Simon Davies1, Junhui Zhao2, Keith P McCullough2, Yong-Lim Kim3, Angela Yee-Moon Wang4, Sunil V Badve5,6, Rajnish Mehrotra7, Talerngsak Kanjanabuch8, Hideki Kawanishi9, Bruce Robinson2, Ronald Pisoni2, Jeffrey Perl10. 1. School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom. 2. Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, South Korea. 4. Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, P.R. China. 5. Renal and Metabolic Division, George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Medicine, Sydney, Australia. 6. Department of Renal Medicine, St. George Hospital, Sydney, Australia. 7. University of Washington, Department of Medicine, Seattle, Washington. 8. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and Center of Excellence in Kidney Metabolic Disorders and Dialysis Policy and Practice Program (DiP3), School of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. 9. Tsuchiya General Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan. 10. St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
Background: Icodextrin has been shown in randomized controlled trials to benefit fluid management in peritoneal dialysis (PD). We describe international icodextrin prescription practices and their relationship to clinical outcomes. Methods: We analyzed data from the prospective, international PDOPPS, from Australia/New Zealand, Canada, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Membrane function and 24-hour ultrafiltration according to icodextrin and glucose prescription was determined at baseline. Using an instrumental variable approach, Cox regression, stratified by country, was used to determine any association of icodextrin use to death and permanent transfer to hemodialysis (HDT), adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, serum albumin, urine volume, transplant waitlist status, PD modality, center size, and study phase. Results: Icodextrin was prescribed in 1986 (35%) of 5617 patients, >43% of patients in all countries, except in the United States, where it was only used in 17% and associated with a far greater use of hypertonic glucose. Patients on icodextrin had more coronary artery disease and diabetes, longer dialysis vintage, lower residual kidney function, faster peritoneal solute transfer rates, and lower ultrafiltration capacity. Prescriptions with or without icodextrin achieved equivalent ultrafiltration (median 750 ml/d [interquartile range 300-1345 ml/d] versus 765 ml/d [251-1345 ml/d]). Icodextrin use was not associated with mortality (HR=1.03; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.48) or HDT (HR 1.2; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.57). Conclusions: There are large national and center differences in icodextrin prescription, with the United States using significantly less. Icodextrin was associated with hypertonic glucose avoidance but equivalent ultrafiltration, which may affect any potential survival advantage or HDT.
Background: Icodextrin has been shown in randomized controlled trials to benefit fluid management in peritoneal dialysis (PD). We describe international icodextrin prescription practices and their relationship to clinical outcomes. Methods: We analyzed data from the prospective, international PDOPPS, from Australia/New Zealand, Canada, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Membrane function and 24-hour ultrafiltration according to icodextrin and glucose prescription was determined at baseline. Using an instrumental variable approach, Cox regression, stratified by country, was used to determine any association of icodextrin use to death and permanent transfer to hemodialysis (HDT), adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, serum albumin, urine volume, transplant waitlist status, PD modality, center size, and study phase. Results: Icodextrin was prescribed in 1986 (35%) of 5617 patients, >43% of patients in all countries, except in the United States, where it was only used in 17% and associated with a far greater use of hypertonic glucose. Patients on icodextrin had more coronary artery disease and diabetes, longer dialysis vintage, lower residual kidney function, faster peritoneal solute transfer rates, and lower ultrafiltration capacity. Prescriptions with or without icodextrin achieved equivalent ultrafiltration (median 750 ml/d [interquartile range 300-1345 ml/d] versus 765 ml/d [251-1345 ml/d]). Icodextrin use was not associated with mortality (HR=1.03; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.48) or HDT (HR 1.2; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.57). Conclusions: There are large national and center differences in icodextrin prescription, with the United States using significantly less. Icodextrin was associated with hypertonic glucose avoidance but equivalent ultrafiltration, which may affect any potential survival advantage or HDT.
Authors: R Saran; J L Bragg-Gresham; N W Levin; Z J Twardowski; V Wizemann; A Saito; N Kimata; B W Gillespie; C Combe; J Bommer; T Akiba; D L Mapes; E W Young; F K Port Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Dharshan Rangaswamy; Vasudeva Guddattu; Angela C Webster; Monique Borlace; Neil Boudville; Philip Clayton; Sunil Badve; David W Johnson; Kamal Sud Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2020-01-17 Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Simon J Davies; Graham Woodrow; Kieron Donovan; Jörg Plum; Paul Williams; Ann Catherine Johansson; Hans-Peter Bosselmann; Olof Heimbürger; Ole Simonsen; Andrew Davenport; Anders Tranaeus; Jose C Divino Filho Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Ronald L Pisoni; Charlotte J Arrington; Justin M Albert; Jean Ethier; Naoki Kimata; Mahesh Krishnan; Hugh C Rayner; Akira Saito; Jeffrey J Sands; Rajiv Saran; Brenda Gillespie; Robert A Wolfe; Friedrich K Port Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Johann Morelle; Joanna Stachowska-Pietka; Carl Öberg; Liliana Gadola; Vincenzo La Milia; Zanzhe Yu; Mark Lambie; Rajnish Mehrotra; Javier de Arteaga; Simon Davies Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Htay Htay; David W Johnson; Kathryn J Wiggins; Sunil V Badve; Jonathan C Craig; Giovanni Fm Strippoli; Yeoungjee Cho Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-10-26
Authors: Andreas Vychytil; César Remón; Catherine Michel; Paul Williams; Ana Rodríguez-Carmona; Belén Marrón; Ed Vonesh; Synke van der Heyden; Jose C Divino Filho Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2008-06-13 Impact factor: 5.992