Literature DB >> 36128453

Missing flux from the ocean: isotope revealed an important NOx flux mediated by microbial processes.

Keisuke Koba1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36128453      PMCID: PMC9477192          DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwac142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Natl Sci Rev        ISSN: 2053-714X            Impact factor:   23.178


× No keyword cloud information.
NOx in the atmosphere can affect human health and economic development as well as atmospheric chemistry and climate. Thus, it is crucial to deeply understand the dynamics of NOx including its sources and sinks. However, as in the cases of other nitrogen compounds such as nitrous oxide, it is quite difficult to trace the fate of NOx, then close its budget. Song et al. [1] nicely tackled this issue with the help of the 15N signature of NOx. They summarized the δ15N data of NO3− in atmospheric particulates observed in the ocean sites, which are quite low. Even after the correction of the potential changes in δ15N, the low δ15N signatures of ocean NOx (−12.5‰ on average) cannot be explained by δ15N of NOx from the oil combustion of marine traffic transportation (+4.7‰ on average), which has been considered as a single NOx emission source in marine environments. The simple isotope mass-balance model required them to include one more NOx emission source with low δ15N: microbially derived NOx. The contribution of microbial NOx emission was estimated as 8.8 ± 1.5 Tg-N/yr [1]. Compared to the total ocean NOx emission (15.2 ± 1.5 Tg-N/yr), this flux estimated by Song et al. [1] is shockingly high. However, this estimation looks reasonable when compared with other important nitrogen fluxes in the ocean such as denitrification (100–450 Tg-N/yr [2]), nitrous oxide emission (3.4 Tg-N/yr [3]) and nitrification (100–200 Tg-N/yr [4]). Many microbial processes such as nitrification and denitrification are known to produce NO, the precursor to atmospheric NOx. Song et al. [1] appealed the urgent necessity for more research on the microbial NOx. It should be noted that although the δ15N signature of NOx is quite powerful in elucidating the missing NOx fluxes as found in Song et al. [1], the estimation, inevitably, heavily depends on the endmembers δ15N data of NOx and isotopic changes during the formation of particle NO3−, both of which are quite difficult to obtain and to constrain. More intensive research on the production/consumption of NOx as well as isotopic fractionations during these processes can make great contributions to constraining the microbially derived NOx fluxes in the ocean and land that are now beautifully unlocked by Song et al. [1].
  4 in total

Review 1.  Global Nitrogen Cycle: Critical Enzymes, Organisms, and Processes for Nitrogen Budgets and Dynamics.

Authors:  Xinning Zhang; Bess B Ward; Daniel M Sigman
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Nitrifier adaptation to low energy flux controls inventory of reduced nitrogen in the dark ocean.

Authors:  Yao Zhang; Wei Qin; Lei Hou; Emily J Zakem; Xianhui Wan; Zihao Zhao; Li Liu; Kristopher A Hunt; Nianzhi Jiao; Shuh-Ji Kao; Kai Tang; Xiabing Xie; Jiaming Shen; Yufang Li; Mingming Chen; Xiaofeng Dai; Chang Liu; Wenchao Deng; Minhan Dai; Anitra E Ingalls; David A Stahl; Gerhard J Herndl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  (K, Na)NbO3-based lead-free piezoceramics: one more step to boost applications.

Authors:  Huan Liu; Yi-Xuan Liu; Aizhen Song; Qian Li; Yang Yin; Fang-Zhou Yao; Ke Wang; Wen Gong; Bo-Ping Zhang; Jing-Feng Li
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 23.178

4.  A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks.

Authors:  Hanqin Tian; Rongting Xu; Josep G Canadell; Rona L Thompson; Wilfried Winiwarter; Parvadha Suntharalingam; Eric A Davidson; Philippe Ciais; Robert B Jackson; Greet Janssens-Maenhout; Michael J Prather; Pierre Regnier; Naiqing Pan; Shufen Pan; Glen P Peters; Hao Shi; Francesco N Tubiello; Sönke Zaehle; Feng Zhou; Almut Arneth; Gianna Battaglia; Sarah Berthet; Laurent Bopp; Alexander F Bouwman; Erik T Buitenhuis; Jinfeng Chang; Martyn P Chipperfield; Shree R S Dangal; Edward Dlugokencky; James W Elkins; Bradley D Eyre; Bojie Fu; Bradley Hall; Akihiko Ito; Fortunat Joos; Paul B Krummel; Angela Landolfi; Goulven G Laruelle; Ronny Lauerwald; Wei Li; Sebastian Lienert; Taylor Maavara; Michael MacLeod; Dylan B Millet; Stefan Olin; Prabir K Patra; Ronald G Prinn; Peter A Raymond; Daniel J Ruiz; Guido R van der Werf; Nicolas Vuichard; Junjie Wang; Ray F Weiss; Kelley C Wells; Chris Wilson; Jia Yang; Yuanzhi Yao
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.