Literature DB >> 36122251

Recognition of DNA Supercoil Handedness during Catenation Catalyzed by Type II Topoisomerases.

Esha D Dalvie1, Jordan C Stacy1, Keir C Neuman2, Neil Osheroff3,4.   

Abstract

Although the presence of catenanes (i.e., intermolecular tangles) in chromosomal DNA stabilizes interactions between daughter chromosomes, a lack of resolution can have serious consequences for genomic stability. In all species, from bacteria to humans, type II topoisomerases are the enzymes primarily responsible for catenating/decatenating DNA. DNA topology has a profound influence on the rate at which these enzymes alter the superhelical state of the double helix. Therefore, the effect of supercoil handedness on the ability of human topoisomerase IIα and topoisomerase IIβ and bacterial topoisomerase IV to catenate DNA was examined. Topoisomerase IIα preferentially catenated negatively supercoiled over positively supercoiled substrates. This is opposite to its preference for relaxing (i.e., removing supercoils from) DNA and may prevent the enzyme from tangling the double helix ahead of replication forks and transcription complexes. The ability of topoisomerase IIα to recognize DNA supercoil handedness during catenation resides in its C-terminal domain. In contrast to topoisomerase IIα, topoisomerase IIβ displayed little ability to distinguish DNA geometry during catenation. Topoisomerase IV from three bacterial species preferentially catenated positively supercoiled substrates. This may not be an issue, as these enzymes work primarily behind replication forks. Finally, topoisomerase IIα and topoisomerase IV maintain lower levels of covalent enzyme-cleaved DNA intermediates with catenated over monomeric DNA. This allows these enzymes to perform their cellular functions in a safer manner, as catenated daughter chromosomes may be subject to stress generated by the mitotic spindle that could lead to irreversible DNA cleavage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36122251      PMCID: PMC9548324          DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.2c00370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.321


  57 in total

Review 1.  DNA topoisomerases.

Authors:  J C Wang
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Function of DNA topoisomerases as replication swivels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  R A Kim; J C Wang
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1989-07-20       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Topoisomerase II Poisons: Converting Essential Enzymes into Molecular Scissors.

Authors:  Kendra R Vann; Alexandria A Oviatt; Neil Osheroff
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Human topoisomerase IIalpha rapidly relaxes positively supercoiled DNA: implications for enzyme action ahead of replication forks.

Authors:  A Kathleen McClendon; A Chapin Rodriguez; Neil Osheroff
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  The topology of the kinetoplast DNA network.

Authors:  J Chen; C A Rauch; J H White; P T Englund; N R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-01-13       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Spontaneous DNA lesions poison human topoisomerase IIalpha and stimulate cleavage proximal to leukemic 11q23 chromosomal breakpoints.

Authors:  P S Kingma; C A Greider; N Osheroff
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1997-05-20       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Cleavage of plasmid DNA by eukaryotic topoisomerase II.

Authors:  Omari J Bandele; Neil Osheroff
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

8.  Escherichia coli topoisomerase IV. Purification, characterization, subunit structure, and subunit interactions.

Authors:  H Peng; K J Marians
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Recognition of DNA Supercoil Geometry by Mycobacterium tuberculosis Gyrase.

Authors:  Rachel E Ashley; Tim R Blower; James M Berger; Neil Osheroff
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  DNA catenation maintains structure of human metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  David L V Bauer; Rodolphe Marie; Kristian H Rasmussen; Anders Kristensen; Kalim U Mir
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.