| Literature DB >> 36121249 |
Moamina Sharqawi1, Shay Hantisteanu2, Asaf Bilgory1, Nardin Aslih1, Yasmin Shibli Abu Raya1, Yuval Atzmon1, Daniela Estrada1, Ofer Limonad1, Shilhav Meisel-Sharon2, Einat Shalom-Paz1,3.
Abstract
Many risk factors can potentially influence sperm quality. Telomeres confer stability on the chromosome and their dysfunction has been implicated in conditions such as cancer, aging, and lifestyle. The impact of lifestyle on sperm cell telomeres is unclear. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the impact of lifestyle behaviors on telomere length in sperm and to follow the correlation with pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). In this prospective observational study, sperm was analyzed for telomere length (TL). Men were asked to report lifestyle behaviors including occupation (physical or sedentary), smoking duration and amount, physical activity, dietary habits, and where they keep their cellular phone (bag, pants, or shirt pocket). Correlations among semen analysis, TL, men's habits, and embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes were evaluated. Among 34 patients recruited, 12 had longer TL and 13 shorter TL. Sperm motility was negatively correlated with TL (Pearson correlation = -.588, p = .002). Smoking adversely affected native sperm motility (53% motility in nonsmokers vs. 37% in smokers; p = .006). However, there was no significant impact on TL. The group with longer telomeres demonstrated significant association with healthy diet (10/12 vs. 6/13; p = .05) and a trend toward more sports activity, weekly (16/84 vs. 7/91; p = .04) compared with the shorter telomeres group. This study suggests that lifestyle, healthy diet, and sports activity are associated with long telomeres in sperm. Sperm quality is also influenced by patients' habits. The study strongly recommends maintaining a healthy lifestyle to preserve general health and fertility.Entities:
Keywords: lifestyle; semen parameters; smoking fertility; sperm telomeres
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36121249 PMCID: PMC9490467 DOI: 10.1177/15579883221119931
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Mens Health ISSN: 1557-9883
Figure 1.Correlation Between Telomere Length and Sperm Motility.
Note. p = .002.
Men’s Characteristics According to Telomere Length.
| Characteristic | Total | Telomere length <0.98 | Telomere length ≥0.98 ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 36.8 ± 7.5 | 4.7 ± 35.6 | 8.9 ± 38.0 | .41 |
| Occupation, | ||||
| Physical job | 14 (56) | 6 (46) | 8 (67) | .43 |
| Nonphysical/office | 11 (44) | 7 (54) | 4 (33) | |
| Body mass index | 5.15 ± 28.3 | 4.3 ± 28.5 | 6.2 ± 28.1 | .84 |
| Smoking, | ||||
| No | 8 (32) | 4 (31) | 4 (33) | 1.00 |
| Yes | 17 (68) | 9 (69) | 8 (67) | |
| Physical activity, | ||||
| 10 (77) | 7 (58) | .29 | ||
| No | 17 (68) | 3 (23) | 5 (42) | |
| Yes | 8 (32) | 7/91 | 16/84 | .07 |
| Eat “healthy food,” | ||||
| No | 9 (36) | 7 (54) | 2 (17) | .05 |
| Yes | 16 (64) | 6 (46) | 10 (83) | |
| Location of cellular phone, | ||||
| Adjacent to genitalia | 7 (28) | 10 (77) | 8 (67) | .67 |
| Far from genitalia | 18 (72) | 3 (23) | 4 (33) | |
| Sperm total motility before wash, % [range] | 48 [29–58] | 43 [29–52] | 35 [22.7–52.5] | .48 |
| Sperm concentration, % [range] | 30 [0.6–200] | 28 [6–55] | 37 [8.7–65 | .89 |
| Sperm total motility after wash, % [range] | 50 [40–71] | 71 [48–80] | 50 [37.7–65] | .046 |
| ICSI | 14 (56%) | 6 (46%) | 8 (67%) | .24 |
| IVF | 1 (4%) | 0 | 1 (8%) | |
| IVF + ICSI | 10 (40%) | 7 (54%) | 3 (25%) |
Note. ICSI = intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF = in vitro fertilization.
Figure 2.Longer Telomeres Were Related to Significantly Slower Sperm Motility.
Note. p = .046.
Figure 3.No Differences in Telomere Length Were Observed Between Patients Who Conceived and Those Who Did Not
Note. p = .86.
Figure 4.Higher Male BMI Was Related to Fewer Pregnancies
Note. p = .039.