| Literature DB >> 36120599 |
Velu Manikandan1, J Saranya Packialakshmi2, Bandna Bharti3, Palaniyappan Jayanthi4, Ranjithkumar Dhandapani5, Palanivel Velmurugan6, Duraisamy Elango4, Ragul Paramasivam5, Vinayagam Mohanavel6, Asad Syed7, Abdhallah M Elgorban7, Ali H Bahkali7, Saravanan Muthupandian8,9.
Abstract
A simple, efficient, and ecofriendly method was employed to synthesize TiO2/ZrO2/SiO2 ternary nanocomposites using Prunus × yedoensis leaf extract (PYLE) that shows improved photocatalytic and antibacterial properties. The characterization of the obtained nanocomposites was done by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic (EDS) analysis. The synthesized ternary nanocomposites with nanoscale pore diameters were investigated for the elimination of Reactive Red 120 (RR120) dye. The obtained results showed about 96.2% removal of RR120 dye from aqueous solution under sunlight irradiation. Furthermore, it shows promising antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. The improved photocatalytic and antibacterial activity of TiO2/ZrO2/SiO2 may bring unique insights into the production of ternary nanocomposites and their applications in the environment and biomedical field.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36120599 PMCID: PMC9481355 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3088827
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 7.310
Figure 1(a) XRD spectra, (b) FTIR spectrum, and (c) Raman spectra of TiO2/ZrO2/SiO2 nanocomposite.
Figure 2(a–c) FE-SEM images of TiO2/ZrO2/SiO2 ternary nanocomposites and (d) EDS spectra of TiO2/ZrO2/SiO2 ternary nanocomposites.
Figure 3(a, c, e, g) Element mapping analysis of TiO2/ZrO2/SiO2 ternary nanocomposites and (b, d, f, h) EDS spectra.
Figure 4UV-Vis spectra of RR120 removal at different time intervals: (a) TiO2/ZrO2, (b) TiO2/SiO2, and (c) TiO2/ZrO2/SiO2 ternary nanocomposites and (d) RR120 removal rate at different photocatalytic systems.
Comparison of photocatalytic activity of TiO2/ZrO2/SiO2 nanocomposites with similar kinds of studies.
| S. No | Catalyst | % removal | Catalyst (mg/L) | Irradiation time | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fe2O3/Ag nanocomposites | 88.2% | 60 | 140 min | [ |
| 2 | TiO2 nanocomposites | 94% | 100 | 150 min | [ |
| 3 | TiO2–SiO2–Ag nanocomposites | 80% | 50 | 4 h | [ |
| 4 | Catechin@ZIF-L nanocomposites | 92% | 50 mg | 150 min | [ |
| 5 | TiO2/ZrO2/SiO2 nanocomposites | 96.2% | 10 mg | 75 min | Our study |
Figure 5(a) Pseudo-first-order reaction kinetics of photodegradation of RR120 over various samples and (b) reusability of the prepared TiO2/ZrO2/SiO2 ternary nanocomposites.
Figure 6Variable numbers of colonies in agar plates (a) Staphylococcus aureus and (b) Escherichia coli exposed to different concentrations of TiO2/ZrO2/SiO2 nanocomposites.
Antibacterial activity (zone of inhibition) of TiO2/ZrO2/SiO2 nanocomposites against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
| Zone of inhibition (ZOI) in mm | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. No | Samples | Bacterial strains | |||||
|
|
| ||||||
| 50 | 75 | 100 | 50 | 75 | 100 | ||
| 1. | PYLE | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2. | TiO2/ZrO2 | — | 1 ± 0.6 | 2 ± 0.2 | — | 1 ± 0.8 | 2 ± 0.4 |
| 3. | TiO2/SiO2 | — | 1 ± 0.2 | 1 ± 0.9 | — | 1 ± 0.5 | 2 ± 0.3 |
| 4. | TiO2/ZrO2/SiO2 nanocomposites | 8 ± 0.6 | 11 ± 0.9 | 12 ± 0.9 | 6 ± 0.4 | 8 ± 0.3 | 10 ± 0.6 |
| 5. | Chloramphenicol | 10 ± 0.7 | 12 ± 0.7 | 15 ± 0.3 | 12 ± 0.4 | 15 ± 0.3 | 16 ± 0.6 |
Figure 7The proposed mechanism of RR120 degradation by TiO2/ZrO2/SiO2 ternary nanocomposites.