| Literature DB >> 36124162 |
Kui Dong1,2, Ji Pu3, Jing Yang3, Guohong Zhou1, Xuan Ji1,2, Zhiming Kang1, Juan Li3, Min Yuan3, Xiaoling Ning1, Zhaoxia Zhang1, XingYu Ma1, Yanpeng Cheng2,4, Hong Li1, Qin Ma1, Hong Li1, Lijun Zhao3, Wenjing Lei1, Bin Sun1, Jianguo Xu3,5,6.
Abstract
Objectives: To characterize the healthy ocular surface microbiota at the species level, including cultured and uncultured taxa.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA; antibiotics resistance; culturomics; healthy eye; metataxonomics; ocular surface; species-level microbiota
Year: 2022 PMID: 36124162 PMCID: PMC9481467 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.950591
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Statistical table of demographic characteristics of the sample.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Female | 42.92 ± 19.15 | 77 | 60.16% | |
| Male | 35.69 ± 18.61 | 51 | 39.84% | ||
| Age group | Children group | Under the age of 9 | 7.67 ± 1.22 | 9 | 7.03% |
| 10–19 old | 13.17 ± 3.19 | 6 | 4.70% | ||
| Youth group | 20–29 old | 25.27 ± 2.15 | 33 | 25.78% | |
| 30–39 old | 34.16 ± 2.57 | 19 | 14.84% | ||
| Middle-aged group | 40–49 old | 44.54 ± 3.57 | 13 | 10.16% | |
| 50–59 old | 53.40 ± 2.77 | 25 | 19.53% | ||
| Elderly group | 60–69 old | 64.93 ± 3.24 | 15 | 11.72% | |
| 70–79 old | 72.80 ± 2.05 | 5 | 3.90% | ||
| Over 80 years old | 80.67 ± 1.15 | 3 | 2.34% | ||
Figure 1Taxonomic profiles of human ocular surface microbiota. (A) 796 cultured species, (B) 784 potentially new species, and (C) 151 potentially higher taxa. *Each dot represents an OPU. The descending hierarchical levels are expressed from the inner to the outer rings. The total number of OPUs at different hierarchical levels is displayed in brackets.
Figure 2The distribution of low and medium prevalent 1,731 OPUs in the healthy eyes. (A) The prevalence and relative abundance of OPUs in ocular surface microbiota the numbers (left axis) and the relative abundance (right axis) of the OPUs in individuals with the 5% interval. (B) The relative abundance of OPUs in low and medium prevalent group. (C) The relative abundance of OPUs of named species, potential new species, and high-level taxa. (D) The number of OPUs in low and medium prevalence groups in 196 eyes. (E) The number of OPUs of named, potential species, and high-level taxa in 196 eyes.
Figure 3Antibiotic resistance profile of ocular surface isolates. The phylogenetic tree was constructed from concatenated protein sequences using PhyloPhlAn and drawn using iTOL. Strains assigned to various phyla are displayed in different colors. All shades of green pixels represent MIC values. All red pixels represent antimicrobial resistance genes detected along each strain using RGI and ResFinder database.
Figure 4The initially isolated origin and potential pathogens in named species. (A) The initial isolation origin of named species detected by metataxonomics. (B) The initial isolation origin of named species isolated by culturomics. (C) The potential pathogenic species in named species detected by metataxonomic.