BACKGROUND: Inferior vena cava (IVC) size and collapsibility (IVC dynamics) are used for estimating right atrial pressure (RAP). However, the diagnostic performance of the American Society of Echocardiography IVC criteria for estimating RAP in patients with congenital heart disease are unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the role of IVC dynamics for estimating RAP in adults with congenital heart disease. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of adults with congenital heart disease that underwent cardiac catheterization and echocardiogram at Mayo Clinic (2003-2019). IVC diameter was measured at inspiration (IVCmin) and end-expiration (IVCmax), and IVC collapsibility index (IVCCI) was calculated. RESULTS: Based on 918 patients, we observed a good correlation between IVCmax and invasive RAP (r=0.56, P<0.001); IVCmin and RAP (r=0.58, P<0.001); and IVCCI (r=-0.72, P<0.001). There was excellent correlation between invasive RAP and estimated RAP using IVCCI (r=0.80, P<0.001). We observed that IVCCI <60% had superior diagnostic performance as compared with American Society of Echocardiography criteria (IVCmax >2.1 cm, area under the curve difference 0.15, P<0.001; IVCCI <50%, area under the curve difference 0.09, P=0.008; combination of IVCmax >2.1 cm; and IVCCI <50%, area under the curve difference 0.06, P=0.02). Estimated RAP >10 mm Hg based on IVCCI had comparable prognostic performance as invasive RAP but superior prognostic performance as the American Society of Echocardiography criteria. CONCLUSIONS: IVCCI <60% was the best criterion to identify patients with elevated RAP. IVCCI was comparable to invasively measured RAP in its relation to prognosis. Further studies are required to determine whether the use of IVCCI in clinical decision-making will improve clinical outcomes in this population.
BACKGROUND: Inferior vena cava (IVC) size and collapsibility (IVC dynamics) are used for estimating right atrial pressure (RAP). However, the diagnostic performance of the American Society of Echocardiography IVC criteria for estimating RAP in patients with congenital heart disease are unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the role of IVC dynamics for estimating RAP in adults with congenital heart disease. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of adults with congenital heart disease that underwent cardiac catheterization and echocardiogram at Mayo Clinic (2003-2019). IVC diameter was measured at inspiration (IVCmin) and end-expiration (IVCmax), and IVC collapsibility index (IVCCI) was calculated. RESULTS: Based on 918 patients, we observed a good correlation between IVCmax and invasive RAP (r=0.56, P<0.001); IVCmin and RAP (r=0.58, P<0.001); and IVCCI (r=-0.72, P<0.001). There was excellent correlation between invasive RAP and estimated RAP using IVCCI (r=0.80, P<0.001). We observed that IVCCI <60% had superior diagnostic performance as compared with American Society of Echocardiography criteria (IVCmax >2.1 cm, area under the curve difference 0.15, P<0.001; IVCCI <50%, area under the curve difference 0.09, P=0.008; combination of IVCmax >2.1 cm; and IVCCI <50%, area under the curve difference 0.06, P=0.02). Estimated RAP >10 mm Hg based on IVCCI had comparable prognostic performance as invasive RAP but superior prognostic performance as the American Society of Echocardiography criteria. CONCLUSIONS: IVCCI <60% was the best criterion to identify patients with elevated RAP. IVCCI was comparable to invasively measured RAP in its relation to prognosis. Further studies are required to determine whether the use of IVCCI in clinical decision-making will improve clinical outcomes in this population.
Authors: J Matthew Brennan; John E Blair; Sascha Goonewardena; Adam Ronan; Dipak Shah; Samip Vasaiwala; James N Kirkpatrick; Kirk T Spencer Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Roberto M Lang; Luigi P Badano; Victor Mor-Avi; Jonathan Afilalo; Anderson Armstrong; Laura Ernande; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Steven A Goldstein; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Patrizio Lancellotti; Denisa Muraru; Michael H Picard; Ernst R Rietzschel; Lawrence Rudski; Kirk T Spencer; Wendy Tsang; Jens-Uwe Voigt Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Alexander C Egbe; Srikanth Kothapalli; William R Miranda; Sorin Pislaru; Naser M Ammash; Barry A Borlaug; Patricia A Pellikka; Maria Najam; Heidi M Connolly Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Nazzareno Galiè; Marc Humbert; Jean-Luc Vachiery; Simon Gibbs; Irene Lang; Adam Torbicki; Gérald Simonneau; Andrew Peacock; Anton Vonk Noordegraaf; Maurice Beghetti; Ardeschir Ghofrani; Miguel Angel Gomez Sanchez; Georg Hansmann; Walter Klepetko; Patrizio Lancellotti; Marco Matucci; Theresa McDonagh; Luc A Pierard; Pedro T Trindade; Maurizio Zompatori; Marius Hoeper Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-08-29 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: A C Zomer; I Vaartjes; E T van der Velde; H M Y de Jong; T C Konings; L J Wagenaar; W F Heesen; F Eerens; L H B Baur; D E Grobbee; B J M Mulder Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Alexander C Egbe; William R Miranda; Joseph Dearani; Patrick S Kamath; Heidi M Connolly Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-12-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Alexander C Egbe; Crystal Bonnichsen; Yogesh N V Reddy; Jason H Anderson; Barry A Borlaug Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 5.501