AIM: This study aimed to develop phosphatase-responsive ζ potential converting nanocarriers utilizing polyphosphate-coated cell-penetrating peptide (CPP)-decorated nanoemulsions (NEs) as a novel gene delivery system to retinal cells. METHODS: Poly-l-lysine (PLL) was first conjugated with oleylamine (OA) only at its carboxylic end to form the amphiphilic PLL-oleylamine (PLOA) conjugate. Afterward, NEs were loaded with PLOA prior to being coated with tripolyphosphate (TPP) to generate PLOA/TPP NEs. A plasmid containing a reporter gene for green fluorescent protein plasmid (pGFP) was complexed with cationic surfactants forming hydrophobic ion pairs that were loaded in the oily core of NEs. Phosphate removal, ζ potential conversion, and cytotoxicity of the system were evaluated. Cellular uptake and transfection efficiency were investigated in 661W photoreceptor-like cells via microscopic analysis, fluorescence spectroscopy, and flow cytometry. RESULTS: Dephosphorylation of PLOA/TPP NEs triggered by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) resulted in the exposure of positive amine groups on the surface of NE droplets and a notable conversion of the ζ potential from -22.4 to +8.5 mV. Cellular uptake of PLOA/TPP NEs performed on 661W photoreceptor-like cells showed a 3-fold increase compared to control NEs. Furthermore, PLOA/TPP NEs also showed low cytotoxicity and high transfection efficacy with ∼50% of cells transfected. CONCLUSIONS: Polyphosphate-coated CPP-decorated NEs triggered by ALP could be a promising nanosystem to efficiently deliver drugs and genetic materials to photoreceptor-like cells and other retinal cells for potential treatments of retinal diseases.
AIM: This study aimed to develop phosphatase-responsive ζ potential converting nanocarriers utilizing polyphosphate-coated cell-penetrating peptide (CPP)-decorated nanoemulsions (NEs) as a novel gene delivery system to retinal cells. METHODS: Poly-l-lysine (PLL) was first conjugated with oleylamine (OA) only at its carboxylic end to form the amphiphilic PLL-oleylamine (PLOA) conjugate. Afterward, NEs were loaded with PLOA prior to being coated with tripolyphosphate (TPP) to generate PLOA/TPP NEs. A plasmid containing a reporter gene for green fluorescent protein plasmid (pGFP) was complexed with cationic surfactants forming hydrophobic ion pairs that were loaded in the oily core of NEs. Phosphate removal, ζ potential conversion, and cytotoxicity of the system were evaluated. Cellular uptake and transfection efficiency were investigated in 661W photoreceptor-like cells via microscopic analysis, fluorescence spectroscopy, and flow cytometry. RESULTS: Dephosphorylation of PLOA/TPP NEs triggered by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) resulted in the exposure of positive amine groups on the surface of NE droplets and a notable conversion of the ζ potential from -22.4 to +8.5 mV. Cellular uptake of PLOA/TPP NEs performed on 661W photoreceptor-like cells showed a 3-fold increase compared to control NEs. Furthermore, PLOA/TPP NEs also showed low cytotoxicity and high transfection efficacy with ∼50% of cells transfected. CONCLUSIONS: Polyphosphate-coated CPP-decorated NEs triggered by ALP could be a promising nanosystem to efficiently deliver drugs and genetic materials to photoreceptor-like cells and other retinal cells for potential treatments of retinal diseases.
Entities:
Keywords:
cell-penetrating peptide; charge-converting system; gene transfection; lipid-based nanocarriers; polyphosphate coating; retinal drug delivery systems
Nonviral gene delivery
nanosystems are promising strategies to
cure and treat retinal- and photoreceptor-related diseases such as
diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, and retinal
neovascularization disorders that are shown to have great potential
in restoring vision loss, resolving difficulties in discerning colors,
and improving light adaptation.[1−4] However, due to the unique anatomy of the eyes, efficient
gene delivery to the retina remains challenging.[5−7] Clinically,
intravitreal injection is currently the most favorable route to deliver
drugs and drug/gene nanocarriers to the posterior segment of the eye
as it can bypass the cornea, provide high local drug concentrations,
and minimize systemic side effects.[1,8] In spite of
this fact, the insufficient transportation to the retina and gene
expression of nonviral gene delivery systems are still among the biggest
obstacles.[9−12]Positively charged nanoparticles have been shown to electrostatically
interact with negatively charged glycosaminoglycan and hyaluronic
acid in the vitreous humor, hindering particle diffusion, promoting
aggregation in some cases, and limiting particles approaching the
retina.[13−15] Besides, nanoparticle positive charges may facilitate
the formation of the protein corona that could reduce nanoparticle
cellular uptake.[16] Nevertheless, electrostatic
interactions between positively charged nanoparticles and negatively
charged domains on cell surfaces are needed for nanoparticle uptake,
which is essential for gene delivery systems.[17,18] Therefore, a system that could provide the right surface charge
at the right stage would minimize the hurdles and maximize the benefits
for optimal drug delivery.Our research group has been employing
the alkaline phosphatase
(ALP)-triggered charge-converting strategy that was shown to assist
negatively charged phosphate-decorated nanocarriers to efficiently
penetrate highly negatively charged mucus gel layers and be internalized
into underneath cell layers.[19,20] Enhancement in cellular
internalization of phosphate-decorated nanocarriers was caused by
the positive charges formed on the surface of the nanocarriers as
they approached the cell and were cleaved off their phosphate groups
by membrane-bound ALP. As ALP is shown to be present in retinal tissue,
that is, the inner and outer segments of the cone photoreceptors,
the inner and outer plexiform layer of cone axons, and Müller
cells,[21−24] ALP-triggered charge-converting nanosystems that could avoid interactions
with negatively charged proteins in the vitreous humor and be efficiently
internalized into retinal cells are of interest. These charge-converting
nanocarriers which can be introduced to the eye by intravitreal injection
or transscleral delivery systems using microneedles[25,26] could be a potential approach to improve gene and drug delivery
efficiencies to the retina.In this study, we designed ALP-responsive
polyphosphate-coated
cell-penetrating peptide (CPP)-decorated nanoemulsions (NEs) aiming
at the delivery of drug or plasmid DNA to the retina and photoreceptor
cells. NEs have been shown to be attractive and efficient nonviral
gene delivery systems as they can provide high gene loading capacity,
protection of cargo genes from enzymatic degradation, high transfection
efficacy, and low toxicity.[27−29] We prepared NEs by diluting lipophilic
preconcentrates loaded with CPP, drug, or genetic materials. First,
poly-l-lysine (PLL), a CPP, was grafted with a fatty acid
chain so that it could anchor itself on the exterior of NEs. The highly
positively charged surface of the obtained NEs was subsequently coated
with tripolyphosphate (TPP) via electrostatic interactions. Finally,
TPP-coated PLL-decorated NEs loaded with Lumogen red or a plasmid
encoding green fluorescent protein plasmid (pGFP) were evaluated for
cellular uptake enhancement and transfection efficiency in 661W photoreceptor-like
cells.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Poly-l-lysine
hydrobromide (PLL; 4.2 KDa) was purchased from Alamanda Polymers (Alabama,
USA). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) Opti-MEM,
RIPA lysis, and extraction buffer were obtained from Thermo Scientific
(Vienna, Austria). ALP from bovine intestinal mucosa ≥10.0
mg protein/mL (≥6500 DEA units/mg protein), phosphatase inhibitors
cocktail 2 (PIC2), Triton-X-100, and Trypan blue 0.4% solution for
molecular biology, ditert-butyl dicarbonate 99% (Boc),
trifluoroacetic acid 99% (TFA), 2, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piper-azineethanesulfonic
acid ≥99.5% (titration) (HEPES), potassium phosphate monobasic
99.5–100.5% (KH2PO4), sodium acetate
anhydrous ≥99%, glacial acetic acid ≥99%, ammonium molybdate
tetrahydrate ≥99.0% (titration), sodium dodecyl sulfate ≥99.0%
(SDS), ascorbic acid ≥98% (with iodine, titration), 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid hydrate ≥99% (titration)
(MES), 2,4,6–trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS), l-cysteine hydrochloride ≥98%, isopropyl myristate ≥98%,
polysorbate 80 (HLB = 15), sodium tripolyphosphate ≥98.0% (titration),
hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) ≥ 99%, and 1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium-propane
chloride (DOTAP) ≥ 98% were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Vienna,
Austria). Capmul MCM (caprylic/capric mono- and diglycerides, HLB
= 6.7) was kindly provided by Abitec (Oberhausen, Germany). Lumogen
F red was obtained from Kremerpigmente GmbH & Co., KG (Aichstetten,
Germany). pGFP was a gift from the Department of Pharmacology and
Toxicology, University of Innsbruck, Austria. All chemicals were of
analytical grade and purchased from commercial sources.
Methods
Synthesis of the PLL–Oleylamine Conjugate
As illustrated in Figure , oleylamine was anchored at the carboxylic end of the PLL
backbone via the amidation reaction to yield the PLL–oleylamine
conjugate (PLOA). In brief, 100 mg of PLL (0.47 mmol of primary amine
groups) were dissolved in 3 mL of anhydrous methanol containing 0.71
mmol trimethylamine. Subsequently, 0.71 mmol Boc dissolved in 2 mL
of methanol was slowly added dropwise into the PLL solution. After
2 h of stirring at room temperature, the mixture was monitored by
thin-layer chromatography (TLC) to ensure completion of the Boc protection
reaction. Methanol was removed from the mixture using a rotary evaporator.
The obtained solid substances were solubilized in dichloromethane
(DCM). DCC (0.94 mmol) and HOBt (0.94 mmol) were added to activate
the carboxylic group on Boc-protected PLL (Boc-PLL). The mixture was
kept in an ice bath and stirred for 30 min. The activated Boc-PLL
was then added dropwise to an oleylamine (0.94 mmol) solution in DCM
being stirred at room temperature. The amidation reaction was controlled
using TLC. The reaction mixture was subsequently washed using a 0.1
M NaCl solution (10 mL, 3 times) and deionized water (DIW) (10 mL,
3 times). The organic phase was collected and evaporated. The obtained
solid was stirred with 6 mL of a 95% (v/v) TFA solution for 4 h to
remove Boc groups. After the deprotection reaction, the reaction mixture
was added with 10 mL of DIW, adjusted to pH 7, and extracted with
DCM (15 mL, 5 times). The aqueous phase was concentrated using a rotary
evaporator and purified using a Sephadex G-10 column. The collected
fractions were monitored using TLC. PLOA-containing fractions were
pooled and subsequently freeze-dried (Gamma LSC 1-16, Martin Christ,
Germany). The PLOA powder was kept at −20 °C for further
use.
Figure 1
Synthesis of PLOA. PLL was 100% Boc-protected prior to the alkylation
with oleylamine. The attachment of oleylamine to PLL occurred at the
carboxylic end of PLL.
Synthesis of PLOA. PLL was 100% Boc-protected prior to the alkylation
with oleylamine. The attachment of oleylamine to PLL occurred at the
carboxylic end of PLL.The structure of PLOA was further confirmed by 1H NMR.
Measurements were performed on a “Mars” 400 MHz AVANCE
4 Neo spectrometer from Bruker Corporation (Billerica, MA, USA, 400
MHz) in dimethyl sulfoxide-d6 (DMSO-d6) solution
at 24 °C. Chemical shifts are expressed in parts per million
(ppm).
Lipophilic Preconcentrates and NE Preparation
and Characterization
The lipophilic preconcentrate is composed
of isopropyl myristate, Capmul MCM, polysorbate 80, and propylene
glycol as the oil, cosurfactant, surfactant, and cosolvent, respectively.
The final ratio of 35:40:15:10 (w/w) was used for further experiments.
The blank lipophilic preconcentrate was subsequently loaded with PLOA
or oleylamine as controls. The payload of PLOA in the lipophilic preconcentrate
was 0.3% w/w. Lipophilic mixtures were shaken in a thermomixer set
at 1800 rpm and 40 °C for 24 h (ThermoMixer C, Eppendorf, Germany).The lipophilic preconcentrate of each NE formulation was stored
at room temperature for 3, 6, and 9 months for long-term stability
testing. At the predetermined time points, samples were centrifuged
at 13,400 rpm for 15 min and evaluated for possible phase separation.The NE was prepared by diluting the lipophilic preconcentrate in
DIW. Emulsification was carried out by gently pipetting the mixture
2–3 times or gently and briefly vortexing the mixture for 2–3
s. NEs at concentrations of 0.2% (v/v) were tested for the droplet
size, ζ potential, and polydispersity index (PDI) via photon
correlation spectroscopy using a Zetasizer Nano-ZSP instrument (Malvern
Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). The droplet size and PDI were determined
in backscatter (173°) detection mode. ζ potential measurement
was carried out using a Dip cell (Malvern ZEN 1002). All measurements
were executed at 37 °C at least three times.
Anionic Coating of NE Droplets with Tripolyphosphate
The PLOA-loaded lipophilic preconcentrate was diluted five times
in DIW to obtain PLOA-decorated NEs (PLOA NEs). To obtain anionic
coating layers on the surface of the emulsion droplets, 250 μL
of 14% (w/v) of TPP solution was added dropwise slowly to the diluted
PLOA NE with gentle vortexing. Afterward, all mixtures were mixed
for 30 min in a thermomixer set at 300 rpm and 24 °C. Unbound
polyphosphates were removed using a Vivaspin ultrafiltration device
(membrane cutoff: 10 kDa). Concentrated NEs were then diluted with
2 mL of DIW and washed. At least three wash cycles were done until
a constant ζ potential was reached. The final concentrated TPP-coated
PLOA-decorated NEs (TPP/PLOA NEs) were diluted in HEPES-buffered saline
(HBS) to a final concentration of 1%, 0.05%, or 0.005% (v/v) for further
experiments. HBS is composed of 1 g/L dextrose, 20 mM HEPES, 5 mM
KCl, 136.7 mM NaCl, and 1 mM CaCl2 adjusted to pH 6.8 using
1 M NaOH.
Enzymatic Monophosphate Cleavage and ζ
Potential Conversion by ALP
ALP is shown to quickly dephosphorylate
not only TPP but also a variety of polyphosphates.[30−32] In brief, two
units of isolated ALP were spiked into 1 mL of 1% (v/v) NEs, and the
mixture was incubated in an orbital shaker–incubator at 37
°C under gentle shaking. At time points of 5, 15, 30, 45, 60,
90, 120, and 180 min, an aliquot of 100 μL was withdrawn from
each sample and compensated with 100 μL of fresh prewarmed HBS.
Subsequently, 700 μL of 10% SDS in 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer
pH 4.0 (SDS-buffer pH 4.0) was added to terminate the enzymatic cleavage
reaction. To quantify released monophosphate, 100 μL of 1% (w/v)
ammonium molybdate solution and 100 μL of 1% (w/v) ascorbic
acid were added. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 60 min
in the orbital shaker–incubator. The absorbance of samples
was measured at 870 nm using a microplate reader (Tecan Infinite M200
spectrophotometer, Tecan Austria GmbH, Grödig, Austria). A
series of standard solutions with increasing amounts of K2HPO4 were utilized to generate the standard curve and
calculate the released monophosphate amount. Negative control and
blank were prepared in the same manner but using a buffer without
isolated ALP and a buffer without NEs, respectively. Triplicate samples
for each NE were performed. This assay is specific for inorganic monophosphate,
and there is no color development with TPP.The ζ potential
of the PLOA/TPP NE before and after incubation with isolated ALP was
measured using Zetasizer Nano-ZSP (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire,
UK). Prior to ζ potential measurement of PLOA/TPP NEs after
incubation with ALP, cleaved monophosphate was removed using a centrifugal
concentrator Vivaspin (10 KDa) as previously described in 2.2.3. The washing step was repeated until negligible
monophosphate was found in the flow-through solution. For this experiment,
three washing cycles were done. DIW was then added to the concentrated
NE to recover the initial volume. All ζ potential measurements
were performed at 37 °C utilizing a Dip cell device (Malvern
ZEN 1002).
Determination of Phosphatase Activity in
the Pig Eye Vitreous Humor
After being injected via the vitreal
pathway, anionic coating NEs must retain their surface charge unchanged
to permeate through the negatively charged vitreous humor before approaching
the target cells. To further confirm the vitreous will not disturb
the phosphate coatings of PLOA/TPP NEs, we studied the phosphatase
activity in the vitreous body isolated from pig eyes. In brief, pig
eyes were freshly obtained from a slaughterhouse and the vitreous
fluid was extracted using a 5 mL syringe. The vitreous fluid of four
eyes was collected and centrifuged for 5 min at 5000 rpm (ThermoMixer
C, Eppendorf, Germany). The phosphatase activity in the supernatant
was analyzed by a colorimetric assay. Accordingly, 500 μL of
vitreous fluid was mixed with 500 μL of 10 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate (PNP) in a 0.5 M 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol
(AMP) buffer, supplemented with 4.9 mM MgCl2 and hydrochloride
acid in a final concentration of 0.5 M. PNP is a substrate of ALP
and transformed by ALP to 4-nitrophenol that can be detected photometrically
at 405 nm. Vitreous fluid spiked with 1 U ALP, vitreous fluid spiked
with 1 mU ALP, buffer containing 1 U, and buffer containing 1 mU ALP
served as controls. Samples were incubated for 3 h at 37 °C.
At different time points, 50 μL aliquots were withdrawn and
phosphatase activity was stopped by adding 50 μL of 1 M NaOH.
A calibration curve of dilutions of a 4-nitrophenol solution was prepared
for quantification.
Cytotoxicity
661W photoreceptor-like
cells were used up to cell passage number 100. Cells were cultured
in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM l-glutamine,
and 0.2% penicillin–streptomycin. Cells were kept in a 5% CO2 and 90% relative humidity atmosphere at 37 °C in a cell
incubator. The 661W cells were seeded in a 24-well plate at a density
of 5 × 103 cells/well and cultivated for 4 days to
obtain about 80% confluency. The medium was changed on the first day
after seeding and every 2 days.Cytotoxicity of PLOA and PLOA/TPP
NEs was evaluated via the 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium
bromide (MTT) assay. A 1:10 MTT working solution in sterile HBS buffer
pH 6.8 was prepared from a MTT stock solution (5 mg/mL in HBS; stored
at −20 °C). Prior to the test, the cell monolayer was
washed twice with prewarmed sterile HBS and incubated with different
concentrations of NEs for 1 and 3 h. HBS and 1% v/v Triton-X 100 in
HBS served as the negative control and positive control, respectively.
After NE removal and two washing steps with prewarmed HBS, 100 μL
of prewarmed MTT working solution was added to each well and incubated
for 3 h. Subsequently, the MTT solution was aspirated and the resulting
formazan crystals were dissolved with 100 μL of DMSO. The absorbance
of the formazan solution in DMSO was recorded at 570 nm using a microplate
reader (Tecan Infinite M200 spectrophotometer, Tecan Austria GmbH,
Grödig, Austria). Cell viability was assessed by the metabolic
capability of viable cells to reduce MTT to purple formazan crystals
in comparison with positive control and negative control (eq )
Phosphate Cleavage by Cellular Enzymes
The release of monophosphate release from the NE surface into the
cell culture medium was determined in the presence and absence of
phosphatase inhibitors. Prior to the experiment, 661W cells were washed
twice with prewarmed HBS and incubated with 500 μL of HBS with
or without 0.5% v/v PIC2 in HBS buffer for 30 min. Thereafter, cells
were incubated with 250 μL of 0.05% v/v of PLOA/TPP NEs solved
in prewarmed HBS for the times indicated, that is, 0, 30, 60, 90,
120, 150, and 180 min. HBS alone served as the control. An aliquot
of 70 μL was taken from each well, supplemented with 70 μL
of SDS-buffer pH 4.0 and 10 μL of 1% w/v ammonium molybdate
solution followed by 10 μL of 1% (w/v) ascorbic acid. The mixture
was incubated at 37 °C for 60 min prior to the absorbance measurement
at 870 nm. A serial dilution of K2HPO4 was used
as the standard curve for quantifying free monophosphate. After sampling,
the test emulsion was removed from each well and the cell layer was
gently washed twice with prewarmed phosphate buffer saline (PBS).
500 μL of PBS and 150 μL of radioimmunoprecipitation assay
(RIPA) buffer were subsequently added to initiate cell lysis. The
protein content was quantified via a Pierce Micro BCA protein assay
kit following the supplier’s instructions. The amount of released
monophosphate was calculated from triplicate samples at every time
point for each NE (eq ).where Ab: absorbance of NE-treated cells at
870 nm, Abo: absorbance of HBS-treated cells at 870 nm,
SlopeSTD: slope value of K2HPO4 standard curve,
and ProCon: protein content in cell lysate.
Cellular Uptake Studies
Concentration-dependent
cellular uptake of NEs was screened by fluorescence spectroscopy.
Microscopic analysis was used to visualize the cellular uptake of
NEs at a concentration of 0.005% v/v. Further examination of cellular
uptake efficiency was performed by flow cytometry using a NE concentration
of 0.05% v/v.For the cellular uptake experiment, Lumogen red
was loaded into the lipophilic phases of control NEs, PLOA NEs, and
PLOA/TPP NE formulations at 0.1% w/w. 661W cells were cultured for
4 days in 24-well plates as described in 2.2.6. After washing and equilibrating with HBS for 30 min, cell layers
were incubated with 250 μL of different concentrations of NEs
for 60 min. In order to evaluate the effect of the surface charge
role of ALP on cellular uptake of NEs, 661W cells were treated with
0.5% v/v PIC2 in HBS prior to and during the incubation with NEs.
Subsequently, tested samples were aspirated and cell layers were gently
washed twice with prewarmed PBS.For quantification of NEs internalized
in cells by fluorescence
spectroscopy, cells were lysed and the amount of internalized NEs
per 1 g of cell protein was calculated. Accordingly, 500 μL
of PBS and 150 μL of ice-cold RIPA buffer for lysis were added
to cell layers. Cell lysates were collected and the fluorescence intensity
was measured at an excitation wavelength λex = 575
nm and an emission wavelength λem = 610 nm. A standard
curve was built from a serial dilution of Lumogen-loaded NEs with
nontreated cell lysate. A Pierce Micro BCA protein assay kit with
bovine serum albumin as the standard protein was used for protein
content quantification. The amount of internalized NEs was calculated
by the average uptake amount of NEs from triplicate experiments (eq ).where FI: fluorescence intensity of NE-treated
cell lysate, FI0: fluorescence intensity of HBS-treated
cell lysate, SlopeNE: slope from linear regression analysis of NE
standard curve, and ProCon: protein content in each cell lysate.The cellular uptake efficiency was observed with an inverted fluorescence
microscope (Zeiss Axio Observer) using a 10× objective with a
numerical aperture of 0.45. NEs at a concentration of 0.005% v/v were
used in microscopic imaging experiments. After incubation with test
samples, cells were washed twice with Opti-MEM and observed under
a microscope. A filter at λ = 555 nm and excitation light (LED)
λ = 567 nm was utilized. The same parameters were set up for
all experiments for comparability of the fluorescence intensity of
all formulations. Image postprocessing was performed using ImageJ
software.Furthermore, the quantification of NE cellular uptake
was examined
using a flow cytometer (BD FACSAria III Cell Sorter). NEs at a concentration
of 0.05% v/v were used. The fluorescence intensity of diluted NEs
among all formulations was checked for equality using a spectrometer
(Tecan Infinite M200 spectrophotometer, Tecan Austria GmbH, Grödig,
Austria) prior to the uptake study. Single cells were collected by
incubation of cell monolayers with 200 μL of Accutase for 10
min. Cell suspensions pooled from six wells of the same sample were
transferred to a 15 mL Falcon centrifuge tube. Cell pellets were obtained
by centrifugation at 800 rpm for 5 min, and the medium was discarded
and replaced with 2 mL of ice-cold PBS. The wash cycle was done twice.
Cell pellets were subsequently resuspended in 500 μL of PBS
and filtered through a 70 μm-pore size cell strainer for flow
cytometry analysis. The same channel voltage and gating strategy (Supporting
Information Figure S.1) were maintained
throughout the analysis process. The gating strategy was based on
the area of forward versus side scatter (FSC-A vs SSC-A). A number
of 100,000 events were analyzed for fluorescence signals. The percentage
of fluorescence-positive cells was identified in the final sorted
population.
Preparation of Hydrophobic Ion Pairs of
Plasmid DNA
pGFP is a common plasmid DNA used to study gene
transfection efficacy of gene delivery systems on different cells
and tissues. Being transfected with pGFP, cells will express green
fluorescence protein that can be observed and examined by fluorescence
microscopy and a flow cytometer. In order to investigate the transfection
efficiency of PLOA/TPP NEs, pGFP was loaded into the lipophilic phase.
To do so, hydrophobic ion pairs between pGFP and cationic surfactants
were prepared to increase the lipophilicity of pGFP. In brief, pGFP
was mixed with CTAB or DOTAP in a thermomixer at a molar ratio of
1:2. The resulting hydrophobic ion pairs precipitated out and were
collected by centrifugation at 13,400 rpm for 5 min. The pGFP/CTAB
and pGFP/DOTAP complexes were lyophilized and stored at −20
°C for further use.
Gene Transfection Study
661W cells
were cultured as described in Section to reach a confluency of about 80%.
The pGFP/CTAB or pGFP/DOTAP complex was loaded in the lipophilic phase
at a concentration of 0.2% w/w. The pGFP complex-loaded NEs were diluted
with HBS buffer to a concentration of 0.05% v/v. In order to initiate
transfection studies and evaluate the effect of ALP on transfection
efficiency, 250 μL of diluted NEs with or without the presence
of 0.5% PIC2 was added to each well. Serving as controls, naked pGFP
solution and pGFP–Lipofectamine 2000 complex (prepared according
to the manufacturer’s instructions with some modifications—see
the Supporting Information) in the final
volume of 250 μL were also incubated with the cell layer. The
ratio of pGFP/Lipofectamine 2000 in the positive control pGFP–Lipofectamine
2000 complex was 1:0.6 w/w. The final concentration of Lipofectamine
2000 on the cell layer was 0.05% v/v. The plasmid DNA amount incubated
in each well was kept at ∼200 ng (per 250 μL) for all
tested samples and controls. After 1 h of incubation, test samples
were removed and 500 μL of fresh culture medium was added to
each well. Cell plates were brought back to the cell incubator. 48
h post-transfection, cells were detached using Accutase and quantified
for green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression using flow cytometry.
The channel voltage and gating strategy were set in the same way as
described in Section .
Statistical Data Analysis
Statistical
data analyses were performed using Student’s t-test to analyze the significant difference between two mean values.
The level of p ≤ 0.05 was set for significant, p ≤ 0.01 for very significant, and p ≤ 0.001 for highly significant. The obtained results were
expressed as the mean of at least three experiments ±standard
deviation (SD).
Results and Discussion
Characterization of PLOA
The structure
of PLOA was studied and confirmed by 1H NMR spectroscopy
in DMSO-d6 (Figure ). There are characteristic peaks for the PLL structure between
7.80 and 8.20 ppm associated with primary and secondary amines. The
distinct peak at 4.20 ppm is associated with the methine proton, while
the peaks at 1.50–1.70 and 2.80 ppm correspond to the methylene
units in the lysine side chain and to the methylene proton next to
primary amine in the lysine side chain. The oleyl chain was characterized
by chemical shifts at 1.20–1.40 and 0.85 ppm regions corresponding
to methyl and methylene protons of the hydrophobic part. A broad chemical
shift from 4.50 to 7.00 ppm is due to the hydrogen bonding of amide,
overlapping with the methine of the bound hydrophobic oleyl part.
From the integral values of the methine of PLL and the methylene chain
end of the oleyl group, the degree of modification is around 80%.
Figure 2
1H NMR spectra of PLOA in DMSO-d6.
1H NMR spectra of PLOA in DMSO-d6.
Preparation and Characterization of TPP-Coated
NEs
As presented in Table , loading fatty amine into a lipophilic phase of the
blank formulation led to an increase in the droplet size (p < 0.05, Student’s t-test), while there was no
significant difference in PDI (p > 0.05, Student’s t-test). The size and PDI of PLOA NEs increased significantly,
∼1.5- and ∼1.9-fold higher compared to those of the
blank formulation, respectively (p < 0.05, Student’s t-test). There was no significant difference in the size
of control NEs and PLOA NEs (p > 0.05, Student’s t-test). Being coated with polyphosphates, the droplet size
of PLOA NEs increased significantly, ∼1.3-fold higher than
that of the PLOA NEs (p < 0.05, Student’s t-test). Regarding the ζ potential, the loading of
OA into a blank formulation led to a less negative value, while the
loading of PLOA led to a shift from a negative to a positive value,
providing evidence for the residence of PLL on the surface of the
oil droplets. When PLOA NEs were coated with TPP, the ζ potential
reversed to a low negative value.
Table 1
Average Size, PDI, and ζ Potential
Profiles of NEsa
formulation
loading content (%, w/w)
size (nm)
PDI
ζ (mV)
potential
blank NEs
72.9 ± 0.6
0.08 ± 0.01
–11.9 ± 0.4
control NEs
OA
0.3
95.1 ± 0.5
0.10 ± 0.01
–9.7 ± 0.2
PLOA NEs
PLOA
0.3
106.4 ± 0.7
0.16 ± 0.01
+10.0 ± 0.6
PLOA/TPP NEs
PLOA
0.3
146.1 ± 13.3
0.25 ± 0.02
–22.4 ± 1.7
Data are means of triplicate measurements
±SD, n ≥ 3. OA and PLOA were loaded into
a lipophilic phase of a blank formulation. TPP was coated on the surface
of PLOA-decorated NEs (PLOA NEs), generating TPP-coated PLOA-decorated
NEs (PLOA/TPP NEs).
Data are means of triplicate measurements
±SD, n ≥ 3. OA and PLOA were loaded into
a lipophilic phase of a blank formulation. TPP was coated on the surface
of PLOA-decorated NEs (PLOA NEs), generating TPP-coated PLOA-decorated
NEs (PLOA/TPP NEs).The long-term stability of all NEs was evaluated after
3, 6, and
9 months of storage at room temperature. There was no phase separation
observed after the centrifugation of the lipophilic phases. Upon being
emulsified in DIW, there was also no significant change in average
size, PDI, and ζ potential.
Enzymatic Cleavage of Monophosphate Inducing
ζ Potential Conversion
As illustrated in Figure , monophosphate release from
PLOA/TPP NEs increased rapidly within the first hour and was likely
to reach a plateau after 2.5 h. Without the addition of phosphatase,
almost no monophosphate was detected. Together with the enzymatic
cleavage of monophosphates, the ζ potential of PLOA/TPP NEs
reversed from −22.4 to +8.5 mV at 3 h (Figure ). No significant change in the ζ potential
was observed for PLOA/TPP NEs without enzyme addition. In order to
confirm the removal of TPP and the subsequent exposure of amine moieties
on the surface of oily droplets, the TNBS assay was exploited to quantify
the amount of surface-exposed primary amine groups as previously described
in ref (32). The results
showed an increase in the amount of surface-exposed primary amine
in accordance with the increase in monophosphate release (Figure ), confirming the
gradual disappearance of the TPP coating layer and reappearance of
PLL substructures on the NE surface.
Figure 3
Time-dependent monophosphate release from
TPP-coated PLOA-decorated
NEs mediated by isolated ALP (▲) and control experiment without
the addition of the enzyme (●). Data are expressed as means
± SD, n ≥ 3. The significant difference
after 3 h is indicated as ***p < 0.001.
Figure 4
Time-dependent ζ potential conversion of TPP-coated
PLOA-decorated
NEs induced by isolated ALP (▲). Control experiment without
the addition of the enzyme (●). Data are expressed as means
± SD, n ≥ 3. The significant difference
is indicated as ***p < 0.001.
Figure 5
Quantification of amine moieties on the surface of TPP-coated
PLOA-decorated
NEs in the presence of isolated APL (▲), in the absence of
ALP, served as the control (●). Data are expressed as means
± SD, n ≥ 3. The significant difference
after 3 h is indicated as ***p < 0.001.
Time-dependent monophosphate release from
TPP-coated PLOA-decorated
NEs mediated by isolated ALP (▲) and control experiment without
the addition of the enzyme (●). Data are expressed as means
± SD, n ≥ 3. The significant difference
after 3 h is indicated as ***p < 0.001.Time-dependent ζ potential conversion of TPP-coated
PLOA-decorated
NEs induced by isolated ALP (▲). Control experiment without
the addition of the enzyme (●). Data are expressed as means
± SD, n ≥ 3. The significant difference
is indicated as ***p < 0.001.Quantification of amine moieties on the surface of TPP-coated
PLOA-decorated
NEs in the presence of isolated APL (▲), in the absence of
ALP, served as the control (●). Data are expressed as means
± SD, n ≥ 3. The significant difference
after 3 h is indicated as ***p < 0.001.In this research, a PLOA conjugate as a monoalkylated
PLL was synthesized.
The ζ potential of PLOA/TPP NEs was converted from a low negative
value of −22.4 to +8.5 mV which is nearly equal to the ζ
potential value of PLOA NEs, that is, +10 mV. In a recent research
study, PLL was randomly alkylated at several amine groups distributed
along the polymer backbone with stearoyl chloride (SA), resulting
in a higher lipophilic PL-SA conjugate. However, the ζ potential
value of TPP-coated PL-SA-decorated NEs (PL-SA/TPP NEs) was not high
and cannot be converted to the value of PL-SA-decorated NEs (PL-SA
NEs); that is, the ζ potential of PL-SA/TPP NEs was −14
mV and was converted to +4.2 mV triggered by ALP, whereas the ζ
potential of PL-SA NEs was +11 mV.[32] We
supposed that the significantly lower ζ potential value of PLOA/TPP
NEs in this research (−22.4 mV vs −14 mV of PL-SA/TPP
NEs) was due to the better extension of positively charged PLL heads
toward the aqueous phase, facilitating the formation of the TPP coating
layer by electrostatic interactions, whereas PL-SA was kept firmly
on the PL-SA NEs surface, leading to poorer interactions with TPP
(Figure ). This difference
in the posture of PLL heads may also affect the enzymatic cleavage
since some TPP molecules may also localize close to the PL-SA/TPP
NE surface, making it harder for the enzyme to access and hydrolyze.
Eventually, the ζ potential conversion is incomplete.
Figure 6
Proposed mechanism
explaining the better efficacy of monoalkylated
PLL (at the carboxylic end) over randomly alkylated PLL (at amine
groups) on the formation of tripolyphosphate coating layer and ζ
potential conversion by isolated ALP.
Proposed mechanism
explaining the better efficacy of monoalkylated
PLL (at the carboxylic end) over randomly alkylated PLL (at amine
groups) on the formation of tripolyphosphate coating layer and ζ
potential conversion by isolated ALP.After being injected via the vitreal pathway, anionic
coating PLOA/TPP
NEs must remain their surface charge and structure unchanged to permeate
through the negatively charged vitreous humor before approaching retina
cells. Understanding the phosphatase activity in the vitreous humor
helps to ensure that PLOA/TPP NEs stay unimpaired when permeating
through the vitreous humor. Figure shows that ALP activity may be present in the vitreous
humor but at a very low level, less than 1 mU per 0.5 mL, approximately.
This is in accordance with Reis et al. claiming that phosphatase activity
was not found in the vitreous body.[33] The
human vitreous humor volume is 4–5 mL;[34,35] therefore, the total activity of ALP in the eye vitreous humor,
if any, is less than 10 mU, assuming the properties of human and pig
eye vitreous humor are similar. Data on time-dependent monophosphate
release from PLOA/TPP NEs mediated by isolated ALP at different concentrations
showed that hardly any released monophosphate was detected at the
ALP activity of 300 mU (Figure ) after 3 h. Concurrently, no change in ζ potential
was observed. With this supporting information, we can safely say
that none or a negligible amount of phosphate can be cleaved from
the surface of PLOA/TPP NEs in the vitreous body. Subsequently, there
would be no ζ potential conversion triggered before NEs reach
the retinal cells.
Figure 7
Time-dependent 4-nitrophenol release after incubation
of 0.5 mL
of vitreous fluid (◯), vitreous fluid with the addition of
1 U ALP (●) and 1 mU ALP (▲), and AMP-buffer incubated
with 1 U (▼) and 1 mU ALP (◆) with 10 mM PNP. The significant
difference after 3 h is indicated as ***p < 0.001
compared with all other samples.
Figure 8
Time-dependent monophosphate release profile of TPP-coated
PLOA-decorated
NEs (PLOA/TPP NEs) incubated with 2 U (▲), 1 U (●),
0.5 U (■), 0.3 U (▼) of isolated ALP. The control experiment
was the one without the addition of enzyme (◯). Data are expressed
as means ± SD, n ≥ 3. The significant
difference is indicated as ***p < 0.001.
Time-dependent 4-nitrophenol release after incubation
of 0.5 mL
of vitreous fluid (◯), vitreous fluid with the addition of
1 U ALP (●) and 1 mU ALP (▲), and AMP-buffer incubated
with 1 U (▼) and 1 mU ALP (◆) with 10 mM PNP. The significant
difference after 3 h is indicated as ***p < 0.001
compared with all other samples.Time-dependent monophosphate release profile of TPP-coated
PLOA-decorated
NEs (PLOA/TPP NEs) incubated with 2 U (▲), 1 U (●),
0.5 U (■), 0.3 U (▼) of isolated ALP. The control experiment
was the one without the addition of enzyme (◯). Data are expressed
as means ± SD, n ≥ 3. The significant
difference is indicated as ***p < 0.001.
Monophosphate Release from Polyphosphate-Coated
CPP-Decorated NEs by Cellular Enzymes
We further confirmed
that monophosphates were also released from the surface of PLOA/TPP
NEs in cell culture. Using 661W cells as a model system, the monophosphate
release into the cell culture medium increased steadily over time
without reaching a plateau after 3 h (Figure ). Membrane-bound enzymes were efficiently
inhibited, showing a 7.4-fold lower monophosphate release after 3
h. However, complete inhibition of enzyme activity was not attained,
a finding that is in agreement with the results from previous research
on Caco-2 and HEK-293 cell lines.[36,37]
Figure 9
Release of
monophosphates from TPP-coated PLOA-decorated NEs induced
by membrane-bound enzymes in 661W cells (▲). Reduced monophosphate
release in the presence of 0.5% v/v phosphatase inhibitor cocktail
2 (●). Data are expressed as means ± SD, n ≥ 3. The significant difference after 3 h is indicated as
***p < 0.001.
Release of
monophosphates from TPP-coated PLOA-decorated NEs induced
by membrane-bound enzymes in 661W cells (▲). Reduced monophosphate
release in the presence of 0.5% v/v phosphatase inhibitor cocktail
2 (●). Data are expressed as means ± SD, n ≥ 3. The significant difference after 3 h is indicated as
***p < 0.001.
Cell Viability Assay
As a next step,
we tested the cell viability of 661W cells by incubating them for
1 h and 3 h with 10 NE concentrations in the range of 0.01–0.125%
v/v (Figure ). After
1 h of incubation, cell viability was above 90% for all tested concentrations
and without significant difference in cell viability between the three
NE formulations (p < 0.05, Student’s t-test). These data suggested that 1 h of exposure to NEs
is safe for further experiments. At NE concentrations ≤0.06%
v/v, cell viabilities are higher than 90% after 1 h and 3 h. At a
NE concentration ≥0.08%, cell viabilities after 3 h fell below
80%, indicating potential cytotoxicity.
Figure 10
Concentration and incubation
time-dependent cytotoxicity of NEs
on 661W cells. (A) Cells were treated with NEs for 1 h. (B) Cells
were treated with NEs for 3 h. White bars: control NEs, gray bars:
PLOA-decorated NEs, and black bars: TPP-coated PLOA-decorated NEs.
Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n ≥
3.
Concentration and incubation
time-dependent cytotoxicity of NEs
on 661W cells. (A) Cells were treated with NEs for 1 h. (B) Cells
were treated with NEs for 3 h. White bars: control NEs, gray bars:
PLOA-decorated NEs, and black bars: TPP-coated PLOA-decorated NEs.
Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n ≥
3.Cationic CPPs in general were considered to be
toxic to most types
of cells.[38,39] The concentration and structure of CPPs
together with nanocarrier properties are factors that affect their
toxicity. Polyamine groups on the CPP backbone can bind to glycosaminoglycan
substructures on the cell membrane, resulting in membrane perturbation
and thus inducing cell toxicity.[40] Recent
findings, however, showed that not only conjunctival and corneal cells
but also endothelial and retinal cells tolerated CPPs quite well.[38,40,41] This observation may explain
the similar cytotoxic properties of (i) PLOA NEs where PLL substructures
are expressed on the NE surface, (ii) PLOA/TPP NEs with PLL substructures
being covered by TPP, and (iii) control NEs loaded with fatty amine
OA. Besides, loading the PLL conjugate into NEs may also reduce the
toxicity of the PLL substructures. Le-Vinh et al. showed that immobilization
of a phosphorylated PEG surfactant on the solid lipid nanoparticle
surface causes a much lower cytotoxic effect on cells compared to
that of the same surfactant in a free state.[36]
Cellular Uptake Studies of CPP-Decorated NEs
As obvious from the cellular uptake profile, NE decoration with
PLOA significantly increased their internalization (Figure ). The positively charged
PLOA NEs showed the highest level of NE internalization of all, wherein
cellular uptake levels were already saturated at 0.075% v/v NEs because
we found no significant difference between 0.075, 0.1, and 0.125%
v/v NEs (p > 0.05, Student’s t-test). The negatively charged PLOA/TPP NEs showed comparable cellular
uptake profiles as PLOA NEs, although it seemed that saturation was
not yet reached at a concentration of 0.125% v/v. Along with monophosphate
cleavage and surface-exposed amine results, these findings provide
further evidence that we uncovered PLL on NE surfaces.
Figure 11
Cellular
uptake of NEs into 661W cells at different concentrations
by fluorescence spectroscopy. Cells were incubated with PLOA-decorated
NEs (▲), TPP-coated PLOA-decorated NEs (■), and control
NEs (●) for 1 h. Data are expressed as means ± SD, n ≥ 3. The significant difference is indicated as
***p < 0.001.
Cellular
uptake of NEs into 661W cells at different concentrations
by fluorescence spectroscopy. Cells were incubated with PLOA-decorated
NEs (▲), TPP-coated PLOA-decorated NEs (■), and control
NEs (●) for 1 h. Data are expressed as means ± SD, n ≥ 3. The significant difference is indicated as
***p < 0.001.Microscopic imaging was utilized to visualize the
cellular uptake
efficiency of control NEs, PLOA NEs, and PLOA/TPP NEs at a concentration
of 0.005% v/v. Red fluorescent signals from PLOA NE- and PLOA/TPP
NE-treated cells indicated a stronger accumulation compared to control
NEs (Figure A vs.
B,C). Conversely, the fluorescence signal decreased when 661W cells
were coincubated with 0.5% v/v PIC2 (Figure D).
Figure 12
Microscopic imaging of 661W cells incubated
with Lumogen red-loaded
NEs diluted to 0.005% v/v: control NEs (A), PLOA-decorated NEs (B),
TPP-coated PLOA-decorated NEs (C), and TPP-coated PLOA-decorated NEs
+0.5% v/v phosphatase inhibitors cocktail 2 (D).
Microscopic imaging of 661W cells incubated
with Lumogen red-loaded
NEs diluted to 0.005% v/v: control NEs (A), PLOA-decorated NEs (B),
TPP-coated PLOA-decorated NEs (C), and TPP-coated PLOA-decorated NEs
+0.5% v/v phosphatase inhibitors cocktail 2 (D).Furthermore, the cellular uptake efficiency was
assessed by flow
cytometry using a defined gating strategy, illustrated in Figure S.1, to identify events corresponding
to the fluorescent molecule uptake of single photoreceptor-like cells.
A notable shift of the fluorescence signal is seen in Figure . A indicates an increase
in fluorescence intensity when cells were incubated with PLOA NEs
and PLOA/TPP NEs as compared to control NEs. Figure . B illustrates the cellular uptake profile
of all formulations at the concentration of 0.05% v/v. The results
showed that PLOA NEs were internalized into ∼50% of the 661W
cell population, which is 3.5-fold higher than that of control NEs,
whereas PLOA/TPP NEs were taken up by ∼45% of the cell population.
The addition of 0.5% v/v PIC2 to samples incubated with PLOA/TPP NEs
led to a remarkable decrease in uptake efficiency into 661W cells
with only 17% of the cell population taking up NEs.
Figure 13
Cellular uptake of Lumogen
red-loaded NEs by flow cytometry. (A)
Single parameter histograms of PLOA-decorated NEs (PLOA NEs, orange),
TPP-coated PLOA-decorated NEs (PLOA/TPP NEs, light green), PLOA/TPP
NEs +0.5% v/v phosphatase inhibitor cocktail 2 (PIC2) (dark green),
control NEs (blue), and HBS (red). Count stands for the number of
events. A phycoerythrin-area channel (PE-A) was used as a detection
parameter for Lumogen red-loaded NE-positive cells. (B) Percentage
of cells that showed uptake of NEs at a 0.05% v/v dilution. Data are
expressed as means ± standard deviations, n ≥
3. The significant differences are indicated as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Cellular uptake of Lumogen
red-loaded NEs by flow cytometry. (A)
Single parameter histograms of PLOA-decorated NEs (PLOA NEs, orange),
TPP-coated PLOA-decorated NEs (PLOA/TPP NEs, light green), PLOA/TPP
NEs +0.5% v/v phosphatase inhibitor cocktail 2 (PIC2) (dark green),
control NEs (blue), and HBS (red). Count stands for the number of
events. A phycoerythrin-area channel (PE-A) was used as a detection
parameter for Lumogen red-loaded NE-positive cells. (B) Percentage
of cells that showed uptake of NEs at a 0.05% v/v dilution. Data are
expressed as means ± standard deviations, n ≥
3. The significant differences are indicated as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Gene Transfection Study
In order
to load pGFP into the lipophilic phase of NEs, DOTAP or CTAB was used
to form hydrophobic ion pairs with pGFP to increase the lipophilicity
of pGFP. As illustrated in Figure A, pGFP/DOTAP showed a significantly higher gene transfection
efficacy than pGFP/CTAB (p < 0.05, Student’s t-test). This result is in agreement with the already published
literature, showing that DOTAP can yield higher gene transfection
levels than CTAB because of the two fatty chains in the DOTAP structure,
while CTAB is a single-chain cationic surfactant.[42−44] Therefore,
the pGFP/DOTAP complex was chosen for further transfection experiments
to test gene transfection efficiencies of pGFP/DOTAP-loaded NEs diluted
at 0.05% v/v. Comparable to our cellular uptake experiments with Lumogen
red (Figure B),
we found that PLOA NEs showed the highest transfection efficiency
followed by PLOA/TPP NEs and then control NEs (Figure B). In the presence of 0.5% v/v PIC2, the
transfection efficiency of PLOA/TPP NEs significantly decreased to
the same range as that of the control NEs. The positive control pGFP/Lipofectamine
2000 yielded an even lower transfection efficacy than the control
NEs (p < 0.01, Student’s t-test). This can be explained by (i) the suboptimal Lipofectamine
2000 to pGFP ratio, (ii) the cell-type dependent effect, and/or (iii)
the short transfection time of 1 h. As an amount of more than 0.25
μL of Lipofectamine 2000 per well showed signs of cytotoxicity
to 661W cells, the Lipofectamine used in this experiment was 0.125
μL/well, meaning that the pGFP/Lipofectamine 2000 ratio was
1:0.6 that was lower than the commonly used 1:2 or 1:3 ratio. Cytotoxicity
of Lipofectamine 2000 has been widely acknowledged, especially when
low cell density was employed.[45−47] Another factor that was also
reported is the considerable difference between Lipofectamine 2000
batches both in toxicity and also transfection efficiency.[48]
Figure 14
(A) Comparison of transfection efficiencies between pGFP/DOTAP-
and pGFP/CTAB-loaded PLOA-decorated NEs. (B) Transfection efficiencies
of pGFP/DOTAP-loaded different NEs after 1 h incubation on 661W cells
as analyzed by flow cytometry. The amount of pGFP in each well was
kept at ∼200 ng. Lipofectamine 2000 was used as a positive
control. Control NEs, PLOA-decorated NEs (PLOA NEs), and TPP-coated
PLOA-decorated NEs (PLOA/TPP NEs) were diluted to the same concentration
of 0.05% v/v. The presence of CPP in PLOA NEs led to ∼2.5 times
higher transfection efficacy than control NEs. Coating PLOA NEs with
TPP did not show a significant change in the number of transfected
cells. The copresence of phosphatase inhibitor cocktail 2 (PIC2) at
0.5% with PLOA/TPP NEs led to ∼50% lower in transfected cells,
confirming the role of ALP as a partner for gene transfection of PLOA/TPP
NEs. Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations, n ≥ 3. The significant differences are indicated
as *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.
(A) Comparison of transfection efficiencies between pGFP/DOTAP-
and pGFP/CTAB-loaded PLOA-decorated NEs. (B) Transfection efficiencies
of pGFP/DOTAP-loaded different NEs after 1 h incubation on 661W cells
as analyzed by flow cytometry. The amount of pGFP in each well was
kept at ∼200 ng. Lipofectamine 2000 was used as a positive
control. Control NEs, PLOA-decorated NEs (PLOA NEs), and TPP-coated
PLOA-decorated NEs (PLOA/TPP NEs) were diluted to the same concentration
of 0.05% v/v. The presence of CPP in PLOA NEs led to ∼2.5 times
higher transfection efficacy than control NEs. Coating PLOA NEs with
TPP did not show a significant change in the number of transfected
cells. The copresence of phosphatase inhibitor cocktail 2 (PIC2) at
0.5% with PLOA/TPP NEs led to ∼50% lower in transfected cells,
confirming the role of ALP as a partner for gene transfection of PLOA/TPP
NEs. Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations, n ≥ 3. The significant differences are indicated
as *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.
Conclusions
ALP-responsive charge-converting
NEs were for the first time applied
to deliver drug and plasmid DNA to retinal cells, showing promising
results in drug delivery and gene transfection efficacy. In this study,
a lipophilic modification of hydrophilic PLL at its carboxylic end
with oleylamine was performed, enabling the loading of PLOA molecules
into the lipophilic preconcentrate and the expression of PLL moieties
on the surfaces of NE droplets. The functional polyphosphate coating
layer on PLOA/TPP NEs covering the positively charged PLL can help
the nanocarriers to traverse the vitreous humor with less risk of
interacting with negatively charged components in the vitreous humor
and facilitating the access of cell membrane-bound ALP, leading to
the almost complete reversion of ζ potential or to be precise,
the almost complete recovery of CPP on the NE surface. As a result,
cellular uptake of NEs was significantly enhanced in photoreceptor-like
cells. Moreover, the hydrophobic ion pair pGFP–DOTAP complexes
were prepared and loaded into PLOA/TPP NEs, resulting in high GFP
expression with ∼50% of cells transfected. Furthermore, with
their low cytotoxicity, ALP-responsive charge-converting NEs could
be a potential functional carrier for retinal drug and gene delivery.
Authors: S Pescina; C Ostacolo; I M Gomez-Monterrey; M Sala; A Bertamino; F Sonvico; C Padula; P Santi; A Bianchera; S Nicoli Journal: J Control Release Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Liesbeth Peeters; Niek N Sanders; Kevin Braeckmans; Koen Boussery; Johan Van de Voorde; Stefaan C De Smedt; Joseph Demeester Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.799