Literature DB >> 36127444

The case for lotteries as a tiebreaker of quality in research funding.

.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Careers; Funding; Lab life

Year:  2022        PMID： 36127444     DOI： 10.1038/d41586-022-02959-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN： 0028-0836            Impact factor:   69.504


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals.

Authors:  Mikael Fogelholm; Saara Leppinen; Anssi Auvinen; Jani Raitanen; Anu Nuutinen; Kalervo Väänänen
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel.

Authors:  Nicholas Graves; Adrian G Barnett; Philip Clarke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-09-27

3.  How much would each researcher receive if competitive government research funding were distributed equally among researchers?

Authors:  Krist Vaesen; Joel Katzav
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.