Determination of some heavy metals and their health risk in T-shirts printed for a special program.

Heavy metals often are used in different textile processes, like dyeing and printing. When the toxic elements are present in more than recommended in textile materials they may impose potential risk to human health by absorption through the skin. In this study concentrations of some heavy metals (Co, Cu, Cr, Cd, and Pb) were analyzed in skin contact fading T-shirts printed for a special program at Mettu town using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy with a microwave digestion method technique for sample preparation. High levels of Cu were found in black, green, blue, and red-colored T-shirts ranging from 26.726-179.315mg/kg. Cr exceeded the recommended limits in most samples of T-shirts and was mostly in yellow, black, and blue colors. Cd levels were found to be within normal ranges. However, all T-shirt samples had low levels of cobalt, ranging from 1.33±2.13 to3.94±0.21. Maximum lead concentrations were found to be 3.40 ± 0.19 mg/kg for red-colored samples and 2.71 ± 0.13 mg/kg for blue colored samples. The metal concentrations in the T-shirts investigated were also compared to the OEKO Tex standard 100 limits. In this investigation, the concentrations of Pb, Cu, and Cr in red and green colored T-shirt samples were above the OEKO Tex suggested standard value. Therefore a strict local and international regulation and measures need to be taken to avoid toxicity of the studied metals.

Introduction

Quality of textile production is very important because people want to be able to buy clothing, bedding, and household textiles that have been tested and are not dyed in any way with harmful substances [1-3]. People are constantly in contact with textiles through wearable clothing, cleansing apparel, carpeting, furniture cover, and bedding; due to this reason, we are often exposed to different allergenic and toxic chemicals coming from these textiles via inhalation, ingestion, and dermal absorption. The textile can be made of natural or synthetic fibers and the whole production process involves extensive use of chemicals. The main chemical pollutants present in textiles are dyes containing carcinogenic amines, metals, pentachlorophenol, chlorine bleaching, halogen carriers, free formaldehyde, biocides, fire retardants, and softeners [4, 5].

Heavy metals often are used in different textile processes, like dyeing and printing [6]. Toxic and allergic metals including Co, Cu, Cr, and Pb are used as metal complex dyes, Cr as pigments mordant, Sn as a catalyst in synthetic fabrics and as synergists of flame retardants, Ag as antimicrobials, and Ti and Zn as water repellents and odor preventive agents [7-10]. Raw textile materials may also contain heavy metals [11]. Cotton, flax, and hemp sometimes adsorb very large amounts of metals from the environment [12, 13] and can be used as bio-absorbers [14].

When toxic elements are present in high amounts in textile materials they may impose potential risk to human health by absorption through the skin including skin alterations i.e. dermatitis, irritation, allergy, and skin micro-flora reduction [15]. It is well known that some metals, such as cobalt, chromium, copper, and nickel, are skin sensitizers[16, 17] while other trace elements (e.g. cadmium and lead) are highly toxic and carcinogenic[18] Cr can lead to liver damage, pulmonary congestion, and cancer [19]. Lead causes neurotoxin. It affects the human brain and cognitive development, as well as the reproductive system. Chromium (VI),(Hexavalent Chromium) is recognized as a human carcinogen and is linked to lung, respiratory system, and sinus cancers. Whereas copper imbalance causes arthritis, fatigue, insomnia, migraine headaches, depression, panic attacks, and attention deficit disorder. The purpose of this study was to determine the concentrations of some heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Cr, Co and Cu) in skin-contact fading T-shirts printed for fun and special ceremonies selected randomly from the printing house and markets of Mettu town by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy and know the pollution status of the studied materials.

Materials and methods

Sample preparation

T-shirt samples in various colors, including black, red, blue, yellow, and green, were purchased at random from Mettu town printing houses and super markets. After drying 0.5 g of each sample in HNO3, it was digested in a Microwave Digestion System (Titan microwave sample preparation system, India) for 5 minutes at 105°C, then 15 minutes at 180°C, and finally 20 minutes at 200°C to determine heavy metal content of T-shirt materials. Extracts were filtered and brought to a volume of 25 mL with ultrapure water after chilling, and AAS was used to analyze them. Blanks made with the same amount of reagents but without the sample were made under the same conditions. The accuracy of the instrumental procedures was tested using blank and control samples, as well as reference materials. A plot of standard metal concentration versus matching absorbance was made for each tested metal, and the calibration curves’ correlation coefficient (R2) and regression equations were recorded. For the samples and standard solutions, all measurements were done in triplicate, and the mean results were used, along with the appropriate standard deviation values, for statistical analysis.

Elemental quantitative analysis

The analysis was carried out using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Buck Scientific model 210 VGP) with a deuterium arc background corrector and a standard air-acetylene flame setup. For maximum signal intensity, the instrument’s operating settings were optimized. At the corresponding primary source line, a hollow cathode lamp for each metal (Co, Cu, Cr, Cd, and Pb) was utilized, which was operated according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. To guarantee acceptable flame conditions, the acetylene and air flow rates were regulated. To determine the elements in the digested blank solutions, the same analytical approach was used. Table 1 summarizes the optimized operational radiation wavelength, slit width, and lamp current employed in the AAS measurements, as well as the detection limit for each analyzed heavy metal in the examined T-shirt samples.

Table 1

Instrumental operating conditions for the determination of Co, Cu, Cr, Cd, and Pb using AAS.

Element	Parameters
	Wavelength/nm	Slit/nm	Lamp current, mA	Instrument detection limit
Pb	283.3	1.0	5	0.04
Cd	228.9	0.5	4	0.01
Cr	357.9	0.2	7	0.04
Co	240.7	0.2	3	0.05
Cu	324.7	0.5	5	0.005
Gas mixture	Acetylene/air

Method validation

The accuracy of digestion procedure and efficiency of the AAS instrument were checked by spiking sample with known concentration of the analyte. Spiked samples were prepared by adding a small known quantity of metal standard solutions to T-shirt samples by applying similar digestion procedure and analyzing for the levels of metals and calculating the recovery percent. Percent recovery (R) was calculated [20] using the Eq (1):

Where, Cs = metal concentration of the spiked sample

C = metal concentration of the non-spiked sample

S = concentration equivalent of analyte added to the sample.

Results

Calibration curves were prepared to determine the concentration of metals in the samples solution. A series of standard working solution were prepared from their respective salt. The concentration range, the correlation coefficients and the correlation equations of the calibration curves for the determination of metals in the samples by AAS are given in Table 2. The correlation coefficients of all the calibration curves were > 0.999 and these correlation coefficients showed that there was very good correlation (relationship) between concentration and absorbance.

Table 2

Concentrations of working standard solutions, correlation coefficients and regression equations of the calibration curves for the studied metals.

Analyzed heavy metals	Concentration range (mg/kg)	Regression equation	R2
Cu	25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200	y = 0.0085x- 0.0089	0.9941
Cr	0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7	y = 0.3002x- 0.0008	0.9975
Co	0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0	y = 0.1675x+0.0086	0.997
Cd	0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3	y = 0.467x+0.0023	0.9977
Pb	0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0	y = 0.3989+0.0022	0.9954

Method detection limit and limit of quantification

In this study Limits of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were calculated from three and ten times the standard deviations for blank measurements divided by the calibration curve slope, respectively. Each blank solution was run with AAS for the metals level in similar manner as the samples and the values obtained for all metals are listed in Table 3.

Table 3

Method detection limit and limit of quantification.

Metals	Method detection limit	Limit of quantification
Cu	12.99	39.36
Cr	0.283	0.859
Co	0.145	0.441
Cd	0.011	0.032
Pb	0.051	0.399

Accuracy

In this study, the method validation was made by the spiking experiment in which known quantities of the metals standard solution were added to the samples and applied the whole procedure to the mixture (spiked samples) and calculated the percent recoveries.

The obtained percentage recovery varied from 95.33% to 101.66% which were in the acceptable range (Table 4).

Table 4

Recovery of heavy metals in T-shirt samples.

Analyzed heavy metals	Mean conc. in sample (mg/kg)	Amount of heavy metal added (mg/kg)	Mean conc. found in spiked sample(mg/kg)	% Recovery
Cu	93.37	5	98.30	98.60
Cr	3.76	3	6.81	101.66
Co	1.92	3	4.78	95.33
Cd	0.1	5	5.02	98.40
Pb	0.33	5	5.29	99.20

Analysis of metals in T-shirts

In this study average concentrations of heavy metals (Co, Cu, Cr, Cd, and Pb) were analyzed using AAS in green, blue, black, yellow, and red colored T-shirts whose results are presented in Table 5.

Table 5

Concentration of heavy metals (mg/kg) found in a different colored T-shirt by Atomic Absorption spectroscopy.

Sample of T-shirt colors	Analyzed heavy metals
	Copper(mg/kg) (Mean ± SD)	Chromium mg/kg) (Mean ± SD)	Cobalt (mg/kg) (Mean ± SD)	Cadmium(mg/kg) (Mean ± SD)	Lead(mg/kg) (Mean± SD)
Black	93.37 ±3.192	3.76±0.205	1.92± 0.161	0.017±0.005	0.33± 0.018
Red	53.68 ± 4.548	1.14± 0.094	3.27± 0.128	0.27± 0.007	3.40± 0.019
Yellow	31.53 ± 4.804	5.21± 0.476	1.68 ± 0.191	0.09± 0.002	0.20± 0.017
Blue	177.01± 2.305	3.01± 0.135	3.94 ± 0.021	0.016±0.005	2.71± 0.013
Green	127.16± 6.741	0.82± 0.107	1.33 ± 0.213	0.018±0.002	0.07± 0.005

SD- Standard deviation

Copper: high concentration of copper was found in blue, green, black and red color t-shirt and it is about 177.01± 2.305 mg/kg, 127.16± 6.741 mg/kg, 93.37 ± 3.192 mg/kg and 93.37 ± 3.192 mg/kg respectively.

Chromium: The study show concentration of chromium in yellow, black, blue, red and green color t-shirt were 5.21± 0.476 mg/kg, 3.76± 0.205 mg/kg, 3.01± 0.135 mg/kg, 1.14± 0.094 mg/kg and 0.82± 0.107 mg/kg respectively.

Cadmium: cadmium level was found 0.011–0.277mg/kg in all t-shirt samples.

Lead: lead concentrations were found to be 3.40 ± 0.019 mg/kg, 2.71± 0.013 mg/kg, 0.33± 0.018 mg/kg, 0.20± 0.017mg/kg and 0.07± 0.005mg/kg in, red, blue, black, yellow and green-colored t-shirt samples respectively.

Cobalt: cobalt concentration ranging from 1.33±0.213 to 3.94±0.021 was found.

Discussion

Among the studied heavy metals, copper had the highest concentration in green, blue, and black color T-shirts due to ferrocyanide and copper-acetates being used like green, blue, and red-brown dyes and pigments in the textile industry [10, 21]. Similarly, because chromium is used as a metal complex dye in polyamide black fabrics, the majority of T-shirt samples had high levels of this element [22]. On the other hand, cadmium was found to be within normal levels except in red and yellow T-shirts. However, low levels of cobalt were identified in all T-shirt samples, ranging from 1.33±0.213 to 3.94±0.021mg/kg. Maximum lead concentrations were found to be 3.40 ± 0.019 mg/kg for red-colored samples and 2.71± 0.013 mg/kg for blue-colored samples. The metal concentration in the T-shirts we investigated was also compared to the 100 limit value of mg/kg OEKO Tex standard and with literature in Tables 6 and 7 respectively. In this investigation, the amounts of Pb, Cu, and Cr obtained in red and green colored T-shirt samples were above the OEKO Tex suggested standard value. On the other hand, the amounts of cadmium and cobalt were found to be within the Oeko-Tex guidelines. Heavy metal concentrations in our study were found to be similar the other study [23, 24]. Heavy metal concentrations in the samples investigated could be used to predict skin toxicity and estimate human exposure and health hazards. When metals are present in textile materials above specified levels, they may present a risk to human health through absorption through the skin [25]. The amounts of heavy metals in the T-shirts under investigation differed from one color to the other. The findings of this study demonstrate that Pb, Cu, and Cr concentrations in T-shirts are indicative of a risk factor for human health.

Table 6

Oeko-Tex Standard 100 limit values (mg/ kg) [2015].

Heavy metals	Concentration (with skin contact)
Pb	1.0
Cd	0.1
Cr	2.0
Co	4.0
Cu	50.0

Table 7

Literature values of heavy metals (as mg/ kg) in textile.

Comparison Table Heavy metals	Other study (Literature)	Present study	Reference
Cu	0.76-341mg/kg	26.726–179.315	[23]
Cr	0-118mg/kg	0.713–5.686
Co	0.0-28mg/kg	1.117–3.961
Cd	0.10–0.41mg/kg	0.011–0.277
Pb	1.23–1.83mg/kg	0.065–3.419	[24]

Conclusion

In this study concentrations of some heavy metals were analyzed in skin contact fading T-shirts printed for a special program at Mettu town using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy with a microwave digestion method technique for sample preparation. After determining the levels of selected heavy metals high levels of Cu were found in black, green, blue, and red-colored T-shirts ranging from 26.726–179.315mg/kg. Cr exceeded the recommended limits in most samples of T-shirts and was mostly in yellow, black, and blue colors. Cd levels were found to be within normal ranges. However, all T-shirt samples had low levels of cobalt, ranging from 1.33±2.13 to3.94±0.21. Maximum lead concentrations were found to be 3.40 ± 0.19 mg/kg for red-colored samples and 2.71 ± 0.13 mg/kg for blue colored samples. The metal concentrations in the T-shirts investigated were also compared to the OEKO Tex standard 100 limits and the concentrations of Pb, Cu, and Cr in red and green colored T-shirt samples were above the OEKO Tex suggested standard value. These metals may cause allergic reactions or much worse health impacts. For this reason, it is important to recommend that manufacturers and printing houses must ensure that products are safe and do not pose a risk to the users.

22 Jun 2022

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

MARIA LUISA ASTOLFI, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

[The authors have no affiliation with any organization a direct or indirect financial interest.]

At this time, please address the following queries:

a) Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution.

b) State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

c) If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders.

d) If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Thank you for stating the following in your Competing Interests section:

[The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.]

Please complete your Competing Interests on the online submission form to state any Competing Interests. If you have no competing interests, please state "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.", as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now

This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Please amend either the abstract on the online submission form (via Edit Submission) or the abstract in the manuscript so that they are identical.

5. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: - Experimental parts (sample preparation, elemental quantitative analysis) should be referenced.

- Results and Discussion sections should be developed.

- Tables look bad. It must be redrawn.

- Celsius degrees symbols must be written correctly.

Reviewer #2: Please see comments on the attached document but the general comments are:

The paper needs English editing as there are a lot of grammatical errors and typos. The paper is poorly written and that needs to be improved. Novelty is lacking and nothing much has been contributed to scientific knowledge. The paper can be considered for publication after a major revision.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Şana Sungur

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Submitted filename: Reviewers Comments 20 June 2022.docx

Click here for additional data file.

18 Aug 2022

based on your comments as much as possible I have corrected all comments

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.

1 Sep 2022

6 Sep 2022

response to reviewer comments attached to files as response to reviewer

Submitted filename: response to reviewer.docx

Click here for additional data file.

8 Sep 2022

Determination of some heavy metals and their health risk in T-shirts printed for a special program.

PONE-D-22-14909R2

Dear Dr. Sima,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

MARIA LUISA ASTOLFI, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

11 Sep 2022

PONE-D-22-14909R2

Determination of some heavy metals and their health risk in T-shirts printed for a special program

Dear Dr. Sima:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. MARIA LUISA ASTOLFI

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE