| Literature DB >> 36124209 |
Neha Chauhan1, Parul Vasava1, Sharuk L Khan2, Falak A Siddiqui2, Fahadul Islam3, Hitesh Chopra4, Talha Bin Emran3,5.
Abstract
Ethosomal systems are newer lipid vesicular carriers that have been around for 20 years, but over that period they have grown significantly as a means of transdermal drug delivery. They have a sizable amount of ethanol in them. These nanocarriers carry medicinal substances with various physicochemical qualities throughout the skin and deep skin layers. Since they were created in 1996, ethosomes have undergone substantial investigation; new substances have been added to their original composition, creating new varieties of ethosomal systems. These innovative carriers, which can be added to gels, patches, and lotions, are prepared using several novel methods. In addition to clinical trials, many in vivo models are employed to assess the effectiveness of dermal/transdermal administration. This review focuses on different generation of ethosomes and their comparison with other conventional liposomes.Entities:
Keywords: Applications; Ethosomes; Proteins and peptides delivery; Transdermal delivery
Year: 2022 PMID: 36124209 PMCID: PMC9482122 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104595
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) ISSN: 2049-0801
Fig. 1Ethosomal subtypes [11].
Difference between various ethosomes for transdermal drug delivery [11].
| Sl. No. | Parameter | Classical ethosomes | Binary ethosomes | Transethosomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Composition | 1. Phospholipids | 1. Phospholipids | 1. Phospholipids |
| 2. Ethanol | 2. Ethanol | 2. Ethanol | ||
| 3. Stabilizer | 3. Propylene glycol (PG) or other alcohol | 3. Edge activator (surfactant) or penetration enhancer | ||
| 4. Charge inducer | 4. Charge inducer | 4. Charge inducer | ||
| 5. Water | 5. Water | 5. Water | ||
| 6. Drug/agent | 6. Drug/agent | 6. Drug/agent | ||
| 2 | Morphology | Spherical | Spherical | Regular or irregular spherical shapes |
| 3 | Size | Smaller than the classical liposomes | Equal to or smaller than classical ethosomes | Size based on type and concentration of penetration enhancer or edge activator used |
| 4 | Entrapment efficiency | Superior than traditional liposomes | Often higher than traditional ethosomes | Higher than the majority of typical ethosomes |
| 5 | Skin permeation | Usually greater than traditional liposomes | Usually on par with or superior to traditional ethosomes | Often higher than traditional ethosomes |
| 6 | Stability | More robust than traditional liposomes | Stabler than classical ethosomes | There was no clear trend found |