| Literature DB >> 36120892 |
Yu Mei Li1,2, Yi Fan Luo1,3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Problem solving has been defined as "a goal-directed sequence of cognitive and affective operations as well as behavioural responses to adapting to internal or external demands or challenges. Studies have shown that some nurses lack rational thinking and decision-making ability to identify patients' health problems and make clinical judgements, and have poor cognition and response to some clinical problems, easy to fall into problem-solving dilemma. This study aimed to understand the influencing factors of clinical nurses' problem solving dilemma, to provide a basis for developing training strategies and improving the ability of clinical nurses in problem solving.Entities:
Keywords: Nurse; problem solving; qualitative research
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36120892 PMCID: PMC9518267 DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2022.2122138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being ISSN: 1748-2623
7 steps of Colaizzi’s phenomenological analysis method.
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| 1.Familiarization | The researcher familiarizes him or herself with the data, by reading through all the participant accounts several times. |
| 2.Identifying | The researcher identifies all statements in the accounts that are of direct relevance to the phenomenon under investigation. |
| 3.Formulating | The researcher identifies meanings relevant to the phenomenon that arise from a careful consideration of the significant statements. The researcher must reflexively “bracket” his or her pre-suppositions to stick closely to the phenomenon as experienced (though Colaizzi recognizes that complete bracketing is never possible). |
| 4.Clustering themes | The researcher clusters the identified meanings into themes that are common across all accounts. Again bracketing of pre-suppositions is crucial, especially to avoid any potential influence of existing theory. |
| 5.Developing an | The researcher writes a full and inclusive description of the phenomenon, incorporating all the themes produced at step 4. |
| 6.Producing the | The researcher condenses the exhaustive description down to a short, dense statement that captures just those aspects deemed to be essential to the structure of the phenomenon. |
| 7.Seeking verification | The researcher returns the fundamental structure statement to all participants (or sometimes a subsample in larger studies) to ask whether it captures their experience. He or she may go back and modify earlier steps in the analysis in the light of this feedback. |
Participant characteristics (N = 14).
| Characteristics | ||
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 30.29 ± 8.49;22 ~ 48 | |
| Working years | 9.71 ± 9.25; 1 ~ 29 | |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 1(7.14%) | |
| Female | 13 (92.86%) | |
| Educational level | ||
| Junior college student | 4 (28.57) | |
| Undergraduate student | 10 (71.43%) | |
| Professional title | ||
| Junior nurse | 8 (57.14%) | |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 (7.14%) | |
| Nurse-in-charge | 4 (28.57%) | |
| Associate Professor of nursing | 1 (7.14%) | |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 6 (42.86%) | |
| Unmarried | 8 (57.14%) | |
| Department | ||
| Department of infectious diseases | 3 (21.43%) | |
| Medical department | 6 (42.86%) | |
| Intensive care unit | 3(21.43%) | |
| Surgical department | 2 ()14.29% |