| Literature DB >> 36119796 |
Xue-Hao Tian1, Hao Zhang1, Shen Wang2, Tong Li1, Xue-Mei Huang1, Meng-Meng Yan1, Xiao-Fei Cao1, Bing Xu1, Peng-Long Wang1, Hai-Min Lei1.
Abstract
Objective: There are some anthraquinones, anthraquinones and flavonones in Sennae Folium which exhibited significant acidity, such as sennoside A/B and sennoside C/D. The current strategies used in separating these components are mainly based on conventional column chromatography which is time consuming, laborious and costly. This study is aimed at exploring a method of precipitation extraction of acid components in Sennae Folium. Using alkaloid as a "hook", it is reasonable to use the principle of "acid-alkali complexation" to "fish" the acidic components in Sennae Folium.Entities:
Keywords: Sennae Folium; acid-alkali complexation; fishing; isothermal titration calorimeter method; weak ponds
Year: 2020 PMID: 36119796 PMCID: PMC9476821 DOI: 10.1016/j.chmed.2020.03.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Herb Med ISSN: 1674-6384
Fig. 1"Fishing" process using Ber as “hook”.
Comparisons of complexations between alkaloids and inorganic base.
| Items | Berberine | Palmatine | Matrine | Higenamine | Sulfanila-mide | Ammonium thiosulfate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structure | ||||||
| Reaction phenomenon | ||||||
| Intensity* | (+++) | (+++) | (++) | (+) | (-) | (-) |
“+++” means high intensity, “++” means medium intensity and “+” means low intensity of the reactions. “-” means no reaction.
Binding heat of all titrations of four alkaloids.
| No. | Berberine into Sen (µJ) | Palmatine into Sen (µJ) | Matrine into Sen (µJ) | Higenamine into Sen (µJ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1393 | −1716 | −227.0 | −67.02 |
| 2 | −1130 | −1117 | −290.5 | −94.56 |
| 3 | −802.5 | −677.2 | −126.5 | −64.00 |
| 4 | −555.1 | −437.3 | −54.67 | −32.81 |
| 5 | −390.5 | −297.3 | −18.84 | −10.04 |
| 6 | −198.4 | −229.0 | −7.880 | −1.297 |
| Δ | −1095 | −1487 | −219.1 | −65.72 |
The energy span between the first drop and the sixth drop.
Parameters during “fishing” process.
| No. | Weight of | Selective “hook” complex/mg | Weight of extract from | Extraction efficiency/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.01 | 93.13 | 69.80 | 9.50 |
| 2 | 6.02 | 111.75 | 83.83 | 10.88 |
| 3 | 5.99 | 97.10 | 72.82 | 10.53 |
| Average | 6.00 ± 0.01 | 100.66 ± 4.85 | 75.48 ± 6.03 | 10.30 ± 0.59 |
Fig. 2Total ion current of Sen-Ber (A) and Sen (B); Secondary cleavage of peak c (C) and peak d (D).
MS and MSa data obtained from HPLC-MSa analysis of Sen-Ber.
| Peaks | Formula | Major fragments (negative ion mode) | Identification | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured | Mass error (× 10−6) | |||||
| a | 1.36 | 593.1522 | 1.69 | C27H30O15 | 353.0630, 285.0402, 227.4849 | Kaempferol-3-rutinoside |
| b | 4.25 | 609.1452 | 1.48 | C27H30O16 | 285.0402 | Kaempferol diglucoside |
| c | 6.18 | 847.2110 | 2.24 | C42H40O19 | 586.1556, 609.1445, 386.0946, 284.9497 | Sennoside C/D |
| d | 7.66 | 861.1920 | 4.88 | C42H38O20 | 699.1370, 549.6667, 430.0839, 386.1036 | Sennoside A/B |
| e | 7.92 | 447.0889 | 4.65 | C21H20O11 | 402.8314, 285.0309, 241.0406 | Kaempferol glucoside |
| f | 8.41 | 407.1347 | 0.25 | C20H24O9 | 345.0595, 287.0880, 245.0837 | Tinnevellin glucoside |
| g | 12.25 | 301.0362 | 0.67 | C16H12O6 | 255.0665, 178.9966 | Quercetin |
| h | 16.25 | 285.0414 | 3.16 | C15H10O6 | 239.0361, 167.0516 | Kaempferol |
| i | 23.45 | 283.0261 | 4.59 | C15H8O6 | 239.0345, 211.0365 | Rhein |
The isomerism of sennoside A, B and sennoside C, D were not determined in this study.
Fig. 3Calorimetric titration of Ber solution into sennoside A and deionized water (A); Heating curve of sennoside A titrated by Ber solution (B); Structures of Ber (C) and sennoside A (D).
Binding thermodynamics of Ber into sennoside A.
| No. | Δ | −TΔ | Δ | n | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ber to sennoside A | −20.09 | 0.6508 | −19.44 | 1.955 | 2.548 × 103 | 3.924 × 10−4 |
Fig. 4UV-visible spectrum of Ber and Sen (A); Fluorescence emission spectra of Ber, Sen and Sen-Ber (B).
Fig. 5SEM images of Sen (a), Ber (b), and Sen-Ber (c, d).