| Literature DB >> 36123928 |
Ali Eray Günay1, Ibrahim Karaman2, Ahmet Guney2, Zehra Filiz Karaman3, Eren Demirpolat4, Zeynep Burcin Gonen5, Serap Dogan6, Mukerrem Betul Yerer4.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to perform clinical, biochemical, and radiological evaluation of the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells derived from Wharton jelly (WJ) present within the human umbilical cord in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Between 2018 and 2019, 10 patients with knee osteoarthritis for whom the conservative treatment was not beneficial were included in the study. Patients were clinically, radiologically, and biochemically evaluated before treatment initiation. Thereafter, the patients were intra-articularly injected using a solution containing 1 × 108 WJ-derived MSCs. Evaluations were performed on day 21 (V1) and 42 (V2) and month 3 (V3), 6 (V4), and 12 (V5) after the procedure. At 1-year post-injection, visual analogue scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Lequesne scores of patients were lower than those observed during the initial evaluation, whereas the mean 36-Item Short Form Health Survey score was higher. Cartilage thicknesses were found to be increased in all regions except in the medial femur, medial posterior femur, lateral posterior femur, and lateral posterior tibia regions in magnetic resonance imaging. A significant increase was observed in tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1β, adiponectin, resistin, and interleukin-6 levels compared with pre-injection values. The leptin levels at 6-month and 1-year controls were lower than the pre-injection levels, and the decrease observed at 6 months was significant. In patients with knee osteoarthritis, intra-articular WJ-derived MSC injection causes significant pain reduction, satisfactory functional improvement, and increased patient satisfaction following a 1-year follow-up. These clinical improvements were supported by magnetic resonance images, along with changes in adiponectin and leptin levels in synovial fluid. Level of evidence: IV.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36123928 PMCID: PMC9478323 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1.Sixty-one year old female. T2 cartilage mapping magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. The mean values of T2 are measured before (A) and after treatment (B) at lateral patellar cartilage. The mean T2 value was decreased from 33.7 to 18.1 ms at this site.
Figure 2.Sixty-one year old female. Sagittal proton density weighted fat-suppressed knee magnetic resonance imaging before (A) and after (B) treatment. The measurements of cartilage thickness at lateral central femoral are seen. The cartilage thickness increased from 2.1 to 2.3 mm at this site.
Figure 3.Representative flow cytometry histograms of WJ-MSCs. The positive expression of CD, CD90, CD44, CD105, and CD73 and negative expression of CD14, CD45, CD11b, and HLA-DR are shown. WJ-MSCs = Wharton jelly-mesenchimal stem cells.
Patient demographics.
| Age (yr) | 58.2 ± 10.0 |
| Gender | |
| Female | 7 |
| Male | 3 |
| Height (cm) | 159.0 ± 4.7 |
| Weight (kg) | 83.0 ± 7.4 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 32.7 ± 4.4 |
BMI = body mass index.
Friedman test results for the difference between the clinical and functional scoring results over time.
| V0 (n = 10) | V1 (n = 10) | V2 (n = 10) | V3 (n = 10) | V4 (n = 10) | V5 (n = 10) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAS | 6.7 ± 2.24 | 7.0 ± 1.9 | 5.8 ± 3.8 | 4.7 ± 3.5 | 3.6 ± 2.8 | 3.4 ± 3.3 |
|
| WOMAC | 49.7 ± 19.4 | 49.8 ± 28.1 | 45.8 ± 32.8 | 40.0 ± 29.7 | 34.5 ± 24.6 | 27.0 ± 22.9 |
|
| Leqeusne | 12.8 ± 3.56 | 14.9 ± 5.1 | 11.9 ± 7.2 | 12.4 ± 6.8 | 10, ± 6.7 | 11.1 ± 7.01 | .239 |
| SF-36 | 42.4 ± 20.6 | 44.0 ± 22.3 | 45.6 ± 28.3 | 56.4 ± 29.6 | 61.8 ± 26.6 | 61.1 ± 29.9 |
|
SF-36 = 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, VAS = visual analog scale, WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.
P < 0.05 to values that are significantly different from the initial (V0) values.
Figure 4.Gradual changes in clinical and functional scoring results.
Paired t test results of difference between magnetic resonance imaging results of first and last controls.
| n | Cartilage thickness | SD |
| T2* | SD |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V0 | V5 | V0 | V5 | ||||||
| PM | 9 | 2,4678 | , 2722 | , 01236 | , 312 | 22.3667 | 21.9889 | 3,04622 | , 720 |
| PL | 9 | , 3000 | , 3089 | , 01833 | , 184 | 21,5111 | 19,8333 | 3,84538 | , 227 |
| MT | 9 | , 1722 | , 1967 | , 02920 |
| 21.1444 | 21.8556 | 4,49067 | , 647 |
| MCF | 3 | , 2167 | , 2167 | , 01000 | 1000 | 18.6667 | 18.9333 | 10,68145 | , 969 |
| MPF | 9 | , 4300 | , 2411 | , 58171 | , 359 | 24,0667 | 18,7444 | 7,26993 | , 059 |
| LT | 9 | , 1978 | , 2000 | , 01563 | , 681 | 21,8111 | 20.9667 | 2.38281 | , 319 |
| LCF | 8 | , 1575 | , 1662 | , 00835 |
| 22.9375 | 20,0500 | 7,15491 | , 291 |
| LPF | 8 | , 2312 | , 2275 | , 01996 | , 612 | 25,8778 | 17,9222 | 8,74873 |
|
| MAT | 6 | , 1400 | , 1567 | , 01033 |
| 20,0667 | 22,1000 | 3.19854 | , 180 |
| MCT | 6 | , 1367 | , 1450 | , 00753 |
| 21,5000 | 20.4500 | 6,95751 | , 727 |
| MPT | 8 | , 1450 | , 1575 | , 01488 |
| 19,0250 | 21.1125 | 7,74623 | , 471 |
| LAT | 6 | , 1450 | , 1550 | , 02000 | , 275 | 20,3000 | 19.3333 | 5,57231 | , 689 |
| LCT | 8 | , 1863 | , 1925 | , 00916 | , 095 | 21,6125 | 21.8250 | 4,72937 | , 902 |
| LPT | 9 | , 1644 | , 1644 | , 01225 | 1000 | 22,6333 | 22,0667 | 7,49767 | , 826 |
Magnetic resonance imaging results of cartilage thickness and T2* mapping by regions.
LAT = lateral anterior tibia, LCF = lateral central femur, LCT = lateral central tibia, LPF = lateral posterior femur, LPT = lateral posterior tibia, LT = lateral trochlea, MAT = medial anterior tibia, MCF = medial central femur, MCT = medial central tibia, MPF = medial posterior femur, MPT = medial posterior tibia, MT = medial trochlea, PL = patella lateral, PM = patella medial.
*P < 0.05 results were considered statistically significant.
Friedman test results of the difference between adipocytokine levels over time.
| TNF-α (ng/L) | IL-1 β (pg/mL) | Adiponectin (mg/L) | IL-6 (ng/L) | Resistin (ng/mL) | Leptin (ng/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V0 | 215.2 ± 106.4 | 3041.2 ± 1234.8 | 22.5 ± 5.1 | 214.7 ± 79.4 | 24.6 ± 9.7 | 26.3 ± 4.6 |
| V1 | 215.2 ± 100.9 | 2167.5 ± 1704.1 | 25.4 ± 1.8 | 198.8 ± 89.2 | 23.2 ± 8.8 | 28.6 ± 2.1 |
| V2 | 232.5 ± 91.6 | 2090.8 ± 1958.5 | 29.8 ± 4.0 | 190.2 ± 81.7 | 25.1 ± 10.7 | 29.7 ± 3.7 |
| V3 | 292.1 ± 93.4 | 2455.7 ± 1787.3 | 28.7 ± 11.6 | 353.4 ± 506.7 | 27.3 ± 10.6 | 29.8 ± 6.9 |
| V4 | 412.7 ± 118.4 | 7210.2 ± 1250.4 | 41.1 ± 9.4 | 2461.6 ± 1065.1 | 30.3 ± 13.4 | 21.1 ± 7.8 |
| V5 | 433.3 ± 102.2 | 7923.2 ± 1952.6 | 40.9 ± 7.6 | 2361.5 ± 1117.8 | 29.9 ± 9.2 | 23.9 ± 4.6 |
|
| .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .001 | .003 |
Refers to values that are significantly different from the initial (V0) values.
IL = interleukin, TNF = tumor necrosis factor.
Figure 5.Gradual change in adipocytokine levels.