Ryo Tamura1, Kiyokuni Nakamura2, Taichi Hirotani2, Yoshitomo Yasui2, Hideaki Okajima2. 1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Daigaku 1-1, Uchinada, Kahoku, Ishikawa, 9200293, Japan. nmy-tam4@kanazawa-med.ac.jp. 2. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Daigaku 1-1, Uchinada, Kahoku, Ishikawa, 9200293, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Escherichia coli and Bacteroides species are the most frequently detected species in ascites in perforated appendicitis and are generally sensitive to non-empiric cephalosporins like cefazolin or cefmetazole. However, monotherapy with such antibiotics is mostly insufficient for perforated appendicitis. To investigate this issue, this study aimed to compare bacterial floras in ascites culture between perforated and non-perforated appendicitis. METHODS: Ascites culture results in perforated and non-perforated appendicitis cases were analyzed using a departmental database. The duration of symptoms before surgery, pre-surgical white blood cell count, C-reactive protein value, postsurgical length of stay, length of antibiotic treatment, and the rate of using second-line antibiotics or complications were also compared. RESULTS: A total of 608 and 72 cases of non-perforated and perforated appendicitis were included. Escherichia coli and Bacteroides species were the dominant bacteria in both conditions. However, the total proportions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus anginosus group, and Enterococcus group were significantly higher in perforated appendicitis than in non-perforated appendicitis. CONCLUSION: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus anginosus group, and Enterococcus group have better susceptibility to penicillin-based empiric antibiotics than cephalosporins. The abundance of these bacteria might explain why non-empiric cephalosporins are not effective in perforated appendicitis and the superiority of penicillin-based empiric antibiotics.
PURPOSE: Escherichia coli and Bacteroides species are the most frequently detected species in ascites in perforated appendicitis and are generally sensitive to non-empiric cephalosporins like cefazolin or cefmetazole. However, monotherapy with such antibiotics is mostly insufficient for perforated appendicitis. To investigate this issue, this study aimed to compare bacterial floras in ascites culture between perforated and non-perforated appendicitis. METHODS: Ascites culture results in perforated and non-perforated appendicitis cases were analyzed using a departmental database. The duration of symptoms before surgery, pre-surgical white blood cell count, C-reactive protein value, postsurgical length of stay, length of antibiotic treatment, and the rate of using second-line antibiotics or complications were also compared. RESULTS: A total of 608 and 72 cases of non-perforated and perforated appendicitis were included. Escherichia coli and Bacteroides species were the dominant bacteria in both conditions. However, the total proportions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus anginosus group, and Enterococcus group were significantly higher in perforated appendicitis than in non-perforated appendicitis. CONCLUSION: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus anginosus group, and Enterococcus group have better susceptibility to penicillin-based empiric antibiotics than cephalosporins. The abundance of these bacteria might explain why non-empiric cephalosporins are not effective in perforated appendicitis and the superiority of penicillin-based empiric antibiotics.