| Literature DB >> 36120142 |
Mohan Li1, Yanping Liu1.
Abstract
Cultural and creative product design of sports events is an important part of sports industry, which can improve the economic benefits of sports industry. Based on this background, this paper puts forward a regression analysis method to deeply analyze the design of cultural and creative products in sports events, aiming at driving the healthy development of residents and improving their health levels. First of all, 620 residents were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group to compare natural characteristics, historical characteristics, folk crafts, regional culture, and other indicators. Then, find out the factors with significant differences, and carry out regression analysis to provide corresponding measures for the design of cultural and creative products in sports events. The results show that the main influencing factors of creative product design are natural characteristics, historical characteristics, folk crafts, regional culture, and promotion effect, and each index has a significant impact on residents' fitness, and there are significant differences. Therefore, all regions should improve the design level of sports events, bring through the development of residents' fitness industry, and effectively guide residents' fitness.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36120142 PMCID: PMC9477587 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3150099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Figure 1Relationship between supply and demand of cultural innovation product design in sports events.
General information of different groups.
| Group | Content | Scope | Mean value |
|---|---|---|---|
| General group | Age | 13∼56 year | Average age 43.21 ± 1.62 year |
| Guidance situation | Effective guidance | 16 | |
| Invalid boot | 4 | ||
| Degree of design | 2∼6 Grade | Average design degree 4.22 ± 1.03 | |
| Regional index | 3.11∼3.45 | Regional index 6.13 ± 1.0 | |
|
| |||
| Guide group | Age | 12∼57 year | Average age 45.12 ± 2.33 year |
| Guidance situation | Effective guidance | ||
| Invalid boot | 15 | ||
| Guidance situation | Effective guidance | 5 | |
| Degree of design | 2∼33 Grade | Average design degree 30.24 ± 1.07 | |
| Regional index | 3.01∼3.46 | Regional index 6.25 ± 1.13 | |
Figure 2Comparison of indicators of different groups.
The Comparison of natural and historical characteristics of residents in the two groups.
| Group | Before implementation | After implementation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural characteristics (points) | Historical characteristics (points) | Folk arts and crafts (points) | Natural characteristics (points) | Historical characteristics (points) | Folk arts and crafts (points) | |
| General group( | 56.33 | 62.61 | 78.34 | 82.71 | 56.49 | 50.13 |
| Guide group( | 57.84 | 62.97 | 78.52 | 63.42 | 59.14 | 103.62 |
|
| 0.907 | 0.176 | 0.107 | 10.192 | 9.137 | 5.789 |
|
| 0.370 | 0.861 | 0.916 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Compared with that before implementation, P < 0.05.
Figure 3Comparison of results of different groups.
Comparison of folk crafts, regional culture, and guiding promotion effect of residents in the two groups.
| Regional culture | Regional culture | Guide and improve the effect | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General group | Modern folk crafts | Local culture | Foreign culture | Effective | Invalid | |
| General group ( | 198 | 182 | 176 | 174ab | 178 | 222 |
| General group ( | 192 | 188 | 180ab | 180 | 141ab | 109ab |
|
| 4.800 | 3.956 | 6.144 | |||
|
| 0.029 | 0.047 | 0.013 | |||
Compared with that before implementation, P < 0.05.
Figure 4Overall judgment result.
Indicators with significant differences.
| Factors that differ | Threshold value |
|---|---|
| Natural characteristics (points) | <60 = 0, >60 = 1 |
| Historical characteristics (points) | <60 = 0, >60 = 1 |
| Folk arts and crafts (points) | <60 = 0, >60 = 1 |
| Folk arts and crafts (points) | <50 = 0, >50 = 1 |
| Guide and improve the effect | >50 = 0, <50 = 1 |
Influence analysis of guiding influencing factors.
| Correlation evaluation |
| Standard deviation | Wald | OR |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural characteristics (points) | 1.512 | 1.152 | 4.612 | 2.121(2.122∼2.492) | <0.01 |
| Historical characteristics (points) | 2.56 | 2.372 | 2.26 | 2.822(2.521∼2.933) | 0.302 |
| Folk arts and crafts (points) | 2.473 | 2.238 | 3.929 | 2.183(2.102∼2.713) | <0.01 |
| Regional culture | 2.317 | 2.271 | 3.122 | 2.133(2.912∼2.26) | <0.01 |
| Regional culture | 2.426 | 2.447 | 2.627 | 2.823(2.482∼2.913) | <0.01 |
Figure 5Late development of residents' fitness.