in O2 atmosphere (cf. Figure S1), an atomically sharp surface is obtained,
ideal for atomic-resolution studies of surface processes at the solid–liquid
interface (Figure a). The surface is well-ordered and exhibits a sharp A-site termination,
which remains stable in O2 environment (cf. Figure S2 and Movie M1). Here, the experimentally observed atomic ordering is well-comparable
to a simulated image of the LSCO surface structure (Figure b), which indicates a predominant
A-site termination of the as-prepared (001) perovskite electrocatalyst,
consistent with a typically observed A-site-enriched surface. To investigate
the LSCO surface structure under near-OER conditions, the imaging
environment is switched from O2 to H2O conditions,
which results in the condensation of a thin water layer at the perovskite
surface. In addition, the incident electron beam induces an anodic
potential to the sample, leading to effective near-OER conditions.
A time sequence of HR-ETEM images of the interface recorded in 0.5
Pa of H2O is shown in Figure c (cf. Movie M2), which reveals dynamical changes of the surface structure that
occur within the timespan of seconds to minutes after exposure to
the water environment. Here, the presence of dynamic adatoms on top
of the ordered A-site-terminated surface is observed (white arrows
at t = 0.5 s). Based on the emerging contrast and
their location at specific B-sites of the extended perovskite lattice,
they are attributed as Co species. They can form dynamic active sites
at the solid–liquid interface under anodic polarization of
the OER catalyst. This observation is consistent with sweep rate-dependent
cyclic voltammetry that reveals an increase in the magnitude of the
exchange current for (operated, but still active) LSCO electrocatalysts
after operation under OER conditions relative to the as-prepared state,
which is accompanied by more pronounced redox features (cf. Figure S3). As these ionic processes occur on
very short time scales in comparison to the catalyst lifetimes they
are likely to play a key role in the catalyst activity. At the same
time, they might affect the atomistic processes responsible for catalyst
degradation.
Figure 3
Observation of the dynamic LSCO (001) surface by ETEM.
(a) Surface
of the as-prepared LSCO lamella is atomically sharp and exhibits A-site
termination in O2 environment. (b) Simulated image of the
LSCO (001) surface shows atomic contrast that is consistent with the
experimentally obtained HRTEM image. A superimposed structural model
illustrates the atomic positions of Sr, La, Co, and O. (c) Representative
images of a time sequence (4 fps) demonstrate the LSCO surface dynamics
in 0.5 Pa of H2O. Highly mobile adatoms are detected at
the solid–liquid interface under near-OER conditions, which
appear at the B-site positions of the extended perovskite surface.
White arrows highlight several exemplary Co adatoms. (d) Line profiles
are recorded close above the A-site-terminated surface as indicated
by the white rectangle in panel (c) to quantitatively evaluate the
hopping events. The noise level is determined above the sample (yellow
rectangle) and the 3σ threshold is calculated from the noise
signal, which indicates the detection limit of Co adatoms. Intensity
fluctuations above 3σ level indicate the presence of highly
mobile adatoms at the interface between the electrocatalysts and the
condensed water layer. (e) Structural transformation of the crystalline
LSCO surface region toward a disordered layer is detected under near-OER
conditions. The image was recorded after imaging under anodic polarization
for 17 min in 7 Pa of H2O.
Observation of the dynamic LSCO (001) surface by ETEM.
(a) Surface
of the as-prepared LSCO lamella is atomically sharp and exhibits A-site
termination in O2 environment. (b) Simulated image of the
LSCO (001) surface shows atomic contrast that is consistent with the
experimentally obtained HRTEM image. A superimposed structural model
illustrates the atomic positions of Sr, La, Co, and O. (c) Representative
images of a time sequence (4 fps) demonstrate the LSCO surface dynamics
in 0.5 Pa of H2O. Highly mobile adatoms are detected at
the solid–liquid interface under near-OER conditions, which
appear at the B-site positions of the extended perovskite surface.
White arrows highlight several exemplary Co adatoms. (d) Line profiles
are recorded close above the A-site-terminated surface as indicated
by the white rectangle in panel (c) to quantitatively evaluate the
hopping events. The noise level is determined above the sample (yellow
rectangle) and the 3σ threshold is calculated from the noise
signal, which indicates the detection limit of Co adatoms. Intensity
fluctuations above 3σ level indicate the presence of highly
mobile adatoms at the interface between the electrocatalysts and the
condensed water layer. (e) Structural transformation of the crystalline
LSCO surface region toward a disordered layer is detected under near-OER
conditions. The image was recorded after imaging under anodic polarization
for 17 min in 7 Pa of H2O.The high mobility of the adatoms is further illustrated
by line
profiles shown in Figure d, extracted right above the topmost A-site column at the
solid–liquid interface. The background fluctuations of the
CCD signal are recorded in the vacuum region above the surface as
a reference and yield the standard deviation 3σ, which defines
the noise level of the measurements. Each signal above the 3σ-level
hence indicates the appearance and disappearance of dynamic Co moieties
at the catalyst surface. The hopping rate, i.e., the presence of active
Co species at the LSCO surface was detected to be increased in H2O environment by a factor of eight (r(O2) ∼ 0.5 s–1 vs r(H2O) ∼ 4.0 s–1, cf. Figure S2). The increased mobility of Co cations
results in transient changes of the surface structure, indicative
of the degradation process associated with the evolution of the initially
atomically sharp surface toward a disordered and Co-rich surface layer
at the catalyst–electrolyte interface, as can be seen in Figure e (cf. Movie M3). The surface reconstruction that includes
displacements and mixing of A- and B-site cations along the disordered
surface was observed to be accelerated by higher partial pressures
of H2O. Consistently, imaging in 0.5 Pa of H2O results in a slow formation of a disordered surface layer (Figure S4a), while at 11 Pa of H2O,
a fast formation of the disordered surface is observed (Figure S4b and Movie M4). Here, the disordered surface layer exhibits a thickness of about
∼1 nm, well-comparable to the degradation zone detected by
XRD after OER operation at high current densities (cf. Figure b,c).OER activity is
typically directly linked to the local electronic
structure at the active catalyst surface. Therefore, electron energy-loss
spectroscopy (EELS) is performed to investigate the evolution of the
electronic structure of the LSCO catalysts under near-OER conditions.
The O-K-edge and Co-L-edge spectra are acquired in the surface region
of the catalyst as well as in the bulk (Figure a). The formation of a disordered surface
layer under near-OER conditions is associated with gradual changes
in the electronic signature toward the surface (Figure b,c). The O-K-edge exhibits three characteristic
peaks denoted as (1), (2), and (3). Here, prepeak (1) is attributed
to the hybridization of the O 2p states with the
Co 3d states and indicates the presence of O 2p holes, while peaks (2) and (3) represent transitions into
hybridized O 2p-Co 4sp states.[37,38] The decrease in the height of prepeak (1) obtained in the topmost
atomic layers after operation of the sample at near-OER conditions
indicates the decrease in the average Co valence state,[39] which furthermore is in good agreement with
the apparent shift in the Co-L-edge toward lower energies.
Figure 4
Electron energy-loss
spectroscopy. EELS analysis is performed in
the as-prepared state (O2) and after near-OER conditions
after transfer to vacuum (1 × 10–5 Pa) of the
LSCO catalyst. (a) Measurement position is varied between the surface
and the subsurface region of the lamella as highlighted by the white
(surface) and black (bulk) rectangles denoted in the ADF-STEM image.
(b) O-K-edge and Co-L-edge spectra recorded by EELS. (c) Plot of the
Co-L3/Co-L2 intensity ratio vs the sampling
position, where 1 corresponds to the topmost surface. A systematic
increase in the Co-L3/Co-L2 ratio after near-OER
conditions indicates a decrease of the average oxidation state of
Co toward the catalyst surface. The spectra are background-subtracted
and energy-calibrated using the corresponding zero-loss peak.
Electron energy-loss
spectroscopy. EELS analysis is performed in
the as-prepared state (O2) and after near-OER conditions
after transfer to vacuum (1 × 10–5 Pa) of the
LSCO catalyst. (a) Measurement position is varied between the surface
and the subsurface region of the lamella as highlighted by the white
(surface) and black (bulk) rectangles denoted in the ADF-STEM image.
(b) O-K-edge and Co-L-edge spectra recorded by EELS. (c) Plot of the
Co-L3/Co-L2 intensity ratio vs the sampling
position, where 1 corresponds to the topmost surface. A systematic
increase in the Co-L3/Co-L2 ratio after near-OER
conditions indicates a decrease of the average oxidation state of
Co toward the catalyst surface. The spectra are background-subtracted
and energy-calibrated using the corresponding zero-loss peak.This observation is consistent with the change
in the intensity
ratio of the Co-L3/Co-L2 signals, which is sensitive
to the valence state of transition metals, where the average cation
valence decreases with increasing Co-L3/Co-L2 intensity ratio.[37] As can be seen, the
ratio is generally increased after treatment at near-OER conditions,
which indicates a reduction of the average oxidation state of Co cations.[40] Moreover, a distinct increase of the Co-L3/Co-L2 intensity ratio is visible with decreasing
distance to the topmost surface (Figure c), which further emphasizes that the electronic
changes evident by EELS appear to be interrelated to the surface processes
driven under near-OER conditions. In comparison, only a small decrease
in the intensity but no change in the spectral shape or shift in the
peak position is detected for the La-M-edge spectra in the surface
region (Figure S5).
Evolution of the Surface
Chemistry from Perovskite Toward Mixed
Phases
To link the structural evolution and electronic changes
at the perovskite electrode surface upon OER operation with compositional
changes in the near-surface region, a combined approach of online
inductively coupled-plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for the investigation
of the leaching behavior and angle-dependent X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
(XPS) analysis for probing the electrode surface region is applied
(Figure ). Online
ICP-MS is performed to determine the rate of cation dissolution under
electrochemical bias in real time, enabling immediate tracking of
dissolved catalyst constituents. The contact between the LSCO thin-film
electrodes and the scanning flow cell (SFC) setup was established
under 1.0 V vs RHE applied potential, followed by a first galvanostatic
hold at different current densities of j1 = 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0 mA·cm–2. The duration
of each galvanostatic hold was set to yield the identical charge passed
(1800, 600, and 180 s, respectively, Δq = 0.18
C). Each measurement protocol was finished with a second galvanostatic
hold at j2 = 2.25 mA·cm–2. This protocol was chosen to test the electrochemical stability
under different potentials and to correlate chemical leaching rates
with the respective OER reaction rates (via j). Throughout
the measurements, only the dissolution of strontium was detected with
generally low dissolution rates, which indicates a selective leaching
of Sr cations from A-sites.
Figure 5
Investigation of stoichiometric changes of LSCO
electrocatalysts
during steady-state OER operation. (a) Chemical analysis of the electrolyte
by online ICP-MS measurements. The dissolution rate of Sr is monitored
during three different measurement protocols. For the systematic investigation
of Sr dissolution at different current densities, two galvanostatic
holds are applied during each measurement protocol, respectively (j1 = 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0 mA·cm–2 and j2 = 2.25 mA·cm–2). (b) Dissolved amounts of Sr are determined for the galvanostatic
holds at different current densities. Error bars represent the standard
deviation of average values obtained from three measurements, each
performed on a fresh catalyst surface. (c) Angle-dependent XPS analysis
of the surface stoichiometry after OER operation in the low-potential
regime similar to the conditions used during online ICP-MS. The depletion
of strontium and the enrichment of cobalt is detected for catalysts
operated at j = 0.3 and 1.0 mA·cm–2. XPS analysis was performed at a photoemission angle Θ = 15°
(less surface-sensitive) and Θ = 64° (more surface-sensitive).
Investigation of stoichiometric changes of LSCO
electrocatalysts
during steady-state OER operation. (a) Chemical analysis of the electrolyte
by online ICP-MS measurements. The dissolution rate of Sr is monitored
during three different measurement protocols. For the systematic investigation
of Sr dissolution at different current densities, two galvanostatic
holds are applied during each measurement protocol, respectively (j1 = 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0 mA·cm–2 and j2 = 2.25 mA·cm–2). (b) Dissolved amounts of Sr are determined for the galvanostatic
holds at different current densities. Error bars represent the standard
deviation of average values obtained from three measurements, each
performed on a fresh catalyst surface. (c) Angle-dependent XPS analysis
of the surface stoichiometry after OER operation in the low-potential
regime similar to the conditions used during online ICP-MS. The depletion
of strontium and the enrichment of cobalt is detected for catalysts
operated at j = 0.3 and 1.0 mA·cm–2. XPS analysis was performed at a photoemission angle Θ = 15°
(less surface-sensitive) and Θ = 64° (more surface-sensitive).Here, the first significant dissolution feature
is typically observed
during the potentiostatic hold prior to switching to the galvanostatic
holds. This feature is related to the dissolution of minor Sr-rich
secondary phases, which are commonly present at the LSCO surface and
is visible when the contact between the scanning flow cell is established
with the LSCO electrode surface (cf. Figure S6).[41,42]Figure a compares
the detected Sr dissolution rate for the three different measurement
protocols. Here, a small transient decay in Sr dissolution is observed
independent of the applied potential owing to a long tail of the initial
contact peak, while distinct dissolution features are only visible
for potential steps that result in increased current densities. Interestingly,
potential-dependent leaching behavior is evident as summarized in Figure b, where Sr dissolution
is only detectable during OER operation at a current density j1 ≥ 1.0 mA·cm–2 yielding around 4.3 ng·cm–2. Here, the dissolution
rate increases in a transient manner and slowly decays until the end
of the hold. While qualitatively, a dissolution feature can be observed
at j1 = 1.0 mA·cm–2, the calculated dissolved amount of Sr needs to be taken with care
at these operation conditions since the value is below the nominal
detection limit of the online ICP-MS system.Galvanostatic holds
at a current density of j2 = 2.25 mA·cm–2, however, are accompanied
with increased Sr dissolution rates and a total amount of dissolved
Sr of about 20.7 ± 0.5, 25.1 ± 5.0, and 21.7 ± 5.8
ng·cm–2. Similar to the dissolution feature
detected at a lower current density (j1 = 1.0 mA·cm–2), Sr dissolution rapidly increases
during the potential step. Each experiment was completed when the
contact was lost due to vigorous bubble formation at the working electrode
surface, blocking the channels of the SFC. Independent of the specific
measurement protocol, the deactivation of the LSCO sample (contact
loss) occurred when similar amounts of Sr (∼25 ng·cm–2) leached from the crystal lattice for all measurement
protocols applied. Our results are consistent with precedent literature
data, where the authors observed increased Sr leaching with increasing
Sr substitution at the A-site of the perovskite lattice. Remarkably,
the authors found that Sr dissolution in LSCO is coupled to the dissolution
of small amounts of cobalt.[43]Again,
the nonlinear dependence of the dissolution rate on the
applied current density indicates that OER catalysis driven at higher
current densities promotes the preferential leaching of A-site strontium
cations with a higher rate, consistent with the nonlinear behavior
of lifetime and charge (Figure e). Based on the online ICP-MS analysis of active LSCO electrocatalysts
in combination with blank measurements and the calibration curve recorded
for Co, a theoretical S number of 1.89 × 106 can be
calculated for cobalt using the galvanostatic holds performed at 2.25
mA·cm–2 for 30 min, which can serve as a metric
for the catalyst stability (which underestimates the real stability
of Co). Remarkably, the theoretical S number for LSCO is in the ballpark
of what was calculated for the state-of-the-art crystalline IrO2 OER catalyst in acidic media.[20]To correlate the dissolution behavior with stoichiometric
changes
at the electrode surface, angle-dependent XPS analysis is performed
(Figures c and S7). Here, the relative cation composition of
the electrode surface is determined after transfer of an equal amount
of charge during OER at different current densities of j = 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 mA·cm–2. Large photoemission
angles Θ allow for the detection of near-surface signals (mean
escape depth d ∼ 0.6 nm for Co 2p3/2), while smaller photoemission angles result in the
detection of photoelectrons originating from larger information depth
(mean escape depth d ∼ 1.3 nm for Co 2p3/2). As can be seen, the surface of the LSCO
model electrodes remains predominantly A-site terminated when operated
at low current densities of j = 0.1 mA·cm–2 (cf. Figure S8 for as-prepared
state). After operation at higher current densities of j = 0.3 and 1.0 mA·cm–2 we observe a relative
increase of the cobalt signal and decrease of the strontium signal
for small Θ, while the lanthanum signal exhibits only minor
changes. In contrast, the relative cation composition appears to remain
unchanged in the (buried) near-surface region of the perovskite catalyst
(large Θ).Consistent with our online ICP-MS measurements,
Sr depletion is
promoted at high current densities, which is evidently accompanied
by an enrichment of cobalt at the LSCO surface. The XPS investigations
reveal, however, that stoichiometric changes at the electrode surface
are induced even at low current densities, j <
1.0 mA·cm–2, while Sr dissolution was detected
by online ICP-MS only during operation at j ≥
1.0 mA·cm–2. Here, the small dissolution rate
of Sr may prevent its detection by time-resolved ICP-MS analysis.
Identification of Mixed Surface Phases
To understand
the nature of the chemical changes at the LSCO surface during steady-state
OER conditions, galvanostatic holds at j = 1.0 and
10.0 mA·cm–2 are applied and XPS core-level
spectra of the as-prepared LSCO surface and the operated catalysts
are recorded (Figure ). Both operated catalysts were still active after OER operation
and transferred to the vacuum of the XPS within ∼2 min to limit
post-experimental aging.
Figure 6
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy investigations
of the LSCO surface
chemistry. (a) Sr 3d, (b) La 3d5/2, (c) Co 2p3/2, and (d) O 1s XPS core-level spectra of LSCO catalysts in the as-prepared
state (first column), and the operated (but still active) state after
OER catalysis for 600 s at j = 1.0 mA·cm–2 (second column) and the operated (but still active)
state after OER catalysis for 600 s at j = 10.0 mA·cm–2 (third column). The respective spectra are displayed
for each sample state after subtraction of a Tougaard background.
The O 1s spectra are deconvoluted by data fitting
of five different components (ABO3 lattice oxygen (purple),
surface termination component (green), oxyhydroxide lattice oxygen
(orange), mixed hydroxide groups (cyan), and organic components (blue)).
XPS analysis was performed at a photoemission angle Θ = 46.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy investigations
of the LSCO surface
chemistry. (a) Sr 3d, (b) La 3d5/2, (c) Co 2p3/2, and (d) O 1s XPS core-level spectra of LSCO catalysts in the as-prepared
state (first column), and the operated (but still active) state after
OER catalysis for 600 s at j = 1.0 mA·cm–2 (second column) and the operated (but still active)
state after OER catalysis for 600 s at j = 10.0 mA·cm–2 (third column). The respective spectra are displayed
for each sample state after subtraction of a Tougaard background.
The O 1s spectra are deconvoluted by data fitting
of five different components (ABO3 lattice oxygen (purple),
surface termination component (green), oxyhydroxide lattice oxygen
(orange), mixed hydroxide groups (cyan), and organic components (blue)).
XPS analysis was performed at a photoemission angle Θ = 46.The Sr 3d spectrum of the as-prepared
sample,
exhibits a shoulder at high binding energies, which is typically related
to Sr-rich surface phases frequently observed for LSCO (Figure a).[34,41,42,44,45] After operation of the catalyst, the high binding
energy component is vanished, which is consistent with the online
ICP-MS investigations presented above. The La 3d5/2 spectrum exhibits distinct multiplet splitting with a magnitude
of ΔB.E. = 4.1 eV for the as-prepared perovskite oxide. In the
operated state, the magnitude of the multiplet splitting is decreased
to ΔB.E. = 3.8 eV (Figure b). Furthermore, a shift in binding energy is evident
by comparison with the as-prepared state. Both observations indicate
the formation of La(OH)3 at the surface upon OER operation.[46] The observed dissolution of strontium and the
formation of lanthanum hydroxide is in accordance with the high solubility
of Sr(OH)2 and the low solubility of La(OH)3 at pH = 13 (0.1 M KOH).[47] In addition,
changes in the chemistry of the transition metal can be observed.
The Co 2p3/2 signature with Doniach–Sunjic
lineshape[48] is composed of an asymmetric
peak and a pronounced tail toward higher binding energies, where the
tail feature originates from a set of satellite peaks (Figure c).In the operated state,
a main peak of decreased width and increased
symmetry is visible, indicating a loss in the metallic character of
the catalyst surface. Furthermore, a separation between the main peak
and the remaining tail structure, now composed of a single satellite
peak, becomes apparent. While the assignment of a nominal oxidation
state for Co in the as-prepared state of the LSCO catalyst which exhibits
metallic character is not physical,[26] the
changes in the relative weight of the satellite features give evidence
about the formation of a new surface component at the operated catalysts,
which exhibits an oxidation state of Co(III), reflected by the pronounced
satellite peak around ∼790 eV.[49,50]Further
insights on the chemical nature of the cobalt surface phase
are gained based on the O 1s core-level signature
(Figure d). Deconvolution
of the O 1s core-level spectrum is based on five
different chemical states that can be assigned to the lattice oxygen
of the LSCO perovskite oxide, a termination layer component or, after
OER operation, a (Co)oxyhydroxide lattice oxygen component, a mixed
hydroxide component, and a small amount of organic compounds.The O 1s signature exhibits clear
changes in the
relative intensity of the different components after electrochemical
operation, in particular, visible in the form of a decreased perovskite
signal. The changes in the O 1s signature are most
likely associated with a change in the cobalt chemistry. Most likely,
the correlated changes in the spectroscopic signature of the Co 2p3/2 and the O 1s core-level
regions indicate the presence of cobalt oxyhydroxide at the catalyst
surface. The evolution of a Co(III) signature is accompanied by the
emergence of an additional peak contributing to the O 1s signal, which is in accordance with the two different chemical states
of oxygen (single bond and double bond) within the CoO(OH) compound.
While the signal of the CoO(OH) hydroxide groups contributes to the
mixed hydroxide component, the newly evolved component (orange peak
in Figure ), visible
only for the operated state, likely reflects the contribution of the
double bonded oxygen in CoO(OH).[50] The
presence of a lanthanum oxyhydroxide compound can be excluded due
to its inherent instability in aqueous solution.[51] Although indications for changes in the Co oxidation state
were detected in previous operando ambient pressure XPS studies of
La0.8Sr0.2CoO3-δ, the
evolution of a pronounced Co-oxyhydroxide signature in the O 1s core-level spectrum has not been observed.[52] Here, the lower strontium content, which is
typically associated with a lower catalytic activity within the La1–SrCoO3−δ group may result in a higher stability and
slower transformation of the perovskite surface. Interestingly, significant
changes in the cobalt oxidation state were observed by operando XAS
studies of La0.6Sr0.4CoO3−δ in the near-surface region, while for an LaCoO3−δ reference sample, little to no changes in the cobalt valence were
detected.[53] Here, the authors report the
reduction in the Co oxidation state at open-circuit potential, while
an oxidation of cobalt is observed under an applied potential of 1.4
V vs RHE, where the authors assume an intact perovskite surface of
the LSCO catalyst at these rather mild conditions. Both studies hence
emphasize the important role of Sr doping for the evolution in the
surface chemistry of LSCO electrocatalysts under OER conditions, which
is furthermore related to the transient degradation behavior described
in the present study.The phase transition of the perovskite
surface of mixed cobalt
valency of nominally (III)/(IV) character toward a Co-oxyhydroxide
phase with an oxidation state of Co(III) is consistent with the EELS
results presented above, which have indicated a reduction of the average
Co oxidation state of the operated catalyst surface. Furthermore,
the observation of CoO(OH) formation is consistent with recent reports
for LSCO OER electrocatalysts.[54] Interestingly,
the cobalt oxyhydroxide component was vanished after the end of lifetime,
leaving behind a Co 2p3/2 and O 1s signature similar to the initial state, while a clear
La(OH)3 signature remains visible (cf. Figure S9). However, it cannot be ruled out that these post-mortem
changes result from the rapidly increasing potential at the end of
the catalyst lifetime in galvanostatic measurements.Our findings
emphasize the particular importance of dynamic surface
transformations at the surface of the perovskite OER catalyst. These
processes are accompanied with severe changes of the catalyst surface
properties, which occur within the initial phase of OER catalysis
at the solid–liquid interface.
Discussion
In
summary, we demonstrate that under OER
conditions, an active
state of the LSCO catalyst surface rapidly evolves where highly mobile
Co species dominate the surface chemistry, while additional irreversible
processes result in an altered surface chemistry associated with a
surface-dominated degradation process on longer time scales. The clear
interrelation between the applied potential and the chemical changes
of the perovskite surface may support the hypothesis that the process
is driven by the potential-induced lattice oxygen evolution reaction.[55,56] Here, the evolution of molecular oxygen, which originates from oxygen
anions of the perovskite lattice, results in the decomposition of
the perovskite structure and the release of Sr, La, and Co cations.The subsequent stoichiometric evolution of the catalyst surface
under applied potential appears to be mostly determined by the solubility
of the involved cations in the investigated potential-pH window,[47] resulting in a complex evolution of mixed oxide
phases at the catalyst surface. The catalyst surface becomes depleted
from highly soluble strontium cations, while cobalt of lower solubility
is enriched at the surface under initial OER operation, as illustrated
in Figure a. In contrast,
lanthanum is insoluble under the given conditions and consistently,
lanthanum stoichiometry appears to be widely unchanged across the
near-surface region. The topmost surface of operated LSCO electrocatalysts
is found to be composed of La(OH)3 and CoO(OH) (Figure a). While Co-oxyhydroxide
was reported to actively catalyze the OER,[8] lanthanum hydroxide may play a particular role in the deactivation
mechanism of LSCO electrocatalysts, since it does not participate
in oxidation reactions[57] and is highly
stable under OER conditions.[47] Therefore,
the compound may have a passivating character and likely blocks parts
of the active catalyst surface. After the assembly of an active Co-oxyhydroxide
layer as well as an inert lanthanum-hydroxide phase under applied
potential, OER catalysis will be widely determined by the equilibrium
between the dynamic dissolution of CoO(OH) and its redeposition.[8]
Figure 7
(a) Schematic illustration of the dynamic surface transformations
induced under OER conditions. Strontium leaching and Co hopping during
the initial phase of OER result in the formation of mixed phases at
the catalyst surface. A dynamically evolving and catalytically active
CoO(OH) phase as well as a highly insoluble and catalytically inactive
La(OH)3 phase is formed. (b) Chronopotentiometric measurements
for the characterization of the LSCO stability on the basis of the
catalyst lifetimes at an applied current density of j = 3.0 mA·cm–2 comparing the lifetime of LSCO
in 0.1 M KOH and Co-spiked 0.1 M KOH. Abrupt increase of potential
denotes the end of lifetime. The catalyst lifetime is considerably
increased by Co-spiking of the electrolyte.
(a) Schematic illustration of the dynamic surface transformations
induced under OER conditions. Strontium leaching and Co hopping during
the initial phase of OER result in the formation of mixed phases at
the catalyst surface. A dynamically evolving and catalytically active
CoO(OH) phase as well as a highly insoluble and catalytically inactive
La(OH)3 phase is formed. (b) Chronopotentiometric measurements
for the characterization of the LSCO stability on the basis of the
catalyst lifetimes at an applied current density of j = 3.0 mA·cm–2 comparing the lifetime of LSCO
in 0.1 M KOH and Co-spiked 0.1 M KOH. Abrupt increase of potential
denotes the end of lifetime. The catalyst lifetime is considerably
increased by Co-spiking of the electrolyte.Considering the dynamic processes at the catalyst
surface, we propose
that the dynamic equilibrium successively shifts toward Co dissolution
with increasing potentials, which results in the gradual loss of cobalt
from the active oxyhydroxide layer to the electrolyte over the course
of many completed oxygen evolution reaction cycles. Thus, the depletion
of Co-oxyhydroxide from the self-assembled surface layer is accelerated
at high OER rates, which may result in a failure of the catalyst when
a critical ratio between CoO(OH)/La(OH)3 coverage of the
surface is reached. In addition, agglomeration of the CoO(OH) surface
phase may result in a decrease of the catalytically active surface
area. As shown in Figure b, this process can be delayed by spiking the electrolyte
by cobalt, following the report of Chung et al.[58] In this way, the balance between Co-oxyhydroxide and La-hydroxide
can be manipulated by shifting the equilibrium between Co dissolution
and redeposition toward the precipitation of the solid Co-oxyhydroxide
phase, which yields a 16-fold increase in lifetime.Our findings
suggest that not only the activity of the LSCO catalysts
is determined by the assembly of active surface phases but also that
the overall lifetime of the electrocatalysts is mainly determined
by the stability of the active Co-oxyhydroxide surface layer. Here,
it is crucial to maintain the balance between dissolution and redeposition
of Co, strongly influenced by the operation conditions, to preserve
the active Co-oxyhydroxide phase. Potential-dependent surface processes
hence may result in the successive degradation of the catalytically
active surface layer under steady-state operation conditions, which
may inherently limit the lifetime of perovskite electrocatalysts at
increased, technically relevant current densities.
Conclusions
Under steady-state OER operation, an active
surface state of LSCO
electrocatalysts rapidly evolves, which is characterized by Co-oxyhydroxide
species that coincides with high ion dynamics at the solid–liquid
interface. On longer time scales, degradation of the LSCO electrocatalysts
is observed. While the catalyst bulk remains mostly unaffected at
constant load, the catalyst lifetime is critically limited by the
dynamic transformations of the topmost perovskite surface toward mixed
phases. The degradation behavior hence considerably differs from dynamic
conditions, where excessive amorphization and dissolution processes
typically result in a loss of the catalytic performance over time.
The surface transformation is potential-induced and results in a limited
efficacy of the LSCO electrocatalysts in the high potential regime.
We show that dynamic hopping of Co species across the LSCO surface
is facilitated in the presence of an aqueous electrolyte, i.e., at
the solid–liquid interface, which most likely plays an important
role in the dynamic structural and chemical evolution of the catalyst
surface. While Sr readily dissolves in the electrolyte at relevant
OER potentials, La remains stable at the surface in the form of La(OH)3 and Co enriches at the surface in the form of CoO(OH) during
the early stage of steady-state OER operation. We propose that the
interplay of the catalytically active and dynamically evolving CoO(OH)
and a highly stable and catalytically inactive La(OH)3 surface
phase results in potential-induced deactivation of the catalyst. Here,
the gradual dissolution of Co in the electrolyte, i.e., successive
passivation of the LSCO surface by La(OH)3, causes the
catalyst failure. The dynamic transformations in the surface chemistry
that are driven under OER conditions are therefore key to understand
not only activity trends but also stability limitations of perovskite
electrocatalysts.
Experimental Section
Thin-Film
Fabrication
Epitaxial La0.6Sr0.4CoO3-δ thin-film model electrodes
of 20 nm thickness were deposited on single-crystalline, epi-polished
(001) SrTiO3 (STO) and (001) Nb(0.5 wt %):SrTiO3 (Nb:STO) substrates (Shinkosha Co. Ltd., Yokohama, Japan) in [001]
orientation. The sample size is 0.5 × 10 × 10 mm3. The deposition process was performed by reflection high-energy
electron-diffraction-controlled pulsed laser deposition at an oxygen
partial pressure of p(O2) = 0.053 mbar.
The growth temperature was T = 650 °C and the
laser fluence F = 2.19 J·cm–2 using a repetition rate of f = 5 Hz. The distance
between the ceramic target and the heated substrate was d = 60 mm and a nanosecond KrF-excimer laser with a wavelength of
λ = 248 nm was used to operate the PLD system. Platinum electrodes
with a thickness of 50 nm were sputtered at the edges of the oxide
thin-film surface to provide sufficient contact with the potentiostat.
Furthermore, the backside and the sides of the substrates were covered
with 50 nm of Pt forming a contact with the front Pt pads. Conductive
Nb:STO substrates were applied to provide an additional pathway for
charge transfer through the Nb:STO/LSCO interface to improve measurement
geometry for individual probing techniques when required. Please note
that the use of undoped and Nb-doped STO substrates may result in
slight differences in the potential drop within the sample and hence
was only applied when an influence on the consistency of data interpretation
can be excluded.
Thin-Film Characterization
The surface
morphology of
the thin-film electrodes was investigated using atomic force microscopy
(AFM, Cypher, Oxford Instruments Asylum Research Inc., Santa Barbara)
operated with a tip with a curvature of ∼8 nm. The crystal
structure of the thin films was characterized by X-ray diffraction
(XRD, D8 Discover, Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) by symmetric
2θ–ω scans around the (002) reflections as well
as reciprocal space mapping (RSM) using asymmetric scans around the
(013) reflections in grazing exit geometry. The diffractometer was
equipped with a goebel mirror, a Cu Kα monochromator,
a centric Eulerian cradle and a Lynxeye XE detector. To provide for
lateral resolution, a pinhole adapter of 2 mm diameter was applied.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Phi 5000 VersaProbe, ULVAC
Phi, Physical Electronics, Inc.) was applied to study the surface
chemistry using the Al Kα line (Eλ = 1486.6 eV, FWHM = 0.26 eV) of a monochromized
X-ray source and constant pass energy (E0 = 29.35 eV) in fixed analyzer transmission mode. To vary between
different information depths of the detected photoelectrons, photoemission
angles of Θ = 15 and 64° (cf. Figures c, S7, and S8)
were applied for the XPS analysis, while the XPS spectra presented
in Figures and S9 were recorded at Θ = 46°. To calculate
the cation stoichiometry, relative sensitivity factors (RSF) were
referenced to the ceramic target material. For peak fitting, the full
width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the components was constrained to
exhibit an equal value and the components have a fixed position on
the B.E. scale for comparison of different samples. However, the mixed
hydroxide component is based on the sum of various overlapping signals
of hydroxide groups with slightly varying binding energy due to differences
in the chemical environment. Consequently, broadening of the multicomponent
peak compared to the other involved (single-component) chemical states
requires a larger FWHM applied for peak fitting. For data evaluation,
a Tougaard-type background was subtracted and the binding energies
of all spectra were aligned to the C 1s signal. The
inelastic mean free path (1lambda IMFP) was calculated by the QUASES-IMFP
software using the TPP2M formula[59] on the
basis of the material properties of as-prepared LSCO. The mean escape
depth was determined as an indicator for the angle-dependent information
depth of the XPS core level.[60] The energy
scale was periodically calibrated to the Au 4f core-level
spectrum of a reference sample. XPS analysis of the operated samples
was performed after rapid transfer (t ∼2 min)
to UHV subsequent to electrochemical operation and after gently patting
the sample dry with a clean room swipe under N2 atmosphere.
TEM Sample Preparation
Three ultrathin TEM lamellae
were prepared from epitaxial (LSCO) (001) thin films with a thickness
of 100 nm deposited on a single-crystalline NdGaO3 (NGO)
substrate in orthorhombic (110) surface orientation. The lamellae
were prepared using an Alkali Resistant Positive Photoresist X AR-P
5900/4 protection layer by means of focused ion beam (FIB) on a DENS
solutions heating and basing chip for in situ TEM measurements. Here,
each lamella is attached to one of the electrical contact of the chip
with +20° offset. Platinum (1 μm thickness) is deposited
to establish an electrical contact with the thin film to measure the
beam-induced potential. Here, Pt is deposited far from the region
of interest, so there is no possibility of interference of Pt in the
in situ ETEM catalytic investigations. Figure S1a shows the region of interest for the in situ ETEM observations.
Primary electron beam-induced secondary electron emission results
in a potential of 1.5 ± 0.2 V, which is close to relevant OER
potentials. To remove a minor amorphous layer that forms on the surface
upon FIB preparation, an electron beam-induced surface recrystallization
procedure is performed in situ under 1 mbar oxygen partial pressure
at T = 400 °C. Additional lamellae were prepared
on a Cu grid for EELS analysis.
Environmental Transmission
Electron Microscopy
To evaluate
the processes at the catalyst surface over time, several ETEM movies
are recorded with a small negative defocus that results in a dark
contrast of all atomic columns. In addition, a through focus series
was acquired in O2 gas for contrast simulation. In situ
ETEM experiments are carried out using a FEI Titan ETEM G2 80-300
at an operating voltage of 300 kV, equipped with a Cs corrector. All
in situ movies are recorded using a Gatan UltraScan 1000XP at a beam
current of 4 nA. The movie in O2 is recorded with a cold
trap to decrease the H2O partial pressure. Local electron
dose rates at the location of TEM lamella surfaces are measured by
calibrated CCD contrast with 0.16696 electrons/count, yielding 19.955
and 35.654 e/Å–2 s–1 for
O2 and H2O environments, respectively. A careful
analysis of beam effects excludes that an observed increase in Co
mobility is induced by the momentum transfer during scattering of
the high energetic primary electrons and give strong evidence for
thermally induced surface hopping that is enhanced by H2O. The electron beam-induced potential was measured via the electronic
contact to the LSCO film and the DENS solutions holder as well as
a FIB-Pt bridge across the substrate to be 1.5(±0.2) V with respect
to the ground (i.e., TEM column). An impedance converter was used
to maintain nearly open-circuit conditions during the voltage measurement.
Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy
The EELS analysis
are performed using a Gatan Quantum 965ER post-column energy filter
in the ETEM. Spectra of Co-L-, O-K-, and L-M-edges are acquired using
0.25 eV/ch dispersion in 1 mbar O2 and post 5 μbar
H2O. Power-law background functions from Gatan’s
Digital Micrograph are fitted to a 50 eV wide window before each Co-L-edge,
25 eV for O-K-edge, and 23 eV for La-M-edge for background subtraction.
Python-based code is used for the precise calculation of the L3/L2 ratio. The spectra are background-subtracted
and energy-calibrated using the corresponding zero-loss peak.
Image
Simulation
Multislice simulations of HRTEM images
are conducted with QSTEM[61] following the
procedure described in ref (35). For this purpose, the sample thickness as well as relevant
electron-optical parameters are determined by minimizing the root-mean-square
difference between experimental and simulated images of a single unit
cell using the Metropolis algorithm. Multislice image simulations
were performed using a sample thickness of 1.53 nm, a defocus of −14.5
nm, and a focal spread of 9 nm. Twofold astigmatism as well as the
spherical aberration are found to have only a small influence on the
image contrast within their experimental uncertainty and thus set
to zero to avoid overfitting. In a second step, the obtained parameters
are used during the simulation of a larger supercell including an
A-site-terminated surface.
Electrochemical Characterization
Electrochemical characterization
of the thin-film electrodes was performed in a rotating disc electrode
(RDE) setup (Pine Research) in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH with
a rotation rate of 1600 rpm using a custom-made adapter for 0.5 ×
10 × 10 mm3-sized thin-film samples. A chemically
resistant Teflon beaker was applied as the electrochemical cell and
O2-saturated (continuous purging) 0.1 M KOH was applied
as the electrolyte, which was prepared by dissolution of KOH pellets
(Sigma-Aldrich, 99.99%) in deionized water (Milli-Q, >18.2 MΩ
cm). The potentiostat (BioLogic SP-150, Bio-Logic Science Instruments,
France) was connected to the platinum contact sputtered at the backside
of the substrate via a Pt stamp, providing for facile charge transfer
to the thin-film working electrode while using a Pt-coil counter electrode.
The center of the perovskite catalyst was sealed from the platinum
contacts by an o ring with a diameter of d = 7.5
mm. The measurements were performed in reference to an Hg/HgO electrode
(CHI Instruments), which was experimentally calibrated to the RHE
(HydroFlex) for each batch of electrolyte. Electrochemical testing
was conducted by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, scan-rate-dependent
cyclic voltammetry in the pseudocapacitive redox phase change region,
and cyclic voltammetry in the OER potential region (two cycles successively).
For Tafel analysis, chronopotentiometric (staircase) measurements
were performed at different potentials in the range of j = 0.1–0.8 mA·cm–2 with galvanostatic
holds of 10 min. For lifetime testing, LSCO thin-film electrodes were
operated in the OER region using chronopotentiometry at different
current densities between j = 0.1 and 10.0 mA·cm–2. The entire setup was stored in a glovebox, which
was continuously purged with nitrogen gas. All potentials were iR-corrected by the uncompensated series resistance RS of the electrode setup, that is typically
in the range between RS = 75 and 100 Ω,
as determined using the high-frequency intersect of the Nyquist plot
determined by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy.
Online ICP-MS
Measurements
To investigate the stability
of the LSCO thin-film samples, the outlet of a custom-designed and
manufactured polycarbonate scanning flow cell (SFC) was coupled to
the inlet of an inductively coupled-plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS,
PerkinElmer NexION 350X). The micro flow cell setup allows to probe
the electrochemical performance and dissolution behavior at several
locations of the same thin-film sample. A glassy carbon rod (SIGRADUR)
was used as the counter electrode and an Ag/AgCl/3 M KCl (Metrohm)
as the reference electrode. The counter electrode was channeled in
the SFC from the inlet side via a T-connector, while the reference
electrode was connected through a capillary channel from the outlet
side (to avoid Cl– contamination). The LSCO thin
films served as the working electrode (measured working electrode
surface was 7.85 × 10–3 cm2). All
electrochemical protocols during online stability measurements were
performed using a potentiostat (Gamry, Reference 600). The working
electrode was placed on an XYZ translation stage (Physik Instrumente
M-403), allowing the rapid screening of multiple spots along the same
LSCO sample. Electrochemical protocols were performed in 0.05 M KOH
electrolyte solution (salt/organic matter content should be less than
2 w/w% for ICP-MS) saturated with Ar. Three different protocols were
carried out as follows: contact with the working electrode was established
at 1 V vs RHE and the electrode was held at this potential for 5 min.
This was followed by either a galvanostatic hold at j = 0.1 mA·cm–2 for t = 30
min or j = 0.3 mA·cm–2 for t = 10 min or j = 1 mA·cm–2 for t = 3 min. All measurements were completed
with a galvanostatic hold at j = 2.25 mA·cm–2 for t = 30 min. An iR correction of 1 kΩ was applied during all measurements. The
total Sr loss during OER operation is quantified by integration of
the dissolution features detected by ICP-MS during the respective
galvanostatic holds. The ICP-MS was calibrated daily by a four-point
calibration slope made from standard solutions (Merck Certipur, Sr,
La, In, Nb, Y, Ti, Sc, Co, Ge 1000 mg·L–1)
containing the metals of interest in a given concentration in 0.05
M KOH. 115In (for 88Sr, 139La), 89Y (for 93Nb), 45Sc (for 47Ti), and 74Ge (for 59Co) served as internal
standards. Internal standard solutions were prepared in 1% HNO3.The electrolyte flow-rate was controlled by the peristaltic
pump of the ICP-MS; the average flow-rate was 3.46 ± 0.03 μL·s–1.
Authors: Ioannis Katsounaros; Serhiy Cherevko; Aleksandar R Zeradjanin; Karl J J Mayrhofer Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Steven J Davis; Nathan S Lewis; Matthew Shaner; Sonia Aggarwal; Doug Arent; Inês L Azevedo; Sally M Benson; Thomas Bradley; Jack Brouwer; Yet-Ming Chiang; Christopher T M Clack; Armond Cohen; Stephen Doig; Jae Edmonds; Paul Fennell; Christopher B Field; Bryan Hannegan; Bri-Mathias Hodge; Martin I Hoffert; Eric Ingersoll; Paulina Jaramillo; Klaus S Lackner; Katharine J Mach; Michael Mastrandrea; Joan Ogden; Per F Peterson; Daniel L Sanchez; Daniel Sperling; Joseph Stagner; Jessika E Trancik; Chi-Jen Yang; Ken Caldeira Journal: Science Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Christoph Baeumer; Jiang Li; Qiyang Lu; Allen Yu-Lun Liang; Lei Jin; Henrique Perin Martins; Tomáš Duchoň; Maria Glöß; Sabrina M Gericke; Marcus A Wohlgemuth; Margret Giesen; Emily E Penn; Regina Dittmann; Felix Gunkel; Rainer Waser; Michal Bajdich; Slavomír Nemšák; J Tyler Mefford; William C Chueh Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Pietro P Lopes; Dong Young Chung; Xue Rui; Hong Zheng; Haiying He; Pedro Farinazzo Bergamo Dias Martins; Dusan Strmcnik; Vojislav R Stamenkovic; Peter Zapol; J F Mitchell; Robert F Klie; Nenad M Markovic Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Kelsey A Stoerzinger; Ryan Comes; Steven R Spurgeon; Suntharampillai Thevuthasan; Kyuwook Ihm; Ethan J Crumlin; Scott A Chambers Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: J Tyler Mefford; Xi Rong; Artem M Abakumov; William G Hardin; Sheng Dai; Alexie M Kolpak; Keith P Johnston; Keith J Stevenson Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-03-23 Impact factor: 14.919