| Literature DB >> 36124114 |
Hongwei Zhang1, Lin Zhang1, Zhixin Zhao1.
Abstract
During the construction of coal mine laneway, due to the particularity of the geographical location and structure of the laneway, its accidents often occur, causing great trouble to the personal and property safety of the construction personnel. Therefore, according to the environmental characteristics of the coal mine tunnel and the positive correlation between the phase envelope range and the wavelength, this paper proposes a structural design of the personnel positioning system of the coal mine tunnel based on the dual wavelength phase unwrapping, which combines the coherent detection structure with the dual wavelength phase measurement method in digital holography. In order to reduce false positives in the position information, the synthetic wavelength is used to increase the spread range of the phase. The experiment shows that this structure can reduce the false positioning without reducing the positioning accuracy, and the average double wavelength phase demodulation can reduce the positioning false alarm by 82.5%, which greatly improves the accuracy of the prediction of the tunnel construction safety, brings great protection to the personal and property safety of the tunnel construction personnel, and improves the mining efficiency of the coal mine.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36124114 PMCID: PMC9482491 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9125594
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Coherent-detection structure for the mine personnel positioning system.
Figure 2BPD working principle.
Figure 3Quadrature phase demodulation.
Figure 4Wrapping of the phase.
Figure 5Structure of dual wavelength method for positioning system in mines.
Figure 6Phase demodulation results. (a) 100 phase difference curve at 1100 m with single wavelength demodulation (b) 100 phase difference curve at 1100 m with dual wavelength demodulation.
Figure 7Corrected positioning results. (a) Corrected single wavelength phase demodulation (b) corrected dual-wavelength phase demodulation.
Figure 8Positioning error accumulation curve of two-phase demodulation methods.
Error comparison of two-phase demodulation methods.
| Demodulation method | Proportion of positioning error <3 m (%) | Proportion of positioning error <10 m (%) | Proportion of positioning error <20 m (%) | Proportion of positioning error <30 m (%) | Average positioning time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single wavelength phase demodulation | 38.12 | 81.22 | 93.18 | 93.59 | 2.56 |
| Synthetic wavelength phase demodulation | 18.24 | 68.27 | 96.74 | 98.88 | 3.24 |