| Literature DB >> 36120393 |
Qinbo Wang1,2,3, Zongyan Li1, Xiaojia Huang1, Xiaoyan Fu1, Qian Li1, Haiyan Li1,3.
Abstract
Purpose: Traditional standardized training in ultrasound-guided minimally invasive breast surgery (UMIBS) focused on lecture-based learning (LBL) resulted in students' insufficient analysis, limited spatial visual conversion ability, and poor practical application. This study examined the effects of the step-by-step (SBS) method combined with a simulation model in UMIBS education. Subjects andEntities:
Keywords: lecture-based learning; minimally invasive; simulation; step by step; ultrasound
Year: 2022 PMID: 36120393 PMCID: PMC9481279 DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S367304
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Med Educ Pract ISSN: 1179-7258
Figure 1The range of the mammary gland on the pig skin was marked, and pickled mustard was placed in the pork to simulate breast mass (A). A neoplasm projection was drawn on the pigskin surface (B). A puncture approach was designed in which a scalpel was used to make an appropriate incision in the nipple and areola area (C). The needle was inserted under the guidance of B ultrasound, and the neoplasm was found and located (D).
Figure 2Course structure of LBL group and SBS group.
Characteristics of All the Participants
| Characteristic | Group A(n=42) | Group B(n=42) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.83 | ||
| Male | 35(83.3%) | 39(92.8%) | |
| Female | 7(16.7%) | 3(7.2%) | |
| Age(yrs) | 27.3±2.7 | 28.2±2.4 | 0.87 |
| Degree | 1.0 | ||
| Bachelor’s | 14(33.3%) | 11(26.1%) | |
| Master’s | 16(38.1%) | 21(50.0%) | |
| PhD | 12(28.6%) | 10(23.8%) | |
| Standardized training duration | 0.83 | ||
| 2 years | 5(11.9%) | 5(11.9%) | |
| 3 years | 37(88.1%) | 37(88.1%) |
Evaluation of Theory and Surgical Skills Before and After Training
| Group A(n=42) | Group B(n=42) | t | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | 70.1±2.8 | 69.7±2.8 | 0.58 | 0.79 |
| After | 80.9±2.0 | 77.8±4.2 | 10.96 | <0.001 |
| Before | 57.5±3.1 | 56.6±2.9 | 1.28 | 0.96 |
| After | 82.8±4.4 | 72.7±4.0 | 4.27 | <0.001 |
Figure 3Evaluation of training effects in the two groups. We compared the grades of the students in theoretical knowledge and surgical skills (100 points for each). **p<0.001, by a t-test.
Evaluation of Surgical Skills Before and After Training
| Items | Group A(n=42) | Group B(n=42) | t | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neoplasm localization sec | ||||
| Before | 35.9±2.6 | 35.9±1.4 | −0.26 | 0.56 |
| After | 17.9±1.6 | 20.9±1.2 | 1.58 | <0.001 |
| Puncture accuracy | ||||
| Before | 35.2±2.5 | 36.4±1.7 | −2.54 | 0.20 |
| After | 88.9±3.2 | 81.9±4.7 | 4.49 | <0.001 |
| Excision integrity | ||||
| Before | 60.5±5.1 | 58.8±5.7 | 1.28 | 0.96 |
| After | 80.1±11.1 | 71.6±2.9 | 1.27 | <0.001 |
Feedback on Two Teaching Methods from Students
| Questions | Group A(n=42) | Group B(n=42) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.This method increases learning interest | 0.015 | ||
| 1 | 2 (4.7%) | 5 (11.9%) | |
| 2 | 8 (19%) | 18 (42.8%) | |
| 3 | 32 (76.2%) | 19 (45.2%) | |
| 2.This method improves the ability of surgical operation | 0.078 | ||
| 1 | 2 (4.7%) | 5 (11.9%) | |
| 2 | 10 (23.8%) | 17 (40.4%) | |
| 3 | 30 (71.4%) | 20 (47.6%) | |
| 3.This method improves the acting ability during operation | <0.001 | ||
| 1 | 0 (0%) | 4 (9.5%) | |
| 2 | 3 (7.1%) | 17 (40.4%) | |
| 3 | 39 (92.8%) | 21 (50.0%) | |
| 4.This method reduces surgical complications | 0.805 | ||
| 1 | 6 (14.2%) | 7 (16.6%) | |
| 2 | 15 (35.7%) | 17 (40.4%) | |
| 3 | 21 (50.0%) | 18 (42.8%) | |
| 5.This method improves clinical thinking ability | 0.586 | ||
| 1 | 1 (2.3%) | 3 (7.1%) | |
| 2 | 10 (23.8%) | 9 (21.4%) | |
| 3 | 31 (73.8%) | 30 (71.4%) | |
| 6.This method reduces the learning pressure | 0.802 | ||
| 1 | 5 (11.9%) | 6 (14.2%) | |
| 2 | 11 (26.1%) | 13 (30.9%) | |
| 3 | 26 (61.9%) | 23 (54.7%) | |
| 7.Are you satisfied with the teaching mode | 0.013 | ||
| 1 | 2 (4.7%) | 4 (9.5%) | |
| 2 | 7 (16.6%) | 18 (42.8%) | |
| 3 | 33 (78.5%) | 20 (47.6%) |
Notes: 1=dissatisfied; 2=neutral; 3=satisfied.