| Literature DB >> 36120435 |
Can Du1, Yueshuang Leng2, Quanwei Zhou1, Ju-Xiong Xiao2, Xian-Rui Yuan1,3,4, Jian Yuan1,3,4.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the relationship between postoperative hypothalamo-hypophyseal injury (HHI) and postoperative water and sodium disturbances in patients with craniopharyngioma.Entities:
Keywords: craniopharyngioma; diabetes insipidus; dysnatremia; hypothalamo–hypophyseal injury; magnetic resonance imaging; postoperative complications
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36120435 PMCID: PMC9478176 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.958295
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 6.055
MRI section used for assessment of hypothalamic injury.
| Assessment of | Selected MRI section |
|---|---|
| 1.Pituitary | midsagittal section |
| 2.Pituitary stalk | midsagittal section |
| 3.Floor of third ventricle (overview) | midsagittal section |
| 3.1 Floor and lateral wall of third ventricle (anterior section) | coronal section through the anterior commissure |
| 3.2 Floor and lateral wall of third ventricle (medial section) | coronal section midway between the anterior commissure and mammillary bodies |
| 3.3 Floor and lateral wall of third ventricle (posterior section) | coronal section through the mammillary bodies |
Figure 1Illustration of hypothalamic injury scoring system. Left: schematic illustration of the MRI sections and anatomic landmarks used for assessment. Right: MR images in four patients (rows 1-4); five columns (A–E) show different sections. (A): preoperative midsagittal section, arrows indicate the margin of the tumor; (B): postoperative midsagittal section); (C): coronal section through the anterior commissure; (D): coronal section midway between the anterior commissure and mammillary bodies; (E): coronal section through the mammillary bodies. 1A-1E: 1A shows a male patient with cystic supra-sellar craniopharyngioma. 1B shows pituitary, pituitary stalk (arrowhead), and third ventricle floor in this patient. Coronal sections (1C–1E) show that the third ventricle floor was intact in three sections. He had a biphasic response after surgery. HHI score: 0. Follow-up serum sodium is 142.8 mmol/L. 2A-2E: 2A shows a male patient with a mainly cystic supra-sellar tumor. (2B, 2C) show that the stalk was sectioned. Coronal sections (2C–2E) show that the third ventricle floor was intact in three sections. He had transient hypernatremia after surgery. HHI score: 1. Follow-up serum sodium: 140.3 mmol/L. 3A-3E: 3A shows a female patient with a mainly solid supra-sellar tumor involving the antero-inferior third ventricle. After surgery, defects of stalk, third ventricle floor (anterior section, medial section), and right third ventricle wall could be observed in 3B-3D. She had persistent hypernatremia after surgery. HHI score: 3.5 Serum sodium at follow-up: 148.5 mmol/L. 4A-4E: 4A shows a child with a mixed solid-cystic large supra-sellar intraventricular tumor, which caused hydrocephalus. 4B stalk and third ventricle floor were injured; pituitary was intact. 4C-4E: Defect of PS, third ventricle floor, and right third ventricle wall can be observed. HHI score: 4.5. Preoperative hydrocephalus strongly correlates with a high HHI score. WSD type: triphasic response. Follow-up serum sodium: 159.3 mmol/L. WSD, water and sodium disturbance; HIS, hypothalamic injury scoring.
Clinical and radiological characteristics.
| Characteristics | Children (N=44) | Adults (N=134) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male sex-no. (%) | 30(68) | 80(60) | |
| Presenting symptoms-no. (%) | |||
| Headaches | 28 (64) | 124 (93) | |
| Vision deficits | 18 (41) | 99 (74) | |
| Polydipsia and polyuria | 14 (32) | 43 (32) | |
| Hypothalamic symptoms | 5 (11) | 16 (12) | |
| Growth retardation | 14 (32) | ||
| Menstrual disorder | 19 (14) | ||
| Decreased libido | 24 (18) | ||
| Mean tumor diameter(cm) | 3.80 ± 0.81 | 3.25 ± 1.06 | |
| Tumor size-no. (%) | |||
| Small | 1 (2) | 13 (10) | |
| Median | 23 (52) | 85 (63) | |
| Large | 18 (41) | 34 (25) | |
| Giant | 0 | 4 (3) | |
| Yasargil classification | |||
| Intrasellar infradiaphragmatic | 0 | 2 (1.5) | |
| Intra-/supra-sellar | 14 (31.8) | 32 (24.6) | |
| Supradiagphragmatic extraventricular (compressing third ventricle floor) | 7 (15.9) | 49 (37.7) | |
| Intra- and extraventricular | 23 (52.3) | 24 (18.5) | |
| paraventricular | 0 | 22 (16.9) | |
| Purely intraventricular | 0 | 1 (0.8) | |
| Hydrocephalus-no. (%) | 21 (47.7) | 28 (20.9) | |
| Pituitary stalk preservation-no. (%) | 5 (11) | 17 (13) | |
| Total resection-no. (%) | 42 (95) | 123 (92) | |
Assessment of hypothalamo–hypophyseal injuries on MRI stratified according to age group and HI score.
| HI score of children (N=44) | HI score of adults (N=134) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-1(n=6) | 2(n=14) | 2.5-3(n=13) | >3(n=11) | 0-1(n=29) | 2(n=35) | 2.5-3(n=48) | >3(n=22) | NS* | ||
| Assess of injuries on MRI-no. (%) | ||||||||||
| Pituitary | 0 (0) | 9 (64.3) | 1 (7.7) | 2 (18.2) | 3 (10.3) | 4 (11.4) | 3 (6.3) | 4 (18.2) | ||
| Pituitary stalk | 3 (50) | 12 (85.7) | 13 (100) | 11 (100) | 17 (58.6) | 30 (85.7) | 48 (100) | 22 (100) | ||
| Third ventricle floor-no. (%) | ||||||||||
| Anterior commissure section | 0 | 2 (14.3) | 12 (92.3) | 11 (100) | 0 | 14 (40) | 39 (81.3) | 21 (95.5) | ||
| Between anterior commissure and mammillary body | 2 (33.3) | 2 (14.3) | 10 (76.9) | 11 (100) | 2 (6.9) | 19 (54.3) | 42 (87.5) | 22 (100) | ||
| Mammillary body section | 0 | 0 | 1 (7.7) | 9 (81.8) | 0 | 0 | 2 (4.2) | 11 (50) | ||
| Third ventricle wall (unilateral/bilateral) | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1 (7.7)/0 | 3 (27.3)/0 | 1 (3.4)/0 | 2 (5.7)/0 | 8 (16.7)/3 (6.3) | 9 (40.9)/7 (31.8) | ||
*Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.
Relation between preoperative tumor features and hypothalamic injury after surgery.
| Hypothalamic injury score | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-1 | 2 | 2.5-3 | 3.5-5 | ||||
| Total number | 35 | 49 | 61 | 33 | |||
| Yasargil classification | χ2 = 87.337; df=18; | ||||||
| Intrasellar infradiaphragmatic | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Intra-/supra-sellar | 22 | 21 | 5 | 0 | |||
| Supradiagphragmatic extraventricular (compressing third ventricle floor) | 12 | 17 | 18 | 9 | |||
| Intra- and extraventricular | 1 | 3 | 26 | 19 | |||
| paraventricular | 0 | 5 | 12 | 5 | |||
| Purely intraventricular | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |||
| hydrocephalus | 1 | 3 | 25 | 20 | χ2 = 46.69; df=3; | ||
| Tumor size-no. (%) | χ2 = 40.675; df=9; | ||||||
| Small (<2 cm) | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Median (2-4 cm) | 24 | 32 | 38 | 14 | |||
| Large (4-6 cm) | 2 | 11 | 21 | 18 | |||
| Giant (>6 cm) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |||
Figure 2The Median serum sodium value of patients had different HI score.
Figure 3Serum sodium results of patients had different HI scores on follow-up day.
Statistics between hypothalamic injury score (HIS) and WSD.
| Hypothalamic injury score(%) | Statistics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-1 (n = 35) | 2 (n = 49) | 2.5-3 (n = 60) | 3.5-5 (n = 33) | |||
| Early DI | 34 | 48 | 60 | 33 | NS* | |
| Institute antidiuretic therapy | 31 (88.6) | 47 (95.9) | 60 (98) | 31 (93.9) | NS* | |
| Postoperative hypernatremia-no. (%) | 25 (71.4) | 29 (59.2) | 45 (72.6) | 30 (93.8) | χ2 = 9.734; df=3; | |
| Median onset time of hypernatremia-(postoperative day) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | NS* | |
| Median duration of hypernatremia-(days) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | NS§ | |
| Severe hypernatremia during hospital-no. (%) | 1(2.9) | 6 (12.2) | 7 (11.3) | 11 (34.4) | χ2 = 11.674; df=3; | |
| Postoperative hyponatremia-no. (%) | 27 (77.1) | 35 (71.4) | 42 (67.7) | 24 (75.0) | NS* | |
| SIAD | 24 (88.9) | 22 (62.9) | 34 (80.9) | 17 (70.8) | NS* | |
| Severe hyponatremia-no. (%) | 7 (20.0) | 10 (20.4) | 8 (12.9) | 5 (15.6) | NS* | |
| Median onset time of hyponatremia-(postoperative day) | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | NS* | |
| Median duration of hyponatremia-(days) | 2.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | NS§ | |
| Prolonged DI | 25 (71.4) | 35 (71.4) | 50 (83.3) | 30 (90.9) | NS* | |
| Triphasic response -no. (%) | 20 (57.1) | 21 (42.85) | 34 (55.7) | 16 (48.5) | NS* | |
| Recurrent hypernatremia during hospitalization-no. (%)# | 2 (5.7) | 4 (8.2) | 14 (23) | 13 (39.4) | χ2 = 17.594; df=3; | |
| Recurrent hypernatremia at follow-up-no. (%)# | 2 (6.9) | 13 (28.9) | 22 (41.5) | 17 (60.7) | χ2 = 20.930; df=3; | |
| Serum Na+ at follow-up(mmol/l) | 142.9± 3.5 | 144.54 ± 4.3 | 146.9 ± 7.1 | 151.7 ± 9.7 | P<0.001§ | |
*Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.
Follow up data was available in 151 patients.
§Kruskal–Wallis test.
NS, no significance.