Isabel Charlotte Hostettler1, David Seiffge1, Andrew Wong1, Gareth Ambler1, Duncan Wilson1, Clare Shakeshaft1, Gargi Banerjee1, Nikhil Sharma1, Hans Rolf Jäger1, Hannah Cohen1, Tarek A Yousry1, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman1, Gregory Y H Lip1, Martin M Brown1, Keith Muir1, Henry Houlden1, David J Werring2. 1. From the Stroke Research Centre (I.C.H., D.S., Duncan Wilson, C.S., G.B., M.M.B., David Werring), University College London, Institute of Neurology; Neurogenetics Laboratory (I.C.H., H.H.), The National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK; Department of Neurosurgery (I.C.H.), Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Switzerland; Stroke Centre (D.S.), Department of Neurology and Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel and University Hospital Basel; Department of Neurology and Stroke Centre (D.S.), University Hospital Berne; MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL (A.W.), London; Department of Statistical Science (G.A.), UCL, London; Department of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience (N.S.), Institute of Neurology, London; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (H.R.J., T.A.Y.), Department of Brain Repair & Rehabilitation, University College London, Institute of Neurology; Haemostasis Research Unit (H.C.), Department of Haematology, University College London; Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences (R.A.-S.S.), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Edinburgh; Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science (G.Y.H.L.), University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital; Department of Clinical Medicine (G.Y.H.L.), Aalborg University, Denmark; and Institute of Neuroscience & Psychology (K.M.), University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, UK. 2. From the Stroke Research Centre (I.C.H., D.S., Duncan Wilson, C.S., G.B., M.M.B., David Werring), University College London, Institute of Neurology; Neurogenetics Laboratory (I.C.H., H.H.), The National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK; Department of Neurosurgery (I.C.H.), Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Switzerland; Stroke Centre (D.S.), Department of Neurology and Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel and University Hospital Basel; Department of Neurology and Stroke Centre (D.S.), University Hospital Berne; MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL (A.W.), London; Department of Statistical Science (G.A.), UCL, London; Department of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience (N.S.), Institute of Neurology, London; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (H.R.J., T.A.Y.), Department of Brain Repair & Rehabilitation, University College London, Institute of Neurology; Haemostasis Research Unit (H.C.), Department of Haematology, University College London; Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences (R.A.-S.S.), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Edinburgh; Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science (G.Y.H.L.), University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital; Department of Clinical Medicine (G.Y.H.L.), Aalborg University, Denmark; and Institute of Neuroscience & Psychology (K.M.), University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, UK. d.werring@ucl.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We investigated the associations between the APOE genotype, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and neuroimaging markers of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). METHODS: We included patients from a prospective, multicenter UK observational cohort study of patients with ICH and representative UK population controls. First, we assessed the association of the APOE genotype with ICH (compared with controls without ICH). Second, among patients with ICH, we assessed the association of APOE status with the hematoma location (lobar or deep) and brain CT markers of CAA (finger-like projections [FLP] and subarachnoid extension [SAE]). RESULTS: We included 907 patients with ICH and 2,636 controls. The mean age was 73.2 (12.4 SD) years for ICH cases vs 69.6 (0.2 SD) for population controls; 50.3% of cases and 42.1% of controls were female. Compared with controls, any APOE ε2 allele was associated with all ICH (lobar and nonlobar) and lobar ICH on its own in the dominant model (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.13-1.7, p = 0.002 and OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.1-2.04, p = 0.01, respectively) but not deep ICH in an age-adjusted analyses (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.97-1.63, p = 0.08). In the cases-only analysis, the APOE ε4 allele was associated with lobar compared with deep ICH in an age-adjusted analyses (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.1-2.2, p = 0.01). When assessing CAA markers, APOE alleles were independently associated with FLP (ε4: OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.04-2.93, p = 0.04 and ε2/ε4: 2.56, 95% CI 0.99-6.61, p = 0.05). We did not find an association between APOE alleles and SAE. DISCUSSION: We confirmed associations between APOE alleles and ICH including lobar ICH. Our analysis shows selective associations between APOE ε2 and ε4 alleles with FLP, a CT marker of CAA. Our findings suggest that different APOE alleles might have diverging influences on individual neuroimaging biomarkers of CAA-associated ICH.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We investigated the associations between the APOE genotype, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and neuroimaging markers of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). METHODS: We included patients from a prospective, multicenter UK observational cohort study of patients with ICH and representative UK population controls. First, we assessed the association of the APOE genotype with ICH (compared with controls without ICH). Second, among patients with ICH, we assessed the association of APOE status with the hematoma location (lobar or deep) and brain CT markers of CAA (finger-like projections [FLP] and subarachnoid extension [SAE]). RESULTS: We included 907 patients with ICH and 2,636 controls. The mean age was 73.2 (12.4 SD) years for ICH cases vs 69.6 (0.2 SD) for population controls; 50.3% of cases and 42.1% of controls were female. Compared with controls, any APOE ε2 allele was associated with all ICH (lobar and nonlobar) and lobar ICH on its own in the dominant model (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.13-1.7, p = 0.002 and OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.1-2.04, p = 0.01, respectively) but not deep ICH in an age-adjusted analyses (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.97-1.63, p = 0.08). In the cases-only analysis, the APOE ε4 allele was associated with lobar compared with deep ICH in an age-adjusted analyses (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.1-2.2, p = 0.01). When assessing CAA markers, APOE alleles were independently associated with FLP (ε4: OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.04-2.93, p = 0.04 and ε2/ε4: 2.56, 95% CI 0.99-6.61, p = 0.05). We did not find an association between APOE alleles and SAE. DISCUSSION: We confirmed associations between APOE alleles and ICH including lobar ICH. Our analysis shows selective associations between APOE ε2 and ε4 alleles with FLP, a CT marker of CAA. Our findings suggest that different APOE alleles might have diverging influences on individual neuroimaging biomarkers of CAA-associated ICH.
Authors: Robert D Bell; Ethan A Winkler; Itender Singh; Abhay P Sagare; Rashid Deane; Zhenhua Wu; David M Holtzman; Christer Betsholtz; Annika Armulik; Jan Sallstrom; Bradford C Berk; Berislav V Zlokovic Journal: Nature Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Daniel Woo; Ritesh Kaushal; Ranajit Chakraborty; Jessica Woo; Mary Haverbusch; Padmini Sekar; Brett Kissela; Arthur Pancioli; Edward Jauch; Dawn Kleindorfer; Matthew Flaherty; Alexander Schneider; Pooja Khatri; Laura Sauerbeck; Jane Khoury; Ranjan Deka; Joseph Broderick Journal: Stroke Date: 2005-08-11 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Andreas Charidimou; Hazel I Zonneveld; Sara Shams; Kejal Kantarci; Ashkan Shoamanesh; Saima Hilal; Paul A Yates; Gregoire Boulouis; Han Kyu Na; Marco Pasi; Allesandro Biffi; Yuek Ling Chai; Joyce Ruifen Chong; Lars-Olof Wahlund; Jack R Clifford; Christopher Chen; M Edip Gurol; Joshua N Goldstein; Duk L Na; Frederik Barkhof; Sang Won Seo; Jonathan Rosand; Steven M Greenberg; Anand Viswanathan Journal: Neurology Date: 2019-06-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Mark James Rawle; Daniel Davis; Rebecca Bendayan; Andrew Wong; Diana Kuh; Marcus Richards Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Mark A Rodrigues; Neshika Samarasekera; Christine Lerpiniere; Catherine Humphreys; Mark O McCarron; Philip M White; James A R Nicoll; Cathie L M Sudlow; Charlotte Cordonnier; Joanna M Wardlaw; Colin Smith; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 44.182