Literature DB >> 3612491

Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion.

D Axsom, S Yates, S Chaiken.   

Abstract

Previous research on the persuasive impact of an overheard audience has yielded conflicting results. In this study, we attempted to understand such audience effects within the framework of the heuristic model of persuasion. Subjects listened to an audiotaped persuasive message that conveyed arguments of either high or low quality and that was responded to by either an enthusiastic or an unenthusiastic overheard audience. In addition, subject involvement (high vs. low) was varied. Consistent with predictions, the audience response cue influenced postmessage opinions only under low involvement; under high involvement, only argument quality affected persuasion. Analyses that took into account subjects' need for cognition supported the additional hypothesis that individuals lower in need for cognition would be more responsive to the audience manipulation under low involvement. Thought-listing data and regression analyses provided further support for the heuristic model.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3612491     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.53.1.30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  5 in total

1.  I spy with my little eye: jurors' detection of internal validity threats in expert evidence.

Authors:  Bradley D McAuliff; Tejah D Duckworth
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2010-12

2.  Individual versus group decision making: Jurors' reliance on central and peripheral information to evaluate expert testimony.

Authors:  Jessica M Salerno; Bette L Bottoms; Liana C Peter-Hagene
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Group Polarization Revisited: A Processing Effort Account.

Authors:  Janusch Sieber; René Ziegler
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2019-03-19

4.  Strategies and motives for resistance to persuasion: an integrative framework.

Authors:  Marieke L Fransen; Edith G Smit; Peeter W J Verlegh
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-14

5.  Candidate Performance and Observable Audience Response: Laughter and Applause-Cheering During the First 2016 Clinton-Trump Presidential Debate.

Authors:  Patrick A Stewart; Austin D Eubanks; Reagan G Dye; Zijian H Gong; Erik P Bucy; Robert H Wicks; Scott Eidelman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.