| Literature DB >> 36120675 |
Lei Tian1.
Abstract
With the rapid economic development, the financial industry has quietly become the leader of industries, the core and lifeblood of promoting economic development. At the same time, various financial services and management platforms emerge one after another. However, the emergence of financial services and management platforms cannot effectively alleviate the current financial crisis. In the face of increasingly complex financial risks, traditional financial service and management platforms cannot achieve effective information sharing, which leads to continued low service and management efficiency and frequent financial risk problems. Support vector machine is a data classification algorithm based on supervision, which can realize data sharing and improve the efficiency of data processing. The article firstly readjusted the underlying architecture of the financial service and management platform to break through the barriers of data interaction. Then on this basis, the article further combines the support vector machine algorithm and extends it from binary data classification to multivariate classification. Finally, the paper redesigns the financial service and management platform considering support vector machines. After a series of experiments, it can be found that the financial service and management platform based on the support vector machine algorithm can reduce the financial risk by 17.2%, improve the financial service level by 30.2%, and improve the financial comprehensive service level by 45.2%. At the same time, thanks to information sharing and interaction, the financial service and management platform can effectively predict financial risks, and the accuracy of the prediction basically reaches 78.9%. This shows that a financial service and management platform that takes into account the support vector machine algorithm can effectively prevent financial risks and improve the efficiency of financial services and management.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36120675 PMCID: PMC9481309 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7964123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Financial management and service system under the traditional model.
Sample data set statistics.
| Variables | Average value | Variance | Minimum value | Maximum value |
|
| ||||
| Cycle | 0.768 | 0.611 | −0.098 | 2.115 |
| Vol | 0.091 | 0.083 | 0.006 | 0.732 |
| InGDP | 3.642 | 0.381 | 1.002 | 4.216 |
| Capital | 0.492 | 0.151 | 0.209 | 1.395 |
Empirical results under multiple factor assessment.
| Variables | Adjacency matrix | Diagonal matrix | Inverse matrix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Models | SVM | SVM | SVM |
| Cycle | 0.231 | 0.038 | 0.019 |
| Vol | −0.035 | −0.029 | −0.034 |
| InDA | 0.0139 | 0.0115 | 0.0451 |
| Capital | 0.031 | 0.019 | 0.214 |
Note. , , and represent data at 10%, 5%, and 1% confidence levels, respectively.
Support vector machine-based financial platform LR test.
| Credit risk | Liquidity risk | Operational risk | Technical risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hysteresis | 11.058 | 5.214 | 9.021 | 10.654 |
| Error | 12.021 | 8.399 | 11.654 | 9.687 |
| Regulation | 16.215 | 10.005 | 18.001 | 2.134 |
Figure 2Basic application areas of SVMs.
Figure 3Schematic figure of the integration of SVMs with financial services and management.
Figure 4Financial service and management platform under the SVM algorithm.
Figure 5Financial services levels considering SVM.
Figure 6Prediction results of financial risk by different algorithms.
Figure 7Risk assessment in financial management.
Figure 8Comprehensive efficiency of financial platform based on SVM.