| Literature DB >> 36119922 |
Haihua Zhang1, Min Zhang2, Fengqing Zhao1.
Abstract
Craniocerebral injury accounts for 9%-21% of the injuries in all parts of the body, and the incidence rate ranks first in all types of trauma or only lower than limb fractures. This study mainly discusses the nursing methods of patients with severe traumatic brain injury and fractures in ambulances. This study is based on risk factors with moderate-to-higher association strength from retrospective studies. According to the regression coefficients of the logistic regression model, the risk factors were assigned, and the early warning score table of craniocerebral injury complicated with hyponatremia was established. The energy efficiency of the early warning score table was evaluated by case diagnostic test and ROC analysis. At the same time, risk grading is carried out, and the chi-square test is used to test the reliability of the grading standard, so as to identify the risk of hyponatremia in patients with craniocerebral injury early and screen out high-risk patients as the key observation objects of nurses. Based on the early warning score table of craniocerebral injury complicated with hyponatremia, different systematic nursing intervention measures were taken for low-risk patients and high-risk patients, and their application effects were evaluated. The clinical application effect of the systematic nursing intervention program was evaluated by the historical control research method, which provided a reference for the nursing in the ambulance to prevent other complications of patients with craniocerebral injury. The positive rate of prehospital operation can reach 64.44%, and the specific rate can reach 84.44%. 60% of the sample sought better metastatic care in terms of the purpose of using an ambulance. The systematic nursing intervention program has a certain effect on reducing the incidence of hyponatremia in patients with craniocerebral injury and shortening the hospitalization time of patients with craniocerebral injury. The early warning score of craniocerebral injury complicated with hyponatremia developed in this study is concise and practical and can provide a basis for clinical assessment of the risk of hyponatremia in patients with craniocerebral injury.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36119922 PMCID: PMC9473891 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2652916
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.246
Specific identification information.
| Part | Cranial | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Open injury | Closed injury | Scalp avulsion |
| 2 | Periocular cyanosis, otorrhea, rhinorrhea, etc. | Otorrhea, rhinorrhea, malformation, localized hematoma, etc. | Otorrhea, rhinorrhea, fluctuating hematoma, etc. |
| 3 | Urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, foreign body incontinence, etc. | Severe pain, etc. | Delirium, epilepsy, etc. |
| 4 | Negative meningeal irritation sign | Negative meningeal irritation sign | Negative meningeal irritation sign |
Figure 1Medical information warning.
Figure 2Ambulance rescue process.
Study factor names and assignments.
| Factor name | Assign |
|---|---|
| Arrival method | 1, arrival by ambulance; 2, arrival by nonambulance |
| Whether to transfer | 1, transfer from another hospital; 2, nontransfer |
| Admission time | 1, day; 2, last night; 3, next night |
| Hospital grade | 1, nontertiary hospital; 0, tertiary hospital |
| Place of death | 1, emergency department; 0, hospital ward |
| Cause of death | 1, nontraumatic brain injury; 0, traumatic brain injury |
Figure 3Calculate the correct rate according to the experimental data of prehospital diagnosis and prehospital operation of craniocerebral trauma in the two groups, respectively.
Statistical results of prehospital trauma assistant diagnosis and treatment system.
| Relevant factors | On-the-spot decision | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | |||
| Prehospital trauma assistant diagnosis and treatment system | Positive | 20 | 16 | 36 |
| Negative | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Total | 25 | 20 | 45 | |
Figure 4Comparison of the time between the ambulance arriving at the scene and arriving at the hospital.
Distribution of injury causes in different age groups.
| Type of injury | 0–22 | 23–35 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of people | Composition ratio (%) | Number of people | Composition ratio (%) | |
| Glass scratches | 6 | 1.69 | 659 | 0.5 |
| Traffic injury | 30 | 42.02 | 25575 | 36.59 |
| Brawl injury | 1112 | 24.65 | 16562 | 14.34 |
| Stab wound | 9 | 823 | 3180 | 1.86 |
| Fall from height | 1484 | 3.16 | 1863 | 2.26 |
Figure 5Distribution of injured sites in different age groups.
Nonemergency transport services care about factors.
| Care factor | Highest score | Lowest score | The average score | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 1.00 | 6.00 | 3.22 | 1.37 |
| Timeliness | 1.00 | 6.00 | 3.15 | 1.19 |
| Service attitude | 1.00 | 6.00 | 2.70 | 1.17 |
| Service fee | 1.00 | 5.00 | 1.82 | 1.16 |
Evaluation of transshipment services.
| Evaluation item | Average value | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Out-of-hospital nonemergency transfer medical service level | 8.45 | 1.80 |
| Out-of-hospital nonemergency transport ambulance equipment | 8.80 | 1.48 |
| Out-of-hospital nonemergency transfer to a vehicle | 8.02 | 1.79 |
| Out-of-hospital nonemergency transfer charges | 6.59 | 2.31 |
| Overall evaluation of out-of-hospital nonemergency transport services | 8.06 | 1.58 |
| Overall evaluation of hospital nonemergency transport services | 7.11 | 2.19 |
Figure 6Ambulance usage and basic car usage attitude of relatives of patients with severe head injury and fractures.
Figure 7Purpose of using an ambulance.
Figure 8Construct validity test.
Figure 9Analysis of the risk degree of pulse beating.