| Literature DB >> 36123612 |
Francesco Baccelli1, Davide Leardini2, Edoardo Muratore1, Daria Messelodi3, Salvatore Nicola Bertuccio3, Maria Chiriaco4, Caterina Cancrini4,5, Francesca Conti6, Fausto Castagnetti7,8, Lucia Pedace9, Andrea Pession3,6, Ayami Yoshimi10, Charlotte Niemeyer10, Marco Tartaglia11, Franco Locatelli9, Riccardo Masetti1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: CBL syndrome is a RASopathy caused by heterozygous germline mutations of the Casitas B-lineage lymphoma (CBL) gene. It is characterized by heterogeneous clinical phenotype, including developmental delay, facial dysmorphisms, cardiovascular malformations and an increased risk of cancer development, particularly juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML). Although the clinical phenotype has been progressively defined in recent years, immunological manifestations have not been well elucidated to date.Entities:
Keywords: CBL; CBL syndrome; Immune dysregulation; JMML; SH2B3
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36123612 PMCID: PMC9484243 DOI: 10.1186/s40246-022-00414-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Genomics ISSN: 1473-9542 Impact factor: 6.481
Fig. 1Pedigree of the described Italian family. Figure summarizes clinical and genetic characteristics of the reported family. Patient I.2 is affected by Philadelphia positive chronic myeloid leukemia and is receiving treatment with Imatinib. The analysis of CBL variants performed on peripheral blood during clinical remission resulted negative. CML: chronic myelogenous leukemia; HSCT: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; JMML: juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia
Results of immunological characterization of the studied family. DNT, γ + δ + T and effector CD8 + memory cells are increased in II.2, III.2 and III.3; II.2 shows a B-cell memory deficiency
| II.1 | II.2 | III.1 | III.2 | III.3 (I-135) | Normal values for age (> 16 yrs.) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBC 10^9 /L | 6.54 | 5.24 | 5.41 | 7.01 | 3.85 | 3.60–10.50 |
| Lymphocytes 10^9 /L | 1.92 | 0.81 | 2.07 | 2.05 | 1.51 | 1.2–4-1 |
| Monocytes 10^9 /L | 0.40 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.35 | 0.10–0.90 |
| CD3 + (PAN T), % (cells/μL) | 72% | 65.1% | 66% | 73.3% | 38.7% | 50–91% lymph |
| CD3 + TCR α + β + , % | 96% | 87.5% | 95% | 89.3% | 90.4% | 36–98% CD3 + |
| CD3 + TCR γ + δ + , % | 4% | 12.3% | 5% | 10.3% | 8.6% | 0.83–11% CD3 + |
| CD3 + CD4-CD8-, (DNT) | 0.7% | 2.9% | 2.7% | 2.4% | 2.6% | 0.57–3% CD3 + |
| CD3 + CD4, % (cells/μL) | 43% (825) | 42.6% | 33% (683) | 27.4% (561) | 19.8% (298) | 28–64% CD3 + (500–2000) |
| CD4 + CD45 RA + (Naïve), % | 21% | 23.3% | 50% | 48.5% | 37% | 16–100% CD4 + |
| CD4 + CD45 RA-CCR7 + (Central memory), % | 55% | 70% | 42% | 48% | 56.2% | 18–95% CD4 + |
| CD4 + CD45 RA-CCR7- (Effector memory), % | 20% | 6.6% | 10% | 3.4% | 6.8% | 1–23% CD4 + |
| CD4 + CD45 RA + CCR7- (Terminal effector memory), % | 3% | 0.1% | < 0.1% | 0.08% | 0.08% | 0.0083–6.8% CD4 + |
| CD4 + CD127 + CCR7 + CD25 + + (T reg) | 4 | n.d | 4 | n.d | n.d | 4–17% CD3 + |
| CD3 + CD8, % (cells/μL) | 25% (480) | 10.8% | 26% (538) | 39.6% (811) | 16% (241) | 12–40% CD3 + (200–1200) |
| CD8 + CD45 RA + (Naïve), % | 22% | 11.6% | 39% | 11.2% | 20.8% | 6–100% CD8 + |
| CD8 + CD45 RA-CCR7 + (Central memory), % | 24% | 2.8% | 10% | 2.0% | 2.2% | 1–20% CD8 + |
| CD8 + CD45 RA-CCR7- (Effector memory), % | 25% | 79.8% | 34% | 78.3% | 68.7% | 14–98% CD8 + |
| CD8 + CD45 RA + CCR7- (Terminal effector memory), % | 28% | 5.6% | 18% | 8.5% | 8.4% | 7–53% CD8 + |
| CD3-CD56 + CD16 + (NK), % | 17% | 25% | 21% | 12.7% | 44.8% | 5–49% WBC |
| CD3 + CD56 + CD16 + (NKT), % | n.d | 4.2% | n.d | 3.8% | 1.7% | 1–18% WBC |
| CD19 + (PAN B), % (cells/μL) | 10.66% (203) | 5.2% | 11.7% (242) | 8.7% (178) | 14.4% (217) | 4–28% (64–820) lymph |
| CD19 + IGD + CD27- (B naïve) | 45% | 47.7% | 59% | 86.70% | 72.40% | 33–100% CD19 + |
| CD19 + IgD + CD27 + (unswitched B memory) | 12% | 25.10% | 21% | 1.70% | 6% | 3–61% CD19 + |
| CD19 + IgD-CD27 + (switched B memory) | 33% | 29.70 | 14% | 11.60% | 14% | 3–46% CD19 + |
| CD19 + CD21 + CD38- (B CD21 + low) | 7% | 4.4% | 7% | 1.1% | 2.6% | 2–14% CD19 + |
| CD19 + IgM + + CD38 + + (B transitional) | 3.6% | 2.3% | 1% | 9% | 7.1% | 0.27–24 CD19 + |
| CD19 + IgM- + CD38 + + (B plasmablasts) | 0.3% | 0.10% | 0.3% | 0.10% | 0.02% | 0.7–6% CD19 + |
| Proliferating Lymphocytes with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 + rec. IL2 [%] | 76 | 97 | 79 | 66 | 94 | > 75% |
| Proliferating Lymphocytes with PHA [%] | 92 | 96 | 98 | 95 | 96 | > 75% |
| Fas-mediated apoptosis (T lymphocyte survival, %) [< 82%] | 64% | 84; 831 | 75% | 95; 82a | n.d | < 82% |
| TRECs expression | Normal | Low | Normal | Low | Low | |
| CD4 + CD45RA + CD31 + (RTE) % | n.d | 13.4 | n.d | 32 | 27.3 | 7–100% |
| CD4 + CD45R0 + CXCR5 + (TFH) % | n.d | 13.7 | n.d | 4.8 | 9.6 | 5–56% |
| CD3 + phospho S6 + , % | 3.58 | 5.1 | 8.51 | 8.2 | 5.25 | % Controls ( |
| CD19 + phosphoS6 + , % | 13.1 | 5.1 | 15.8 | 5.8 | 13.2 | % Controls ( |
Fas-mediated apoptosis is defective in II.2 and III.2. Fas-mediated apoptosis is defective in II.2 and III.2. TRECs expression is reduced in II.2, III.2 and III.3.DNT: double negative T lymphocytes; pS6 + : phosphoS6 + ; PHA: Phytohemagglutinin; RTE: recent thymic emigrants; TFH: T follicular helper lymphocytes; TRECs: T-cell receptor excision circles
aThe test was repeated in two separate assays
nd not determined
Fig. 2Immunological characterization. A Percentage of viable (7AAD-/AnnV-), apoptotic (7AAD-/AnnV +) or necrotic (7AAD +) PBMC investigated on patients II.2, III.2 and III.3 after 24 h of PHA-stimulation (1ug/ml); B surviving fraction (%) of CD4 and CD8 cells with or without PHA-stimulation; C Modulation of pAKT expression by IC87114 inhibitor (5 mM, for 30’) performed graphed as ratio between expression of pAKT /expression of B-actin (WB)
Results of coagulative analysis in the studied family
| Patient | vWF reduction | LAC | INR (n.v. 0.9–1.2) | aPTT (n.v. 0.85 – 1.25) | Coagulation factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| III.1 | – | Normal | Normal | n.d | |
| III.2 | + | – | 1.22 | 1.50 (1.11 after correction with normal plasma) | Slight reduction in II, V, X, XI, XII |
| III.3 pre HSCT | – | + | 1.54 | 1.48 | n.d |
| III.3 post-HSCT | – | – | 1.1 | 0.96 | n.d |
| II.1 | – | – | n.d | n.d | n.d |
| II.2 | + | – | n.d | n.d | n.d |
| II.3 | + | + | n.d | n.d | Slight reduction in fXI |
| I.1 | + | + | n.d | n.d | n.d |
| I.2 | – | – | n.d | n.d | n.d |
| I.3 | + | + | n.d | n.d | n.d |
III.2, III.2, II.3, I.1 and I.3 show a vWF reduction. Coagulation factors consumption was observed in III.2