Teresa Intrieri1, Gianfranco Manneschi1, Adele Caldarella2. 1. Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Villa delle Rose Via Cosimo il Vecchio, 2- 50139, Florence, Italy. 2. Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Villa delle Rose Via Cosimo il Vecchio, 2- 50139, Florence, Italy. a.caldarella@ispro.toscana.it.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Invasive breast cancer prognosis has significantly improved over time; however, there are few data about the long-term survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed the data on female breast cancer incident during 2004-2005 in the area of the Tuscan Cancer Registry, distinguishing them in five subtypes, according to ER, PgR, HER2, and Ki67 expression: luminal A, luminal B, luminal B/HER2 + , triple-negative, and HER2 + . Effects of subtypes and age on 10 years breast cancer specific survival were analysed by Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox analysis. RESULTS: The majority of breast cancer were luminal B (57%), and 45% of them were diagnosed at pathological stage I. The 10-year survival rates (p < 0.001) were higher among luminal A (90.2%) and lower among HER-2 + patients (70.3%). Prognostic effect of age was statistically significant (p < 0.0004): the 10-year cancer specific survival rates were higher among 40-59 years of age patients (88.5%), lower among 0-39 (75.8%). Luminal A breast cancer patients had a constant low risk throughout 10 years of follow up, while luminal B/HER2 + and triple negative tumours showed a peak 5 years after the diagnosis and then declined. DISCUSSION: Our study confirmed the prognostic effect of biological subtype also in a long term follow up study; moreover, age at diagnosis showed to influence the outcome, other than stage at diagnosis and treatment. The long term follow up showed a constant risk of death for luminal A and B tumours, whereas for non-luminal cancer a peak 5 years after the diagnosis was found.
INTRODUCTION: Invasive breast cancer prognosis has significantly improved over time; however, there are few data about the long-term survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed the data on female breast cancer incident during 2004-2005 in the area of the Tuscan Cancer Registry, distinguishing them in five subtypes, according to ER, PgR, HER2, and Ki67 expression: luminal A, luminal B, luminal B/HER2 + , triple-negative, and HER2 + . Effects of subtypes and age on 10 years breast cancer specific survival were analysed by Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox analysis. RESULTS: The majority of breast cancer were luminal B (57%), and 45% of them were diagnosed at pathological stage I. The 10-year survival rates (p < 0.001) were higher among luminal A (90.2%) and lower among HER-2 + patients (70.3%). Prognostic effect of age was statistically significant (p < 0.0004): the 10-year cancer specific survival rates were higher among 40-59 years of age patients (88.5%), lower among 0-39 (75.8%). Luminal A breast cancer patients had a constant low risk throughout 10 years of follow up, while luminal B/HER2 + and triple negative tumours showed a peak 5 years after the diagnosis and then declined. DISCUSSION: Our study confirmed the prognostic effect of biological subtype also in a long term follow up study; moreover, age at diagnosis showed to influence the outcome, other than stage at diagnosis and treatment. The long term follow up showed a constant risk of death for luminal A and B tumours, whereas for non-luminal cancer a peak 5 years after the diagnosis was found.
Authors: Nadia Howlader; Sean F Altekruse; Christopher I Li; Vivien W Chen; Christina A Clarke; Lynn A G Ries; Kathleen A Cronin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2014-04-28 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Fiona M Blows; Kristy E Driver; Marjanka K Schmidt; Annegien Broeks; Flora E van Leeuwen; Jelle Wesseling; Maggie C Cheang; Karen Gelmon; Torsten O Nielsen; Carl Blomqvist; Päivi Heikkilä; Tuomas Heikkinen; Heli Nevanlinna; Lars A Akslen; Louis R Bégin; William D Foulkes; Fergus J Couch; Xianshu Wang; Vicky Cafourek; Janet E Olson; Laura Baglietto; Graham G Giles; Gianluca Severi; Catriona A McLean; Melissa C Southey; Emad Rakha; Andrew R Green; Ian O Ellis; Mark E Sherman; Jolanta Lissowska; William F Anderson; Angela Cox; Simon S Cross; Malcolm W R Reed; Elena Provenzano; Sarah-Jane Dawson; Alison M Dunning; Manjeet Humphreys; Douglas F Easton; Montserrat García-Closas; Carlos Caldas; Paul D Pharoah; David Huntsman Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Jeffrey E Johnson; Paula D Strassle; Guilherme C de Oliveira; Chris B Agala; Philip Spanheimer; Kristalyn Gallagher; David Ollila; Hyman Muss; Stephanie Downs-Canner Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-06-26 Impact factor: 4.624
Authors: José P Leone; Carlos T Vallejo; Michael J Hassett; Julieta Leone; Noah Graham; Nabihah Tayob; Rachel A Freedman; Sara M Tolaney; Bernardo A Leone; Eric P Winer; Nancy U Lin Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-08 Impact factor: 4.872